Search Results

Search found 17138 results on 686 pages for 'facebook actionscript api'.

Page 83/686 | < Previous Page | 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90  | Next Page >

  • WPF / Silverlight - Mapping API

    - by Travis
    I am about to start on a project where I need to display maps with cross streets and possibly directions. I know there are a lot of API for the web, but I was wondering what the best solution is for a desktop application. I know of Bing Maps and I believe there are some Google Maps solutions out there as well. Any help or information on good mapping API's would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • .NET Reflection Helper API?

    - by Paul Kohler
    When using reflection we typically just was the basic System.Reflection API but I am wondering if anyone know of a nice "wrapper" layer or API that has a more "schema style" approach? (e.g. kind of like a code generators DB schema view)

    Read the article

  • Right way to access the Google Cloud Storage bucket via Public API

    - by SyBer
    I'm trying the following request to access the bucket by using curl, via the public API: curl -X POST -H 'Content-Type: image/jpeg' -d @xxx.jpeg 'https://www.googleapis.com/upload/storage/v1/b/clips.eyecam.com/o?uploadType=media&name=x.jpeg&key=XXX' With XXX being the generated key in the Public API. However I'm getting an authorization failure: { "error": { "errors": [ { "domain": "global", "reason": "required", "message": "Login Required", "locationType": "header", "location": "Authorization" } ], "code": 401, "message": "Login Required" } } Seems the request is incorrect and does not pass the authorization key, any idea what would be the right form of the request?

    Read the article

  • Private API and SMS content URI's on Android

    - by Shadow
    Without accessing private API's to get Content URI's, etc. for SMS, how are we expected to query this data? I am currently in the process of writing my own SMS app and I want to stay as compatible as possible. Without storing the information myself in my own database (such that I can store the text messages so that other programs can access the data when/if they delete my app) and without using private API's how the heck are we suppose to query SMS data?

    Read the article

  • Google Maps API v3 show local businesses/points of interest

    - by julio
    I know at some point I'd come across a Google service built into their API that would provide local information as markers on the viewport (schools, hospitals, etc.)-- I believe this was a simple control that could be added just like the normal map controls, to allow users to turn it on or off with a checkbox or button. I can't seem to find this feature documented anywhere in the v3.0 API docs. Can anyone provide some information on this, or let me know if it was deprecated? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Can you call FB.login inside a callback from other FB methods (like FB.getLoginStatus) without triggering popup blockers?

    - by Erik Kallevig
    I'm trying to set up a pretty basic authentication logic flow with the FB JavaScript SDK to check a user's logged-in status and permissions before performing an action (and prompting the user to login with permissions if they are not)... User types a message into a textarea on my site to post to their Facebook feed and click's a 'post to facebook' button on my site. In response to the click, I check user's logged in status with FB.getLoginStatus In the callback to FB.getLoginStatus, if user is not logged in, prompt them to login (FB.login). In the callback to FB.login I then need to make sure they have the right permissions so I make a call to FB.api('/me/permissions') -- if they don't , I again prompt them to login (FB.login) The problem I'm running into is that anytime I try to call FB.login inside a callback to other FB methods, the browser seems to lose track of the origin of execution (the click) and thus will block the popup. I'm wondering if I'm missing some way to prompt the user to login after checking their status without the browser mistakenly thinking that it's not a user-initiated popup? I've currently fallen back to just calling FB.login() first regardless. The undesired side effect of this approach, however, is that if the user is already logged-in with permissions and I'm still calling FB.login, the auth popup will open and close immediately before continuing, which looks rather buggy despite being functional. It seems like checking a user's login status and permissions before doing something would be a common flow so I feel like I'm missing something. Here's some example code. <div onclick="onClickPostBtn()">Post to Facebook</div> <script> // Callback to click on Post button. function onClickPostBtn() { // Check if logged in, prompt to do so if not. FB.getLoginStatus(function(response) { if (response.status === 'connected') { checkPermissions(response.authResponse.accessToken); } else { FB.login(function(){}, {scope: 'publish_stream'}) } }); } // Logged in, check permissions. function checkPermissions(accessToken) { FB.api('/me/permissions', {'access_token': accessToken}, function(response){ // Logged in and authorized for this site. if (response.data && response.data.length) { // Parse response object to check for permission here... if (hasPermission) { // Logged in with permission, perform some action. } else { // Logged in without proper permission, request login with permissions. FB.login(function(){}, {scope: 'publish_stream'}) } // Logged in to FB but not authorized for this site. } else { FB.login(function(){}, {scope: 'publish_stream'}) } } ); } </script>

    Read the article

  • WURFL's New API Question

    - by silent
    Hi all, I have a simple stupid question. Here's the problem, for years, my company has been using the old WURFL PHP API. Now, with the release of the new WURFL PHP API that promises a better performance, we want to use it. What I want to ask is, how do I update the cache? Can I use the old *update_cache.php*?

    Read the article

  • How do I change the name of an application tab?

    - by Tom Rom
    I'm working on a facebook page for a client and with the new profiles pages starting to roll out I've come across an issue with the name of the app I created. The original profiles which most of you will see here - http://www.facebook.com/DrMartyBecker says "Welcome" as the tab name. On the new profile pages the tab says 'drMARTY', I can't find the place where I can modify the name. So i was wondering if there was a way to change this and where. Thanks for the help!

    Read the article

  • Slideshare , API feed for javascript , jquery ...

    - by Alexander Corotchi
    Hi everybody, Can you help me with some information, to make it faster ? Can I use API feed from slideshare with JavaScript (jquery) ? Here, http://www.slideshare.net/developers/documentation I see just "Response XML Format" don't see any Json Response. Can somebody help me with that, some helpful links, or some suggestions, how can I use "Slideshare" API feeds with JavaScript. Thanks A lot !!!!!

    Read the article

  • echoing our parts of an Array?

    - by Wes
    I have the following array that I get as an output from facebook: http://www.paste.to/v/1jntlnml With the following code: $stream = $facebook->api_client->stream_get('',128342905144,'0','0',30,'','','',''); foreach($stream as $wallpost) { echo '<pre>'; print_r($wallpost); echo '</pre>'; } So I get the data that I need, but I want to call the individual variables within this array. For example, echo out the [message] for each post. Since it only loops once, I cant echo $wallpost['message'] or anything similar. any idea?

    Read the article

  • Why would a FaceBook application "work" on a profile, but not a page?

    - by edt
    I made a FaceBook application that works fine on profiles, but I can't figure out how to get it to show on a FaceBook page. For example, after I visit the application canvas URL, allow the application, then edit application settings and "add" to box and tab view... I cannot click the "plus" symbol to the left of the tabs in order to add a tab for the application. It does not appear in the list of available applications. Meanwhile, the application is working/showing up on profiles with no issues. I DID check the "Installable to Pages" checkbox on the application (authentication tab) settings. What could cause this? Here is the application canvas URL: http://apps.facebook.com/russian_girls/

    Read the article

  • vs2010 wpf c#: how to get friends list from facebook? (Desktop application)

    - by Ash
    As per this link code from stack overflow i have try this code for getting friendslist but after login i got this error "requires valid signature" string APIKey = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["API_Key"]; string APISecret = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["API_Secret"]; Facebook.Session.ConnectSession connectsession = new Facebook.Session.ConnectSession(APIKey, APISecret); Facebook.Rest.Api api = new Facebook.Rest.Api(connectsession); var friends = api.Friends.GetLists(); foreach (var friend in friends) { System.Console.WriteLine(friend.name); } guide me to find out the solution Thanks ash

    Read the article

  • SINGLE SIGN ON SECURITY THREAT! FACEBOOK access_token broadcast in the open/clear

    - by MOKANA
    Subsequent to my posting there was a remark made that this was not really a question but I thought I did indeed postulate one. So that there is no ambiquity here is the question with a lead in: Since there is no data sent from Facebook during the Canvas Load process that is not at some point divulged, including the access_token, session and other data that could uniquely identify a user, does any one see any other way other than adding one more layer, i.e., a password, sent over the wire via HTTPS along with the access_toekn, that will insure unique untampered with security by the user? Using Wireshark I captured the local broadcast while loading my Canvas Application page. I was hugely surprised to see the access_token broadcast in the open, viewable for any one to see. This access_token is appended to any https call to the Facebook OpenGraph API. Using facebook as a single click log on has now raised huge concerns for me. It is stored in a session object in memory and the cookie is cleared upon app termination and after reviewing the FB.Init calls I saw a lot of HTTPS calls so I assumed the access_token was always encrypted. But last night I saw in the status bar a call from what was simply an http call that included the App ID so I felt I should sniff the Application Canvas load sequence. Today I did sniff the broadcast and in the attached image you can see that there are http calls with the access_token being broadcast in the open and clear for anyone to gain access to. Am I missing something, is what I am seeing and my interpretation really correct. If any one can sniff and get the access_token they can theorically make calls to the Graph API via https, even though the call back would still need to be the site established in Facebook's application set up. But what is truly a security threat is anyone using the access_token for access to their own site. I do not see the value of a single sign on via Facebook if the only thing that was established as secure was the access_token - becuase for what I can see it clearly is not secure. Access tokens that never have an expire date do not change. Access_tokens are different for every user, to access to another site could be held tight to just a single user, but compromising even a single user's data is unacceptable. http://www.creatingstory.com/images/InTheOpen.png Went back and did more research on this: FINDINGS: Went back an re ran the canvas application to verify that it was not any of my code that was not broadcasting. In this call: HTTP GET /connect.php/en_US/js/CacheData HTTP/1.1 The USER ID is clearly visible in the cookie. So USER_ID's are fully visible, but they are already. Anyone can go to pretty much any ones page and hover over the image and see the USER ID. So no big threat. APP_ID are also easily obtainable - but . . . http://www.creatingstory.com/images/InTheOpen2.png The above file clearly shows the FULL ACCESS TOKEN clearly in the OPEN via a Facebook initiated call. Am I wrong. TELL ME I AM WRONG because I want to be wrong about this. I have since reset my app secret so I am showing the real sniff of the Canvas Page being loaded. Additional data 02/20/2011: @ifaour - I appreciate the time you took to compile your response. I am pretty familiar with the OAuth process and have a pretty solid understanding of the signed_request unpacking and utilization of the access_token. I perform a substantial amount of my processing on the server and my Facebook server side flows are all complete and function without any flaw that I know of. The application secret is secure and never passed to the front end application and is also changed regularly. I am being as fanatical about security as I can be, knowing there is so much I don’t know that could come back and bite me. Two huge access_token issues: The issues concern the possible utilization of the access_token from the USER AGENT (browser). During the FB.INIT() process of the Facebook JavaScript SDK, a cookie is created as well as an object in memory called a session object. This object, along with the cookie contain the access_token, session, a secret, and uid and status of the connection. The session object is structured such that is supports both the new OAuth and the legacy flows. With OAuth, the access_token and status are pretty much al that is used in the session object. The first issue is that the access_token is used to make HTTPS calls to the GRAPH API. If you had the access_token, you could do this from any browser: https://graph.facebook.com/220439?access_token=... and it will return a ton of information about the user. So any one with the access token can gain access to a Facebook account. You can also make additional calls to any info the user has granted access to the application tied to the access_token. At first I thought that a call into the GRAPH had to have a Callback to the URL established in the App Setup, but I tested it as mentioned below and it will return info back right into the browser. Adding that callback feature would be a good idea I think, tightens things up a bit. The second issue is utilization of some unique private secured data that identifies the user to the third party data base, i.e., like in my case, I would use a single sign on to populate user information into my database using this unique secured data item (i.e., access_token which contains the APP ID, the USER ID, and a hashed with secret sequence). None of this is a problem on the server side. You get a signed_request, you unpack it with secret, make HTTPS calls, get HTTPS responses back. When a user has information entered via the USER AGENT(browser) that must be stored via a POST, this unique secured data element would be sent via HTTPS such that they are validated prior to data base insertion. However, If there is NO secured piece of unique data that is supplied via the single sign on process, then there is no way to guarantee unauthorized access. The access_token is the one piece of data that is utilized by Facebook to make the HTTPS calls into the GRAPH API. it is considered unique in regards to BOTH the USER and the APPLICATION and is initially secure via the signed_request packaging. If however, it is subsequently transmitted in the clear and if I can sniff the wire and obtain the access_token, then I can pretend to be the application and gain the information they have authorized the application to see. I tried the above example from a Safari and IE browser and it returned all of my information to me in the browser. In conclusion, the access_token is part of the signed_request and that is how the application initially obtains it. After OAuth authentication and authorization, i.e., the USER has logged into Facebook and then runs your app, the access_token is stored as mentioned above and I have sniffed it such that I see it stored in a Cookie that is transmitted over the wire, resulting in there being NO UNIQUE SECURED IDENTIFIABLE piece of information that can be used to support interaction with the database, or in other words, unless there were one more piece of secure data sent along with the access_token to my database, i.e., a password, I would not be able to discern if it is a legitimate call. Luckily I utilized secure AJAX via POST and the call has to come from the same domain, but I am sure there is a way to hijack that. I am totally open to any ideas on this topic on how to uniquely identify my USERS other than adding another layer (password) via this single sign on process or if someone would just share with me that I read and analyzed my data incorrectly and that the access_token is always secure over the wire. Mahalo nui loa in advance.

    Read the article

  • Jangaroo 0.7.12, l'application Java qui compile l'Actionscript en JavaScript : une alternative à Flash Player

    Jangaroo 0.7.12, l'application Java qui compile l'Actionscript en JavaScript Une alternative à Flash Player Jangaroo est une suite d'outils incorporant un compilateur écrit en java permettant de faire tourner du code as3 dans un environnement Javascript 1.X plus précisement dans les naviguateurs récents. Jangaroo est un projet open sources sous Apache License, Version 2.0. Exemple d'application : version as3 :http://www.box2dflash.org/ version as3 complié en js : http://www.jangaroo.net/files/exa...

    Read the article

  • Facebook totalement hors-service cette nuit, un employé aurait dévoilé des prototypes par erreur

    Facebook totalement hors-service cette nuit, un employé aurait dévoilé des prototypes par erreur Hier soir (à partir de 22h15 heure française), Facebook a été hors service pendant près de 30 minutes. Le site n'a pourtant subi aucune attaque extérieure. En fait, il a été mis hors ligne par la firme elle-même. En cause ? Lors du passage au nouveau design des pages de marques (avec une galerie photo repensée et de nouvelles fonctionnalités de management des pages), un ingénieur de l'équipe de développement a également déployé certains prototypes internes. Ces brouillons de futurs produits de Facebook auraient dû rester secrets, et c'est pourquoi le site a été désactivé : le temps pour son staff de nettoyer...

    Read the article

  • Microsoft intègre Office à Facebook : une des nouveautés de ses Futur Social Experience Labs pour mi

    Microsoft intègre Office à Facebook Une des nouveautés de son Futur Social Experience Labs En ce moment se tient à San Francisco le salon du Web 2.0. A cette occasion, une représentante de Microsoft en a profité pour présenter deux nouveaux produits issus du Futur Social Experience Labs (alias le FUSE) de la société. La première réalisation du FUSE avait été l'intégration des Tweets dans les résultats de Bing. Cette foic-ci, le laboratoire de R&D propose un site (Docs.com) qui permet d'intégrer des documents de Microsoft Office dans Facebook. Plus précisément de permettre aux contacts Facebook d'accéder aux documents sur le modèle de la pièce joint...

    Read the article

  • Silverlight Client for Facebook updated for Silverlight 4 RC

    If you installed the Silverlight Client for Facebook, and also upgraded to the release candidate for Silverlight 4, you may have noticed it stopped working :-). NOTE: Applications compiled on Silverlight 4 beta will not work on machines with Silverlight RC runtime. This is known/expected. As with all pre-release software, this type of breaking can be expected. Weve recently updated the Facebook application, and you will have to re-install. Follow these steps: Uninstall the Silverlight Facebook...Did you know that DotNetSlackers also publishes .net articles written by top known .net Authors? We already have over 80 articles in several categories including Silverlight. Take a look: here.

    Read the article

  • Facebook est désormais valorisé à 50 milliards de dollars, et dépasse Yahoo, eBay et Time Warner

    Facebook est désormais valorisé à 50 milliards de dollars, et dépasse Yahoo, eBay et Time Warner La valeur de Facebook vient de faire un grand bond en avant, malgré que la firme ne soit toujours pas présente en bourse du fait des réticences de son fondateur. En effet, la banque d'affaires Goldman Sachs vient d'investir 450 millions de dollars dans le site communautaire de Mark Zuckerberg. Mais ce n'est pas tout, le conglomérat russe Digital Sky Technologies a aussi apporté sa pierre à l'édifice en y injectant 50 millions de dollars. Deux opérations financières qui permettent à Facebook d'être désormais valorisé à hauteur de... 50 milliards de dollars ! L'entreprise ne cesse de croître, tout en s'appr...

    Read the article

  • Des applications fleurissent sur la toile pour gérer la confidentialité sur Facebook, afin de protég

    Mise à jour du 18.05.2010 par Katleen Des applications fleurissent sur la toile pour gérer la confidentialité sur Facebook, afin de protéger facilement ses données personnelles Avec de plus en plus de changements dans ses paramètres de confidentialité, Facebook devient un site Internet compliqué à paramétrer pour certains. En effet, le réseau social offre pas moins de 50 paramètres assortis à plus de 70 options, pour contrôler ce que le Net peut voir de vous... Pour preuve, ce graphique publié la semaine dernière par le New York Times illustrant toutes les configurations disponibles : [IMG]http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/images/newsgraphics/2010/0512-facebook/gif1.jpg[/IMG]...

    Read the article

  • ExcelBook Conceals Facebook Browsing in a Spreadsheet

    - by Jason Fitzpatrick
    If you can’t get enough of social media while you’re at work, ExcelBook hides your Facebook browsing inside a spreadsheet. It’s certainly not the way to win the employee of the month award, but if you’re looking for a subtle way to browse and update Facebook from your cube ExcelBook offers and Adobe Air-based Facebook interface that looks like a spreadsheet application. Hit up the link below to grab a copy. ExcelBook [BeStupidAtWork via Yahoo! News] HTG Explains: Photography with Film-Based CamerasHow to Clean Your Dirty Smartphone (Without Breaking Something)What is a Histogram, and How Can I Use it to Improve My Photos?

    Read the article

  • Securing Facebook

    - by Promather
    Probably like most of you, I am concerned about the privacy of Facebook. Some people suggested that I use the HTTPS address instead. Unfortunately, many links in the HTTPS page itself link back to HTTP. So I am wondering whether it is possible in Ubuntu to redirect any request to: http://www.facebook.com/ to https://www.facebook.com/ This way I feel safer. If you also know the solution for Windows, it might be great to share (probably as a comment to my question rather than answer, as this forum is supposed to be for Ubuntu) so that I can share it with friends.

    Read the article

  • Facebook corrige un bogue susceptible d'avoir provoqué une fuite de données de six millions d'utilisateurs

    Facebook corrige un bogue susceptible d'avoir provoqué une fuite de données de six millions d'utilisateursSi vous avez reçu ce weekend un courriel de la part de Facebook vous expliquant que votre compte a été compromis suite à un bogue, sachez que ce n'est pas un SPAM.En effet, vendredi dernier, Facebook a voulu jouer la carte de la transparence en annonçant dans un billet blog avoir été victime d'une panne logicielle qui a été à l'origine de la fuite de données de près de six millions d'utilisateurs. Download Your Information (DYI) est l'outil qui a provoqué le dysfonctionnement. Il est chargé de récupérer les adresses de courriel et numéros de téléphone des utilisateurs dans le cadre de la sécu...

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90  | Next Page >