Search Results

Search found 21317 results on 853 pages for 'key mapping'.

Page 86/853 | < Previous Page | 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93  | Next Page >

  • Emacs key binding in Eclipse IDE

    - by Peter Delaney
    Hello; I am an Emacs lover probably because I love the key binding and I am able to do things very quickly. I also use Eclipse IDE for my Java/Android/Python/ development because it is free, most of my peers use it, and it works. I find myself switching between emacs and Eclipse and the workflow just isn't great. What I would like to do is setup the key bindings in Eclipse so that they are like Emacs. Can someone suggest the best Eclipse plugin I could use for this. Or can anyone talk about how they've used Eclipse to be more Emacs like. Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • Linq : problem with primary key

    - by Nickson
    I get the following error message The table/view 'TABLE1' does not have a primary key defined and no valid primary key could be inferred. This table/view has been excluded. To use the entity you will need to review your schema, add the correct keys and uncomment it when I try to add a view to an Entity Data Model. For testing, I have created a very simple view and I still get the error. below is the view definition SELECT DISTINCT TOP (100) PERCENT MIN(id) AS Expr4, MIN(EmpNo) AS Expr1, MIN(Name) AS Expr2, MIN(Category) AS Expr3 FROM dbo.MYView1 GROUP BY id does any one know of a simple work around. I have looked at this thread http://stackoverflow.com/questions/745341/can-ms-sql-views-have-primary-and-foriegn-keys but in my scenario, what is recommended is not applicable. If I could only have the view added to the Model.

    Read the article

  • Need to add an array into another array at a specified key value

    - by sologhost
    Ok, I have an array like so, but it's not guaranteed to be laid out in this order all of the time... $array = array( 'sadness' => array( 'info' => 'some info', 'info2' => 'more info', 'value' => 'value', ), 'happiness' => array( 'info' => 'some info', 'info2' => 'more info', 'value' => 'the value', ), 'peace' => array( 'info' => 'some info', 'info2' => 'more info', 'value' => 'the value', ) ); Ok, and I'd like to throw in this array right after the happiness key is defined. I can't use the key of "peace" since it must go directly after happiness, and peace might not come after happiness as this array changes. So here's what I need to add after happiness... $another_array['love'] = array( 'info' => 'some info', 'info2' => 'more info', 'value' => 'the value of love' ); So the final output after it gets inputted directly after happiness should look like this: $array = array( 'sadness' => array( 'info' => 'some info', 'info2' => 'more info', 'value' => 'value', ), 'happiness' => array( 'info' => 'some info', 'info2' => 'more info', 'value' => 'the value', ), 'love' => array( 'info' => 'some info', 'info2' => 'more info', 'value' => 'the value of love', ), 'peace' => array( 'info' => 'some info', 'info2' => 'more info', 'value' => 'the value', ) ); Can someone please give me a hand with this. Using array_shift, array_pop, or array_merge doesn't help me at all, since these go at the beginning and at the end of the array. I need to place it directly after a KEY position within $array. Thanks :)

    Read the article

  • Good way to get the key of the highest value of a Dictionary in C#

    - by Arda Xi
    I'm trying to get the key of the maximum value in the Dictionary<double, string> results. This is what I have so far: double max = results.Max(kvp => kvp.Value); return results.Where(kvp => kvp.Value == max).Select(kvp => kvp.Key).First(); However, since this seems a little inefficient, I was wondering whether there was a better way to do this.

    Read the article

  • How to reserve a set of primary key identifiers for preloading bootstrap data

    - by Joshua
    We would like to reserve a set of primary key identifiers for all tables (e.g. 1-1000) so that we can bootstrap the system with pre-loaded system data. All our JPA entity classes have the following definition for the primary key. @Id @GeneratedValue(strategy = IDENTITY) @Column(name = "id", unique = true, nullable = false, insertable = false, updatable = false) private Integer id; is there a way to tell the database that increments should start happening from 1000 (i.e. customer specific data will start from 1000 onwards). We support (h2, mysql, postgres) in our environment and I would prefer a solution which can be driven via JPA and reverse engineering DDL tools from Hibernate. Let me know if this is the correct approach

    Read the article

  • Unique Key in MySql

    - by Vinodtiru
    I have a table with four Columns. Col1, Col2, Col3, and Col4. Col1, Col2, Col3 is string and Col4 is a integer primary key with Auto Increment. Now my requirement is to have unique combination of Col2 and Col3. I mean to say like. Insert into table(Col1,Col2,Col3) Values('val1','val2','val3'); Insert into table(Col1,Col2,Col3) Values('val4','val2','val3'); the second statement has to throw error as the same combination of 'val2','val3' is present in the table. But i cant make it as a primary key as i need a auto increment column and for that matter the col4 has to be primary. Please let me know a approach by which i can have both in my table. Any kind of help is appreciated. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How do you use the LINQ to SQL designer to generate accessor methods for subclasses?

    - by Pricey
    Above is the LINQ to SQL designer view for my data context. Below is the relevant code: public System.Data.Linq.Table<ActivityBase> ActivityBases { get { return this.GetTable<ActivityBase>(); } } ... [Table(Name="dbo.Activities")] [InheritanceMapping(Code="1", Type=typeof(ActivityBase), IsDefault=true)] [InheritanceMapping(Code="2", Type=typeof(Project))] [InheritanceMapping(Code="3", Type=typeof(ProjectActivity))] [InheritanceMapping(Code="5", Type=typeof(Task))] [InheritanceMapping(Code="4", Type=typeof(Activity))] public abstract partial class ActivityBase : INotifyPropertyChanging, INotifyPropertyChanged { ... Is there a way to generate accessor methods for the subclasses as shown in the inheritance mapping above (Project, Task, etc...) without doing it manually? I added them manually but then a change in the designer overwrites any manual changes. Am i doing this wrong? should I not be making accessors for the sub classes? filtering from ActivityBase seems worse to me. Thanks for any help on this.

    Read the article

  • NHibernate with nothing but stored procedures

    - by ChrisB2010
    I'd like to have NHibernate call a stored procedure when ISession.Get is called to fetch an entity by its key instead of using dynamic SQL. We have been using NHibernate and allowing it to generate our SQL for queries and inserts/updates/deletes, but now may have to deploy our application to an environment that requires us to use stored procedures for all database access. We can use sql-insert, sql-update, and sql-delete in our .hbm.xml mapping files for inserts/updates/deletes. Our hql and criteria queries will have to be replaced with stored procedure calls. However, I have not figured out how to force NHibernate to use a custom stored procedure to fetch an entity by its key. I still want to be able to call ISession.Get, as in: using (ISession session = MySessionFactory.OpenSession()) { return session.Get<Customer>(customerId); } and also lazy load objects, but I want NHibernate to call my "GetCustomerById" stored procedure instead of generating the dynamic SQL. Can this be done? Perhaps NHibernate is no longer a fit given this new environment we must support.

    Read the article

  • How to map IEnumerable<SelectListItem> to IList<> for ListBox

    - by Superhuman
    I have two classes. Class1 and Class2. public class Class1{ ... public virtual IList<Class2> Class2s{get;set;} ... } public class Class2{ ... public virtual IList<Class1> Class1s{get;set;} ... } The view contains <%=Html.ListBox("Class2s", ViewData.Model.Class2s.Select( x => new SelectListItem { Text = x.Name, Value = x.Id.ToString(), Selected = ViewData.Model.Class1.Class2s.Any(y => y.Id == x.Id) }) They have many to many mapping. I have a ListBox in Class1 view which displays Class2. How to map the output of the ListBox back to IList Class2s property of Class1? I am able to display the values in the ListBox but unable to map back the SelectListItem to IList.

    Read the article

  • Inflector::humanize($key) converts Date of joining TO Date Of Joining

    - by Aruna
    Hi, I have a Form and i am submitting them like using function submit($formid = null,$fillerid=null) { $this->data['Result']['form_id']=$formid; $this->data['Result']['submitter_id']=$fillerid; $this->data['Result']['submitter']=$this->Session->read('filler'); echo "submitter: ".$this->Session->read('filler'); $results=$this->Form->hasResults($this->data); //echo http_build_query($_POST); if(empty($results)){ foreach ($_POST as $key => $value): if(is_array($value)){ $value = implode('', $_POST[$key]); $this->data['Result']['value']=$value; } else{ $this->data['Result']['value']=$value; } $this->data['Result']['form_id']=$formid; $this->data['Result']['submitter_id']=$fillerid; $this->data['Result']['label']=Inflector::humanize($key); $this->data['Result']['submitter']=$this->Session->read('filler'); $this->Form->submitForm($this->data); endforeach; $this->Session->setFlash('Your entry has been submitted.'); } I am having A fORM LIKE <form method="post" action="/FormBuilder/index.php/forms/submit/1/4" id="ResultSubmit"> <div class="input text"><label for="1">Firstname</label><input type="text" value="" style="width: 300px;" id="1" name="Firstname"/></div> <br/> <div class="input text"><label for="2">Last Name</label><input type="text" value="" style="width: 300px;" id="2" name="Last Name"/></div> <br/> <div class="input text"><label for="3">Age</label><input type="text" value="" style="width: 200px;" id="3" name="Age"/></div> <br/> <center> <span id="errmsg3"/> </center> <div class="input textarea"><label for="4">Address</label><textarea style="height: 300px;" id="4" rows="6" cols="30" name="Address"/></div> <br/> <div class="input text"><label for="5">Date Of Joining</label><input type="text" value="" style="width: 300px;" id="5" name="Date of joining"/></div><br/> <div class="input text"><label for="6">Email - Id</label><input type="text" value="" style="width: 300px;" id="6" name="Email - id"/></div> <br/> <div class="input text"> <label for="7">Personal Number</label><input type="text" value="" maxlength="3" style="width: 30px;" id="7" name="Personal Number[]"/><input type="text" value="" style="width: 30px;" maxlength="3" id="7-1" name="Personal Number[]"/><input type="text" value="" style="width: 70px;" maxlength="4" id="7-2" name="Personal Number[]"/></div> <span id="errmsg7"/> <br/> <div class="input select"><label for="8">Gender</label><select id="8" name="Gender"> MaleFemale <div class="input text"><label for="9">Official Number</label><input type="text" value="" style="width: 200px;" id="9" name="Official Number"/></div><br/> <div class="input select"><label for="10">Experience</label><select id="10" name="Experience"> <option value="Fresher">Fresher</option><option yrs="" 5="" value="Below">Below 5 Yrs</option><option yrs="" 10="" value="Above">Above 10 yrs</option></select></div><br/> actually My input has the names as Firstname Last Name Age Address Date of joining Email - id Personal Number Gender Official Number But when i use Inflector::humanize($key) for saving the names which has white space characters they have converted into like Date Of Joining i.e.., O and J becomes Capital letters... But i need to save them as such as Date of joining.. How to do so???

    Read the article

  • Create automatically table that is composed by its primery key and 2 other foreign keys

    - by user210481
    I have table A with a primary id, a table B with a primary key id also and another table C with a primary key id and rows Aid and Bid where Aid and Bid are foreign keys of C and the primary keys of A and B respectively. One way of populating these DB would be populating table A, table B and table C separately. I would like to know if there is a more clever way of doing it, where I could populate A first and at the same time I populate B, I can indicate that an entry in C should be also created. Any idea and suggestion on how to populate them is welcome. I'm trying to take advantage of the foreign keys structure Thanks

    Read the article

  • Handling pointer while updating a key value in rpgle

    - by abhinav singh
    my code goes like this femp uf e k disk dvar1 s 5p 0 c *loval setll emp c read emp c dow not %eof(emp) C eval ecode = ecode + 10 c eval var1=ecode c update recemp c var1 setgt emp c read emp c enddo c eval *inlr=*on here is a file named emp with record format name recemp with ecode as the key ...now when i am reading the file and then updating the ecode without using setgt ..the pointer is not moving ahead it is updating the same ecode value many time ...now when i use set gt pointer picks the next record but it dint work when two ecode values are same ...else also it will not be working with descending key values...is there any solution so that i can set pointer regardless of the fact whether the values are same or ascending or descending .......thanks

    Read the article

  • There is no Key attribute in EF CTP 5

    - by Spence
    According to the blog post here Data Annotations in the Entity Framework there should be an attribute for a column called "Key" which allows you to mark the primary key of an entity. However I cannot locate this in .Net 3.5 or .Net 4.0. What have I missed? I've included the reference to EntityFramework.dll and I've checked all the attributes under System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations but I cannot locate it. I have set my project to .Net 4.0 full (not client profile). Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Interface builder problem: When hooking up an IBOutlet, getting "this class is not key value coding-

    - by Robert
    Here is what I do: 1) Create New UIViewController subclass , tick with NIB for interface builder 2) In the header: @interface QuizMainViewController : UIViewController { UILabel* aLabel; } @property (nonatomic, retain) IBOutlet UILabel* aLabel; @end 3) In the .m #import "QuizMainViewController.h" @implementation QuizMainViewController @synthesize aLabel; - (void)dealloc { [aLabel release]; [super dealloc]; } @end 4) Open the NIB In interface builder, drag a new UILabel into the view. I test the program here and it runs fine. 5) right click on file's owner, connect 'aLabel' from the Outlets to the UILabel. I run here and it crashes. Message from log: * Terminating app due to uncaught exception 'NSUnknownKeyException', reason: '[ setValue:forUndefinedKey:]: this class is not key value coding-compliant for the key aLabel.'

    Read the article

  • ManyToMany Relation does not create the primary key

    - by Javi
    Hello, I have a ManyToMany relationship between two classes: ClassA and ClassB, but when the table for this relationship (table called objectA_objectB) there is no primary key on it. In my ClassA I have the following: @ManyToMany(fetch=FetchType.LAZY) @OrderBy(value="name") @JoinTable(name="objectA_objectB", joinColumns= @JoinColumn(name="idObjectA", referencedColumnName="id"), inverseJoinColumns= @JoinColumn(name="idObjectB", referencedColumnName="id") ) private List<ClassB> objectsB; and in my ClassB I have the reversed relation @ManyToMany List<ClassA> objectsA; I just want to make a primary key of both id's but I need to change the name of the columns as I do. Why is the PK missing? How can I define it? I use JPA 2.0 Hibernate implementation, if this helps. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • code sign error : doesnt match key pair in default keychain

    - by abhiTouchmagic
    *Code Sign error: The identity 'iPhone Developer: XXXXXXXXXX' doesn't match any valid certificate/private key pair in the default keychain.* i am a member in developer profile... i am having theprovisioning profile... what must be the problem sir? Code Sign error: The identity 'iPhone Developer: BD9A19AA-EFEF-41CC-9560-2D97E157380C' doesn't match any valid certificate/private key pair in the default keychain what abt this? what am i supposed to do? i earched a lot but may be i am getting wrong somewhere? help me with this

    Read the article

  • What's the best way to authorize a USB Key

    - by ScottCate
    We have an auto update for our software that is installed via USB key (with the auto run). If I wanted to ensure that only authorized USB Keys were used, what's the best way? Our installer is already signed, and it won't run otherwise. But I'm more wanting to inspect the USB Key for a signed installer, and if it's not there, just ignore, or even "Eject" the USB device. And I should be able to tell the difference (in code) between a usb storage device, and say a camera, or keyboard. I'm only wanting to disable non-authorized storage devices. Thank you for your ideas.

    Read the article

  • Django models: Use multiple values as a key?

    - by Rosarch
    Here is a simple model: class TakingCourse(models.Model): course = models.ForeignKey(Course) term = models.ForeignKey(Term) Instead of Django creating a default primary key, I would like to use both course and term as the primary key - taken together, they uniquely identify a tuple. Is this allowed by Django? On a related note: I am trying to represent users taking courses in certain terms. Is there a better way to do this? class Course(models.Model): name = models.CharField(max_length=200) requiredFor = models.ManyToManyField(RequirementSubSet, blank=True) offeringSchool = models.ForeignKey(School) def __unicode__(self): return "%s at %s" % (self.name, self.offeringSchool) class MyUser(models.Model): user = models.ForeignKey(User, unique=True) takingReqSets = models.ManyToManyField(RequirementSet, blank=True) takingTerms = models.ManyToManyField(Term, blank=True) takingCourses = models.ManyToManyField(TakingCourse, blank=True) school = models.ForeignKey(School) class TakingCourse(models.Model): course = models.ForeignKey(Course) term = models.ForeignKey(Term) class Term(models.Model): school = models.ForeignKey(School) isPrimaryTerm = models.BooleanField()

    Read the article

  • Read nested Lua table who key is a System.Double

    - by Robert Kerr
    Using C# and LuaInterface, I am trying to read a nested table, but am getting a null LuaTable when I try to open the key containing the table. The .lua file: DB = { ["inventory"] = { [10001] = { ["row"] = 140, ["count"] = 20, }, [10021] = { ["row"] = 83, ["count"] = 3, }, [10075] = { ["row"] = 927, ["count"] = 15, }, } } I can successfully foreach the entries under inventory, by opening that table with: LuaTable tbl = lua.GetTable("DB.inventory"); foreach (DictionaryEntry de in tbl) ... What I cannot do is open an inventory item and enumerate its entries the same way. Is this because the key is a System.Double type? This fails: LuaTable tbl = lua.GetTable("DB.inventory.10001"); foreach (DictionaryEntry de in tbl) with an exception, because tbl is null. Effectively, once I enumerate the keys (inventory items), I then want to drill down into the nested table and work with those contents. As you can see, I am not able to get a reference to the nested table the way I am doing it.

    Read the article

  • Problem simulating a key press on Python for Symbian platform on a Nokia 5th ed phone

    - by abhishekbhardwaj007
    I am developing an app for Nokia 5800 Music Express (S60 5th edition) using PyS60 (Python for S60) ,I want to simulate a KeyPress say if a message comes,I detect a message and Press a Key. There does exist a Keypress module for PyS60 for 2nd edition phones which allows this. However I have not been able to install it on my 5th ed phone. Is this module portable? If yes then how do I install it (I get certificate error) and If no then any alternatives for simulating a key press on a 5th edition touch phone?

    Read the article

  • Tables with no Primary Key

    - by Matt Hamilton
    I have several tables whose only unique data is a uniqueidentifier (a Guid) column. Because guids are non-sequential (and they're client-side generated so I can't use newsequentialid()), I have made a non-primary, non-clustered index on this ID field rather than giving the tables a clustered primary key. I'm wondering what the performance implications are for this approach. I've seen some people suggest that tables should have an auto-incrementing ("identity") int as a clustered primary key even if it doesn't have any meaning, as it means that the database engine itself can use that value to quickly look up a row instead of having to use a bookmark. My database is merge-replicated across a bunch of servers, so I've shied away from identity int columns as they're a bit hairy to get right in replication. What are your thoughts? Should tables have primary keys? Or is it ok to not have any clustered indexes if there are no sensible columns to index that way?

    Read the article

  • NHibernate Unique Constraint on Name and Parent Object fails because NH inserts Null

    - by James
    Hi, I have an object as follows Public Class Bin Public Property Id As Integer Public Property Name As String Public Property Store As Store End Class Public Class Store Public Property Id As Integer Public Property Bins As IEnumerable(Of Bin) End Class I have a unique constraint in the database on Bin.Name and BinStoreID to ensure unique names within stores. However, when NHibernate persists the store, it first inserts the Bin records with a null StoreID before performing an update later to set the correct StoreID. This violates the Unique Key If I persist two stores with a Bin of the same name because The Name columns are the same and the StoreID is null for both. Is there something I can add to the mapping to ensure that the correct StoreID is included in the INSERT rather than performing an update later? We are using HiLo identity generation so we are not relying on DB generated identity columns Thanks James

    Read the article

  • PHP Associative Array Duplicate Key?

    - by Steven
    Hello, I have an associative array, however when I add values to it using the below function it seems to overwrite the same keys. Is there a way to have multiple of the same keys with different values? Or is there another form of array that has the same format? I want to have 42=56 42=86 42=97 51=64 51=52 etc etc function array_push_associative(&$arr) { $args = func_get_args(); foreach ($args as $arg) { if (is_array($arg)) { foreach ($arg as $key => $value) { $arr[$key] = $value; $ret++; } }else{ $arr[$arg] = ""; } } return $ret; }

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93  | Next Page >