Search Results

Search found 171078 results on 6844 pages for 'not recognized'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 8/6844 | < Previous Page | 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  | Next Page >

  • GA 8KNXP Rev1.0: 4 GB installed, only 3.5 GB recognized by BIOS

    - by hurikhan77
    I've installed 2x 1 GB and 4x 512 MB memory into my GA-8KNXP system which would sum up to 4 GB. The specification from the manual says: Maximum memory support: 4 GB. If all six slots are utilized, slot 5+6 may only equipped with single-sided RAM modules. And so I did. Anyway: The BIOS counts up to 3.5 GB and finishes there. Also my Linux system reports only 3.5 GB of memory although 4 GB memory support is activated in the kernel. So I suppose this is a memory mapping issue or a hardware issue. I've tried removing only on of the 512 MB memory modules leaving 5 modules in place. But that just stopped the system from powering on correctly (screen stays black although fans and leds come to live). Dual Channel was detected and enabled so the system technically found all 6 modules. "dmidecode" in Linux reports only memory in slots 1 to 4 and ignores slots 5+6, so it only detects 3 GB of memory. It also says the system would support up to 16 GB of memory with 4 GB modules per slot. I think technically the chipset should be able to offer and utilize the complete 4 GB memory range. Any clues what else I could check? Or do I have just to live with 0.5 GB wasted memory?

    Read the article

  • NTFS partition size not recognized after disaster recovery clone

    - by djechelon
    I'm in the middle of a disaster recovery of a 250GB hard disk that was "clicking". Obviously I didn't have a backup copy. I managed to salvage all the files thanks to GParted Live that was able to read the disk without a single "click" sound. So I cloned the partition to a new drive sized 500GB. Unfortunately, GParted process went to some kind of infinite loop, disks stopped I/O and after a couple of hours I interrupted the clone process I started. Now the problem is: when cloning the partition I also chose to expand 250GB to the whole 500GB of the target disk. Windows sees the partition sized 500GB in computer management, but Windows Explorer only sees 250. chkdsk e: /f says the filesystem is OK. How can I repair the file system and let Windows see the full 500GB of the new partition? An alternate idea is to deep-copy the files from the backup disk to a newly formatted disk. This should definitely fix. Any other ideas?

    Read the article

  • GA 8KNXP Rev1.0: 4GB installed, only 3.5 recognized by BIOS

    - by hurikhan77
    I've installed 2x 1 GB and 4x 512 MB memory into my GA-8KNXP system which would sum up to 4GB. The specs from the manual say: Maximum memory support: 4GB. If all six slots are utilized, slot 5+6 may only equipped with single-sided RAM modules. And so I did. Anyway: The BIOS counts up to 3.5 GB and finishes there. Also my linux system reports only 3.5 GB of memory although 4 GB memory support is activated in the kernel. So I suppose this is a memory mapping issue or a hardware issue. I've tried removing only on of the 512 MB memory modules leaving 5 modules in place. But that just stopped the system from powering on correctly (screen stays black although fans and leds come to live). Dual Channel was detected and enabled so the system technically found all 6 modules. "dmidecode" in linux reports only memory in slots 1 to 4 and ignores slots 5+6, so it only detects 3 GB of memory. It also says the system would support up to 16 GB of memory with 4 GB modules per slot. I think technically the chipset should be able to offer and utilize the complete 4 GB memory range. Any clues what else I could check? Or do I have just to live with 0.5 GB wasted memory?

    Read the article

  • Only half of RAM is recognized by BIOS

    - by Rick Crawford
    I got a Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3 mainboard. Some time ago I noticed that Windows only showed 2GB instead of 4GB. I don't know exactly what caused it anyway. I tried putting in each of the 4 x 1GB RAM modules one by one, and tried every slot one by one, until every stick and slot worked. However, then I tried adding one more at a time, and it kept showing 1GB, until I put in all 4, where it only showed 2 GB instead of 4 (in BIOS and windows 7 64bit). I tried replacing the BIOS battery since I've read that low battery could cause it. It didn't help though. I also bought 4GB new RAM (yes, it's supported, I checked it), and it's still the same, it only shows 2GB (or 3GB, when I put in 4 of the new and 2 of the old). I also did the latest BIOS update, and used default BIOS settings, but nothing of that helped. When my PC boots it shows "RAM modules used 2 and 3", when 4 sticks are in - or "0 and 1", when only 2 are in.

    Read the article

  • SATA drive not recognized when installing RHEL 5.1 on PowerEdge R410

    - by Rachel
    Here's my setup: Dell R410 with Perc S100 (software) raid controller on an Intel ICH10R chipset The first problem is that the Perc S100 is only supported on windows. I'm trying to install RHEL 5.1. It boots from the cdrom, but later the installer can't see the cdrom or hard drive. Both are connected to the on-board sata controller. The only options in the R410 bios for SATA are ATA or RAID. I don't need raid, I just want a single drive setup.

    Read the article

  • DVD drive not recognized

    - by David Oneill
    I'm in the midst of building a computer (first time builder) I got everything plugged in, and hit the power button. After the excitement of the first boot coming up on my screen, I was looking through the BIOS settings. However, joy soon turned sour, as I looked at the list of installed SATA devices. My DVD drive wasn't on the list :( So, what are common things I should check/try?

    Read the article

  • USB Device Not Recognized (Mac)

    - by Nargis
    Fortunately, my Mac-pro also made one of my USB storage devices inoperable. My data loss in that USB device but such as another USB device and USB keyboard are unaffected. I have heard that my friend usually trigger this problem by having at least two devices plugged in - typically thumb drives/USB flash drives, and then once a second flash drive is plugged in that become unrecognized. I have only two USB ports and first I think port loose when I connect two USB devices. But later I found these hidden files (“.Spotlight-V100”, “.TemporaryItems”, “.Trashes”, and “._.Trashes”) are created by Mac OS. And before unrecognized that USB device I have deleted these files and my friend had also done the same action. Now I don’t want to test for next USB device to become unrecognized and I won’t deleted any hidden system file inside the flash drives. But I really want to know why these problems happened. Can I delete these hidden files when I only connect to virtual machine (Vista), because I used to delete all useless hidden files from USB flash drives? Any suggestions or thoughts to prevent this or alternative suggestions to fix the problem that take lossless would be much appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Dell Inspiron 1501 battery no longer "recognized"

    - by mwalling
    My parents were on vacation last weekend and franticly called me saying that they couldn't get their Inspiron 1501 to boot anymore without the BIOS whining about the battery. Before this happened, they said the "battery went dead with negligible pre-warning". On bootup, the computer says: WARNING: The battery cannot be identified. This system will be unable to charge this battery. With options to enter the BIOS or continue booting. I got to look at the machine last night. The battery still holds a charge, and will recharge. Windows detects it as a DellPY9617 battery manufactured by "DynaPack". I didn't get the BIOS revision, but the machine's ship date was 7/21/2007. The recommendations I could find on the internet varied from "discharge the battery completely" to "your computer is too old" to "update the BIOS", and wanted a more specific answer before doing something drastic.

    Read the article

  • Almost all of my programs arn't recognized anymore.

    - by alaster
    I had a virus on my computer and was able to remove it, however, now almost all of my programs won't work. Even trying to open freecell pulls up the "select a software to run this in" window. I can't even install software anymore because after downloading a setup file and clicking on it, it too opens the "choose a program to run this in" window. I'm trying to find a way to fix without reinstalling the OS. Does anyone know a way to restore the file/files that are missing that are causing this problem without starting over?

    Read the article

  • aapt not found when building new Android app in NetBeans

    - by Oz
    I just installed NetBeans and the Android SDK following the instructions here. I am running Ubuntu 9.10 (Karmic). NetBeans is 6.7.1. The Android SDK is version 7. When I try to compile a new project it gives me the following error: Execute failed: java.io.IOException: Cannot run program "/home/oz/android-sdk/platforms/android-7/tools/aapt" (in directory "/home/oz/projects/ArmyBuilder/android"): java.io.IOException: error=2, No such file or directory When I go into that directory, I see that the file does exist and it has proper permissions to be executable by anyone, yet even bash can't find it! oz@Ivory-Coast:~/android-sdk/platforms/android-7/tools$ pwd /home/oz/android-sdk/platforms/android-7/tools oz@Ivory-Coast:~/android-sdk/platforms/android-7/tools$ ls -l total 4652 -rwxrwxrwx 1 oz oz 3472784 2010-04-20 18:16 aapt -rwxrwxrwx 1 oz oz 1050336 2010-04-20 18:16 aidl -rwxrwxrwx 1 oz oz 213698 2010-04-20 18:16 dexdump -rwxrwxrwx 1 oz oz 2497 2010-04-20 18:16 dx drwxr-xr-x 2 oz oz 4096 2010-04-20 18:16 lib -rw-r--r-- 1 oz oz 10800 2010-04-20 18:16 NOTICE.txt oz@Ivory-Coast:~/android-sdk/platforms/android-7/tools$ ./aapt bash: ./aapt: No such file or directory oz@Ivory-Coast:~/android-sdk/platforms/android-7/tools$ Googling for this error turns up a few other people having this same issue (ht tp://www.mentby.com/erisa/aapt-not-found.html, ht tp://www.helloandroid.com/content/file-not-found-hello-world-application) both with no responses.

    Read the article

  • Websphere logs report {0} File not found, but application continues to work without issues

    - by Eric
    A websphere 6.1 server is running a struts application that seems to be working fine. In the logs, however, I'm seeing the following error message, which is being continually emailed to the support staff. com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.webapp.WebAppErrorReport: SRVE0190E: File not found: {0} at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.webapp.WebAppDispatcherContext.sendError(WebAppDispatcherContext.java:536) at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.srt.SRTServletResponse.sendError(SRTServletResponse.java:930) at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.extension.DefaultExtensionProcessor.handleRequest(DefaultExtensionProcessor.java:524) at com.ibm.ws.wswebcontainer.extension.DefaultExtensionProcessor.handleRequest(DefaultExtensionProcessor.java:111) at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.webapp.WebApp.handleRequest(WebApp.java:3129) at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.webapp.WebGroup.handleRequest(WebGroup.java:238) at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.WebContainer.handleRequest(WebContainer.java:811) at com.ibm.ws.wswebcontainer.WebContainer.handleRequest(WebContainer.java:1433) at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.channel.WCChannelLink.ready(WCChannelLink.java:93) I can narrow down the issue to a single Action and JSP, which are too big to show here, but here's the action definition in struts-config.xml: <action path="/HappyDefaultThing" name="HappyDefaultThingActionForm" type="com.foo.webadministration.action.HappyDefaultThingAction" validate="true" input="/WaAssignDefaultHappyThing.jsp" scope="session"> <forward name="success" path="/WaAssignDefaultHappyThing.jsp"/> <forward name="failure" path="/WaAssignDefaultHappyThing.jsp"/> </action> As far as I can see, nothing is missing, and everything necessary is being found, but the logs say "File not found: {0}" What is "{0}"?? The stack trace only shows IBMs code, which I can't see the source of, and therefore can't trace. Is this a bug in the websphere code? I'd appreciate any help.

    Read the article

  • Cannot update, apt-get cannot fetch index files

    - by Evan
    I have a fresh install of Ubuntu 11.10 from the iso 'ubuntu-11.10-desktop-amd64.iso'. I installed this in VMWare Fusion 4.1.1 running on OSX 10.7.3. When setting up the VM, I allowed easy install to take care of creating my user and installing VMWare tools. No problems during installation, everything seems to be working great. The problem is that apt-get will NOT update, so I can't do software updates or install any software with apt-get install. I have been searching high and low, and have found several threads covering similar issues. How to fix a ruined package catalog? is one, Update manager generates 404 error while attempting update. Will not update is another, Ubuntu 11.10 Update issue (failed to fetch...) is a third I have tried changing my software source download location to "Main Server" rather than "Server for United States", to no avail. Same errors. Tried sudo apt-get clean, sudo apt-get autoclean, Have done a sudo rm /var/lib/apt/lists/*, still having the exact same problem. As I said, this is a brand new installation as of yesterday evening. Since I know it will be needed, here is my output from a sudo apt-get update: evan@ubuntu:~$ sudo apt-get update Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric InRelease Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates InRelease Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports InRelease Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security InRelease Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric Release.gpg Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates Release.gpg Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports Release.gpg Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security Release.gpg Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric Release Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates Release Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports Release Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security Release Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/main TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/restricted TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/universe TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/main TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/restricted TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/universe TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/main TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/restricted TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/universe TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/restricted TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe TranslationIndex Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/main Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/restricted Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/universe Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/multiverse Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/main amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/restricted amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/universe amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/multiverse amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/main i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/restricted i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/universe i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/multiverse i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/main Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/restricted Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/universe Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/multiverse Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/main amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/restricted amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/universe amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/multiverse amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/main i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/restricted i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/universe i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/multiverse i386 Packages 404 Not Found Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com oneiric InRelease Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/main Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/restricted Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/universe Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/multiverse Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/main amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/restricted amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/universe amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/multiverse amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/main i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/restricted i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/universe i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/multiverse i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/restricted Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/multiverse Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/restricted amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/multiverse amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/restricted i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/multiverse i386 Packages 404 Not Found Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/main Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/main Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/multiverse Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/restricted Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/universe Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/universe Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/main Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/main Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/multiverse Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/restricted Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/universe Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/universe Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/main Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/main Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/multiverse Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/restricted Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/universe Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/universe Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/multiverse Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/restricted Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe Translation-en Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com oneiric Release.gpg Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com oneiric Release Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com oneiric/main Sources Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com oneiric/main amd64 Packages Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com oneiric/main i386 Packages Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com oneiric/main TranslationIndex Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com oneiric/main Translation-en_US Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com oneiric/main Translation-en W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric/main/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric/restricted/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric/universe/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric/multiverse/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric/restricted/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric/universe/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric/multiverse/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric/restricted/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric/universe/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric/multiverse/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-updates/main/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-updates/restricted/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-updates/universe/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-updates/multiverse/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-updates/restricted/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-updates/universe/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-updates/multiverse/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-updates/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-updates/restricted/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-updates/universe/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-updates/multiverse/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-backports/main/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-backports/restricted/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-backports/universe/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-backports/multiverse/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-backports/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-backports/restricted/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-backports/universe/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-backports/multiverse/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-backports/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-backports/restricted/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-backports/universe/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-backports/multiverse/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/main/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/restricted/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/universe/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/multiverse/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/restricted/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/universe/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/multiverse/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/restricted/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/universe/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/multiverse/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead. Here is my /etc/apt/source.list: evan@ubuntu:~$ cat /etc/apt/sources.list # deb cdrom:[Ubuntu 11.10 _Oneiric Ocelot_ - Release amd64 (20111012)]/ dists/oneiric/main/binary-i386/ # deb cdrom:[Ubuntu 11.10 _Oneiric Ocelot_ - Release amd64 (20111012)]/ oneiric main restricted # See http://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes for how to upgrade to # newer versions of the distribution. deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric main restricted deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric main restricted ## Major bug fix updates produced after the final release of the ## distribution. deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-updates main restricted deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-updates main restricted ## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu ## team. Also, please note that software in universe WILL NOT receive any ## review or updates from the Ubuntu security team. deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric universe deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric universe deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-updates universe deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-updates universe ## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu ## team, and may not be under a free licence. Please satisfy yourself as to ## your rights to use the software. Also, please note that software in ## multiverse WILL NOT receive any review or updates from the Ubuntu ## security team. deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric multiverse deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric multiverse deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-updates multiverse deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-updates multiverse ## N.B. software from this repository may not have been tested as ## extensively as that contained in the main release, although it includes ## newer versions of some applications which may provide useful features. ## Also, please note that software in backports WILL NOT receive any review ## or updates from the Ubuntu security team. deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-backports main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-backports main restricted universe multiverse deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-security main restricted deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-security main restricted deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-security universe deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-security universe deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-security multiverse deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-security multiverse ## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from Canonical's ## 'partner' repository. ## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by Canonical and the ## respective vendors as a service to Ubuntu users. # deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu oneiric partner # deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu oneiric partner ## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by third-party ## developers who want to ship their latest software. deb http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric main deb-src http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric main And here is my output from lsb_release -a: evan@ubuntu:~$ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 11.10 Release: 11.10 Codename: oneiric If anyone could help me out here, that would be wonderful!

    Read the article

  • Ubuntu 10.10 not recognizing external hard drive

    - by sr71
    Installed Ubuntu 10.10 on a hard drive by itself (no windows). All updates are up to date. Everything`works fine except when I plug in a 320 gig Toshiba external hard drive....it is not recognized. When I plug in an 8 gig flash drive it is recognized no problem. What do I mean by "not recognized"? I mean: how do you know it was not recognized. You can check the command "cat /proc/partitions" in a terminal with and without the hdd attached. If you see some difference, it's ok. If the difference is something like "sda1" (sd+letter+number) then you have partition on it, maybe it can't be handled in Ubuntu (no filesystem on it or so). If there is only "sda" in the difference for example (sd+letter, but no number after it) then the drive itself is detected, just no partition is created on it. Also you can check out the messages of the kernel, with the "dmesg" command in the terminal. If there is no disk/partition/anything in /proc/partitions, there can be an USB level problem, you can issue command "lsusb" as it was suggested before my answer. It's really matter of what do you mean about "not recognized". @Marco Ceppi @Oli @Pitto By "not recognized" I meant that when I plug in a 8 gig flash drive an icon immediately appears on the desktop imdicating that there is a flash drive plugged in and I can click on it and view the files on the flash drive. It also shows up on the "Nautilus" default file manager. When I plug in the 320 gig Toshiba external hard drive, I get no indication on the desktop or the file manager (thus "not recogized"). When I run the command "cat/proc/partitions/" I get an error message Could not open location 'file:///home/bob/cat/proc/partitions' with or without the external hard drive installed. With the "dmeg" command I get about 10 pages of info with no mention of disk/partition/anything in /proc/partitions. When I run "lsub" command I get the following: bob@bob-desktop:~$ lsusb Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 003 Device 003: ID 04b3:3003 IBM Corp. Rapid Access III Keyboard Bus 003 Device 002: ID 04b3:3004 IBM Corp. Media Access Pro Keyboard Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub bob@bob-desktop:~$

    Read the article

  • not getting updates

    - by gknarayana
    when i check for updates the message is "W:Failed to fetch cdrom://Ubuntu 12.04 LTS _Precise Pangolin_ - Release i386 (20120423)/dists/precise/main/binary-i386/Packages Please use apt-cdrom to make this CD-ROM recognized by APT. apt-get update cannot be used to add new CD-ROMs , W:Failed to fetch cdrom://Ubuntu 12.04 LTS _Precise Pangolin_ - Release i386 (20120423)/dists/precise/restricted/binary-i386/Packages Please use apt-cdrom to make this CD-ROM recognized by APT. apt-get update cannot be used to add new CD-ROMs , W:Failed to fetch cdrom://Ubuntu 11.10 _Oneiric Ocelot_ - Release i386 (20111012)/dists/oneiric/main/binary-i386/Packages Please use apt-cdrom to make this CD-ROM recognized by APT. apt-get update cannot be used to add new CD-ROMs , W:Failed to fetch cdrom://Ubuntu 11.10 _Oneiric Ocelot_ - Release i386 (20111012)/dists/oneiric/restricted/binary-i386/Packages Please use apt-cdrom to make this CD-ROM recognized by APT. apt-get update cannot be used to add new CD-ROMs , E:Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead." please suggest what i should do

    Read the article

  • The multi-part identifier could not be bound

    - by jello
    I have this very simple sql statement: SELECT max_dose FROM psychotropes WHERE (patient_meds.psychotrope = psychotrope_name) AND (patient_meds.patient_id = 12) when I try to run it in Visual Studio 2008, it tells me "The multi-part 'patient_meds.psychotrope' identifier could not be bound" it's weird, because I did set a relationship between the two tables in the diagram viewer

    Read the article

  • NSURLConnectionDelegate connection:didReceiveData not working

    - by Shibin Moideen
    Hi All, I need some help regarding the NSURLConnectionDelegate method. - (void)startDownload { NSString *URLString = [NSString stringWithFormat:appRecord.imageURLString]; NSURL *url = [NSURL URLWithString:URLString]; NSURLRequest *request = [NSURLRequest requestWithURL:url]; imageConnection = [[NSURLConnection alloc] initWithRequest:request delegate:self]; if(imageConnection) { activeDownload = [NSMutableData data]; } } I am using this method to initiate the NSURLConnection, but the - (void)connection:(NSURLConnection *)connection didReceiveData:(NSData *)data is not calling.. Need Help Thanks in advance, Shibin

    Read the article

  • error : [0.8879153] kernel panic -not syncing VFS unable to mount fs unknow block (8.3)

    - by Fiasco
    hello i installed ubuntu using wubit inside the windows and started working on it then i got this error afer updating [0.8879153] kernel panic -not syncing VFS unable to mount fs unknow block (8.3) and i can't user rescue mode and it's give me another error no filesystem could mount root ..... i looked at grub folder and didn' find any file on disks/boot/grub/ so i tryed to user super grub to fix it but it didn' work and it keep giving me. any idea plz .

    Read the article

  • "Format is not recognized" error while trying to sign xap-file with signtool

    - by Eugene Larchick
    Hi, I am trying to follow this tutotial: http://channel9.msdn.com/learn/courses/Silverlight4/Overview/Overview/Moving-Beyond-the-Browser--Elevated-Trust-Applications/#_Toc256192962 in order to sign my silverlight application. But on the last step which is something like that: signtool sign /v /f c:\Demo\TestOOBCodeSigningCA.pfx /p password c:\Demo\SilverlightApplication2\SilverlightApplication2.Web\ClientBin\SilverlightApplication2.xap I got the following error: SignTool Error: This file format cannot be signed because it is not recognized SignTool Error: An error occured while attempting to sign: c:\Demo\SilverlightApplication2\SilverlightApplication2.Web\ClientBin\SilverlightApplication2.xap What can be the reason?

    Read the article

  • Is there a recognized Deployment Process?

    - by Steve Griff
    Hello there, We have a decent deployment process for our web sites utilized in our company that works pretty well. I was wondering, is there a recognized, standard for deploying? Or is it a case of everyone having their own kind of deployment process that is built from their own experience and how the coding architecture is managed? Regards, Steve Griff

    Read the article

  • Fluent Nhibernate Automap convention for not-null field

    - by user215015
    Hi, Could some one help, how would I instruct automap to have not-null for a cloumn? public class Paper : Entity { public Paper() { } [DomainSignature] [NotNull, NotEmpty] public virtual string ReferenceNumber { get; set; } [NotNull] public virtual Int32 SessionWeek { get; set; } } But I am getting the following: <column name="SessionWeek"/> I know it can be done using fluent-map. but i would like to know it in auto-mapping way. Many thanks. Regards Robie

    Read the article

  • Error processing Spree sample images - file not recognized by identify command in paperclip geometry.rb:29

    - by purpletonic
    I'm getting an error when I run the Spree sample data. It occurs when Spree tries to load in the product data, specifically the product images. Here's the error I'm getting: * Execute db:load_file loading ruby <GEM DIR>/sample/lib/tasks/../../db/sample/spree/products.rb -- Processing image: ror_tote.jpeg rake aborted! /var/folders/91/63kgbtds2czgp0skw3f8190r0000gn/T/ror_tote.jpeg20121007-21549-2rktq1 is not recognized by the 'identify' command. <GEM DIR>/paperclip-2.7.1/lib/paperclip/geometry.rb:31:in `from_file' <GEM DIR>/spree/core/app/models/spree/image.rb:35:in `find_dimensions' I've made sure ImageMagick is installed correctly, as previously I was having problems with it. Here's the output I'm getting when running the identify command directly. $ identify Version: ImageMagick 6.7.7-6 2012-10-06 Q16 http://www.imagemagick.org Copyright: Copyright (C) 1999-2012 ImageMagick Studio LLC Features: OpenCL ... other usage info omitted ... I also used pry with the pry-debugger and put a breakpoint in geometry.rb inside of Paperclip. Here's what that section of geometry.rb looks like: # Uses ImageMagick to determing the dimensions of a file, passed in as either a # File or path. # NOTE: (race cond) Do not reassign the 'file' variable inside this method as it is likely to be # a Tempfile object, which would be eligible for file deletion when no longer referenced. def self.from_file file file_path = file.respond_to?(:path) ? file.path : file raise(Errors::NotIdentifiedByImageMagickError.new("Cannot find the geometry of a file with a blank name")) if file_path.blank? geometry = begin silence_stream(STDERR) do binding.pry Paperclip.run("identify", "-format %wx%h :file", :file => "#{file_path}[0]") end rescue Cocaine::ExitStatusError "" rescue Cocaine::CommandNotFoundError => e raise Errors::CommandNotFoundError.new("Could not run the `identify` command. Please install ImageMagick.") end parse(geometry) || raise(Errors::NotIdentifiedByImageMagickError.new("#{file_path} is not recognized by the 'identify' command.")) end At the point of my binding.pry statement, the file_path variable is set to the following: file_path => "/var/folders/91/63kgbtds2czgp0skw3f8190r0000gn/T/ror_tote.jpeg20121007-22732-1ctl1g1" I've also double checked that this exists, by opening my finder in this directory, and opened it with preview app; and also that the program can run identify by running %x{identify} in pry, and I receive the same version Version: ImageMagick 6.7.7-6 2012-10-06 Q16 as before. Removing the additional digits (is this a timestamp?) after the file extension and running the Paperclip.run command manually in Pry gives me a different error: Cocaine::ExitStatusError: Command 'identify -format %wx%h :file' returned 1. Expected 0 I've also tried manually updating the Paperclip gem in Spree to 3.0.2 and still get the same error. So, I'm not really sure what else to try. Is there still something incorrect with my ImageMagick setup?

    Read the article

  • Custom HTMLControl derived from HtmlImage control not visible in VS2008 toolbox

    - by Tinvan
    I have a custom control deriving from HtmlImage control which I cant get to show up on toolbox, it says "There are no components in '...\bin\Debug\ImageCustomControl.dll' that can be placed on the toolbox.". Here is the code for the control: namespace ImageCustomControl { public class ImageHtmlControl : HtmlImage { public override void RenderControl(HtmlTextWriter writer) { this.Src = "https://somedomain.com" + this.Src; base.RenderControl(writer); } } } Here is a post back from 2003 that says its not possible, but just wanted to know if it has changed since: http://www.microsoft.com/mspress/books/sampchap/5728d.aspx Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  | Next Page >