Search Results

Search found 1033 results on 42 pages for 'destroy'.

Page 8/42 | < Previous Page | 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  | Next Page >

• C#/MonoDevelop: GTK MessageDialogs require a doubleclick to close - why?

  - by Connel

  I'm a newbie programmer writting a program in MonoDevelop in C# and have a porblem with my gtk MessageDialogs. The close button on the window boarders of my GTK Message dialogues require a double click to actually close them. The close button on the dialogue its self works fine. Could someone please tell me how I can fix this below is the code: if (fchDestination.CurrentFolder == fchTarget.CurrentFolder) { MessageDialog msdSame = new MessageDialog(this, DialogFlags.Modal, MessageType.Error, ButtonsType.Close, "Destination directory cannot be the same as the target directory"); msdSame.Title="Error"; if ((ResponseType) msdSame.Run() == ResponseType.Close) { msdSame.Destroy(); } return; } if (fchTarget.CurrentFolder.StartsWith(fchDestination.CurrentFolder)) { MessageDialog msdContains = new MessageDialog(this, DialogFlags.Modal, MessageType.Error, ButtonsType.Close, "error"); msdContains.Title="Error"; if ((ResponseType) msdContains.Run() == ResponseType.Close) { msdContains.Destroy(); } return; }

  Read the article

• accepts_nested_attributes_for ignore blank values

  - by Mike

  i have class Profile has_many :favorite_books, :dependent => :destroy has_many :favorite_quotes, :dependent => :destroy accepts_nested_attributes_for :favorite_books, :allow_destroy => true accepts_nested_attributes_for :favorite_quotes, :allow_destroy => true end I have a dynamic form where you press '+' to add new textareas for creating new favorites. What i want to do is ignore the blank ones, I find this harder to sort through in the update controller than a non nested attribute. What i have temporarily is a hack in the after_save callback deleting the empty records. Whats the most rails way to ignore these blank objects? I dont want validation and errors, just a silent deletion/ignore.

  Read the article

• Why doesn't this Ruby on Rails code work as I intend it to?

  - by Justin Meltzer

  So I attempted to build what I asked about in this question: Fix voting mechanism However, this solution doesn't work. A user can still vote however many times he or she wants. How could I fix this and/or refactor? def create @video = Video.find(params[:video_id]) @vote = @video.video_votes.new @vote.user = current_user if params[:type] == "up" @vote.value = 1 else @vote.value = -1 end if @previous_vote.nil? if @vote.save respond_to do |format| format.html { redirect_to @video } format.js end else respond_to do |format| format.html { redirect_to @video } format.js {render 'fail_create.js.erb'} end end elsif @previous_vote.value == params[:type] @previous_vote.destroy else @previous_vote.destroy if @vote.save respond_to do |format| format.html { redirect_to @video } format.js end else respond_to do |format| format.html { redirect_to @video } format.js {render 'fail_create.js.erb'} end end end @previous_vote = VideoVote.where(:video_id => params[:video_id], :user_id => current_user.id).first end

  Read the article

• Memory management in Qt?

  - by Martin

  I'm quite new to Qt and am wondering on some basic stuff with memory management and the life of objects. When do I need to delete / destroy my objects? Is any of this handled automatically? In the example below, which of the objects I create do I need to delete? What happens to the instance variable myOtherClass when myClass is destroyed? What happens if I don't delete / destroy my objects at all, will that be a problem to memory? in MyClass.h: class MyClass { public: MyClass(); ~MyClass(); MyOtherClass *myOtherClass; }; in MyClass.cpp: MyClass::MyClass() { myOtherClass = new MyOtherClass(); MyOtherClass myOtherClass2; QString myString = "Hello"; } As you can see this is quite newbie-easy stuff but where can I learn about this in an easy way? Thanks really much

  Read the article

• Associated models in Rails?

  - by dannymcc

  Hi Everyone, In my rails application I have two models called Kases and Notes. They work in the same way comments do with blog posts, I.e. each Kase entry can have multiple notes attached to it. I have got everything working, but for some reason I cannot get the destroy link to work for the Notes. I think I am overlooking something that is different with associated models to standard models. Notes Controller class NotesController < ApplicationController # POST /notes # POST /notes.xml def create @kase = Kase.find(params[:kase_id]) @note = @kase.notes.create!(params[:note]) respond_to do |format| format.html { redirect_to @kase } format.js end end end Kase Model class Kase < ActiveRecord::Base validates_presence_of :jobno has_many :notes Note Model class Note < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :kase end In the Kase show view I call a partial within /notes called _notes.html.erb: Kase Show View <div id="notes"> <h2>Notes</h2> <%= render :partial => @kase.notes %> <% form_for [@kase, Note.new] do |f| %> <p> <h3>Add a new note</h3> <%= f.text_field :body %><%= f.submit "Add Note" %> </p> <% end %> </div> /notes/_note.html.erb <% div_for note do %> <div id="sub-notes"> <p> <%= h(note.body) %><br /> <span style="font-size:smaller">Created <%= time_ago_in_words(note.created_at) %> ago on <%= note.created_at %></span> </p> <%= link_to "Remove Note", kase_path(@kase), :confirm => 'Are you sure?', :method => :delete, :class => 'important' %> </div> <% end %> As you can see, I have a Remove Note destroy link, but that destroys the entire Kase the note is associated with. How do I make the destroy link remove only the note? <%= link_to "Remove Note", kase_path(@kase), :confirm => 'Are you sure?', :method => :delete, :class => 'important' %> Any help would, as always, be greatly appreciated! Thanks, Danny

  Read the article

• An interesting case of delete and destructor (C++)

  - by Viet

  I have a piece of code where I can call destructor multiple times and access member functions even the destructor was called with member variables' values preserved. I was still able to access member functions after I called delete but the member variables were nullified (all to 0). And I can't double delete. Please kindly explain this. Thanks. #include <iostream> using namespace std; template <typename T> void destroy(T* ptr) { ptr->~T(); } class Testing { public: Testing() : test(20) { } ~Testing() { printf("Testing is being killed!\n"); } int getTest() const { return test; } private: int test; }; int main() { Testing *t = new Testing(); cout << "t->getTest() = " << t->getTest() << endl; destroy(t); cout << "t->getTest() = " << t->getTest() << endl; t->~Testing(); cout << "t->getTest() = " << t->getTest() << endl; delete t; cout << "t->getTest() = " << t->getTest() << endl; destroy(t); cout << "t->getTest() = " << t->getTest() << endl; t->~Testing(); cout << "t->getTest() = " << t->getTest() << endl; //delete t; // <======== Don't do it! Double free/delete! cout << "t->getTest() = " << t->getTest() << endl; return 0; }

  Read the article

• How are variables bound to the body of a define_method?

  - by Chris

  While trying to brush up my Ruby skills I keep running across this case which I can't figure out an explanation for by just reading the API docs. An explanation would be greatly appreciated. Here's the example code: for name in [ :new, :create, :destroy ] define_method("test_#{name}") do puts name end end What I want/expect to happen is that the name variable will be bound to the block given to define_method and that when #test_new is called it will output "new". Instead each defined method outputs "destroy" -- the last value assigned to the name variable. What am I misunderstanding about define_method and its blocks? Thanks!

  Read the article

• To Interface or Not?: Creating a polymorphic model relationship in Ruby on Rails dynamically..

  - by Globalkeith

  Please bear with me for a moment as I try to explain exactly what I would like to achieve. In my Ruby on Rails application I have a model called Page. It represents a web page. I would like to enable the user to arbitrarily attach components to the page. Some examples of "components" would be Picture, PictureCollection, Video, VideoCollection, Background, Audio, Form, Comments. Currently I have a direct relationship between Page and Picture like this: class Page < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :pictures, :as => :imageable, :dependent => :destroy end class Picture < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :imageable, :polymorphic => true end This relationship enables the user to associate an arbitrary number of Pictures to the page. Now if I want to provide multiple collections i would need an additional model: class PictureCollection < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :collectionable, :polymorphic => true has_many :pictures, :as => :imageable, :dependent => :destroy end And alter Page to reference the new model: class Page < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :picture_collections, :as => :collectionable, :dependent => :destroy end Now it would be possible for the user to add any number of image collections to the page. However this is still very static in term of the :picture_collections reference in the Page model. If I add another "component", for example :video_collections, I would need to declare another reference in page for that component type. So my question is this: Do I need to add a new reference for each component type, or is there some other way? In Actionscript/Java I would declare an interface Component and make all components implement that interface, then I could just have a single attribute :components which contains all of the dynamically associated model objects. This is Rails, and I'm sure there is a great way to achieve this, but its a tricky one to Google. Perhaps you good people have some wise suggestions. Thanks in advance for taking the time to read and answer this.

  Read the article

• "too many threads error" in blackberry OS-4.5

  - by SWATI

  hi in my application i have 20 icons(bitmap fields) on the home screen When i click on any icon an HTTP request is made in a separate thread. I have used invoke later method wherever necessary to take care of multi-threading problems. But still the number of threads goes beyond 16 and an error pops up indicating too many threads error and applications needs to be restarted!! can anybody tell me how to destroy these threads when they are no longer in use. I don't understand why they don't destroy on their own as usually they do.

  Read the article

• How to repopulate DataTables when having lots of data?

  - by chobo2

  Hi I am using datatables jquery plugin. I now have to clear the entire datatable and populate it with new data on the fly(all done through ajax). So what I was thinking to do is when I need to do this. Destroy the datatable remove the data html call up the partial view that renders the table Rebind the datatable with jquery. However it seems that datatable has no destroy method. So I know you can set the datatable to do something with ajax but I am not sure how. My datatable just uses the dom way when the page is loaded. I don't want to use the "fnAddData" as I am not sure how to format this 2d array they want and I don't think this is the best option. I think the best option is some how render the partial view back and use there ajax plugin. But I am not sure where that is or how to use it(I know it exists but that's about it). Thanks

  Read the article

• C++ -- How can we call "delete this; " in a const-member function?

  - by q0987

  Hello all, I saw the code snippet as follows: class UPNumber { public: UPNumber(); UPNumber(int initValue); ... // pseudo-destructor (a const member function, because // even const objects may be destroyed) void destroy() const { delete this; } // why this line is correct??? ... private: ~UPNumber(); }; First, I am sure that above class definition is correct. Here is my question, why we can define the function 'destroy' as above? The reason being asking is that why we can modify 'this' in a const-member function? Thank you

  Read the article

• No method error in controller create action

  - by user2799827

  I have read a number of Q&As on SO in search of some help on this but have so far not solved my issue. I am trying to teach myself ruby/rails, and as a test project, I want to create a list of tvshows and a list of characters where each tvshow has_many characters and each character belongs_to a specific show. I am sure I am doing something basic incorrectly. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated. here is the characters controller: class CharactersController < ApplicationController before_action :set_character, only: [:show, :edit, :update, :destroy] # GET /characters # GET /characters.json def index @characters = Character.all end # GET /characters/1 # GET /characters/1.json def show end # GET /characters/new def new @character = Character.new end # GET /characters/1/edit def edit end # POST /characters # POST /characters.json def create @character = @tvshow.characters.create(params[:character]) respond_to do |format| if @character.save format.html { redirect_to @character, notice: 'Character was successfully created.' } format.json { render action: 'show', status: :created, location: @character } else format.html { render action: 'new' } format.json { render json: @character.errors, status: :unprocessable_entity } end end end # PATCH/PUT /characters/1 # PATCH/PUT /characters/1.json def update respond_to do |format| if @character.update(character_params) format.html { redirect_to @character, notice: 'Character was successfully updated.' } format.json { head :no_content } else format.html { render action: 'edit' } format.json { render json: @character.errors, status: :unprocessable_entity } end end end # DELETE /characters/1 # DELETE /characters/1.json def destroy @character.destroy respond_to do |format| format.html { redirect_to characters_url } format.json { head :no_content } end end private # Use callbacks to share common setup or constraints between actions. def set_character @character = Character.find(params[:id]) end # Never trust parameters from the scary internet, only allow the white list through. def character_params params.require(:character).permit(:first_name, :last_name, :bio) end end character model: class Character < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :tvshow default_scope -> { order('created_at DESC') } validates :tvshow_id, presence: true end tvshow model: class Tvshow < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :characters, dependent: :destroy end error gets returned when I attempt to create a character. here is the full trace: app/controllers/characters_controller.rb:27:in `create' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_controller/metal/implicit_render.rb:4:in `send_action' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/abstract_controller/base.rb:189:in `process_action' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_controller/metal/rendering.rb:10:in `process_action' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/abstract_controller/callbacks.rb:18:in `block in process_action' activesupport (4.0.0) lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:413:in `_run__1211653665462320621__process_action__callbacks' activesupport (4.0.0) lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:80:in `run_callbacks' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/abstract_controller/callbacks.rb:17:in `process_action' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_controller/metal/rescue.rb:29:in `process_action' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_controller/metal/instrumentation.rb:31:in `block in process_action' activesupport (4.0.0) lib/active_support/notifications.rb:159:in `block in instrument' activesupport (4.0.0) lib/active_support/notifications/instrumenter.rb:20:in `instrument' activesupport (4.0.0) lib/active_support/notifications.rb:159:in `instrument' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_controller/metal/instrumentation.rb:30:in `process_action' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_controller/metal/params_wrapper.rb:245:in `process_action' activerecord (4.0.0) lib/active_record/railties/controller_runtime.rb:18:in `process_action' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/abstract_controller/base.rb:136:in `process' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/abstract_controller/rendering.rb:44:in `process' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_controller/metal.rb:195:in `dispatch' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_controller/metal/rack_delegation.rb:13:in `dispatch' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_controller/metal.rb:231:in `block in action' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/routing/route_set.rb:80:in `call' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/routing/route_set.rb:80:in `dispatch' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/routing/route_set.rb:48:in `call' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/journey/router.rb:71:in `block in call' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/journey/router.rb:59:in `each' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/journey/router.rb:59:in `call' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/routing/route_set.rb:655:in `call' rack (1.5.2) lib/rack/etag.rb:23:in `call' rack (1.5.2) lib/rack/conditionalget.rb:35:in `call' rack (1.5.2) lib/rack/head.rb:11:in `call' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/params_parser.rb:27:in `call' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/flash.rb:241:in `call' rack (1.5.2) lib/rack/session/abstract/id.rb:225:in `context' rack (1.5.2) lib/rack/session/abstract/id.rb:220:in `call' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/cookies.rb:486:in `call' activerecord (4.0.0) lib/active_record/query_cache.rb:36:in `call' activerecord (4.0.0) lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/connection_pool.rb:626:in `call' activerecord (4.0.0) lib/active_record/migration.rb:369:in `call' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/callbacks.rb:29:in `block in call' activesupport (4.0.0) lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:373:in `_run__2792846465963916895__call__callbacks' activesupport (4.0.0) lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:80:in `run_callbacks' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/callbacks.rb:27:in `call' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/reloader.rb:64:in `call' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/remote_ip.rb:76:in `call' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/debug_exceptions.rb:17:in `call' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/show_exceptions.rb:30:in `call' railties (4.0.0) lib/rails/rack/logger.rb:38:in `call_app' railties (4.0.0) lib/rails/rack/logger.rb:21:in `block in call' activesupport (4.0.0) lib/active_support/tagged_logging.rb:67:in `block in tagged' activesupport (4.0.0) lib/active_support/tagged_logging.rb:25:in `tagged' activesupport (4.0.0) lib/active_support/tagged_logging.rb:67:in `tagged' railties (4.0.0) lib/rails/rack/logger.rb:21:in `call' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/request_id.rb:21:in `call' rack (1.5.2) lib/rack/methodoverride.rb:21:in `call' rack (1.5.2) lib/rack/runtime.rb:17:in `call' activesupport (4.0.0) lib/active_support/cache/strategy/local_cache.rb:83:in `call' rack (1.5.2) lib/rack/lock.rb:17:in `call' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/static.rb:64:in `call' railties (4.0.0) lib/rails/engine.rb:511:in `call' railties (4.0.0) lib/rails/application.rb:97:in `call' rack (1.5.2) lib/rack/lock.rb:17:in `call' rack (1.5.2) lib/rack/content_length.rb:14:in `call' rack (1.5.2) lib/rack/handler/webrick.rb:60:in `service' /Users/dariusgoore/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p194/lib/ruby/1.9.1/webrick/httpserver.rb:138:in `service' /Users/dariusgoore/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p194/lib/ruby/1.9.1/webrick/httpserver.rb:94:in `run' /Users/dariusgoore/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p194/lib/ruby/1.9.1/webrick/server.rb:191:in `block in start_thread'

  Read the article

• rails: undefined method and form_tags

  - by SuperString

  I have this in courses.html.erb under app/views/students <% if @student.courses.count < Course.count then%> <% form_tag(course_add_student_path(@student)) do%> <%= select_tag(:course, options_from_collection_for_select(@student.unenrolled_courses, :id, :name))%> <%= submit_tag 'Enroll'%> <%end%> <%else%> <p><%=h @student.name%> is enrolled in every course. </p> <%end%> I have this in my students_controller.rb under app/controllers: def course_add @student = Student.find(params[:id]) @course = Course.find(params[:course]) unless @student.enrolled_in?(@course) @student.coursess << @course flash[:notice] = 'course added' else flash[:error] = 'course already enrolled' end redirect_to :action => courses, :id => @student end And in my routes.rb, I have: resources :students, :has_many => [:awards], :member => {:courses => :get, :course_add => :post, :course_remove => :post} However, I am getting this error: undefined method `course_add_student_path' for #<#<Class:0x105321d78>:0x1053200e0> What am I missing here? Rake routes output: students GET /students(.:format) {:action=>"index", :controller=>"students"} POST /students(.:format) {:action=>"create", :controller=>"students"} new_student GET /students/new(.:format) {:action=>"new", :controller=>"students"} edit_student GET /students/:id/edit(.:format) {:action=>"edit", :controller=>"students"} student GET /students/:id(.:format) {:action=>"show", :controller=>"students"} PUT /students/:id(.:format) {:action=>"update", :controller=>"students"} DELETE /students/:id(.:format) {:action=>"destroy", :controller=>"students"} courses GET /courses(.:format) {:action=>"index", :controller=>"courses"} POST /courses(.:format) {:action=>"create", :controller=>"courses"} new_course GET /courses/new(.:format) {:action=>"new", :controller=>"courses"} edit_course GET /courses/:id/edit(.:format) {:action=>"edit", :controller=>"courses"} course GET /courses/:id(.:format) {:action=>"show", :controller=>"courses"} PUT /courses/:id(.:format) {:action=>"update", :controller=>"courses"} DELETE /courses/:id(.:format) {:action=>"destroy", :controller=>"courses"} student_awards GET /students/:student_id/awards(.:format) {:action=>"index", :controller=>"awards"} POST /students/:student_id/awards(.:format) {:action=>"create", :controller=>"awards"} new_student_award GET /students/:student_id/awards/new(.:format) {:action=>"new", :controller=>"awards"} edit_student_award GET /students/:student_id/awards/:id/edit(.:format) {:action=>"edit", :controller=>"awards"} student_award GET /students/:student_id/awards/:id(.:format) {:action=>"show", :controller=>"awards"} PUT /students/:student_id/awards/:id(.:format) {:action=>"update", :controller=>"awards"} DELETE /students/:student_id/awards/:id(.:format) {:action=>"destroy", :controller=>"awards"} courses_student GET /students/:id/courses(.:format) {:action=>"courses", :controller=>"students"} GET /students(.:format) {:action=>"index", :controller=>"students"} POST /students(.:format) {:action=>"create", :controller=>"students"} GET /students/new(.:format) {:action=>"new", :controller=>"students"} GET /students/:id/edit(.:format) {:action=>"edit", :controller=>"students"} GET /students/:id(.:format) {:action=>"show", :controller=>"students"} PUT /students/:id(.:format) {:action=>"update", :controller=>"students"} DELETE /students/:id(.:format) {:action=>"destroy", :controller=>"students"}

  Read the article

• EGL initialized failed

  - by aquatear

  Hello Everybody, I used a SurfaceView and EGL to render my 3D contents. When I press BACK and return my activity, the activity's 3D objects become to white. The reason is when the original activity(3D activity) resume, EGL would initialize again. So EGL would initialize and destroy everytime when different activities switch. I am not sure if the problem is EGL initialize twice... but I did initialize and destroy EGL correctly. Anybody have this problem ? Have any solutions about this ?? Thank you so much

  Read the article

• Authlogic Help! Registering a new user when currently logged-in as a user not working.

  - by looloobs

  Hi Just as a disclaimer I am new to rails and programming in general so apologize for misunderstanding something obvious. I have Authlogic with activation up and running. So for my site I would like my users who are logged in to be able to register other users. The new user would pick their login and password through the activation email, but the existing user needs to put them in by email, position and a couple other attributes. I want that to be done by the existing user. The problem I am running into, if I am logged in and then try and create a new user it just tries to update the existing user and doesn't create a new one. I am not sure if there is some way to fix this by having another session start??? If that is even right/possible I wouldn't know how to go about implementing it. I realize without knowing fully about my application it may be difficult to answer this, but does this even sound like the right way to go about this? Am I missing something here? Users Controller: class UsersController < ApplicationController before_filter :require_no_user, :only => [:new, :create] before_filter :require_user, :only => [:show, :edit, :update] def new @user = User.new end def create @user = User.new if @user.signup!(params) @user.deliver_activation_instructions! flash[:notice] = "Your account has been created. Please check your e-mail for your account activation instructions!" redirect_to profile_url else render :action => :new end end def show @user = @current_user end def edit @user = @current_user end def update @user = @current_user # makes our views "cleaner" and more consistent if @user.update_attributes(params[:user]) flash[:notice] = "Account updated!" redirect_to profile_url else render :action => :edit end end end My User_Session Controller: class UserSessionsController < ApplicationController before_filter :require_no_user, :only => [:new, :create] before_filter :require_user, :only => :destroy def new @user_session = UserSession.new end def create @user_session = UserSession.new(params[:user_session]) if @user_session.save flash[:notice] = "Login successful!" if @user_session.user.position == 'Battalion Commander' : redirect_to battalion_path(@user_session.user.battalion_id) else end else render :action => :new end end def destroy current_user_session.destroy flash[:notice] = "Logout successful!" redirect_back_or_default new_user_session_url end end

  Read the article

• Trouble Upgrading Rails 2 Routes for a Redmine Plugin

  - by user1858628

  I am trying to get a Redmine plugin designed for Rails 2 to work with Rails 3. https://github.com/dalyons/redmine-todos-scrum-plugin I've pretty much fixed most parts, but having no success whatsoever in getting the routes to work. The original routes for Rails 2 are as follows: map.resources :todos, :name_prefix => 'project_', :path_prefix => '/projects/:project_id', :member => {:toggle_complete => :post }, :collection => {:sort => :post} map.resources :todos, :name_prefix => 'user_', :path_prefix => '/users/:user_id', :controller => :mytodos, :member => {:toggle_complete => :post }, :collection => {:sort => :post} map.my_todos 'my/todos', :controller => :mytodos, :action => :index map.connect 'projects/:project_id/todos/show/:id', :controller => "todos", :action => "show" rake routes outputs the following: sort_project_todos POST /projects/:project_id/todos/sort(.:format) {:controller=>"todos", :action=>"sort"} project_todos GET /projects/:project_id/todos(.:format) {:controller=>"todos", :action=>"index"} POST /projects/:project_id/todos(.:format) {:controller=>"todos", :action=>"create"} new_project_todo GET /projects/:project_id/todos/new(.:format) {:controller=>"todos", :action=>"new"} toggle_complete_project_todo POST /projects/:project_id/todos/:id/toggle_complete(.:format) {:controller=>"todos", :action=>"toggle_complete"} edit_project_todo GET /projects/:project_id/todos/:id/edit(.:format) {:controller=>"todos", :action=>"edit"} project_todo GET /projects/:project_id/todos/:id(.:format) {:controller=>"todos", :action=>"show"} PUT /projects/:project_id/todos/:id(.:format) {:controller=>"todos", :action=>"update"} DELETE /projects/:project_id/todos/:id(.:format) {:controller=>"todos", :action=>"destroy"} sort_user_todos POST /users/:user_id/todos/sort(.:format) {:controller=>"mytodos", :action=>"sort"} user_todos GET /users/:user_id/todos(.:format) {:controller=>"mytodos", :action=>"index"} POST /users/:user_id/todos(.:format) {:controller=>"mytodos", :action=>"create"} new_user_todo GET /users/:user_id/todos/new(.:format) {:controller=>"mytodos", :action=>"new"} toggle_complete_user_todo POST /users/:user_id/todos/:id/toggle_complete(.:format) {:controller=>"mytodos", :action=>"toggle_complete"} edit_user_todo GET /users/:user_id/todos/:id/edit(.:format) {:controller=>"mytodos", :action=>"edit"} user_todo GET /users/:user_id/todos/:id(.:format) {:controller=>"mytodos", :action=>"show"} PUT /users/:user_id/todos/:id(.:format) {:controller=>"mytodos", :action=>"update"} DELETE /users/:user_id/todos/:id(.:format) {:controller=>"mytodos", :action=>"destroy"} my_todos /my/todos {:controller=>"mytodos", :action=>"index"} /projects/:project_id/todos/show/:id {:controller=>"todos", :action=>"show"} The nearest I have got for Rails 3 is follows: scope '/projects/:project_id', :name_prefix => 'project_' do resources :todos, :controller => 'todos' do member do post :toggle_complete end collection do post :sort end end end scope '/users/:user_id', :name_prefix => 'user_' do resources :todos, :controller => 'mytodos' do member do post :toggle_complete end collection do post :sort end end end match 'my/todos' => 'mytodos#index', :as => :my_todos match 'projects/:project_id/todos/show/:id' => 'todos#show' rake routes outputs the following: toggle_complete_todo POST /projects/:project_id/todos/:id/toggle_complete(.:format) todos#toggle_complete {:name_prefix=>"project_"} sort_todos POST /projects/:project_id/todos/sort(.:format) todos#sort {:name_prefix=>"project_"} todos GET /projects/:project_id/todos(.:format) todos#index {:name_prefix=>"project_"} POST /projects/:project_id/todos(.:format) todos#create {:name_prefix=>"project_"} new_todo GET /projects/:project_id/todos/new(.:format) todos#new {:name_prefix=>"project_"} edit_todo GET /projects/:project_id/todos/:id/edit(.:format) todos#edit {:name_prefix=>"project_"} todo GET /projects/:project_id/todos/:id(.:format) todos#show {:name_prefix=>"project_"} PUT /projects/:project_id/todos/:id(.:format) todos#update {:name_prefix=>"project_"} DELETE /projects/:project_id/todos/:id(.:format) todos#destroy {:name_prefix=>"project_"} POST /users/:user_id/todos/:id/toggle_complete(.:format) mytodos#toggle_complete {:name_prefix=>"user_"} POST /users/:user_id/todos/sort(.:format) mytodos#sort {:name_prefix=>"user_"} GET /users/:user_id/todos(.:format) mytodos#index {:name_prefix=>"user_"} POST /users/:user_id/todos(.:format) mytodos#create {:name_prefix=>"user_"} GET /users/:user_id/todos/new(.:format) mytodos#new {:name_prefix=>"user_"} GET /users/:user_id/todos/:id/edit(.:format) mytodos#edit {:name_prefix=>"user_"} GET /users/:user_id/todos/:id(.:format) mytodos#show {:name_prefix=>"user_"} PUT /users/:user_id/todos/:id(.:format) mytodos#update {:name_prefix=>"user_"} DELETE /users/:user_id/todos/:id(.:format) mytodos#destroy {:name_prefix=>"user_"} my_todos /my/todos(.:format) mytodos#index /projects/:project_id/todos/show/:id(.:format) todos#show I am guessing that I am not using :name_prefix correctly, resulting in duplicate paths which are then omitted. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Read the article

• Pygame's Message-multiple lines?

  - by Jam

  I am using pygame and livewires (though I don't think that part is relevant here) to create a game. I've got the game working, but I'm trying to make something akin to a title screen before the game starts. However, it doesn't recognize when I try to make a new line appear. Here is what I have: begin_message=games.Message(value=""" Destroy the Bricks!\n In this game, you control a paddle,\n controlled by your mouse,\n and attempt to destroy all the rows of bricks.\n Careful though, you only have 1 life.\n Don't mess up! The game will start in\n 5 seconds.""", size=30, x=games.screen.width/2, y=games.screen.height/2, lifetime=500, color=color.white, is_collideable=False) games.screen.add(begin_message) The message appears on the screen, but the newline doesn't happen, so I can only read the first part of the message. Is there a way to make this message actually appear, or can I not use the 'Message' for this?

  Read the article

• Model self referential collections in Rails

  - by Najitaka

  I have written an application for an online clothing store in Rails 2.3.5. I want to show related Products when a customer views the Product Detail page. For example, if the customer views the detail page for a suit, I'd like to display the accessory products that match the dress such as a vest, shoes, and belt. I have named the related products an Ensemble. However, the vest, shoes, and belts are also Products which is what has me struggling. I have it working as follows but I know it's not the Rails way. I have a Products table for all of the products. Not important here but I also have a ProductDetails table. I have an Ensembles table that has the following columns: product_id - the main or origination product, the one displayed on the detail page outfit_id - the related or accessory product In setting up the data, on the Products list, for each Product I have an Ensemble link. This link takes you to the index action in the Ensembles controller. Using the id from the "main" Product, I find all of the associated Ensemble rows by product_id or I create a new ensemble and assign the id from the main product as the product_id. I'd like to just be able to do @product.related_products to get an Ensemble collection. Also on the index page I list the columns of the main product so the user can be sure their main product was the one they selected from the list. I also have a select list of the other products, with an Add to Ensemble action. Finally on the same index page, I have a table that displays the products that are already in the ensemble and in that list each row has a destroy link to remove a particular product from the ensemble. It would be nice if given a single Ensemble row @ensemble I could do @ensemble.product to get the Product related to the outfit_id of the ensemble row. I've got it working without associations but I have to run queries in the controller to build my own @product, @ensemble, and @ensembles collections. Also the only way I found to destroy an ensemble row is by Ensemble.connection.delete(sql to delete), simple @ensemble.destroy doesn't work. Anyone know how I would set up the associations or have a link to a site explaining a similar setup. None of the examples I found use the same table. They have A related to B through C. I want A related to other A through B.

  Read the article

• What is the purpose of this delegate usage?

  - by Kev

  Whilst poking around some code in .NET Reflector in an app I don't have the source code for I found this: if (DeleteDisks) { using (List<XenRef<VDI>>.Enumerator enumerator3 = list.GetEnumerator()) { MethodInvoker invoker2 = null; XenRef<VDI> vdiRef; while (enumerator3.MoveNext()) { vdiRef = enumerator3.Current; if (invoker2 == null) { // // Why do this? // invoker2 = delegate { VDI.destroy(session, vdiRef.opaque_ref); }; } bestEffort(ref caught, invoker2); } } } if (caught != null) { throw caught; } private static void bestEffort(ref Exception caught, MethodInvoker func) { try { func(); } catch (Exception exception) { log.Error(exception, exception); if (caught == null) { caught = exception; } } } Why not call VDI.destroy() directly. Is this just a way of wrapping the same pattern of try { do something } catch { log error } if it's used a lot?

  Read the article

• What is the most elegant way to access current_user from the models? or why is it a bad idea?

  - by TheLindyHop

  So, I've implemented some permissions between my users and the objects the users modify.. and I would like to lessen the coupling between the views/controllers with the models (calling said permissions). To do that, I had an idea: Implementing some of the permission functionality in the before_save / before_create / before_destroy callbacks. But since the permissions are tied to users (current_user.can_do_whatever?), I didn't know what to do. This idea may even increase coupling, as current_user is specifically controller-level. The reason why I initially wanted to do this is: All over my controllers, I'm having to check if a user has the ability to save / create / destroy. So, why not just return false upon save / create / destroy like rails' .save already does, and add an error to the model object and return false, just like rails' validations? Idk, is this good or bad? is there a better way to do this?

  Read the article

• Dialog Box Not Working properly

  - by user1360694

  function showPopup(){ var popup = $('<div>').dialog(); popup.html('<div id="mydiv"></div>'); for (var i=1; i<5; i++) setContent($('#mydiv')); popup.dialog("option", "buttons", { "Add": function(){ //code to add $(this).dialog('close'); $(this).dialog('destroy'); }, "Cancel": function(){ //code to add $(this).dialog('close'); $(this).dialog('destroy'); }, }); } function setContent(container){ container.append('<p>sadfsdfsdfsdfdsf</p>'); } On clicking a "ADD BUTTON" the showPopup function is called which displays a dialog box setting its content from the setContent method. On the first click the content is displayed properly while on further clicks(after the previous dialog is closed) no content is displayed. Can anyone help with this.

  Read the article

• Why Does TFS Allow Orphaned Content and How Do I Get Rid of It?

  - by Chad

  My TfsVersionControl database has grown to 40+ GB in size. We recently did a TFS Destroy on a folder tree that should have cleared up at least 10 GB but instead it seemed to have no effect. When I look at the tables in TfsVersionControl, I am first shocked to see that there are no foreign keys at all in the database. Running a few queries, I see that there is some orphaning going on: tbl_Content has 13.9 GB of records that don't have a related tbl_File record tbl_File and tbl_Content have 2.4 GB that don't have a related tbl_Namespace record The cleanup job seems to be running nightly (prc_DeleteUnusedContent) and running it against the database manually doesn't remove any orphans. I see in the log for the cleanup job that it failed on 3/16, which is the morning after I destroyed the large amount of data. The error was due to a full transaction log. Could that error be the reason I'm left with all this orphaned data that can't be deleted? How can I permanently destroy this unneeded content?

  Read the article

• Access uploaded file in JSON encoded data

  - by okello

  I've encoded my form data into JSON. This has been achieved by the following ExtJS store configuration: Ext.define('XXX.store.Registration', { extend: 'Ext.data.Store', model: 'XXX.model.Registration', autoLoad: true, pageSize: 15, autoLoad: { start: 0, limit: 15 }, proxy: { type: 'ajax', api: { create: './server/registration/create.php', read: './server/registration/get.php', update: './server/registration/update.php', destroy: './server/registration/destroy.php' }, reader: { type: 'json', root: 'registrations', successProperty: 'success' }, writer: { type: 'json', writeAllFields: true, encode: true, root: 'registrations' } } }); My server side code has been implemented in PHP. I can access the encoded form fields by using the field name as a key, as exemplified below: $reg = $_REQUEST['registrations']; $data = json_decode(stripslashes($reg)); $registerNum = $data->registerNum; $folioNum = $data->folioNum; One of the fields in my form is a fileuploadfield. How can I access the uploaded file from the uploaded JSON. Any assistance will be highly appreciated.

  Read the article

• How to check if TypeIdenitifier(T) is an Object?

  - by John

  I'm creating a generic list class that has a member of type Array(Array of ). The problem is the class descruction,because the class is supposed to be used for types from byte to types inheriting TObject. Specifically: destructor Destroy; var elem:T; begin /*if(T is Tobject) then //Check if T inherits TObject {Compiler error!} for elem in FData do TObject(elem).Free;*/ // do not know how to do it SetLength(FItems,0); //FItems : Array of T inherited Destroy; end; How do I check if T is TObject so I can free every member if the typeidenitifier is a class,for example?

  Read the article

• Why activity result code is diffrent then I expected

  - by Fisher

  I have 2 activities. In child activity i have put something like that in onPause(): if (isFinishing()) { final Intent intent = new Intent(); intent.putExtra(SOME_DATA, value); setResult(RESULT_OK, intent); Log.i("test", "Result set to RESULT_OK"); } In parent activity i check resultCode when child activity is destroyed, and this is what i have noticed: If i destroy child activity by some action (in some condition i invoke finish()), then resultCode is RESULT_OK But when i destroy by pressing return key (i works only in emulator so its ESC) who kills activity, then resultCode read in parent onActivityResult method equals 0 (RESULT_CANCELD). "test" log read in each case is the same.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  | Next Page >