Search Results

Search found 4993 results on 200 pages for 'experts direct'.

Page 8/200 | < Previous Page | 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  | Next Page >

  • Direct network transfers C#

    - by Wladek
    I was just curious, is it possible to have direct network transfers in c#, without local caching. e.g. I have response stream which represents GoogleDrive file and request stream to upload file to another GoogleDrive account. At that momment I can download file to local pc and next upload it to the google drive. But is it possible to upload it directly from one google drive to another or, at least, start uploading before full download will be completed. Thank

    Read the article

  • Writing direct to disk with php

    - by Jurander
    I would like to create an upload script that doesn't fall under the php upload limit. There might be an occasion where I need to upload a 2GB, or larger file and I don't want to have to change the whole server execution to above 32MB. Is there a way to write direct to disk from php? What method might you propose someone would use to accomplish this? I have read around stack overflow but haven't quite found what I am looking to do.

    Read the article

  • htaccess PHP deny direct url request to files in specific folder

    - by Garbit
    Hi there just wondering; How do i deny direct access to files in a specific folder. I have an upload script that uploads to /uploadedFiles and currently i just have an index.php which redirects the user to the login page however how do i stop users from accessing a file directly such as; www.myurl.com/uploadedFiles/thisFile.jpeg Thanks in advance :)

    Read the article

  • Raising events vs direct method calls differences

    - by dotnetdev
    Hi Raising an event, will call its event handler. eg http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa645739%28VS.71%29.aspx What is the difference between using the events mechanism and direct calls to other methods (eg if a condition is met in method A(), call B() )? And what is the difference between consuming and raising events? Thanks

    Read the article

  • "Google a raté le coche avec Chrome OS" affirment certains experts qui s'inquiètent des retards pris par le système d'exploitation

    "Google a raté le coche avec Chrome OS", affirment certains experts qui s'inquiètent des retards pris par système d'exploitation de Google Chrome OS aurait du voir le jour en 2010. Et pourtant, personne encore ne l'a vu pointer le bout de son nez. Du coup, certains experts s'inquiètent. Pour eux, le marché change vite, trop vite. Chrome OS est destiné a équiper les appareils de puissance moindre, comme les netbooks et les ordinateurs lowcost. Seulement : "il y a un an, personne n'aurait pu prédire les grands changements qui sont survenus". Ce que les analystes veulent dire, c'est qu'au moment où Google à annoncé son produit, les netbooks avaient le vent en poupe. Aujourd'hui, ils so...

    Read the article

  • Rendez vous des Experts : Introduction à Ruby On Rails, une émission avec Developpez.com pour tout savoir sur le framework Web

    Rendez vous des Experts : Introduction à Ruby On Rails Une émission en partenariat avec Developpez.com pour tout savoir sur le framework Web Ruby On Rails n'est pas spécialement la technologie Web la plus connue. Pour faire simple, « Ruby » est le langage et « On Rails » est le framework qui vient s'y ajouter pour l'adapter aux développements Web. Le résultat est un outil assez récent (Ruby est en version 1.9.2, Rails quant à lui approche la version 3.1), interprété (et non pas compilé), utilisable aussi bien sur des EDI comme Eclispe ou Netbeans que dans un simple éditeur de texte. Le Rendez-vous des Experts et Julien Dollon , avec lesquels D...

    Read the article

  • Chrome résiste aux attaques des experts en sécurité lors de la première journée du Pwn2Own 2010, pas

    Chrome résiste aux attaques des experts en sécurité Lors de la première journée du Pwn2Own 2010, pas les autres navigateurs La nouvelle n'en est pas vraiment une. Mais elle a au moins le mérite de rappeler une évidence : aucun navigateur n'est sûr à 100 %. Safari, Internet Explorer (version 8) et Firefox n'ont pas résisté aux attaques des experts en sécurité lors du Pwn2Own qui se déroule actuellement. Le Pwn2Own est concours de hacking où les navigateurs sont mis à rude épreuve. Le but est de mettre à jour leurs failles et leurs vulnérabilités. Le but n'est évidemment pas de créer de l'insécurité. Au contraire, il s'agit d'attirer l'attention des éditeurs s...

    Read the article

  • Biztalk Ordered Delivery direct bound to multiple ports

    - by WtFudgE
    Hi, another ordered delivery problem. We have an orchestration which is bound to a send port which has ordered delivery true. Another send port also picks up these messages through filtering, this port also has ordered delivery. Now for some reason when there are multiple ports using the message and one of these is directly port binded only one of the ports is being used. I mean that not both ports give an output. If i unenlist one of the ports it's always outputted, this works in both ways. We used to have this with 2 ports which both used filters instead, this worked but we had to change one to a direct port, the problem occured since then. Also the choice of ports for BizTalk is pretty random, because on our server it for example chooses port A and when I recreate the same problem on my local machine it for example choses port B. It's kind of a weird problem and we have no idea what could be the cause.

    Read the article

  • Prevent direct access to a PHP page.

    - by SyaZ
    How do I prevent my users from accessing directly pages meant for ajax calls only? Passing a key during ajax call seems like a solution, whereas access without the key will not be processed. But it is also easy to fabricate the key, no? Curse of View Source... p/s: Using Apache as webserver. EDIT: To answer why, I have jQuery ui-tabs in my index.php, and inside those tabs are forms with scripts, which won't work if they're accessed directly. Why a user would want to do that, I don't know, I just figure I'd be more user friendly by preventing direct access to forms without validation scripts.

    Read the article

  • Can't log in: Error occurred while sending a direct message or getting the response

    - by Joshua Gitlin
    This belongs on Meta but I can't ask it there since, well, I can't log in :-) I'm unable to log into my account using my OpenID, josh.gitlin.name on either StackOverflow or Meta. The error message I receive after entering my OpenID on the login page and pressing "Login" is: Unable to log in with your OpenID provider: Error occurred while sending a direct message or getting the response My alternate OpenID hmblprogrammer.pip.verisignlabs.com doesn't work either. Anything I can try? (And is there any way this question can be associated with my account even though I'm not logged in?)

    Read the article

  • Google app engine or Amazin ec2 for Restful services and direct access to datastore

    - by imran
    I'm thinking of building a Restful app on either App engine or ec2 devloped in Java. I'm interested in opinions/experience of using the two options for this. The primary purpose is to create web services to write and retrieve data through a mobile device...basically creating an API for the service I want to create. It seems to me it would be quicker and cheaper in the beginning to go with google app engine using either restlet or grails.But I also think that I could run into problems in the future when I want to so somthing more advanced and might be restricted by app engines environment. I also want to be able to do data analysis on the data in the datastore as well. It seems that with app engine this would be hard as I don't have direct access to the datastore ( in Amazon I could still have access to the underlying db if I go with MySQL ) .

    Read the article

  • PLESK direct www.domain.com to another server with a unique IP

    - by Cudos
    Hello. I got a customer where I host mail and www address on my server with PLESK 9.2 I want to direct the www address to another IP address like this: Original: www.domain.com -> IP: 1.2.3.4 mail.domain.com -> IP: 1.2.3.4 webmail.domain.com -> IP: 1.2.3.4 New: www.domain.com -> IP: 22.22.22.22 mail.domain.com -> IP: 1.2.3.4 webmail.domain.com -> IP: 1.2.3.4

    Read the article

  • Joomla Development - Allow Direct File Access AND use Joomla-intern Framework

    - by Email
    Hi As usual you write in Joomla Development defined('_JEXEC') or die('Restricted access'); I make a plugin which needs access from Paypal/IPN, so i exclude that in that specific file. BUT I also need to use the Joomla-intern Variables to access the Database, so i tried this: require("../filewithaccesstoframework.php"); OR even $baseurl = $_SERVER['HTTP_HOST']; $baseurl ="http://".$baseurl."/configuration.php"; require($baseurl); By using the first code it displays "Restircted Access" since it seems to take this from the included file which i can't skip to put-in-there. The second code does not seem to recognize the Variables used in configuration.php like $host, $db, $password. the file configuration.php is chmod 444 Why this happens and is there a workarround to allow direct access to a file AND using the Joomla intern Framework (Variables, Functions)?

    Read the article

  • Dreamweaver creating temp php files instead of working direct from the local test server files

    - by Dan382
    Trying to get MAMP running with Dreamweaver. When I preview a php file inside Dreamweavers 'Live View' mode instead of working direct from my file: http://localhost/php_test/timetest.php it creates its own temp file which looks like: http:// 127.0.0.1/php_test/ TMPWY5ZEM.php (I've added the additional spaces as stockoverflow assumed I was spamming) I know the localhost runs correctly as if I type the URL directly into a browser it runs fine. I've set up the Dreamweaver site correctly to the best of my knowledge, the details are below: Local site folder: /Applications/MAMP/htdocs/php_test Server Folder: /Applications/MAMP/htdocs/php_test Web URL: http://localhost/php_test/ Testing Server: PHP MySQL Any help?

    Read the article

  • Direct web URL to PayPal transaction

    - by tags2k
    Having implemented PayPal's Website Payments Standard, I'd like to link to the details view of a transaction from my site's back end - just a simple direct web URL to the PayPal side. I don't know why this is tricky but when I try to get it from being logged in to the PayPal system it seems very obfuscated, in this form: history.paypal.com/uk/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_history-details&info=[looks like some kind of GUID]&ptype=4&history_cache=[huge encoded string] I'm guessing it's by design but it's not very helpful if you want a quick way to jump to a transaction's details. I've tried the https://www.paypal.com/vst/id=1234 form (also with co.uk as I am UK-based) recommended on a few sites I saw in my search, but I am told that: The transaction ID in your link is invalid. This happens even when copying the transaction ID directly from PayPal's back-end order listing. Is there a reliable way to directly link to an order / transaction details page in PayPal?

    Read the article

  • a direct, simple api to run as system?

    - by fejesjoco
    Suppose a program is running with elevated privileges already, and it needs to see the contents of the System Volume Information folder, and by default, only NT Authority\System can do that. A workaround would be to change ACL's on the folder, but I don't want to mess with that. I already found two ways to do it: the task scheduler and psexec. They are too indirect, I don't even need to describe the first one, and the second one works by installing a windows service, running it, telling it to run whatever I wanted to run, then uninstalling the service. Now the question is: is there a direct, simple WinAPI function to run something as system? I don't think that such an API would circumvent the security restrictions, as an administrator I have the right to schedule a task or install a service, so there must be a shortcut.

    Read the article

  • The type{0} does not support direct content - WPF / XAML

    - by Levo
    Hi there: I defined in my code two classes: a "Person" class with public "Age" and "Name" property, and a "People" class that inherits from Generic.List(of T). The code for People class is as followed: Public Class People Inherits Collections.Generic.List(Of Person) ... End Class What I want to achieve is to directly initialize the People class, and add individual Person to it in XAML, i.e.: <local:People x:Key="Familty"> <local:Person Age="11" Name="John" /> <local:Person Age="12" Name="John2" /> ... </local:People> But I keep getting an error in XAML saying: The type 'People' does not support direct content. Any idea as for how to solve this problem? Thank you very much!

    Read the article

  • SimpleDB direct client access

    - by AlexJReid
    One of the useful things about S3 for content storage is that a client can directly make a direct HTTP request to download the object. For instance, this is how Twitter serve up avatar images. SimpleDB provides an HTTP interface to data. Rather than having to write a proxy that sits inbetween SimpleDB and the client, is it possible for client software (i.e. desktop, mobile) to make calls to read values from a SimpleDB domain, without sharing credentials that shouldn't be shared? Or is a proxy in-between the only way to go?

    Read the article

  • MVC Serve audio files while preventing direct linking using HttpResponseBase

    - by VinceGeek
    I need to be able to serve audio files to an mvc app while preventing direct access. Ideally the page would render with a player control so the user can start/stop the audio linked to the database record (audio files are in a folder not the db). I have a controller action like this: Response.Clear(); Response.ContentType = "audio/wav"; Response.TransmitFile(audioFilename); Response.End(); return Response; and the view uses the RenderAction method <% Html.RenderAction("ServeAudioFile"); %> this works but it won't display inline on the existing view, it opens a new page with just the media control. Am I totally barking up the wrong tree or is there a way to embed the response in the existing view? works exactly as I would like but I can't control access to the file.

    Read the article

  • CodeIgniter | direct Echo during working script

    - by Sep O Sep
    Is it possible to echo something while the script for example is still running in a loop? my problem: I ask the server with Ajax and then the server is fetching mails and store them in Database. This took around 15 sec. During that Time the Server should echo his progress so that the Javascript can update a loading bar. This is working with a php script without CodeIgniter well. Is there a way to skip the output class and all that stuff to get a direct echo? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Forwarding HTTP Request with Direct Server Return

    - by Daniel Crabtree
    I have servers spread across several data centers, each storing different files. I want users to be able to access the files on all servers through a single domain and have the individual servers return the files directly to the users. The following shows a simple example: 1) The user's browser requests http://www.example.com/files/file1.zip 2) Request goes to server A, based on the DNS A record for example.com. 3) Server A analyzes the request and works out that /files/file1.zip is stored on server B. 4) Server A forwards the request to server B. 5) Server B returns file1.zip directly to the user without going through server A. Note: steps 4 and 5 must be transparent to the user and cannot involve sending a redirect to the user as that would violate the requirement of a single domain. From my research, what I want to achieve is called "Direct Server Return" and it is a common setup for load balancing. It is also sometimes called a half reverse proxy. For step 4, it sounds like I need to do MAC Address Translation and then pass the request back onto the network and for servers outside the network of server A tunneling will be required. For step 5, I simply need to configure server B, as per the real servers in a load balancing setup. Namely, server B should have server A's IP address on the loopback interface and it should not answer any ARP requests for that IP address. My problem is how to actually achieve step 4? I have found plenty of hardware and software that can do this for simple load balancing at layer 4, but these solutions fall short and cannot handle the kind of custom routing I require. It seems like I will need to roll my own solution. Ideally, I would like to do the routing / forwarding at the web server level, i.e. in PHP or C# / ASP.net. However, I am open to doing it at a lower level such as Apache or IIS, or at an even lower level, i.e. a custom proxy service in front of everything.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  | Next Page >