Search Results

Search found 34060 results on 1363 pages for 'ubuntu font family'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 88/1363 | < Previous Page | 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95  | Next Page >

  • Rackspace Ubuntu 12.04 server stuck in initramfs after kernel upgrade

    - by Znarkus
    Can't boot after I did a aptitude full-upgrade and let it update menu.lst (did a diff first and it looked good). This is what I've done so far in the BusyBox shell: mkdir /tmp/xvda1 mount /dev/xvda1 /tmp/xvda1 chroot /dev/xvda1 nano /boot/grub/menu.lst This file looks like this: title Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS, kernel 3.2.0-31-virtual root(hd0,0) kernel /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-31-virtual root=UUID=/dev/xvda1 ro quiet splash initrd /boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-31-virtual title Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS, kernel 3.2.0-31-virtual (recovery mode) root(hd0,0) kernel /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-31-virtual root=UUID=/dev/xvda1 ro single initrd /boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-31-virtual titleUbuntu 12.04.1 LTS, kernel 3.2.0-24-virtual root(hd0,0) kernel/boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-24-virtual root=UUID=/dev/xvda1 ro quiet splash initrd/boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-24-virtual titleUbuntu 12.04.1 LTS, kernel 3.2.0-24-virtual (recovery mode) root(hd0,0) kernel/boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-24-virtual root=UUID=/dev/xvda1 ro single initrd/boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-24-virtual titleUbuntu 12.04.1 LTS, kernel 3.2.0-24-generic root(hd0,0) kernel/boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-24-generic root=UUID=/dev/xvda1 ro quiet splash initrd/boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-24-generic titleUbuntu 12.04.1 LTS, kernel 3.2.0-24-generic (recovery mode) root(hd0,0) kernel/boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-24-generic root=UUID=/dev/xvda1 ro single initrd/boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-24-generic titleChainload into GRUB 2 root(hd0,0) kernel/boot/grub/core.img titleUbuntu 12.04.1 LTS, memtest86+ root(hd0,0) kernel/boot/memtest86+.bin From what I remember, the upgrade added the UUID= string. Should I remove these? Or rather, how do I get my system back online again? Thanks. Update: Seems like I can't even edit the file. [ Error writing /boot/grub/menu.lst: Read-only file system ]

    Read the article

  • Ubuntu 12.04 Very slow especially with Android Studio

    - by Nada
    I have an old laptop with the following specification: Memory: 485 MiB, Processor: Genuine intel CPU T2300 @ 1.66 GHz ×2, OS Type: 32 bit, Disk: 78.1 GB, I installed on it Ubuntu 12.04 LTS and I noticed that the overall system is very slow in responding. I tried to search about that in the internet and I found some articles talking about how to make Ubuntu 12.04 LTS run fast I applied all what they said including download LXDE desktop environment and then nothing different in the system response time. Then I need to develop some android applications so, I download Android Studio (Beta) 0.8.6. The problem became worse than before whenever I tried to open the Android Studio the screen is frozen for some minutes then it took time to download the projects and initialize the work space also, when I tried to move the cursor he is move very slowly. When I tried to run my first application on the AVD it took three hours and still not run yet. I delete the Android Studio and install it again several times, I was trying to solve the problem but still nothing change. Please if you have any suggestions that may help me make my laptop and Android Studio work faster I will appreciate it for you. Thank you in advance.

    Read the article

  • RAID degraded on Ubuntu server

    - by reano
    We're having a very weird issue at work. Our Ubuntu server has 6 drives, set up with RAID1 as follows: /dev/md0, consisting of: /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb1 /dev/md1, consisting of: /dev/sda2 /dev/sdb2 /dev/md2, consisting of: /dev/sda3 /dev/sdb3 /dev/md3, consisting of: /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1 /dev/md4, consisting of: /dev/sde1 /dev/sdf1 As you can see, md0, md1 and md2 all use the same 2 drives (split into 3 partitions). I also have to note that this is done via ubuntu software raid, not hardware raid. Today, the /md0 RAID1 array shows as degraded - it is missing the /dev/sdb1 drive. But since /dev/sdb1 is only a partition (and /dev/sdb2 and /dev/sdb3 are working fine), it's obviously not the drive that's gone AWOL, it seems the partition itself is missing. How is that even possible? And what could we do to fix it? My output of cat /proc/mdstat: Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [raid10] md1 : active raid1 sda2[0] sdb2[1] 24006528 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU] md2 : active raid1 sda3[0] sdb3[1] 1441268544 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU] md0 : active raid1 sda1[0] 1464710976 blocks super 1.2 [2/1] [U_] md3 : active raid1 sdd1[1] sdc1[0] 2930133824 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU] md4 : active raid1 sdf2[1] sde2[0] 2929939264 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU] unused devices: <none> FYI: I tried the following: mdadm /dev/md0 --add /dev/sdb1 But got this error: mdadm: add new device failed for /dev/sdb1 as 2: Invalid argument Output of mdadm --detail /dev/md0 is: /dev/md0: Version : 1.2 Creation Time : Sat Dec 29 17:09:45 2012 Raid Level : raid1 Array Size : 1464710976 (1396.86 GiB 1499.86 GB) Used Dev Size : 1464710976 (1396.86 GiB 1499.86 GB) Raid Devices : 2 Total Devices : 1 Persistence : Superblock is persistent Update Time : Thu Nov 7 15:55:07 2013 State : clean, degraded Active Devices : 1 Working Devices : 1 Failed Devices : 0 Spare Devices : 0 Name : lia:0 (local to host lia) UUID : eb302d19:ff70c7bf:401d63af:ed042d59 Events : 26216 Number Major Minor RaidDevice State 0 8 1 0 active sync /dev/sda1 1 0 0 1 removed

    Read the article

  • How do i install apache on my ubuntu 12.04 where it has virtualhost

    - by YumYumYum
    According to the docs https://help.ubuntu.com/10.04/serverguide/httpd.html i have done following, and that is almost how i do always in my Fedora, but Ubuntu looks like its not working. a) DNS to IP $ echo "127.0.0.1 a" > /etc/hosts $ echo "127.0.0.1 b" > /etc/hosts b) Apache virtualhost $ ls 1 2 default default.backup default-ssl $ cat 1 <VirtualHost *:80> ServerName a ServerAlias a DocumentRoot /var/www/html/a/public <Directory /var/www/html/a/public> #AddDefaultCharset utf-8 DirectoryIndex index.php AllowOverride All Order allow,deny Allow from all </Directory> </VirtualHost> $ cat 2 <VirtualHost *:80> ServerName b ServerAlias b DocumentRoot /var/www/html/b/public <Directory /var/www/html/b/public> #AddDefaultCharset utf-8 DirectoryIndex index.php AllowOverride All Order allow,deny Allow from all </Directory> </VirtualHost> c) load into Apache and restart the service $ a2ensite 1 $ a2ensite 2 $ a2dissite default $ /etc/init.d/apache2 restart d) Browse the new 2 hosts $ firefox http://a Does not work it goes always with http://a or http://b to /var/www/html How do i fix it so that it goes to its own directory e.g: http://a goes to /var/www/html/a/public not /var/www/html?

    Read the article

  • Ubuntu Server Wireless connection issue - replaced router but kept ESSID

    - by Stevo
    I have a ubuntu server 12.04 which was connected to my wireless network with no problem I replaced the wireless router but kept the ESSID and password the same. All other devices on network have connected correctly. However the Ubuntu Server will not route correctly. It will connect to the wifi router, and get a dhcp served IP address, however it will not route anything. I cannot ping the router from the server. the contents of /etc/resolve.conf are updated with the information from the router, (the host name has been served) I know there is nothing wrong with the router or the server, or the wireless card etc. I'm assuming there's some cached setting that associates the old router with the ESSID and causing the issue. I've got a lot of other devices connected to the router, so don't want to change the name of the ESSID. How do I fix this? EDIT: outputs (abbreviated as I've got no cut and paste) netstat -rn: Kernel IP Routing table Dest Gate Gen Flags MSS Window irtt Iface 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0. UG 0 0 0 wlan0 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0. 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 wlan0

    Read the article

  • Getting dwl-g122 to work on ubuntu

    - by User1
    I have a USB WiFi adapter, D-Link dwl-g122. I'm running Ubuntu 10.4. My laptop has a built-in wireless card that is connecting fine to the router. I plug in the usb and it never really connects. Here are some details: iwconfig wlan1 IEEE 802.11bg ESSID:"\x0B\xE1..." Mode:Managed Frequency:2.457 GHz Access Point: Not-Associated Tx-Power=19 dBm Retry long limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off Power Management:on lshw -c network: *-network:1 description: Wireless interface physical id: 3 logical name: wlan1 serial: 00:13:46:8b:xx:xx capabilities: ethernet physical wireless configuration: broadcast=yes multicast=yes wireless=IEEE 802.11bg dmesg [ 1096.814176] wlan1: direct probe to AP xxx (try 1) [ 1096.820960] wlan1: direct probe responded [ 1096.820969] wlan1: authenticate with AP xxx (try 1) [ 1096.823790] wlan1: authenticated [ 1096.823869] wlan1: associate with AP xxx (try 1) [ 1096.827667] wlan1: RX AssocResp from xxx (capab=0x411 status=0 aid=1) [ 1096.827674] wlan1: associated [ 1142.590912] wlan1: deauthenticating from xxx by local choice (reason=3) lsmod|rt2 rt2500usb 19643 0 rt2x00usb 11260 1 rt2500usb rt2x00lib 32133 2 rt2500usb,rt2x00usb mac80211 238896 3 ath5k,rt2x00usb,rt2x00lib cfg80211 148725 4 ath5k,ath,rt2x00lib,mac80211 led_class 3764 3 ath5k,rt2x00lib,sdhci It looks like the driver loads but it doesn't feel like connecting. The behavior is identical even if I blacklist the other wifi card (using an ath5k driver). It's almost like it is using the wrong password or something. Does anyone know what is happening? Is anyone using Ubuntu successful?

    Read the article

  • Installing maven on Ubuntu by manual download

    - by WebDevHobo
    To install Maven, I downloaded the latest version from the website and then followed these steps: http://maven.apache.org/download.html#Installation The last step, the version control, does not work. It says that 'mvn' is currently not installed and that I should type sudo apt-get install maven2 If I go directly to the mvn file itself, it does work: root@ubuntu:~# /usr/local/apache-maven/apache-maven-2.2.1/bin/mvn --version Apache Maven 2.2.1 (r801777; 2009-08-06 12:16:01-0700) Java version: 1.6.0_21 Java home: /usr/java/jdk1.6.0_21/jre Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8 OS name: "linux" version: "2.6.32-25-generic" arch: "i386" Family: "unix" So, what am I doing wrong here? Or what would and apt-get install do extra that I might have forgotten?

    Read the article

  • VirtualBox with Ubuntu Server guest can't ping outside

    - by Danidan
    Here's my situation: an Ubuntu 12.04 Host running VirtualBox; two guest VMs running Ubuntu Server 12.04 home network, so my Host pc has a wireless connection to the router of my ISP. My problem is in one of the virtual machines: it has 3 NICs, one in NAT mode and the others in Host Only mode. My purpose is to use eth0 (NAT) for Internet access and eth1, eth2 (Host Only) for management of internal virtual network (eth1 uses a VBoxNet with this IP 192.168.69.254). Whenever I try to $ping 8.8.8.8 I get Destination Host Unreachable. While if I $ping 192.168.69.10, that is the IP of the other VM, it works. I can't also ping my Host nor my router My /etc/network/interfaces file is: auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto eth0 iface eth0 inet dhcp auto eth1 iface eth1 inet static address 192.168.69.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 auto eth2 iface ifconfig $IFACE 0.0.0.0 up up ip link set $IFACE promisc on down ip link set $IFASE promisc off down ifconfig $IFACE down $route -n returns: Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 0.0.0.0 10.0.2.2 0.0.0.0 UG 100 0 0 eth0 10.0.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 192.168.69.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 virbr0 Forgetting for now what eth2 needs to do and its setup, why I can't go outside the Host box? What can I do to help you helping me? :-)

    Read the article

  • Xamp on ubuntu serves php source for root url only

    - by mazaryk
    Hey, Okay, so installed xamp on my ubuntu machine, started it up and everything worked. Apache ran my php app just fine (including requests to the root url "/"). However, after the first reboot since installing, when I request "http://localhost/" apache serves up the index php page as a phtml source file. All other urls (like "http://localhost/login") work as expected. Backgound: The only modification I made to xamp was to setup a vhost for my app. The app uses an .htaccess file where I define some rewrite rules (the app is an MVC framework and all urls are rewritten to a single entry point php file). I'm using Xamp because I need php = 5.3.0. I know apache will serve up the source of a php file when it doesn't know to process php files. But the config does indeed have "AddType application/x-httpd-php .php" and as I said, the app works for all urls except the root "/" (and only since I've rebooted). The .htaccess file does contain a DirectoryIndex directive. xamp 1.3.7a Ubuntu 9.10 Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Ubuntu 12.04 can't boot after installing with software RAID 1

    - by Bill
    I've been trying to install Ubuntu with software RAID on my server and there is obviously something that I don't understand about the process. This is the guide that I followed: https://help.ubuntu.com/11.04/serverguide/advanced-installation.html I have two identical 1 TB disks in my server. I went through the initial install process and manually set up my partitions. On each disk I set up: (1) 100 MB partition for EFI boot (I didn't originally have this but added it based on a forum post I found after my original install failed to boot, I ended up with EFIboot since that was what the 'guided partitioning' decided to do) (1) 970 MB partition for / (1) 30 MB partition for swap I then created new RAID 1 disks combining the two partitions, one from each disk, such that each partition is mirrored. I then configured their usage as stated above. After saving the configuration I said yes to boot in a degraded state. The rest of the setup went normally, no errors of any kind. I saw GRUB being installed and again no errors. However, after rebooting the server I get the dreaded 'Insert boot media' and nothing happens. I loaded up the recovery disk and the mdadm configuration looks correct. md0 is my EFIBoot partition md1 is my \ partition using ext4 md2 is my swap partition Running file -s /dev/md0 doesn't indicate that GRUB is there and so I attempted to reinstall GRUB using the recovery disk. I selected the md0 disk and it appeared to install just fine. Running file -s /dev/md1 shows the error needs journal recovery, I'm not sure if that's related or not or how to fix that. Rebooting gives me the same problem, no boot media found. I've searched around the internet but can't figure out what to do next or more importantly how to troubleshoot what exactly is going wrong. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Ubuntu server 10.04 disconnects after short periods of inactivity on my site

    - by user57019
    I'm new to Ubuntu (installed it for the first time just a couple of days ago on my server). I've Ubuntu Server 10.04 and am just using the terminal, no GUI like Gnome. So far it's working pretty great except for one big thing. Whenever I go to sleep and there's no activity on my server (it's not a big site so active users drop to 0 during the night), the server kind of disconnects. The only thing that can bring the site back online is to restart the whole server. I've tried disabling powersaving by using setterm but that changes nothing. Even if I wake up the server by pressing any key or so the site wont go back online! I've tried just restarting both Apache and MySQL (I'm using LAMP-server btw) but not even that works. But as soon as I turn the power off and on at the server, everythings work like normal for a couple of minutes of inactivity (~5-15 minutes I'd guess) and then it's down again unless someone logs in to the site and is active. I was previously using XAMPP on my laptop with Windows XP and that worked 24/7 so I don't think it's anything with my router or ISP. This is driving me crazy! My site is down all the time I'm in school as I have no possibility to restart the server if it becomes offline. Does anyone have a clue to what could be wrong?

    Read the article

  • Ubuntu server 10.04 disconnects after short periods of inactivity on my site

    - by Melot
    Hi! I'm new to Ubuntu (installed it for the first time just a couple of days ago on my server). I've Ubuntu Server 10.04 and am just using the terminal, no GUI like Gnome. So far it's working pretty great except for one big thing. Whenever I go to sleep and there's no activity on my server (it's not a big site so active users drop to 0 during the night), the server kind of disconnects. The only thing that can bring the site back online is to restart the whole server. I've tried disabling powersaving by using setterm but that changes nothing. Even if I wake up the server by pressing any key or so the site wont go back online! I've tried just restarting both Apache and MySQL (I'm using LAMP-server btw) but not even that works. But as soon as I turn the power off and on at the server, everythings work like normal for a couple of minutes of inactivity (~5-15 minutes I'd guess) and then it's down again unless someone logs in to the site and is active. I was previously using XAMPP on my laptop with Windows XP and that worked 24/7 so I don't think it's anything with my router or ISP. This is driving me crazy! My site is down all the time I'm in school as I have no possibility to restart the server if it becomes offline. Does anyone have a clue to what could be wrong?

    Read the article

  • ubuntu 12.04 kvm virtual server network setup, can't get the machine to be connectable

    - by xyious
    I have worked on my Ubuntu Server host for weeks now and I just can not manage to get the virtual machines into the network.... here's what I need to do: I need to be able to create virtual machines that have IP addresses that can be reached from the outside (192.168 network). I need to be able to connect to the virtual machines through ssh, ftp, http and preferably https, anything else doesn't matter that much. So far everything seems simple enough and I have a lot of leeway in terms of IP address range and server/client configuration. I have the option of taking part of a /24 net as most IPs aren't used, and if it's absolutely necessary I have the option of creating a new /24 subnet. Also have the option of reformatting and reinstalling OS on the host and recreating the virtual machines as nothing has been done other than trying to get virtual machines to work. I would prefer if the virtual machines were just part of the normal network which would be 192.168.5.0/24. The host machine has 2 network cards so I don't even necessarily need the Host to be connectable in the same /24 network. I have tried (I think) just about everything from about 5 different tutorials on bridging (giving br0 the same IP that eth0 used to have (Host is able to connect to VM and vice versa, VM doesn't have outside network access), having eth0 set up like it always was and having br0 have a different IP (same as above), NAT with port forwarding (which I would have preferred not to use but will if it works), turning off one of the hosts network cards and just using one of them, different subnets.... etc. I do know my way around iptables fairly well.... Host is 64bit Ubuntu Server 12.04, using libvirt/kvm. edits: Local network is 192.168.5.0/24, host has static ip 192.168.5.254, GW .5.1 which is also nameserver. We have a second Local network at 192.168.10.0/24 with .10.1 GW, but both hosts and VMs were supposed to go into the .5 subnet. The .10 subnet isn't required, but it wouldn't be horrible if the Host were only accessible in the .10 subnet.

    Read the article

  • Ubuntu 9.10 won't reboot after replacing a failed drive

    - by user149041
    Hello Serverfault community. I hope someone can shed light on a peculiar problem I am having with an Ubuntu 9.10 server install. I am not a Linux expert but have the responsibility of fixing the box if something goes wrong. DOH! I have Ubuntu 9.10 server installed on on a desktop platform: Compaq Presario SR5027CL. There are two 1TB SATA drives configured in a RAID 1 array; I use the box as an email backup server for a small group of users. Last week one of the drives failed and was replaced with a new drive of the same type. The problem I have been having is getting the box to reboot after a restart or a shutdown halt. The OS and the RAID 1 array are on the same drives that make up the RAID 1 array. The replacement drive (sda) was added to the box and the partitions were created to match the existing good drive (sdb). The array is made up of sda1 and sdb1. I found an interesting point while checking the BIOS settings: there is a "HDD Boot Group Priority" section, and the new drive was selected as the "1. 3rd master"; the server wouldn't boot configured like that, but when I set the old drive to be "1. 4th master", the box will reboot. I'm checking some more things, but I would certainly appreciate any useful information. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Ubuntu error: no candidate ver

    - by codedude
    Ok...so for some reason by Ubuntu 10.04 partition won't startup anymore. I'm not exactly sure what I did. I have the feeling that I accidentally removed some important packages. However, when I startup in Recovery Mode and select "dpkg: repair broken packages" I get this output: rm: cannot remove /var/lib/apt/lists/partial/*': No such file or directory rm: cannot remove/var/cache/apt/archives/partial/*': No such file or directory Reading Cache Reading Package lists: Done Reading State Information: Done Reading State Information: Done Reading State Information: Done No candidate ver: libisc44 No candidate ver: readahead No candidate ver: libdirectfb-1.0-0 No candidate ver: upstart-logd No candidate ver: libparted1.8-10 No candidate ver: libflickrnet2.1.5-cil No candidate ver: libicu38 No candidate ver: fast-user-switch-applet No candidate ver: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.28-11-generic No candidate ver: libnm-util0 No candidate ver: libwebkit-1.0-1 No candidate ver: libopal3.6.1 No candidate ver: libbind9-40 No candidate ver: linux-restricted-modules-common No candidate ver: upstart-compat-sysv No candidate ver: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.28-13-generic No candidate ver: chromium-browser No candidate ver: libisc45 No candidate ver: belocs-locales-bin No candidate ver: libxcb-xlib0 No candidate ver: libpoppler4 No candidate ver: libpulsecore9 No candidate ver: libpulsecore5 No candidate ver: linux-image-2.6.28-15-generic No candidate ver: libntfs-3g49 No candidate ver: libisccfg40 No candidate ver: libavahi-core5 No candidate ver: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.27-7-generic No candidate ver: libparted1.8-9 No candidate ver: libmagickwand1 No candidate ver: libwvstreams4.4-base No candidate ver: linux-image-2.6.28-14-generic No candidate ver: libraw1394-8 No candidate ver: libdatrie0 No candidate ver: libboost-program-options1.35.0 No candidate ver: libgnomekbdui3 No candidate ver: libsgutils1 No candidate ver: libass1 No candidate ver: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.28-15-generic No candidate ver: libindicate1 No candidate ver: libgnomekbd3 No candidate ver: system-services No candidate ver: linux-image-2.6.28-13-generic No candidate ver: libmagick10 No candidate ver: libcolamd-3.2.0 No candidate ver: desktop-effects-kde No candidate ver: picasa No candidate ver: libgnome-desktop-2-7 No candidate ver: libntfs-3g28 No candidate ver: libxklavier12 No candidate ver: libgpod3 No candidate ver: libmagickcore1 No candidate ver: libffado0 No candidate ver: libzephyr3 No candidate ver: libuniconf4.4 No candidate ver: libmbca0 No candidate ver: liblwres40 No candidate ver: hotkey-setup No candidate ver: libkrb53 No candidate ver: ttf-bitstream-vera No candidate ver: libee12-2 No candidate ver: libopal-2.2 No candidate ver: songbird No candidate ver: plib1.8.4c2 No candidate ver: linux-image-2.6.27-7-generic No candidate ver: libpoppler3 No candidate ver: google-chrome-unstable No candidate ver: linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic No candidate ver: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.28-14-generic No candidate ver: simgear1.0.0 No candidate ver: libpoppler-glib3 No candidate ver: mono-common No candidate ver: libx264-65 No candidate ver: libwvstreams4.4-extras No candidate ver: libdns43 No candidate ver: libnm-glib0 No candidate ver: libpt2.6.1 No candidate ver: libisccc40 No candidate ver: libdns45 No candidate ver: libisc44 No candidate ver: readahead No candidate ver: libdirectfb-1.0-0 No candidate ver: upstart-logd No candidate ver: libparted1.8-10 No candidate ver: libflickrnet2.1.5-cil No candidate ver: libicu38 No candidate ver: fast-user-switch-applet No candidate ver: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.28-11-generic No candidate ver: libnm-util0 No candidate ver: libwebkit-1.0-1 No candidate ver: libopal3.6.1 No candidate ver: libbind9-40 No candidate ver: linux-restricted-modules-common No candidate ver: upstart-compat-sysv No candidate ver: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.28-13-generic No candidate ver: chromium-browser No candidate ver: libisc45 No candidate ver: belocs-locales-bin No candidate ver: libxcb-xlib0 No candidate ver: libpoppler4 No candidate ver: libpulsecore9 No candidate ver: lipulsecore5 No candidate ver: linux-image-2.6.28-15-generic No candidate ver: libntfs-3g49 No candidate ver: libisccfg40 No candidate ver: libavahi-core5 No candidate ver: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.27-7-generic No candidate ver: libparted1.8-9 No candidate ver: libmagickwand1 No candidate ver: linux-image-2.6.28-14-generic No candidate ver: libraw1394-8 No candidate ver: libdatrie0 No candidate ver: libboost-program-options1.35.0 No candidate ver: libgnomekbdui3 No candidate ver: libsgutils1 No candidate ver: libass1 No candidate ver: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.28-15-generic No candidate ver: libindicate1 No candidate ver: libgnomekbd3 No candidate ver: system-services No candidate ver: linux-image-2.6.28-13-generic No candidate ver: libmagick10 No candidate ver: libcolamd-3.2.0 No candidate ver: desktop-effects-kde No candidate ver: picasa No candidate ver: libgnome-desktop-2-7 No candidate ver: libntfs-3g28 No candidate ver: libxklavier12 No candidate ver: libgpod3 No candidate ver: libmagickcore1 No candidate ver: libffado0 No candidate ver: libzephyr3 No candidate ver: libuniconf4.4 No candidate ver: libmbca0 No candidate ver: liblwres40 No candidate ver: hotkey-setup No candidate ver: libkrb53 No candidate ver: ttf-bitstream-vera No candidate ver: libeel2-2 No candidate ver: libopal-2.2 No candidate ver: songbird No candidate ver: plib1.8.4c2 No candidate ver: linux-image-2.6.27-7-generic No candidate ver: libpoppler3 No candidate ver: google-chrome-unstable No candidate ver: linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic No candidate ver: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.28-14-generic No candidate ver: simgear1.0.0 No candidate ver: libpoppler-glib3 No candidate ver: mono-common No candidate ver: libx264-65 No candidate ver: libwvstreams4.4-extras No candidate ver: libdns43 No candidate ver: libnm-glib0 No candidate ver: libpt2.6.1 No candidate ver: libisccc40 No candidate ver: libdns45 Your system is up-to-date There are no upgrades available for your system. The upgrade will now be canceled. Do you want to start the upgrdae? Continue [yN] Details [d] (Sorry that is so long...) I'm assuming I'm missing each of those packages. However, when I try to install them, for example: sudo apt-get install libisc44 I get some response that this package is missing and/or it may be part of another package. I'm not exactly sure what I should do. I don't want to reinstall ubuntu, since I have it dual booted with Windows Vista and I don't want to risk anything on the Windows partition. What are your thoughts? EDIT: I've posted this on Ubuntu Forums and nobody ever responded so...yah

    Read the article

  • Ubuntu error: no candidate ver

    - by codedude
    Ok...so for some reason by Ubuntu 10.04 partition won't startup anymore. I'm not exactly sure what I did. I have the feeling that I accidentally removed some important packages. However, when I startup in Recovery Mode and select "dpkg: repair broken packages" I get this output: rm: cannot remove /var/lib/apt/lists/partial/*': No such file or directory rm: cannot remove/var/cache/apt/archives/partial/*': No such file or directory Reading Cache Reading Package lists: Done Reading State Information: Done Reading State Information: Done Reading State Information: Done No candidate ver: libisc44 No candidate ver: readahead No candidate ver: libdirectfb-1.0-0 No candidate ver: upstart-logd No candidate ver: libparted1.8-10 No candidate ver: libflickrnet2.1.5-cil No candidate ver: libicu38 No candidate ver: fast-user-switch-applet No candidate ver: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.28-11-generic No candidate ver: libnm-util0 No candidate ver: libwebkit-1.0-1 No candidate ver: libopal3.6.1 No candidate ver: libbind9-40 No candidate ver: linux-restricted-modules-common No candidate ver: upstart-compat-sysv No candidate ver: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.28-13-generic No candidate ver: chromium-browser No candidate ver: libisc45 No candidate ver: belocs-locales-bin No candidate ver: libxcb-xlib0 No candidate ver: libpoppler4 No candidate ver: libpulsecore9 No candidate ver: libpulsecore5 No candidate ver: linux-image-2.6.28-15-generic No candidate ver: libntfs-3g49 No candidate ver: libisccfg40 No candidate ver: libavahi-core5 No candidate ver: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.27-7-generic No candidate ver: libparted1.8-9 No candidate ver: libmagickwand1 No candidate ver: libwvstreams4.4-base No candidate ver: linux-image-2.6.28-14-generic No candidate ver: libraw1394-8 No candidate ver: libdatrie0 No candidate ver: libboost-program-options1.35.0 No candidate ver: libgnomekbdui3 No candidate ver: libsgutils1 No candidate ver: libass1 No candidate ver: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.28-15-generic No candidate ver: libindicate1 No candidate ver: libgnomekbd3 No candidate ver: system-services No candidate ver: linux-image-2.6.28-13-generic No candidate ver: libmagick10 No candidate ver: libcolamd-3.2.0 No candidate ver: desktop-effects-kde No candidate ver: picasa No candidate ver: libgnome-desktop-2-7 No candidate ver: libntfs-3g28 No candidate ver: libxklavier12 No candidate ver: libgpod3 No candidate ver: libmagickcore1 No candidate ver: libffado0 No candidate ver: libzephyr3 No candidate ver: libuniconf4.4 No candidate ver: libmbca0 No candidate ver: liblwres40 No candidate ver: hotkey-setup No candidate ver: libkrb53 No candidate ver: ttf-bitstream-vera No candidate ver: libee12-2 No candidate ver: libopal-2.2 No candidate ver: songbird No candidate ver: plib1.8.4c2 No candidate ver: linux-image-2.6.27-7-generic No candidate ver: libpoppler3 No candidate ver: google-chrome-unstable No candidate ver: linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic No candidate ver: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.28-14-generic No candidate ver: simgear1.0.0 No candidate ver: libpoppler-glib3 No candidate ver: mono-common No candidate ver: libx264-65 No candidate ver: libwvstreams4.4-extras No candidate ver: libdns43 No candidate ver: libnm-glib0 No candidate ver: libpt2.6.1 No candidate ver: libisccc40 No candidate ver: libdns45 No candidate ver: libisc44 No candidate ver: readahead No candidate ver: libdirectfb-1.0-0 No candidate ver: upstart-logd No candidate ver: libparted1.8-10 No candidate ver: libflickrnet2.1.5-cil No candidate ver: libicu38 No candidate ver: fast-user-switch-applet No candidate ver: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.28-11-generic No candidate ver: libnm-util0 No candidate ver: libwebkit-1.0-1 No candidate ver: libopal3.6.1 No candidate ver: libbind9-40 No candidate ver: linux-restricted-modules-common No candidate ver: upstart-compat-sysv No candidate ver: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.28-13-generic No candidate ver: chromium-browser No candidate ver: libisc45 No candidate ver: belocs-locales-bin No candidate ver: libxcb-xlib0 No candidate ver: libpoppler4 No candidate ver: libpulsecore9 No candidate ver: lipulsecore5 No candidate ver: linux-image-2.6.28-15-generic No candidate ver: libntfs-3g49 No candidate ver: libisccfg40 No candidate ver: libavahi-core5 No candidate ver: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.27-7-generic No candidate ver: libparted1.8-9 No candidate ver: libmagickwand1 No candidate ver: linux-image-2.6.28-14-generic No candidate ver: libraw1394-8 No candidate ver: libdatrie0 No candidate ver: libboost-program-options1.35.0 No candidate ver: libgnomekbdui3 No candidate ver: libsgutils1 No candidate ver: libass1 No candidate ver: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.28-15-generic No candidate ver: libindicate1 No candidate ver: libgnomekbd3 No candidate ver: system-services No candidate ver: linux-image-2.6.28-13-generic No candidate ver: libmagick10 No candidate ver: libcolamd-3.2.0 No candidate ver: desktop-effects-kde No candidate ver: picasa No candidate ver: libgnome-desktop-2-7 No candidate ver: libntfs-3g28 No candidate ver: libxklavier12 No candidate ver: libgpod3 No candidate ver: libmagickcore1 No candidate ver: libffado0 No candidate ver: libzephyr3 No candidate ver: libuniconf4.4 No candidate ver: libmbca0 No candidate ver: liblwres40 No candidate ver: hotkey-setup No candidate ver: libkrb53 No candidate ver: ttf-bitstream-vera No candidate ver: libeel2-2 No candidate ver: libopal-2.2 No candidate ver: songbird No candidate ver: plib1.8.4c2 No candidate ver: linux-image-2.6.27-7-generic No candidate ver: libpoppler3 No candidate ver: google-chrome-unstable No candidate ver: linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic No candidate ver: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.28-14-generic No candidate ver: simgear1.0.0 No candidate ver: libpoppler-glib3 No candidate ver: mono-common No candidate ver: libx264-65 No candidate ver: libwvstreams4.4-extras No candidate ver: libdns43 No candidate ver: libnm-glib0 No candidate ver: libpt2.6.1 No candidate ver: libisccc40 No candidate ver: libdns45 Your system is up-to-date There are no upgrades available for your system. The upgrade will now be canceled. Do you want to start the upgrdae? Continue [yN] Details [d] (Sorry that is so long...) I'm assuming I'm missing each of those packages. However, when I try to install them, for example: sudo apt-get install libisc44 I get some response that this package is missing and/or it may be part of another package. I'm not exactly sure what I should do. I don't want to reinstall ubuntu, since I have it dual booted with Windows Vista and I don't want to risk anything on the Windows partition. What are your thoughts? EDIT: I've posted this on Ubuntu Forums and nobody ever responded so...yah

    Read the article

  • Installed Ubuntu 12.04.01 with Windows XP but lost access to Windows XP

    - by Bob D
    The First time I tried to install Ubuntu the installer installed it on my D drive. This resulted in only booting to Windows XP with no access to Ubuntu. I had to download a disk partitioning program to undo all of this. A tip from the Internet said to create a partition on the C drive for Ubuntu, so I did along with a Swap Partition. I did this manually because the installer on the CD would not do so and would not let me do so from within the installer program. With the fresh partitions created for Ubuntu I let the installer do its thing. The computer rebooted and came up in Ubuntu. I then installed WINE and all was well. Then I shut the computer down for the night. The next day I turned on the computer and it booted directly into Ubuntu. I can see the Windows partition and all the files but it will not allow me to switch to the Windows XP OS. Does not even give me a choice to do so. I have reinstalled Ubuntu several times and each time is the same, I cannot access Windows XP anymore. Right now I am in a fresh install with only whatever the installer installed. How do I fix this?! I have tried the hold the shift key to see if something called GRUB shows up, but no. I tried shifting the order of boot in GRUB but that did not work either. I tried using EasyBCD but that will not run. One symptom I do not understand, my monitor will post a graphic when the computer reboots that the cable is disconnected, this is normal. Then when the computer gets to the actual boot process it will display the splash screens etc and it did this for Windows XP as well. But now something new has popped up, while booting Ubuntu after where it probably should be showing me a menu to pick what OS I want to boot, the monitor posts "Input Unsupported" until Ubuntu loads. I have never seen it post this before, maybe a clue to someone.

    Read the article

  • How to uninstall Ubuntu 12.04 LTS ( installed alongside Win 7 from Boot CD)

    - by Mohammad Yaseen
    A few days back I installed Ubuntu 12.04 alongside windows. When I put the CD in, the setup said that I should boot from CD and then I can choose from demo to install Ubuntu alongside Windows, I followed the instruction and selected Install alongside Windows 7 from the setup wizard. My Win 7 drive is originally 60 GB but after installing Ubuntu it appears as if it were 43 GB. Now I want to UNINSTALL Ubuntu and get just Win 7 back on. Please guide me how to do this. Presently, at start-up I get a choice to Boot either into Win 7 or Ubuntu. I am new to Ubuntu and Linux both! This is the partition layout as seen on Win 7 :

    Read the article

  • Installing Ubuntu 14.04 on macbook pro EFI

    - by user279771
    Macbook pro: mavericks, 5.2, graphics: nvidia geforce 9600M I followed the guides from here: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UEFIBooting#Detect_.28U.29EFI_firmware_processor_architecture and http://www.rodsbooks.com/ubuntu-efi/. What I have is the following: /dev/sda apple partitions /boot / (root) swap When installing ubuntu, I did not install the boot loader during installation but did so in a chroot environment after installing grub-efi. I installed grub to /dev/sda1 (efi) which created the grub64.efi file in efi/ubuntu. This allows the refined boot manager to bring up grub and select ubuntu however, the graphics does not work. Even after adding nomodeset and removing quiet/splash from the kernel parameters. Any ideas on what could be wrong? To be clear, if I remove quiet/splash, I can see all the text startup messages being printed out however, the display manager doesn't appear to start (the screen stays black). Oddly enough though, the ubuntu startup sound can be heard.

    Read the article

  • Increase text size in Ubuntu due to having large resolution/monitors

    - by Sridhar Ratnakumar
    I have 24" dual monitors with 1920x1080 resolution on both of them. Consequently the text appears so small. I use the following text-intensive applications frequently: Web browser (Google Chrome) IDE (Komodo) Terminal (Gnome Terminal) Email (Thunderbird) I can configure text size on IDE, Terminal and Email. But for Chrome, it is not a good idea to set proportional font size because often one wants to see the entire (not just proportional fonts) site to be zoomed. So I am asking: Is it possible to increase DPI in Ubuntu (much like on Windows) so as to increase the text size across all apps? OR Is it possible to set permanent 'zoom' in Google Chrome, using a third-party extension maybe?

    Read the article

  • How to UEFI install Ubuntu 12.10?

    - by Geezanansa
    Running a newer FM1 motherboard which is using an AMD 3870k APU with a new 1TB HDD. Following the advice in the motherboard manual and https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UEFI have now got to grub option screen for UEFI install. see http://imgur.com/VW5vz The dvd.iso being used is Ubuntu 12.10 desktop amd64 from ubuntu .com. The hdd has had a gpt partition table made for, by using gparted when in a live desktop session when booted in bios mode. (*edit/update: Although the old cd updates on running it is an old kernel and it did make a gpt but that version of gparted uses fdisk whereas gdisk is required to make gpt. Think am going to have to spend more time here http://www.dedoimedo.com/computers/gparted.html lol Using the gparted from 12.10 live session to make partitions; following the guidance regarding this at https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UEFI#Creating_an_EFI_partition, but can only boot to grub option screen http://imgur.com/VW5vz when 12.10 options to "try ubuntu" or "install ubuntu" are selected they give errors as described below*) but after making the gpt decided to leave it unformatted/unallocated space with the intention of using installer to set up partitions. update-originally but gparted now sees hdd as http://imgur.com/hFIvm as described above. *Booting live dvd in EFI mode gives "Secure Boot not installed" just before grub kernel option list with the option to "install ubuntu" but get "can not read cd/0" and "the kernel must be loaded first" errors; when that option is selected. Any pointers on how to get installer going for UEFI install would be good. Thanks in advance. update: Hopefully these screenshots can help better highlight where i am going wrong or if there is something else going on http://imgur.com/g30RB, http://imgur.com/VW5vz, http://imgur.com/31E0q, http://imgur.com/bnuaG, http://imgur.com/y4KGu, http://imgur.com/3u2QE, http://imgur.com/n9lN3, http://imgur.com/FEKvz, http://imgur.com/hFIvm, update: Thank you fernando garcia for pointing me in the right direction to start the process of elimantion. What i have done since asking question is a little home work starting here http://askubuntu.com/faq#bounty and here http://askubuntu.com/questions/how-to-ask. Looking at other similar questions was good fun and found this 12.10 UEFI Secure Boot install the most relative in helping getting ubuntu to uefi install on my system. In response to wolverine's question this article was referred to http://web.dodds.net/~vorlon/wiki/blog/SecureBoot_in_Ubuntu_12.10/ This article in the first sentence gives a link to http://www.ubuntu.com/download which is where i downloaded the 12.10 desktop amd64 .iso(and others) but have been unable to do a efi install of ubuntu on this system and as this is a new system have ended up just going with bios installer running which at least puts my mind at ease that i have not bricked my new mobo.(had to do a clrcmos and flash to latest bios version) So it possibly could be the bios settings or the bios version being used that is problem. To try and eliminate bios version i can not get to post screen in order to id bios version being used. Pressing tab to show post instead of logo and trying to pausebreak to catch post is proving difficult. If logo screen in bios is disabled just get black screen no post shown and pressing tab does not show post. Appreciate using appropriate bios settings and latest 12.10 release should simply get uefi installer running when selected from the grub list (nice graphic details in Identifying if computer boots the cd in efi mode section at https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UEFI#Identifying_if_the_computer_boots_the_CD_in_EFI_mode) And to confirm the hdd is booting in efi mode https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UEFI#Identifying_if_the_computer_boots_the_HDD_in_EFI_mode running the command [ -d /sys/firmware/efi ] && echo "EFI boot on HDD" || echo "Legacy boot on HDD" gave Legacy boot on HDD This is as expected because i allowed the bios installer (which was 12.04 desktop amd64 after trying 12.10 desktop amd64 in efi mode) to run to get a working installation. Which is not what was intended or wished for but wanted to get a working os to bench test new mobo i.e. prove it is working. There are other options as in installing other bootmanagers/loaders but do not wish to do so as shim should get grub2 going that is after secure boot has been signed.(Now got rough idea what should happen just it aint happening. Is it possible ahci drivers are required?) Will post boot info script url of the updated config/setup. The original question asked seems irrelevant to what is being said in this update but as the problem is not resolved will keep on trying efi installing! i.e the problem is same as when question asked just trying to update. Have tried to edit and update the best i can!

    Read the article

  • Cannot dual Windows XP and Ubuntu

    - by Fabio Machado
    I am new to Ubuntu and at the moment I am trying to get Ubuntu 12.10 to one of my machines. The machine is a Pentium 4 @ 3.06, 2Gb RAM, 200GB Hard Drive and a NVidia GeForce 8800 GT. A few days ago, I tried Ubuntu without installing and it worked perfectly. Yesterday, I decided to formatted the hard drive and divide my hard drive into four partitions: 1 for the XP, 1 for Ubuntu, 1 for swamp and 1 where I will have my documents. Everything went great, I installed XP and then Ubuntu but I did something wrong on the partition window (Ubunto partion window) that I ended up without boot loader. This morning, I formatted everything again, installed XP and when I went to install Ubuntu (with the same DVD as before) the problems started. First, I had a black screen with a msg written with white text saying something like: unable to find a medium containing a live file system. After I burned another CD and tried again, I got stuck at the red dots (loading screen). I then went online and I read somewhere that it could be the CD, so I checked the integrity of the CD and everything was fine. I also unplugged all USBs connected to the computer and nothing changed. I goggled further options to try to solve my problem and some users suggested that people having these types of problems should try the alternate installation, which if I am not wrong is for networks. I then tried to install and yes the installation process was different from the normal CD, but it did get stuck on a page where it was doing something, like: ...finding ethd0 and it was stuck on the 100%. I tried USB installation as well and it also got stuck at the red dots (I do not have USB 3.0 on the computer in question). I have burned 5 different CD's and all at low speed. I checked the integrity and all are fine. I downloaded other distribution as well as other versions of Ubuntu and I still cannot install or even run the Live CD of Ubuntu or any other distribution. What is really annoying me is that everything was working perfectly before, when I first tried to install Ubuntu. Anyway, any help is welcome. Edit: My boot load is normal, no errors and all the hardware is working fine. I forgot to mention that after the loading screen (red dots) gets stuck, the DVD drive and the hard drive goes into idle state. I also restored the default values of the BIOS and no luck.

    Read the article

  • Running Ubuntu on Vaio laptops

    - by Deepak Adhikari
    I am an Ubuntu user... and willing to buy a laptop for my undergraduate study, but the brand which I am likely to buy does not fall on Ubuntu certified hardware. I am willing to buy vaio S series laptop. Can anyone answer my following questions? will Ubuntu 11.10 run smoothly with full hardware compatibility on vaio S series laptop? is there ubuntu support for vaio or vaio support for Ubuntu? googling on net found that there are some problems running Ubuntu on vaio is that true? if so will I get support from any community?

    Read the article

  • Parallel Installation of Ubuntu, Wubi and Windows 7?

    - by Aufwind
    I have Windows 7 installed on a Notebook. Because I wanted to experiment with Ubutnu without loosing my Windows 7 configuration I installed the Wubi Version of Ubuntu inside of Windows 7. Since things seam to work out well with Ubuntu and my harddisk space is very limited, I want to make Ubuntu my only operating system on this machine. So my question is: Is it possible, to install Ubuntu 11.04 additionally to my actual configuration (Wubi and Windows 7)? And if things turned out well with the native installation of Ubuntu, too, to delete Wubi and Windows 7 from my system afterwards? Why I am asking this is simply, that I am afraid, that if I just format my machine and made the whole harddisk available for the fresh Ubuntu installation, it could be possible, that it turns out, that one thing or an other would not work properly, like it did in Wubi. (Possible Network, VPN, and Firewall@work issues) In this case I'd like the possibility to switch back.

    Read the article

  • ubuntu broke my windows boot

    - by Then Enok
    I was installing ubuntu on pendrive and once finished I needed to run windows a bit, even though I chose erase and install ON THE PENDRIVE it altered my hdd boot sector When I remove the ubu cd and pendrive it should only boot from hdd (windows) but it gives Error: no such device : blablabla(numerbes and letters) Grub rescue _ If I place the pendrive inside it asks me whether to start windows or linux (windows works here) I need to run windows without the pendrive, how can I remove grub from the hdd and also run ubuntu from the pendrive(once I remove grub from the hdd) || THX ArK, your information help me do wonders! :) || Now... it seems that without grub i can not boot the ubuntu from the pendrive anymore, blank screen and nothing loads(i did check the ubuntu with the grub from the hdd, and everything inside it worked perfectly (except the clock, it didnt find my local hour...) ) New problem: it seems that grub which is now on the pendrive is always asking me whether to boot from windows or ubuntu F*ck of course i want to boot ubuntu otherwise i would stick the pen inside the computer

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95  | Next Page >