Search Results

Search found 13817 results on 553 pages for 'net4 full'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 8/553 | < Previous Page | 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  | Next Page >

  • Full-Scale Star Trek Props Recreated in LEGO

    - by Jason Fitzpatrick
    Is there a finer way to immortalize your love for one geeky thing than building it with another geeky thing? Flickr user Geeky Tom lives up to his name with these well done 1:1 Star Trek props crafted from LEGO bricks. Hit up the link below to check out the full gallery of phasers, tricorders, and more. LEGO Star Trek TOS [via Neatorama] How to Play Classic Arcade Games On Your PC How to Use an Xbox 360 Controller On Your Windows PC Download the Official How-To Geek Trivia App for Windows 8

    Read the article

  • Microsoft Delivers Full Suite of SQL Server Powershell Cmdlets

    - by merrillaldrich
    We’ve all been waiting several years for this, and finally it’s here! Coinciding (approximately) with the release of SQL Server 2012, a new Feature Pack has appeared on the Microsoft web site that adds a full suite of PowerShell cmdlets for DDL and other functions. This means that, at last, we can do things like fully-featured SQL deployment scripts without all the (severe) limitations of T-SQL, such as primitive use of variables, flow control, exception handling. Taking a cue, finally, from the...(read more)

    Read the article

  • How to Do a Full Shutdown in Windows 8 Without Disabling Hybrid Boot

    - by Taylor Gibb
    Windows 8 comes with a new Hybrid Boot feature, which decreases boot times. But from time to time you may find you need to do a classic, full shutdown. Here’s how to do just that without disabling Hybrid Boot. How to Factory Reset Your Android Phone or Tablet When It Won’t Boot Our Geek Trivia App for Windows 8 is Now Available Everywhere How To Boot Your Android Phone or Tablet Into Safe Mode

    Read the article

  • contractor vs full time employee

    - by Victor
    What is the long term career prospect of a contractor/consultant in IT field vs a full time salaried employee? The usual arguments aside: Stability vs more upfront money;paid leaves vs tax savings;less paperwork vs more freedom;stagnation vs changing job environments etc etc etc Can some one with a long career experience in hopefully both sides of the divide comment on the pros and cons of contracting vs being an employee? This will be beneficial for all if only people with ample experience choose to answer. Comments are always welcome though.

    Read the article

  • Where would you implement the code to make a full screen webpage [on hold]

    - by Derek Drummond
    This will be my first time creating a website from the ground up and I would like to get some insight on how to implement a full screen site as well as some problems that may arise from it. I really like the design and layout of sites like uCast and spree. Since I am using ASP.net would this be implemented in the Master page or would this be implemented in the .ASPX file for each specific page on the site?

    Read the article

  • EDM -> POCO -> WCF (.NET4) But transferring Collections causes IsReadOnly set to TRUE

    - by Gary B
    Ok, this may sound a little 'unorthodox', but...using VS2010 and the new POCO t4 template for Entity Framework (http://tinyurl.com/y8wnkt2), I can generate nice POCO's. I can then use these POCO's (as DTO's) in a WCF service essentially going from EDM all the way through to the client. Kinda what this guys is doing (http://tinyurl.com/yb4bslv), except everything is generated automatically. I understand that an entity and a DTO 'should' be different, but in this case, I'm handling client and server, and there's some real advantages to having the DTO in the model and automatically generated. My problem is, that when I transfer an entity that has a relationship, the client generated collection (ICollection) has the read-only value set, so I can't manipulate that relationship. For example, retrieving an existing Order, I can't add a product to the Products collection client-side...the Products collection is read-only. I would prefer to do a bunch of client side 'order-editing' and then send the updated order back rather than making dozens of server round trips (eg AddProductToOrder(product)). I'd also prefer not to have a bunch of thunking between Entity and DTO. So all-in-all this looks good to me...except for the read-only part. Is there a solution, or is this too much against the SOA grain?

    Read the article

  • Good .net4 profiler

    - by Martin
    What is a good profiler for .NET 4.0? I'm willing to spend some money, but not too much (say up to £50) I'm developing games for windows phone and xbox using XNA, which means that the projects are commercial. I mention it because I've seen several which are free for non commercial use. Extra points for Visual studio integration. Nb. I'm using Visual Studio Professional 2010

    Read the article

  • How to get rank from full-text search query with Linq to SQL?

    - by Stephen Jennings
    I am using Linq to SQL to call a stored procedure which runs a full-text search and returns the rank plus a few specific columns from the table Article. The rank column is the rank returned from the SQL function FREETEXTTABLE(). I've added this sproc to the data model designer with return type Article. This is working to get the columns I need; however, it discards the ranking of each search result. I'd like to get this information so I can display it to the user. So far, I've tried creating a new class RankedArticle which inherits from Article and adds the column Rank, then changing the return type of my sproc mapping to RankedArticle. When I try this, an InvalidOperationException gets thrown: Data member 'Int32 ArticleID' of type 'Heap.Models.Article' is not part of the mapping for type 'RankedArticle'. Is the member above the root of an inheritance hierarchy? I can't seem to find any other questions or Google results from people trying to get the rank column, so I'm probably missing something obvious here.

    Read the article

  • Enterprise Library 4.1 and .Net4

    - by Matthew
    Hello I have a project that uses the Enterprise Library 4.1. When I target .net 4 and compile, I get an error that says I need to add a reference to System.ServiceModel version 3. My reference is to System.ServiceModel version 4. How can I tell Visual Studio 2010 to reference a .net3 assembly from a .net3 project? Or, does somebody have a workaround for this issue? I am using the RTM version of VS2010 Thanks

    Read the article

  • Slow performance of System.Math library in .NET4/VS2010

    - by Niranjan
    My application compiled in .NET 4 seems to be performing really slow compared to .NET 3.5. When I did the performance analysis, I found out that the System.Math libraries in VS2010/.NET 4 have slowed down considerably. Any explanation to this? Has anyone else come across this or am I the only one seeing this? Thanks, Niranjan

    Read the article

  • Possible to rank partial matches in Postgres full text search?

    - by Joe
    I'm trying to calculate a ts_rank for a full-text match where some of the terms in the query may not be in the ts_vector against which it is being matched. I would like the rank to be higher in a match where more words match. Seems pretty simple? Because not all of the terms have to match, I have to | the operands, to give a query such as to_tsquery('one|two|three') (if it was &, all would have to match). The problem is, the rank value seems to be the same no matter how many words match. In other words, it's maxing rather than multiplying the clauses. select ts_rank('one two three'::tsvector, to_tsquery('one')); gives 0.0607927. select ts_rank('one two three'::tsvector, to_tsquery('one|two|three|four')); gives the expected lower value of 0.0455945 because 'four' is not the vector. But select ts_rank('one two three'::tsvector, to_tsquery('one|two')); gives 0.0607927 and likewise select ts_rank('one two three'::tsvector, to_tsquery('one|two|three')); gives 0.0607927 I would like the result of ts_rank to be higher if more terms match. Possible? To counter one possible response: I cannot calculate all possible subsequences of the search query as intersections and then union them all in a query because I am going to be working with large queries. I'm sure there are plenty of arguments against this anyway! Edit: I'm aware of ts_rank_cd but it does not solve the above problem.

    Read the article

  • Deploying asp.net application(.Net4.0) package on to IIS 6.0

    - by Vinod.Nair
    Hi , I have created a asp.net application project in Visual Studio 2010 (.net 4.0). I had published it using Project- Build Deployment Package. It generated .zip file along with files having extension " .deply.cmd", ".SetParameters.xml", ".SourceManifest.xml" and readme.txt, in Application (obj\Release\Package) folder My intension is to host the package on test server which has IIS6.0, Windows Server 2003 R2 x64 Edition service pack 2. It has .net 4.0. I tried by running the cmd file but its showed me an message as below: ERROR: The system was unable to find the specified registry key or value. msdeploy.exe is not found on this machine. Please install Web Deploy before execute the script. any help pl....

    Read the article

  • LEGO Lord of the Rings Cut Scenes Spliced into a Full Length Movie [Video]

    - by Jason Fitzpatrick
    If you take all the cut scenes from the LEGO Lord of the Rings video game and splice them end-to-end, the result is an hour and a half LEGO Lord of the Rings movie. Check out the full video here. Courtesy of SpaceTopGames, this mega splice includes every cut scene from the video game, weighs in at one hour and thirty one minutes, and actually works really well as a movie when strung all together. LEGO Lord of the Rings – All Cutscenes [via Freeware Genius] HTG Explains: Does Your Android Phone Need an Antivirus? How To Use USB Drives With the Nexus 7 and Other Android Devices Why Does 64-Bit Windows Need a Separate “Program Files (x86)” Folder?

    Read the article

  • Bring a Touch of the Wild West to Your Desktop with the Rango Theme for Windows 7

    - by Asian Angel
    Rango the chameleon has his hands full when he becomes the new sheriff in an Old West town called Dirt. Now you can bring his adventures to your desktop with this new theme from Microsoft. The theme comes with seven wallpapers featuring Rango, his new friends, and others he meets along the way. Download the Rango Windows 7 Theme [Windows 7 Personalization Gallery] Latest Features How-To Geek ETC Should You Delete Windows 7 Service Pack Backup Files to Save Space? What Can Super Mario Teach Us About Graphics Technology? Windows 7 Service Pack 1 is Released: But Should You Install It? How To Make Hundreds of Complex Photo Edits in Seconds With Photoshop Actions How to Enable User-Specific Wireless Networks in Windows 7 How to Use Google Chrome as Your Default PDF Reader (the Easy Way) Bring a Touch of the Wild West to Your Desktop with the Rango Theme for Windows 7 Manage Your Favorite Social Accounts in Chrome and Iron with Seesmic E.T. II – Extinction [Fake Movie Sequel Video] Remastered King’s Quest Games Offer Classic Gaming on Modern Machines Compare Your Internet Cost and Speed to Global Averages [Infographic] Orbital Battle for Terra Wallpaper

    Read the article

  • Mulitple full joins in Postgres is slow

    - by blast83
    I have a program to use the IMDB database and am having very slow performance on my query. It appears that it doesn't use my where condition until after it materializes everything. I looked around for hints to use but nothing seems to work. Here is my query: SELECT * FROM name as n1 FULL JOIN aka_name ON n1.id = aka_name.person_id FULL JOIN cast_info as t2 ON n1.id = t2.person_id FULL JOIN person_info as t3 ON n1.id = t3.person_id FULL JOIN char_name as t4 ON t2.person_role_id = t4.id FULL JOIN role_type as t5 ON t2.role_id = t5.id FULL JOIN title as t6 ON t2.movie_id = t6.id FULL JOIN aka_title as t7 ON t6.id = t7.movie_id FULL JOIN complete_cast as t8 ON t6.id = t8.movie_id FULL JOIN kind_type as t9 ON t6.kind_id = t9.id FULL JOIN movie_companies as t10 ON t6.id = t10.movie_id FULL JOIN movie_info as t11 ON t6.id = t11.movie_id FULL JOIN movie_info_idx as t19 ON t6.id = t19.movie_id FULL JOIN movie_keyword as t12 ON t6.id = t12.movie_id FULL JOIN movie_link as t13 ON t6.id = t13.linked_movie_id FULL JOIN link_type as t14 ON t13.link_type_id = t14.id FULL JOIN keyword as t15 ON t12.keyword_id = t15.id FULL JOIN company_name as t16 ON t10.company_id = t16.id FULL JOIN company_type as t17 ON t10.company_type_id = t17.id FULL JOIN comp_cast_type as t18 ON t8.status_id = t18.id WHERE n1.id = 2003 Very table is related to each other on the join via foreign-key constraints and have indexes for all the mentioned columns. The query plan details: "Hash Left Join (cost=5838187.01..13756845.07 rows=15579622 width=835) (actual time=146879.213..146891.861 rows=20 loops=1)" " Hash Cond: (t8.status_id = t18.id)" " -> Hash Left Join (cost=5838185.92..13542624.18 rows=15579622 width=822) (actual time=146879.199..146891.833 rows=20 loops=1)" " Hash Cond: (t10.company_type_id = t17.id)" " -> Hash Left Join (cost=5838184.83..13328403.29 rows=15579622 width=797) (actual time=146879.165..146891.781 rows=20 loops=1)" " Hash Cond: (t10.company_id = t16.id)" " -> Hash Left Join (cost=5828372.95..10061752.03 rows=15579622 width=755) (actual time=146426.483..146429.756 rows=20 loops=1)" " Hash Cond: (t12.keyword_id = t15.id)" " -> Hash Left Join (cost=5825164.23..6914088.45 rows=15579622 width=731) (actual time=146372.411..146372.529 rows=20 loops=1)" " Hash Cond: (t13.link_type_id = t14.id)" " -> Merge Left Join (cost=5825162.82..6699867.24 rows=15579622 width=715) (actual time=146372.366..146372.472 rows=20 loops=1)" " Merge Cond: (t6.id = t13.linked_movie_id)" " -> Merge Left Join (cost=5684009.29..6378956.77 rows=15579622 width=699) (actual time=144019.620..144019.711 rows=20 loops=1)" " Merge Cond: (t6.id = t12.movie_id)" " -> Merge Left Join (cost=5182403.90..5622400.75 rows=8502523 width=687) (actual time=136849.731..136849.809 rows=20 loops=1)" " Merge Cond: (t6.id = t19.movie_id)" " -> Merge Left Join (cost=4974472.00..5315778.48 rows=8502523 width=637) (actual time=134972.032..134972.099 rows=20 loops=1)" " Merge Cond: (t6.id = t11.movie_id)" " -> Merge Left Join (cost=1830064.81..2033131.89 rows=1341632 width=561) (actual time=63784.035..63784.062 rows=2 loops=1)" " Merge Cond: (t6.id = t10.movie_id)" " -> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=1417360.29..1594294.02 rows=1044480 width=521) (actual time=59279.246..59279.264 rows=1 loops=1)" " Join Filter: (t6.kind_id = t9.id)" " -> Merge Left Join (cost=1417359.22..1429787.34 rows=1044480 width=507) (actual time=59279.222..59279.224 rows=1 loops=1)" " Merge Cond: (t6.id = t8.movie_id)" " -> Merge Left Join (cost=1405731.84..1414378.65 rows=1044480 width=491) (actual time=59121.773..59121.775 rows=1 loops=1)" " Merge Cond: (t6.id = t7.movie_id)" " -> Sort (cost=1346206.04..1348817.24 rows=1044480 width=416) (actual time=58095.230..58095.231 rows=1 loops=1)" " Sort Key: t6.id" " Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 17kB" " -> Hash Left Join (cost=172406.29..456387.53 rows=1044480 width=416) (actual time=57969.371..58095.208 rows=1 loops=1)" " Hash Cond: (t2.movie_id = t6.id)" " -> Hash Left Join (cost=104700.38..256885.82 rows=1044480 width=358) (actual time=49981.493..50006.303 rows=1 loops=1)" " Hash Cond: (t2.role_id = t5.id)" " -> Hash Left Join (cost=104699.11..242522.95 rows=1044480 width=343) (actual time=49981.441..50006.250 rows=1 loops=1)" " Hash Cond: (t2.person_role_id = t4.id)" " -> Hash Left Join (cost=464.96..12283.95 rows=1044480 width=269) (actual time=0.071..0.087 rows=1 loops=1)" " Hash Cond: (n1.id = t3.person_id)" " -> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.00..49.39 rows=7680 width=160) (actual time=0.051..0.066 rows=1 loops=1)" " -> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.00..17.04 rows=3 width=119) (actual time=0.038..0.041 rows=1 loops=1)" " -> Index Scan using name_pkey on name n1 (cost=0.00..8.68 rows=1 width=39) (actual time=0.022..0.024 rows=1 loops=1)" " Index Cond: (id = 2003)" " -> Index Scan using aka_name_idx_person on aka_name (cost=0.00..8.34 rows=1 width=80) (actual time=0.010..0.010 rows=0 loops=1)" " Index Cond: ((aka_name.person_id = 2003) AND (n1.id = aka_name.person_id))" " -> Index Scan using cast_info_idx_pid on cast_info t2 (cost=0.00..10.77 rows=1 width=41) (actual time=0.011..0.020 rows=1 loops=1)" " Index Cond: ((t2.person_id = 2003) AND (n1.id = t2.person_id))" " -> Hash (cost=463.26..463.26 rows=136 width=109) (actual time=0.010..0.010 rows=0 loops=1)" " -> Index Scan using person_info_idx_pid on person_info t3 (cost=0.00..463.26 rows=136 width=109) (actual time=0.009..0.009 rows=0 loops=1)" " Index Cond: (person_id = 2003)" " -> Hash (cost=42697.62..42697.62 rows=2442362 width=74) (actual time=49305.872..49305.872 rows=2442362 loops=1)" " -> Seq Scan on char_name t4 (cost=0.00..42697.62 rows=2442362 width=74) (actual time=14.066..22775.087 rows=2442362 loops=1)" " -> Hash (cost=1.12..1.12 rows=12 width=15) (actual time=0.024..0.024 rows=12 loops=1)" " -> Seq Scan on role_type t5 (cost=0.00..1.12 rows=12 width=15) (actual time=0.012..0.014 rows=12 loops=1)" " -> Hash (cost=31134.07..31134.07 rows=1573507 width=58) (actual time=7841.225..7841.225 rows=1573507 loops=1)" " -> Seq Scan on title t6 (cost=0.00..31134.07 rows=1573507 width=58) (actual time=21.507..2799.443 rows=1573507 loops=1)" " -> Materialize (cost=59525.80..63203.88 rows=294246 width=75) (actual time=812.376..984.958 rows=192075 loops=1)" " -> Sort (cost=59525.80..60261.42 rows=294246 width=75) (actual time=812.363..922.452 rows=192075 loops=1)" " Sort Key: t7.movie_id" " Sort Method: external merge Disk: 24880kB" " -> Seq Scan on aka_title t7 (cost=0.00..6646.46 rows=294246 width=75) (actual time=24.652..164.822 rows=294246 loops=1)" " -> Materialize (cost=11627.38..12884.43 rows=100564 width=16) (actual time=123.819..149.086 rows=41907 loops=1)" " -> Sort (cost=11627.38..11878.79 rows=100564 width=16) (actual time=123.807..138.530 rows=41907 loops=1)" " Sort Key: t8.movie_id" " Sort Method: external merge Disk: 3136kB" " -> Seq Scan on complete_cast t8 (cost=0.00..1549.64 rows=100564 width=16) (actual time=0.013..10.744 rows=100564 loops=1)" " -> Materialize (cost=1.08..1.15 rows=7 width=14) (actual time=0.016..0.029 rows=7 loops=1)" " -> Seq Scan on kind_type t9 (cost=0.00..1.07 rows=7 width=14) (actual time=0.011..0.013 rows=7 loops=1)" " -> Materialize (cost=412704.52..437969.09 rows=2021166 width=40) (actual time=3420.356..4278.545 rows=1028995 loops=1)" " -> Sort (cost=412704.52..417757.43 rows=2021166 width=40) (actual time=3420.349..3953.483 rows=1028995 loops=1)" " Sort Key: t10.movie_id" " Sort Method: external merge Disk: 90960kB" " -> Seq Scan on movie_companies t10 (cost=0.00..35214.66 rows=2021166 width=40) (actual time=13.271..566.893 rows=2021166 loops=1)" " -> Materialize (cost=3144407.19..3269057.42 rows=9972019 width=76) (actual time=65485.672..70083.219 rows=5039009 loops=1)" " -> Sort (cost=3144407.19..3169337.23 rows=9972019 width=76) (actual time=65485.667..68385.550 rows=5038999 loops=1)" " Sort Key: t11.movie_id" " Sort Method: external merge Disk: 735512kB" " -> Seq Scan on movie_info t11 (cost=0.00..212815.19 rows=9972019 width=76) (actual time=15.750..15715.608 rows=9972019 loops=1)" " -> Materialize (cost=207925.01..219867.92 rows=955433 width=50) (actual time=1483.989..1785.636 rows=429401 loops=1)" " -> Sort (cost=207925.01..210313.59 rows=955433 width=50) (actual time=1483.983..1654.165 rows=429401 loops=1)" " Sort Key: t19.movie_id" " Sort Method: external merge Disk: 31720kB" " -> Seq Scan on movie_info_idx t19 (cost=0.00..15047.33 rows=955433 width=50) (actual time=7.284..221.597 rows=955433 loops=1)" " -> Materialize (cost=501605.39..537645.64 rows=2883220 width=12) (actual time=5823.040..6868.242 rows=1597396 loops=1)" " -> Sort (cost=501605.39..508813.44 rows=2883220 width=12) (actual time=5823.026..6477.517 rows=1597396 loops=1)" " Sort Key: t12.movie_id" " Sort Method: external merge Disk: 78888kB" " -> Seq Scan on movie_keyword t12 (cost=0.00..44417.20 rows=2883220 width=12) (actual time=11.672..839.498 rows=2883220 loops=1)" " -> Materialize (cost=141143.93..152995.81 rows=948150 width=16) (actual time=1916.356..2253.004 rows=478358 loops=1)" " -> Sort (cost=141143.93..143514.31 rows=948150 width=16) (actual time=1916.344..2125.698 rows=478358 loops=1)" " Sort Key: t13.linked_movie_id" " Sort Method: external merge Disk: 29632kB" " -> Seq Scan on movie_link t13 (cost=0.00..14607.50 rows=948150 width=16) (actual time=27.610..297.962 rows=948150 loops=1)" " -> Hash (cost=1.18..1.18 rows=18 width=16) (actual time=0.020..0.020 rows=18 loops=1)" " -> Seq Scan on link_type t14 (cost=0.00..1.18 rows=18 width=16) (actual time=0.010..0.012 rows=18 loops=1)" " -> Hash (cost=1537.10..1537.10 rows=91010 width=24) (actual time=54.055..54.055 rows=91010 loops=1)" " -> Seq Scan on keyword t15 (cost=0.00..1537.10 rows=91010 width=24) (actual time=0.006..14.703 rows=91010 loops=1)" " -> Hash (cost=4585.61..4585.61 rows=245461 width=42) (actual time=445.269..445.269 rows=245461 loops=1)" " -> Seq Scan on company_name t16 (cost=0.00..4585.61 rows=245461 width=42) (actual time=12.037..309.961 rows=245461 loops=1)" " -> Hash (cost=1.04..1.04 rows=4 width=25) (actual time=0.013..0.013 rows=4 loops=1)" " -> Seq Scan on company_type t17 (cost=0.00..1.04 rows=4 width=25) (actual time=0.009..0.010 rows=4 loops=1)" " -> Hash (cost=1.04..1.04 rows=4 width=13) (actual time=0.006..0.006 rows=4 loops=1)" " -> Seq Scan on comp_cast_type t18 (cost=0.00..1.04 rows=4 width=13) (actual time=0.002..0.003 rows=4 loops=1)" "Total runtime: 147055.016 ms" Is there anyway to force the name.id = 2003 before it tries to join all the tables together? As you can see, the end result is 4 tuples but it seems like it should be a fast join by using the available index after it limited it down with the name clause, although very complex.

    Read the article

  • Unlock the Full Value of Oracle CRM On Demand

    - by charles.knapp
    Register for this live Oracle CRM On Demand Virtual Community Session! Oracle CRM On Demand delivers the most complete On Demand CRM available anywhere. But how can you ensure you are getting maximum value from the many powerful features that Oracle CRM On Demand offers? Join our interactive Oracle CRM On Demand Virtual Community Session on Tuesday, January 11, 2011 from 10.00-11 a.m. PT / 1 p.m.-2 p.m. ET to get expert advice and discuss the best ways to unlock the full potential of Oracle CRM Demand with Mike Lairson, author of 'Oracle CRM On Demand Reporting'. Book OfferSend your Oracle CRM On Demand configuration ideas before the Webcast to [email protected] and you could win a free copy of 'Oracle CRM On Demand Reporting' by Mike Lairson. Learn more and register now!

    Read the article

  • Unlock the Full Value of Oracle CRM On Demand

    - by ruth.donohue
    Register for this live Oracle CRM On Demand Virtual Community Session! Oracle CRM On Demand delivers the most complete On Demand CRM solution on the market. But how can you ensure you are getting maximum value from the many powerful features that Oracle CRM On Demand offers? Join our interactive Oracle CRM On Demand Virtual Community Session on Tuesday, January 11, 2011 from 10.00-11 a.m. PT / 1 p.m.-2 p.m. ET to get expert advice and discuss the best ways to unlock the full potential of Oracle CRM Demand with Mike Lairson, author of 'Oracle CRM On Demand Reporting'. Book Offer Send your Oracle CRM On Demand configuration ideas before the Webcast to [email protected] and you could win a free copy of 'Oracle CRM On Demand Reporting' by Mike Lairson. Learn more and register now!

    Read the article

  • CPU fan kicks in to full gear when i try to install ubuntu 12.10 or LTS

    - by Remi cook
    Whenever I try to install (DUAL BOOT WITH WINDOWS 7) both versions of Ubuntu desktop on my PC the CPU fan starts spinning so fast that I couldn't even go through the installation for fear of my CPU exploding. In windows 7, the temp reaches 25-30 idle and 30-45 under full load. I tried installing through Wubi and by burning it to USB drive. Both wield the same results. I would appreciate any help. I'm a complete noob so take it easy one me. Intel Core i5 2500 @ 3.30GHz 4.00 GB Dual-Channel DDR3 @ 668MHz (9-9-9-24) Motherboard ASUSTeK Computer INC. P8Z68-V LX (LGA1155) Graphics AMD Radeon HD 6850 (Sapphire/PCPartner)

    Read the article

  • HTG Explains: Why It’s Good That Your Computer’s RAM Is Full

    - by Chris Hoffman
    Is Windows, Linux, Android, or another operating system using a lot of RAM? Don’t panic! Modern operating systems use RAM as a file cache to speed things up. Assuming your computer is performing well, there’s nothing to worry about. While it may seem counterintuitive to those of us who remember our computers always being starved for RAM, high RAM usage means your RAM is being put to good use. Empty RAM is wasted RAM. HTG Explains: Why It’s Good That Your Computer’s RAM Is Full 10 Awesome Improvements For Desktop Users in Windows 8 How To Play DVDs on Windows 8

    Read the article

  • The History Of Operating Systems [Infographic]

    - by ETC
    Earlier this week we shared a history of operating system names with you. This infographic complements that with a timeline of quotes and facts from the annals of computer history. Hit up the link below to check out the full infographic. The History Of Operating Systems [MakeUseOf] Latest Features How-To Geek ETC Have You Ever Wondered How Your Operating System Got Its Name? Should You Delete Windows 7 Service Pack Backup Files to Save Space? What Can Super Mario Teach Us About Graphics Technology? Windows 7 Service Pack 1 is Released: But Should You Install It? How To Make Hundreds of Complex Photo Edits in Seconds With Photoshop Actions How to Enable User-Specific Wireless Networks in Windows 7 The History Of Operating Systems [Infographic] DriveSafe.ly Reads Your Text Messages Aloud The Likability of Angry Birds [Infographic] Dim an Overly Bright Alarm Clock with a Binder Divider Preliminary List of Keyboard Shortcuts for Unity Now Available Bring a Touch of the Wild West to Your Desktop with the Rango Theme for Windows 7

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  | Next Page >