Search Results

Search found 53346 results on 2134 pages for 'error 404'.

Page 9/2134 | < Previous Page | 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  | Next Page >

  • Rails: How to produce 404 or redirect upon undesired url exploitation?

    - by Baby Diego
    I want to hide the urls for editing users and their profiles behind safer and meaningful urls. For instance, I want /user/13/edit to be /settings/account and /user/13/profile/edit to be /settings/profile. I managed to achieve that, but for that I had to load the user information from the current_user bit from the session. Like so: # users_controller def edit @user = current_user end # profiles_controller def edit @user = current_user @profile = @user.profile end But now, since I can't compare @user.id from the params with the current_user in the session, how can I stop the old urls (/user/13/edit and /user/13/profile/edit) from being exploitable? They always load the forms for the current user, so there's no harm done, but I'd be more comfortable if they just produced a 404 error or something. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • 404 Not Found for a PL script that exists!

    - by Abs
    Hello all, I make a GET request to a CGI script and I get a 404 error. However, I am 100% sure that script is present and it has permissions: -rwxr-xr-x 1 apache apache 6520 Sep 7 03:01 uu_ini_status_audios.pl The request URL is: http://mysite.com/cgi-bin/uu_ini_status_audios.pl?tmp_sid=893facacc5dc392ad0f4c91e6a9e8d40&rnd_id=0.12266222834382812 The error I get: The requested URL /cgi-bin/uu_ini_status_audios.pl was not found on this server. This use to work for me before, but I think it stopped working after I restarted apache so maybe it means its a configuration I changed?? I checked the error logs for apache and php and nothing useful was found to help me with my problem! I appreciate any help on this!

    Read the article

  • Avoid SEO loss after URL structure change

    - by Eric Nguyen
    We recently re-wrote our site from Umbraco to WordPress. This has been done by third-party developers. I have been the project manager and it is my mistake that I haven't notice the change of URLs that affect SEO until now. New site was launch last Thursday. The old URL for a "place" (a WordPress custom post type, in case you're WordPress expert and want/ need to point me to another discussion on WP Stackexchange) page is as follows: ourdomain.com/singapore/central/alexandra/an-interesting-place Now it has been changed to ourdomain.com/places/an-interesting-place I have already requested the third-party developers to work rewriting the URLs to emulate the old URL structure. However, it's taking quite a lot of time (we have multiple custom post types e.g. events etc. so it might be complicated; the developers seem quite by blur when I first mentioned rewriting URLs for the custom post types) In the meantime, I wonder if there is a quicker work around for this 1) Use .htaccess to rewrite ourdomain.com/singapore/central/alexandra/an-interesting-place to ourdomain.com/places/an-interesting-place This should avoid 90% loss of the search traffic. I suppose I can learn how to do this quite quickly but no harm mentioning it here 2) Use rel="canonical" to indicate that ourdomain.com/places/an-interesting-place is the exact duplicate of ourdomain.com/singapore/central/alexandra/an-interesting-place I will definitely go for both approaches (and also I'm changing 404 page to cater for this temporary isue) but I wonder if 2) is even feasible and if I have missed anything. Is there anything else you could recommend me in this situation. Let me know if my question is not clear anywhere. Clarifications The old website is on a Windows Server EC2 completely separated from the Linux EC2 instance on which the new site is running. In addition, the same domain "ourdomain.com" is used here (an A record is used to point to an EC2 Elastic IP). Therefore, the old server is completely inaccessible at the moment, unless you we use the IP address to old server (which doesn't help me at all in this case). Even if the old server is accessible, I can't see where one can put the .htaccess or a HTML file to do 301 redirect here. Unless I'm successful with my approach 1) or the developers can rewrite the URLs with coding, 404 page is really a choice for me.

    Read the article

  • SEO redirects for removed pages

    - by adam
    Hi, Apologies if SO is not the right place for this, but there are 700+ other SEO questions on here. I'm a senior developer for a travel site with 12k+ pages. We completely redeveloped the site and relaunched in January, and with the volatile nature of travel, there are many pages which are no longer on the site. Examples: /destinations/africa/senegal.aspx /destinations/africa/features.aspx Of course, we have a 404 page in place (and it's a hard 404 page rather than a 30x redirect to a 404). Our SEO advisor has asked us to 30x redirect all our 404 pages (as found in Webmaster Tools), his argument being that 404's are damaging to our pagerank. He'd want us to redirect our Senegal and features pages above to the Africa page (which doesn't contain the content previously found on Senegal.aspx or features.aspx). An equivalent for SO would be taking a url for a removed question and redirecting it to /questions rather than showing a 404 'Question/Page not found'. My argument is that, as these pages are no longer on the site, 404 is the correct status to return. I'd also argue that redirecting these to less relevant pages could damage our SEO (due to duplicate content perhaps)? It's also very time consuming redirecting all 404's when our site takes some content from our in-house system, which adds/removes content at will. Thanks for any advice, Adam

    Read the article

  • Tomcat6 Manager Webapp is 404 on apt-get install on Ubuntu 10.10

    - by Noel
    http://localhost:8080/manager/html gives a 404 error on apt-get install of tomcat6 (6.0.28 on JVM 1.6.0_20-b20 on 2.6.35-27-generic amd64). http://localhost:8080/host-manager/html works. Lists one Host name, localhost. Installed tomcat6-admin with apt-get. $ ls dpkg -l | grep -i tomcat6-admin ii tomcat6-admin 6.0.28-2ubuntu1.1 Servlet and JSP engine -- admin web applications $ cat /usr/share/tomcat6/conf/tomcat-users.xml <tomcat-users> <role rolename="admin"/> <role rolename="manager" /> <user username="tomcatuser" password="Password1" roles="admin,manager"/> </tomcat-users> $ cat /usr/share/tomcat6/conf/Catalina/localhost/manager.xml <Context path="/manager" docBase="/usr/share/tomcat6-admin/manager" antiResourceLocking="false" privileged="true" /> <role name="manager" /> <user name="manager" password="Password1" roles="manager" /> <user name="tomcatuser" password="Password1" roles="manager" /> Those two files are the only documentation I've seen on how to setup the Manager webapp, and they seem to be compliant with the requirements.

    Read the article

  • Tomcat6 Manager Webapp returns a 404

    - by Noel
    http://localhost:8080/manager/html gives a 404 error on apt-get install of tomcat6 (6.0.28 on JVM 1.6.0_20-b20 on 2.6.35-27-generic amd64). http://localhost:8080/host-manager/html works. Lists one Host name, localhost. Installed tomcat6-admin with apt-get. ls dpkg -l | grep -i tomcat6-admin ii tomcat6-admin 6.0.28-2ubuntu1.1 Servlet and JSP engine -- admin web applications $ cat /usr/share/tomcat6/conf/tomcat-users.xml <tomcat-users> <role rolename="admin"/> <role rolename="manager" /> <user username="tomcatuser" password="Password1" roles="admin,manager"/> </tomcat-users> cat /usr/share/tomcat6/conf/Catalina/localhost/manager.xml <Context path="/manager" docBase="/usr/share/tomcat6-admin/manager" antiResourceLocking="false" privileged="true" /> <role name="manager" /> <user name="manager" password="Password1" roles="manager" /> <user name="tomcatuser" password="Password1" roles="manager" /> Those two files are the only documentation I've seen on how to setup the Manager webapp, and they seem to be compliant with the requirements.

    Read the article

  • strange 404 errors

    - by user1400532
    i have this website thinkmovie.in recently i enabled cloudfare along with maxcdn. When i look at my server logs, i see these strange 404 errors for many of the files. for eg: http://thinkmovie.in/img/content/15062012faith/thumbs/model_fai12e8th_latest_photoshoot_10.jpg But the actual url is http://thinkmovie.in/img/content/15062012faith/thumbs/model_faith_latest_photoshoot_10.jpg refer_url: http://www.thinkmovie.in/gallery/ It means the term "model_faith" is replaced by "model_fai12e8th" and one more http://thinkmovie.in/image.php/?offset=1&height=120&width=144&cropratio=1.2:1%E2%84%91=/img/content/07052012pranitha/pranitha_hot_in_saguni_movie_press_meet_0.jpg?offset=1&height=120&width=144&cropratio=1.2:1%E2%84%91=/img/content/07052012pranitha/pranitha_hot_in_saguni_movie_press_meet_0.jpg actual url http://thinkmovie.finalytics.in/image.php/?offset=1&height=120&width=144&cropratio=1.2:1%E2%84%91=/img/content/07052012pranitha/pranitha_hot_in_saguni_movie_press_meet_0.jpg?offset=1&height=120&width=144&cropratio=1.2:1&image=/img/content/07052012pranitha/pranitha_hot_in_saguni_movie_press_meet_0.jpg refer_url: http://www.thinkmovie.in/gallery/hotactress/album/pranitha_hot_stills_19012012pranitha/ {&image replaced by %E2%84%91} I'm not able to understand how this is happening. I checked my code server times. And I am not able to replicate this problem from my browser. Please help me.

    Read the article

  • WebDav And Exchange2007 HTTP1.1 404 Ressource not Found!

    - by adrien
    i have Exchange2007. and i am using the url: "https://exchange2007.exchange.server.com/Exchange/username/calendar"; 'calendar', or 'mailbox'( in your language! example, "boite de reception" in french or "calendário" in portuguese) with that url that i'm using i can list my ressources, but can't send a mail or write an appointement! why?!? See that i get a response of the server 207multistatus and ok, but the return a HTTP/1.1 404 Resource Not Found i wish a 201 created!!! (for my appointement) someone have better ideia ? thx. Console: >>>>>>> to server --------------------------------------------------- PROPPATCH /Exchange/marcelo/calend%C3%A1rio HTTP/1.1 Authorization: Basic bWFyY2Vsb0BleGNoYW5nZTptdXN0YWZhMSQ= Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8 User-Agent: Jakarta Commons-HttpClient/2.0final Host: exchange2007.exchange.snap.com.br Content-Length: 1407 <D:propertyupdate xmlns:D="DAV:"> <D:set> <D:prop> <mapi xmlns="xmlns"> http://schemas.microsoft.com/mapi/ </mapi> <Cmd xmlns="urn:"> saveappt </Cmd> <dtEnd xmlns="urn:schemas:calendar"> 2009-06-30T10:30:00.000Z </dtEnd> <contentclass xmlns="DAV"> urn:content-classes:Appointment </contentclass> <Subject xmlns="urn:schemas:httpmail"> Changed Test Appointment Subject </Subject> <Location xmlns="urn:schemas:calendar"> do </Location> <responserequested xmlns="urn:schemas:calendar"> 0 </responserequested> <saveappt xmlns="urn:schemas:calendar:cmd"> 1 </saveappt> <ressource xmlns="DAV"> https://exchange2007.exchange.snap.com.br/Exchange/marcelo/calendárioassuntoteste.EML </ressource> <alldayevent xmlns="urn:schemas:calendar"> 0 </alldayevent> <to xmlns="urn:schemas:header"> adrien </to> <dtStart xmlns="urn:schemas:calendar"> 2009-06-30T10:00:00.000Z </dtStart> <isfolder xmlns="DAV"> 0 </isfolder> <cmd xmlns="Cmd"> saveappt </cmd> <HtmlDescription xmlns="urn:schemas:httpmail"> Let's meet here </HtmlDescription> <outlookmessageclass xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/subject-utf8=Appointment"> IPM.Appointement </outlookmessageclass> <instancetype xmlns="urn:schemas:calendar"> 0 </instancetype> <meetingstatus xmlns="urn:schemas:calendar"> CONFIRMED </meetingstatus> <finvited xmlns="urn:schemas:mapi"> 0 </finvited> <BusyType xmlns="urn:schemas:calendar"> BUSY </BusyType> </D:prop> </D:set> </D:propertyupdate> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ <<<<<<< from server --------------------------------------------------- HTTP/1.1 207 Multi-Status Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:29:40 GMT Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0 X-Powered-By: ASP.NET MS-Exchange-Permanent-URL: https://exchange2007.exchange.snap.com.br/Exchange/marcelo/-FlatUrlSpace-/b3ee92320938254c828a96e2e269a417-a6271d Repl-UID: <rid:b3ee92320938254c828a96e2e269a417000000a6282e> Content-Type: text/xml Content-Length: 825 ResourceTag: <rt:b3ee92320938254c828a96e2e269a417000000a6282eb3ee92320938254c828a96e2e269a41700545bb4844c> MS-WebStorage: 08.01.10240 <a:multistatus xmlns:a="DAV:" xmlns:b="xmlns" xmlns:c="urn:" xmlns:d="urn:schemas:calendar" xmlns:e="DAV" xmlns:f="urn:schemas:httpmail" xmlns:g="urn:schemas:calendar:cmd" xmlns:h="urn:schemas:header" xmlns:i="Cmd" xmlns:j="http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/subject-utf8=Appointment" xmlns:k="urn:schemas:mapi"> <a:response> <a:href> https://exchange2007.exchange.snap.com.br/Exchange/marcelo/Calend%C3%A1rio </a:href> <a:propstat> <a:status> HTTP/1.1 200 OK </a:status> <a:prop> <b:mapi> </b:mapi> <c:Cmd> </c:Cmd> <d:dtEnd> </d:dtEnd> <e:contentclass> </e:contentclass> <f:Subject> </f:Subject> <d:Location> </d:Location> <d:responserequested> </d:responserequested> <g:saveappt> </g:saveappt> <e:ressource> </e:ressource> <d:alldayevent> </d:alldayevent> <h:to> </h:to> <d:dtStart> </d:dtStart> <e:isfolder> </e:isfolder> <i:cmd> </i:cmd> <f:HtmlDescription> </f:HtmlDescription> <j:outlookmessageclass> </j:outlookmessageclass> <d:instancetype> </d:instancetype> <d:meetingstatus> </d:meetingstatus> <k:finvited> </k:finvited> <d:BusyType> </d:BusyType> </a:prop> </a:propstat> </a:response> </a:multistatus> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> to server --------------------------------------------------- PROPFIND /Exchange/marcelo/calend%C3%A1rio HTTP/1.1 Authorization: Basic bWFyY2Vsb0BleGNoYW5nZTptdXN0YWZhMSQ= Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8 User-Agent: Jakarta Commons-HttpClient/2.0final Host: exchange2007.exchange.snap.com.br Content-Length: 207 Depth: 0 <D:propfind xmlns:D="DAV:"> <D:prop> <D:displayname> </D:displayname> <D:getcontentlength> </D:getcontentlength> <D:getcontenttype> </D:getcontenttype> <D:resourcetype> </D:resourcetype> <D:getlastmodified> </D:getlastmodified> <D:lockdiscovery> </D:lockdiscovery> </D:prop> </D:propfind> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ <<<<<<< from server --------------------------------------------------- HTTP/1.1 207 Multi-Status Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:29:40 GMT Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0 X-Powered-By: ASP.NET Content-Type: text/xml Accept-Ranges: rows MS-WebStorage: 08.01.10240 Transfer-Encoding: chunked <a:multistatus xmlns:a="DAV:" xmlns:b="urn:uuid:c2f41010-65b3-11d1-a29f-00aa00c14882/" xmlns:c="xml:"> <a:response> <a:href> https://exchange2007.exchange.snap.com.br/Exchange/marcelo/Calend%C3%A1rio/ </a:href> <a:propstat> <a:status> HTTP/1.1 200 OK </a:status> <a:prop> <a:displayname> Calendário </a:displayname> <a:getcontentlength b:dt="int"> 0 </a:getcontentlength> <a:resourcetype> <a:collection> </a:collection> </a:resourcetype> <a:getlastmodified b:dt="dateTime.tz"> 2009-07-16T20:29:40.098Z </a:getlastmodified> <lockdiscovery xmlns="DAV:"> </lockdiscovery> </a:prop> </a:propstat> <a:propstat> <a:status> HTTP/1.1 404 Resource Not Found </a:status> <a:prop> <a:getcontenttype> </a:getcontenttype> </a:prop> </a:propstat> </a:response> </a:multistatus>

    Read the article

  • Tomcat Manager Application and HTTP 404 Error

    - by David
    I am trying to set up the admin application for a Tomcat 6.0.24 instance. None of the searches I've done turn up anything I can use. I am using this configuration for Apache 2.2.14: Alias /manager /usr/share/tomcat6-admin/manager <Directory "/usr/share/tomcat6-admin/manager"> Options Indexes FollowSymLinks AllowOverride None allow from all </Directory> ProxyPass /manager ajp://localhost:8009/manager In the tomcat-users.xml I have this: <tomcat-users> <role rolename="tomcat"/> <role rolename="admin"/> <role rolename="operator"/> <role rolename="manager"/> <user username="admin" password="nopasswordforyou" roles="admin,tomcat,manager"/> <user username="operator" password="nevermind" roles="operator"/> </tomcat-users> I found the docs that suggested I needed manager-gui role installed and defined, but that appears to be Tomcat 7, not Tomcat 6. The manager.xml is the default provided with Ubuntu Lucid Lynx 10.04: <Context path="/manager" docBase="/usr/share/tomcat6-admin/manager" antiResourceLocking="false" privileged="true" /> If I access /manager from a web browser, I get a 404 error from Tomcat: "requested resource not available." If I access /manager/images I get the same thing. If I access /manager/401.jsp I get the actual page. In addition, the server.xml has not only the usual Realm (UserDatabaseRealm) but also one for MySQL authentication (JDBCRealm). Investigating this showed that the role of manager was not present there for the user admin; I fixed that by doing: INSERT USER_ROLE_DB SET USER_NAME='admin', ROLE_NAME='manager'; I restarted Tomcat, although I suspect that was overkill. No change. I don't see any errors in catalina.out or in localhost.* log files. What am I missing? What is the interaction between the different realms? How do I get the manager application working?

    Read the article

  • JQuery + WCF + HTTP 404 Error

    - by hangar18
    HI All, I've searched high and low and finally decided to post a query here. I'm writing a very basic HTML page from which I'm trying to call a WCF service using jQuery and parse it using JSON. Service: IMyDemo.cs [ServiceContract] public interface IMyDemo { [WebInvoke(Method = "POST", BodyStyle = WebMessageBodyStyle.WrappedRequest, ResponseFormat = WebMessageFormat.Json)] Employee DoWork(); [OperationContract] [WebInvoke(Method = "POST", BodyStyle = WebMessageBodyStyle.WrappedRequest, ResponseFormat = WebMessageFormat.Json)] Employee GetEmp(int age, string name); } [DataContract] public class Employee { [DataMember] public int EmpId { get; set; } [DataMember] public string EmpName { get; set; } [DataMember] public int EmpSalary { get; set; } } MyDemo.svc.cs public Employee DoWork() { // Add your operation implementation here Employee obj = new Employee() { EmpSalary = 12, EmpName = "SomeName" }; return obj; } public Employee GetEmp(int age, string name) { Employee emp = new Employee(); if (age > 0) emp.EmpSalary = 12 + age; if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(name)) emp.EmpName = "Server" + name; return emp; } WEb.Config <system.serviceModel> <services> <service behaviorConfiguration="EmployeesBehavior" name="MySample.MyDemo"> <endpoint address="" binding="webHttpBinding" contract="MySample.IMyDemo" behaviorConfiguration="EmployeesBehavior"/> </service> </services> <behaviors> <serviceBehaviors> <behavior name="EmployeesBehavior"> <serviceMetadata httpGetEnabled="true" /> <serviceDebug includeExceptionDetailInFaults="true" /> </behavior> </serviceBehaviors> <endpointBehaviors> <behavior name="EmployeesBehavior"> <webHttp/> </behavior> </endpointBehaviors> </behaviors> <serviceHostingEnvironment multipleSiteBindingsEnabled="true" /> </system.serviceModel> MyDemo.htm <head> <title></title> <script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="Scripts/jquery-1.4.1.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="Scripts/json.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> //create a global javascript object for the AJAX defaults. debugger; var ajaxDefaults = {}; ajaxDefaults.base = { type: "POST", timeout : 1000, dataFilter: function (data) { //see http://encosia.com/2009/06/29/never-worry-about-asp-net-ajaxs-d-again/ data = JSON.parse(data); //use the JSON2 library if you aren’t using FF3+, IE8, Safari 3/Google Chrome return data.hasOwnProperty("d") ? data.d : data; }, error: function (xhr) { //see if (!xhr) return; if (xhr.responseText) { var response = JSON.parse(xhr.responseText); //console.log works in FF + Firebug only, replace this code if (response) alert(response); else alert("Unknown server error"); } } }; ajaxDefaults.json = $.extend(ajaxDefaults.base, { //see http://encosia.com/2008/03/27/using-jquery-to-consume-aspnet-json-web-services/ contentType: "application/json; charset=utf-8", dataType: "json" }); var ops = { baseUrl: "/MyService/MySample/MyDemo.svc/", doWork: function () { //see http://api.jquery.com/jQuery.extend/ var ajaxOptions = $.extend(ajaxDefaults.json, { url: ops.baseUrl + "DoWork", data: "{}", success: function (msg) { console.log("success"); console.log(typeof msg); if (typeof msg !== "undefined") { console.log(msg); } } }); $.ajax(ajaxOptions); return false; }, getEmp: function () { var ajaxOpts = $.extend(ajaxDefaults.json, { url: ops.baseUrl + "GetEmp", data: JSON.stringify({ age: 12, name: "NameName" }), success: function (msg) { $("span#lbl").html("age: " + msg.Age + "name:" + msg.Name); } }); $.ajax(ajaxOpts); return false; } } </script> </head> <body> <span id="lbl">abc</span> <br /><br /> <input type="button" value="GetEmployee" id="btnGetEmployee" onclick="javascript:ops.getEmp();" /> </body> I'm just not able to get this running. When I debug, I see the error being returned from the call is " Server Error in '/jQuerySample' Application. <h2> <i>HTTP Error 404 - Not Found.</i> </h2></span> " Looks like I'm missing something basic here. My sample is based on this I've been trying to fix the code for sometime now so I'd like you to take a look and see if you can figure out what is it that I'm doing wrong here. I'm able to see that the service is created when I browse the service in IE. I've also tried changing the setting as mentioned here Appreciate your help. I'm gonna blog about this as soon as the issue is resolved for the benefit of other devs Thanks -Soni

    Read the article

  • Need assistance with Kohana 3 and catch all route turning into a 404 error

    - by alex
    Based on this documentation, I've implemented a catch all route which routes to an error page. Here is the last route in my bootstrap.php Route::set('default', '<path>', array('path' => '.+')) ->defaults(array( 'controller' => 'errors', 'action' => '404', )); However I keep getting this exception thrown when I try and go to a non existent page Kohana_Exception [ 0 ]: Required route parameter not passed: path If I make the <path> segment optional (i.e. wrap it in parenthesis) then it just seems to load the home route, which is... Route::set('home', '') ->defaults(array( 'controller' => 'home', 'action' => 'index', )); The home route is defined first. I execute my main request like so $request = Request::instance(); try { // Attempt to execute the response $request->execute(); } catch (Exception $e) { if (Kohana::$environment === Kohana::DEVELOPMENT) throw $e; // Log the error Kohana::$log->add(Kohana::ERROR, Kohana::exception_text($e)); // Create a 404 response $request->status = 404; $request->response = Request::factory(Route::get('default')->uri())->execute(); } $request->send_headers(); echo $request->response; This means that the 404 header is sent to the browser, but I assumed by sending the request to the capture all route then it should show the 404 error set up in my errors controller. <?php defined('SYSPATH') or die('No direct script access.'); class Controller_Errors extends Controller_Base { public function before() { parent::before(); } public function action_404() { $this->bodyClass[] = '404'; $this->internalView = View::factory('internal/not_found'); $longTitle = 'Page Not Found'; $this->titlePrefix = $longTitle; } } Why won't it show my 404 error page?

    Read the article

  • Strange request - http://66.196.81.202/error/vote

    - by mplungjan
    Hi a friend of mine is asking about the request which can for example be found here: http://www.geoidee.ch/geodata/geoserver-2.0.0/logs/2010_11_23.request.log His original message: On a couple of hundred web sites worldwide, one of the 50 most popular "File not found" error 404 is caused by the following request: "GET http://66.196.81.202/error/vote HTTP/1.0" It originates from a user agent that purports to be an iPhone. The two requests that hit my servers appeared to originate near Frankfort, Germany. The IP address in the request is part of Yahoo although I doubt that Yahoo had any intentional part. fe1.buzz.vip.re1.yahoo.com The HTTP request has a host header 66.196.81.202 and a X-Forwarded-For of 96.6.99.16 and my IP address I expected to be able to do a Google search and find some kind of security bulletin on it, but I found nothing. It could just be that my search skills are deficient. Thanks for any pointers to what this could be

    Read the article

  • Handling site not found and page not found with dynamic mass virtual hosting

    - by Rick Moynihan
    I have recently setup mass virtual hosting in Apache so that all we need to do is create a directory to create a new vhost. We're then also using wildcard DNS to map all subdomains to the server running our Apache instance. This works excellently, however I'm now having trouble configuring it to fail-over to an appropriate default/error-page when the vhost directory does not exist. The problem appears to be conflated between by my desire to handle the two error conditions: vhost not found i.e. there was no directory found matching the host supplied in the HTTP host header. I'd like this to display an appropriate site not found error page. The 404 page not found condition of the vhost. Additionally I have a specialised "api" vhost in its own vhost block. I've tried a number of variations and none seem to exhibit the behaviour I want. Here's what I'm working with right now: NameVirtualHost *:80 <VirtualHost *:80> DocumentRoot /var/www/site-not-found ServerName sitenotfound.mydomain.org ErrorDocument 500 /500.html ErrorDocument 404 /500.html </VirtualHost> <VirtualHost *:80> ServerName api.mydomain.org DocumentRoot /var/www/vhosts/api.mydomain.org/current # other directives, e.g. setting up passenger/rails etc... </VirtualHost> <VirtualHost *:80> # get the server name from the Host: header UseCanonicalName Off VirtualDocumentRoot /var/www/vhosts/%0/current # other directives ... e.g proxy passing to api etc... ErrorDocument 404 /404.html </VirtualHost> My understanding is that the first vhost block is used as the default, so I have this here as my catch all site. Next I have my API vhost, and then finally my mass vhost block. So for a domain that doesn't match the first two ServerName's and has no corresponding directory in /var/www/vhosts/ I'd expect it to fall-over to the first vhost, however with this setup, all domains resolve to my default site-not-found. Why is this? By putting the mass-vhost block first, I can get the mass-vhosts to resolve properly, but not my site-not-found vhost... and in this case I can't seem to find a way to distinguish between a page-level 404 in the vhost, and the case where the VirtualDocumentRoot fails to find a vhost directory (this appears to use the 404 also). Any help out of this bind is much appreciated!

    Read the article

  • Weird .ASP pages from my non-ASP site generating 404s

    - by Amanda
    In Google Webmaster Tools, I have a huge list of "Not Found" crawl errors (404) with URLs that look like this: http://www.exclusivevillas.co.za/villa_view.asp?vSeq=82&activitySeq=3&page=3, seemingly originating from URLs very similar to that (eg http://www.exclusivevillas.co.za/villa_view.asp?vSeq=82&activitySeq=3&page=4. Thing is, the site is WordPress. Has been for almost a year now. Was plain html before that. I don't know where these ASP requests are coming from. And furthermore, the dates these supposed ASP pages requested these other ASP pages, resulting in 404s, are very recent. What's going on?

    Read the article

  • I see files in filezilla, but the internet denies their existance

    - by Zach L.
    I am doing some updates to a 10-year old site, and I am baffled. Everything worked great locally, so I uploaded a bunch of stuff to the server using filezilla. Within filezilla I can see all of the files, but for some reason I get a 404 when trying to view them. It seems as though (at least for the folder Im currently checking) this is happening for items which are "farther down the list" alphabetically. I tried to re-upload a file individually but it didn't change anything. Is this an indication that I hit some sort of limit with the hosting company? And if so why can I still view the files from filezilla? Please offer guidance. I am at a loss.

    Read the article

  • Redirecting non existing post to homepage; is that good for SEO?

    - by BlackEagle
    I am checking my website out on Google Webmasters and I am seeing an astonishing 5000 links that could not be found by Google's Crawlers. That's normal, because my website is built in a manner that users can drop their own things, which also lead to 404 pages. Not a problem at all if I can find a workaround of course... So my question is: what if I made a function or a mod rewrite that will check if the link exists (a post for example) and if not, it will redirect it to the home page. Is this good for SEO? Will Google see this as 'link found'? How do I have to look at this problem?

    Read the article

  • URL parameter names being changed by user agents

    - by Mike Deck
    In reviewing one of our site's web logs I'm seeing instances where we are returning a 404 to requests because we're expecting an id parameter to be sent, but instead we're seeing a di parameter. The resource in question is an image but which image file actually gets served is dependent on the id parameter. The expected url is something like http://images.mysite.com/photo.gif?id=123&width=200&height=300 What I'm seeing in the logs is requests for http://images.mysite.com/photo.gif?di=123&width=200&height=300 The only case where we are seeing this on the id parameter. It seems unlikely that this is due to a server side or JavaScript bug since it seems to be only effecting a small percentage of our traffic. We are seeing this across a wide variety of user agents (both mobile and desktop) and IPs. Has anyone else seen this? Is there a browser plugin or other software you're aware of that could be causing this, and if so is there a good way to work around the issue?

    Read the article

  • Joomla url issue with sh404SEF

    - by user5858
    it's couple of months I've been using SH404SEF With my site. But in my site I'm getting url's in the form: http://www.downloadformsindia.com/Income-Tax-Forms/all-income-tax-return-itr-forms-2010-2011.html?task=view If I remove this suffix(?task=view), it takes us to the same page. I had raised this issue in SH404SEF forum, and I was told that this data is taken as parameter by search engines hence ignored. I want to redirect using RewriteMatch in .htaccess all such url's to the url's without ?task=view ones : ....downloadformsindia.com/Income-Tax-Forms/all-income-tax-return-itr-forms-2010-2011.html?task=view to be redirected to http://www.downloadformsindia.com/Income-Tax-Forms/all-income-tax-return-itr-forms-2010-2011.html So my question is: Will this redirection create 404's in the Google webmaster. I've thousand's of pages in the site

    Read the article

  • nginx + php fpm -> 404 php pages - file not found

    - by Mahesh
    *2037 FastCGI sent in stderr: "Primary script unknown" while reading response header from upstream server { listen 80; ## listen for ipv4; this line is default and implied #listen [::]:80 default ipv6only=on; ## listen for ipv6 server_name .site.com; root /var/www/site; error_page 404 /404.php; access_log /var/log/nginx/site.access.log; index index.html index.php; if ($http_host != "www.site.com") { rewrite ^ http://www.site.com$request_uri permanent; } location ~* \.php$ { fastcgi_index index.php; fastcgi_pass 127.0.0.1:9000; #fastcgi_pass unix:/var/run/php-fpm/php-fpm.sock; fastcgi_buffer_size 128k; fastcgi_buffers 256 4k; fastcgi_busy_buffers_size 256k; fastcgi_temp_file_write_size 256k; fastcgi_read_timeout 240; include /etc/nginx/fastcgi_params; fastcgi_param SCRIPT_FILENAME $document_root$fastcgi_script_name; fastcgi_param SCRIPT_NAME $fastcgi_script_name; } location ~ /\. { access_log off; log_not_found off; deny all; } location ~ /(libraries|setup/frames|setup/libs) { deny all; return 404; } location ~ ^/uploads/(\d+)/(\d+)/(\d+)/(\d+)/(.*)$ { alias /var/www/site/images/missing.gif; #i need to modify this to show only missing files. right now it is showing missing for all the files. } location ~* \.(jpg|jpeg|png|gif|ico|css|js)$ { access_log off; expires 20d; } location /user_uploads/ { location ~ .*\.(php)?$ { deny all; } } location ~ /\.ht { deny all; } } php-fpm config is default and is not touched. The problem is little strange for me. Error pages are showing File not found only if they are .php files. Other error files are clearly calling the 404.php file site.com/test = calls 404.php site.com/test.php = File not found. I am searching and making changes. but it hasn't solved the problem.

    Read the article

  • Error when trying to install Menulibre in Lubuntu 12.10 [closed]

    - by cipricus
    Possible Duplicate: How can I fix a 404 Error using a PPA? When trying to add a PPA (to install menulibre) I get these errors: Err http://ppa.launchpad.net quantal/main Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ppa.launchpad.net quantal/main i386 Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ppa.launchpad.net/menulibre-dev/devel/ubuntu/dists/quantal/main/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ppa.launchpad.net/menulibre-dev/devel/ubuntu/dists/quantal/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found Why is that and how to solve it? As the question was flagged as duplicate: I should clarify that I want to know why i cannot add a source that seems active in launchpad, and how could i add it and install the program, not just how to remove the error by removing the source in the software sources list Menulibre seems available in software sources. Why can't I install it? I'm in Lubuntu 12.10

    Read the article

  • IIS 7.5 returning 404 for unknown host names

    - by WaldenL
    This just doesn't seem correct to me, so I'm looking for someone to tell me how I've misconfigured IIS... Configuration is IIS7.5 (2008R2), without SP1. I have IIS 7.5 configured w/several sites. ALL sites have hostnames defined in the bindings, there is NO site w/out a hostname. However, if I request an unknown hostname from the server IIS (technically Microsoft-HTTPAPI/2.0) return a 404 error, not a 400 error. I would expect a 400 (or some other major error) rather than a lowly 404. This causes a problem when I have nginx in front of multiple IISs and want to stop a site so nginx takes it out of rotation. Since IIS still returns a 404 for the request even when there is no active site for that name, nginx doesn't know the server is dead. NB: IIS returns the 404 regardless of whether there is a server, but it's stopped, or there is no server. Thoughts? Solutions? -- Additional info: OK, I added a site on a port other than 80 (5000) and then on a connection to that port asked for a site that doesn't exist, and I get the expected error 400 (Invalid hostname). So, while IIS isn't listening for generic (no host name) connections on port 80 it would seem that something is. Any ideas how to get HTTPSys to dump the list of what it's listening for?

    Read the article

  • Bingbot seems to be adding "ForceRecrawl: 0" to URLs when crawling my sites

    - by Louis Somers
    I'm seeing this in the iis-logs of two websites that I maintain: GET /an/existing/page/on/my/site+ForceRecrawl:+0 - 80 - 207.46.195.105 HTTP/1.1 Mozilla/5.0+(compatible;+bingbot/2.0;++http://www.bing.com/bingbot.htm) I get about one or two of these per day from these IP addresses: 207.46.195.105, 65.52.110.190.. an more, all belonging to msnbot-ip.search.msn.com Probably Microsoft has a bug in their crawler? Any way, doing a search on "ForceRecrawl: 0" in major search engines comes up with a bunch of random sites. Doing the search on StackOverflow or here gave no results (to my amazement). Am I the only one seeing this? I first noticed these on the 9th of this month, and I'm seeing them pass almost daily since... Another thing that I think is crazy, is that the URL http://www.bing.com/bingbot.htm redirects to mail.live.com (hotmail). Currently I'm returning 404's but I'm considering to catch these, strip the trailing " ForceRecrawl: 0" and process as if it were a legitimate url. Could anyone shed some light on this? Could it have to do with some configuration or so in Bing's Webmaster Tools?

    Read the article

  • GWT: reporting crawling errors for non existing links

    - by pixeline
    Google Webmaster Tools is reporting crawl errors for links that never existed, and if i check the "Linked from" tab for a given error link, it shows another that never existed. They all mention joomla/ which is not the cms used on this domain (it's wordpress fyi). Exampled: http://example.com/joomla/index.php/component/user/register Linked from: http://example.com/joomla/component/user/login?return=L2###### What is going on? UPDATE 1 I tried something: I provided one of the faulty urls to the "Fetch as Google" functionality. Instead of returning a 404, it returns a 301 to another Joomla page. HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently Server: Apache/2.4.3 X-Powered-By: PHP/5.4.4-10 X-Pingback: http://example.com/xmlrpc.php Expires: Wed, 11 Jan 1984 05:00:00 GMT Cache-Control: no-cache, must-revalidate, max-age=0 Pragma: no-cache Set-Cookie: PHPSESSID=1fgr5v2oip39miibuptd51s8h0; path=/ Set-Cookie: woocommerce_items_in_cart=0; expires=Sat, 12-Jan-2013 11:44:01 GMT; path=/ Location: http://example.com/joomla/component/user/register Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Length: 387 Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 12:44:01 GMT Via: 1.1 varnish Connection: keep-alive Accept-Ranges: bytes Age: 0 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN"> <html><head> <title>301 Moved Permanently</title> </head><body> <h1>Moved Permanently</h1> <p>The document has moved <a href="http://example.com/joomla/component/user/register">here</a>.</p> <p>Additionally, a 301 Moved Permanently error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.</p> </body></html>

    Read the article

  • Using default parameters for 404 error (PHP with mvc design)?

    - by user1175327
    I have a custom made Framework (written in PHP). It all works very good, but i have some doubts about a certain thing. Right now when a user call this url for example: http://host.com/user/edit/12 Which would resolve to: user = userController edit = editAction() in userController 12 = treated as a param But suppose the controller 'userController' doesn't exist. Then i could throw a 404. But on the other hand, the url could also be used as params for the indexController (which is the default controller). So in that case: controller = indexController user = could be an action in indexController, otherwise treated as a param edit = treated as a param 12 = treated as a param That is actually how it works right now in my framework. So basically, i never throw a 404. I could ofcourse say that only params can be given if the controller name is explicitly named in the URL. So if i want the above url: http://host.com/user/edit/12 To be invoked by the indexController, in the indexAction. Then i specifically have to tell what controller and action it uses in the URL. So the URL should become: http://host.com/index/index/user/edit/12 index = indexController index (2nd one) = the action method user = treated as a param edit = treated as a param 12 = treated as a param That way, when a controller doesn't exist, i don't reroute everything as a param to the index controller and simply throw a 404 error. Now my question is, which one is more preffered? Should i allow both options to be configurable in a config file? Or should i always use one of them. Simply because that's the only and best way to do it?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  | Next Page >