Search Results

Search found 127951 results on 5119 pages for 'http status code 301'.

Page 9/5119 | < Previous Page | 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  | Next Page >

• Is It bad for SEO to have internal redirected links? [closed]

  - by Jonas Lindqvist

  I have a large number of pages having similar but not identical content. Example: site.com/dream_dictionary_flying and site.com/dream_interpretation_flying. The problem is that although not being identical, they are sometimes on the edge of being duplicate content. The solution via redirect 301 in htaccess is simple and can be done in a minute, BUT, changing all existing links on the whole site from "/something" to "/something_else" would take ages, it would be thousands of manual changes taking x hundreds of hours. My question is this; is it bad for SEO to have internal links that are redirected, or rather HOW bad is it? For the human user it would not matter at all but from what I have experienced, the search engines don't like it. Is there any rule of thumb here? Please come back with your thoughts and experience on this. Thanks!

  Read the article

• Redirect pages to fix crawl errors

  - by sarah

  Google is giving me a crawl error for pages that I have removed like www.mysite.com/mypage.html. I want to redirect this pages to the new page www.mysite.com/mysite/mypage. I tried to do that by using .htaccess but instead of fixing the problem, the crawl pages increased and a new crawl came www.mysite.com/www.mysite.com. This is my .htaccess file: <IfModule mod_rewrite.c> RewriteEngine On RewriteBase /sitename/ RewriteRule ^index\.php$ - [L] RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d RewriteRule . /sitename/index.php [L] </IfModule> # END WordPress Should I add this after the rewrite rule or I should do something else? RewriteRule ^pagename\.html$ http://www.sitename.com/pagename [R=301]

  Read the article

• Using an old penalized domain for a new website

  - by MiladSafaei

  I had a website with 2 domains like these: firstdomain.com and first-domain.com. The main domain was first-domain.com and the other one was 301 redirected to first one. The main domain got a Google Penguin penalty some months ago. I uploaded the site on an new domain and removed Google index of old domain by using the remove URL tool in Webmaster Tools. Now, I want to use firstdomain.com (which was redirected to the penalized domain) for a new and fresh website with new and perfect content. Is it probable that history of this domain affects the new website and harms its ranking?

  Read the article

• How to prevent a 404 Error when installing a subdomain using a wordpress multi-site installation

  - by Chris

  I have installed a multi-site instillation of WordPress onto my domain. I then added the necessary code to the wp-config.php file and .htaccess as instructed by WordPress. I also installed a plugin called Quick Page/Post Redirect Plugin which allowed me to place a 301 redirect onto the main domain as I only want to use the sub domain and not the main domain. Then I also added the following line of code to the wp-config.php file to redirect the main domain define( 'NOBLOGREDIRECT', 'URL Redirect Address' ); The site works fine with a redirect on the main domain and my subdomain runs fine when you type in subdomain.domain.com or http://subdomain.domain.com. However when I enter www.subdomain.domain.com or http://www.subdomain.domain.com the following error message is returned: Not Found The requested URL / was not found on this server. Apache/2.4.9 (Unix) Server at www.subdomain.domain.com Port 80 Any help with this would be much appreciated.

  Read the article

• SEO disasters moving domain for a high traffic website?

  - by chrism2671

  We're looking at moving our website from http://www.wikijob.co.uk to http://www.wikijob.com/uk as we spread our wings internationally. Our .co.uk website has a PR6 and received around 1/2 million visitors a month, 40% international. The wikijob.com domain, while registered for a while, has not been used nor promoted. I am concerned that moving domain could really haemorrhage our traffic and result in a loss of goodwill from Google, even if we use a 301, but equally, if we could transfer that pagerank to the .com domain, that would give us a massive head start around the world. Should we do it, or should we start over with .com and leave .co.uk as is?

  Read the article

• Multiple domains

  - by menardmam

  I got 6 domains : company.ca and company.com (because both where free, but we are a canadian company but can do business with the rest of the world). Then, we sell sportwear because of the company name is totally unknown to the world. Our product is we have bought product specific domain : chandails.ca and t-shirt.ca as well as shorts.ca and shorts.com. So those 6 domains are mine. Now what is the best way to do? Now all are 301 redirect to the main company name (.com) or make micro-site, super simple one page optimized for just shirt and one for shorts, then tell people to know more, go to the main site. Because now, I cannot really find the benefit of the search word in domain name edge if never somebody see something in that domain... I got confused and don't find strait answer to this question.

  Read the article

• Redirect from the main page on multilanguage site

  - by Pluto

  I've decided to start developing multilingual web site. Now I'm thinking about the structure. The idea is to use a simple algorithm to find out what language is most interesting to the visitor when he makes his first visit to the root page, and then forward him to the corresponding address, for example, http://example.com/en/ for English-speaking audience and http://example.com/ru/ for Russians. The question is, how search engines react on such redirect? If this approach does not take away site's reputation, which redirects should I choose: 301 or 302? I would be very grateful for the reasoned response.

  Read the article

• Redirect subdomain (weblog) to new domain without access to .htaccess

  - by fafa

  I've a problem that I can't find the solution for on the web. I have a blog that has PR 1 and it's subdomain "aaaa.domain.com" that "domain.com" is a blog server. Now I want buy a domain "newdomain.com" and I want tell google webmaster to redirect the old subdomain to this new domain and send traffic to my new domain. I can't access .htaccess to use a 301 redirect. The only thing that I can do is put html code in the html. How can I do this? When I use "Change of Address" in google webmaster it say:"Restricted to root level domains only".

  Read the article

• Redisigning an old site, structure change etc

  - by RhymeGuy

  I have an old site built in 2006, it has around 200 pages and 500 pictures. Every single page is of course indexed as well as images. It is very well ranked for targeted keywords and I receive good amount of SEO traffic (I guess that's due the various campaigns, branding, ppc, etc..) Problem: Site has outdated design, pages and images have not so proper names, there are no heading and alt tags, it was built in tables, inline CSS etc.. Goal: Complete redisign site, use divs, change file names, add proper meta data, alt tags etc.. Question: How this can affect current SEO positions? I will redirect (301) every single page to the new one, build site map, but what to do with images? Do I need to redirect them also? Any other suggestion?

  Read the article

• How to prevent a 404 Error when creating a subdomain and using www to access it?

  - by Chris

  I have installed a multi-site installation of WordPress onto my domain. I then added the necessary code to the wp-config.php file and .htaccess as instructed by WordPress. I also installed a plugin called Quick Page/Post Redirect Plugin which allowed me to place a 301 redirect onto the main domain as I only want to use the sub domain and not the main domain. Then I also added the following line of code to the wp-config.php file to redirect the main domain define( 'NOBLOGREDIRECT', 'URL Redirect Address' ); The site works fine with a redirect on the main domain and my subdomain runs fine when you type in subdomain.example.com or http://subdomain.example.com. However when I enter www.subdomain.example.com or http://www.subdomain.example.com the following error message is returned: Not Found The requested URL / was not found on this server. Apache/2.4.9 (Unix) Server at www.subdomain.domain.com Port 80 Any help with this would be much appreciated.

  Read the article

• How to get rid of crawling errors due to the URL Encoded Slashes (%2F) problem in Apache

  - by user14198

  The Google web crawler has indexed a whole set of URLs with encoded slashes (%2F) for our site. I assume it has picked up the pages from our XML sitemap file. The problem is that the live pages will actually result in a failure because of the Url Encoded Slashes Problem in Apache. Some solutions are mentioned here We are implementing a 301 redirect scheme for all the error pages. This should make the Google bot delete the pages from the crawling errors (no more crashing pages). Does implementing the 301s require the pages to be "live"? In that case we may be forced to implement solution 1 in the article. The problem is that solution 1 will pose a security vulnerability..

  Read the article

• Redirect from domain to other one

  - by Michal

  I deal with the following problem. I am customer of one domain reseller, which has fair prices, fine administration, and I have all my domains registered by it. Recently I've created a new webpage using a free web service (those sites where you can create a simple webpages with some template after few clicks). This new web page has default address in the following form: "pagename.provider.cz", but I want to use my own domain "pagename.cz". And that is the problem, because the provider would assign domain name to my presentation only if I registered mentioned domain by him. That wouldn't be a problem, but he is three times more expensive then my favorite one. So I am thinking about registering domain "pagename.cz" under my favorite registrator and then making 301 PHP redirect from it to "pagename.provider.cz". Shall this affect (negatively) my domain ranking? Are there any catches which I shoud care about?

  Read the article

• I have domain.com and domain.org to the same site, should I use redirects to avoid duplicate content

  - by bunzip

  I have both the .com and the .org for a domain name, and using Apache I point them to the same site content. I think this might be causing problems with the Search Engines because of duplicate content. I want the .org to be the essential website. How do others handle this situation? Should I be using 301 redirects to point all the .com requests to the .org? Should I just use the link rel="canonical" on each page to point to the .org?

  Read the article

• Considerations for changing URL path

  - by Mandar

  I am having an e-commerce site and current URL structure is like this: www.example.com/category1 [Category landing page] www.example.com/category1/sub-category [sub-category listing page] www.example.com/category1/sub-category/product-name [Product Details page] I am finding it difficult to identify from the URLs whether the URL is category landing page or a listing page or a product details page (primarily in Google Analytics). To solve this problem, I am thinking of adding qualifiers in the URL as follows: www.example.com/category1/cat-land [Category landing page] www.example.com/category1/sub-category/cat-list [sub-category listing page] www.example.com/category1/sub-category/product-name/prod-details [Product Details page] Original URLs would be redirected to new URLs using 301 permanent redirect. Would this have any negative effect on existing SEO and Google ranking?

  Read the article

• Difference in stats on the same domain - seo related

  - by Duoweb

  Recently i started to optimize my company's website. With a little help of market samurai. One of the adjustments was a www redirect to the prefered domain. We currently rank on #8 for our desired keyword with the domain without the www. If I add a custom url (our domain with www), we see a difference in stats BLP (backlinks to the page) {it's the website on top} Can anyone tell me how i could merge this so we might even rank better for our keyword? What I did so far: 3 weeks ago set the www.duo.be as prefered domain in GWT and put a 301 redirect in place so the duo.be gets redirected to www.duo.be Both domains are in GWT and both with www.duo.be as preferred domain. Tho I see no change. Can anyone help me out, because i'm clueless. Marketsamurai screenshot: http://i.stack.imgur.com/CYkb8.png

  Read the article

• How to redirect a international domain to a subfolder on the English site without hurting Google rankings?

  - by ernest1a

  I have two sites: www.example.de www.main.com www.main.com is English version of www.example.de which is in German. I want to keep only www.main.com. For the English version I will keep www.main.com, but for German I want to move it to www.main.com/de. I am wondering what would be best solution for old www.example.de: Redirect everything from www.example.de to www.main.com/de using 301 redirect? Redirect everything from www.example.de towww.main.com/de/page-url-of-old-size.html? So each link actually get own address. Is that necessary or will Google realize where the page belongs on new site even if I redirect everything to home page? Any other solution, maybe just set in Google webmaster tools the new domain or anything like that?

  Read the article

• Google Analytics - New & Old Domain Filtering

  - by DotNetStudent

  I have two domains associated with the same hosting account. Domain A was the one I had purchased when I first set up my website, but I didn't like it all that much and it was getting low ranks, and so I bought domain B and 301'd links from domain A to domain B. Now I would like to know if there is any way I can filter page views on Google Analytics based on the domain used to access the website, so that I can know if it is worth to keep the old domain associated with the account. Is there any easy way I can do this?

  Read the article

• jQuery Mobile Frame Forwarding [on hold]

  - by Nizam

  I have a site that does a standard forward to another site [301 Redirect]. In the redirected site, I detect if the device is a mobile using the following code: if (/Android|webOS|iPhone|iPad|iPod|BlackBerry/i.test(navigator.userAgent)) { window.location.replace("Mobile/Login/Login.aspx") } else { window.location.replace("Apps/Login/Login.aspx") } It works and jQuery mobile makes the site fits device very well. To do so, I use the following code in ASPX page: <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1, maximum-scale=1" /> The problem is that I am wanting to frame forward - instead of standard forward - (there are a lot of advantages), but the site is not fitted for the device anymore, and even the icon I have chosen for my page is not well defined anymore. The code I use to set the icon of page is: <link rel="apple-touch-icon" href="../../Apps/Imagens/Icone.png" /> My site is hosted by Mochahost My question is: Is there anything I could do to make it works?

  Read the article

• My 301 redirect via htaccess code is not working sometimes

  - by Gagan Modi

  The 301 redirect is working sometime and somes time not What could be the problem in below code its over a week now RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^usedcarindelhi\.com$ [OR] RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.usedcarindelhi\.com$ RewriteRule ^/?$ "http\:\/\/www\.mycarhelpline\.com\/index\ .php\?option\=com_usedcar\&view\=category\&Itemid\=3\&location\=delhi" [R=301,L] i basically need to move usedcarindelhi.com & www.usedcarindelhi.com to http://www.mycarhelpline.com/index.php?option=com_usedcar&view=category&Itemid=3&location=delhi Sometimes the 301 redirect is working making me go to mycarhelpline n sometimes am find myself on usedcarindelhi can someone help in this pls Thanks

  Read the article

• Problem with apt-get update: failed to fetch error

  - by user171447

  I run an Ubuntu Server 12.04.3 LTS. Today, I wanted to update it, but I did not managed it (yes...), however upgrading worked well. I don't want you to solve my problem but it would be greatful if you could give me some hints. I googled hours, I fould a lot of this kind of errors, but not exactly this. Here is the output of apt-get update: Hit http://filepile.fastit.net precise Release.gpg Hit http://filepile.fastit.net precise Release Hit http://filepile.fastit.net precise/main amd64 Packages Hit http://filepile.fastit.net precise/restricted amd64 Packages Hit http://filepile.fastit.net precise/universe amd64 Packages Hit http://filepile.fastit.net precise/multiverse amd64 Packages Hit http://filepile.fastit.net precise/main i386 Packages Hit http://filepile.fastit.net precise/restricted i386 Packages Hit http://filepile.fastit.net precise/universe i386 Packages Hit http://filepile.fastit.net precise/multiverse i386 Packages Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/main TranslationIndex Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/restricted TranslationIndex Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/universe TranslationIndex Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/main Translation-en_GB Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/main Translation-en Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/main Translation-en_GB.UTF-8 Hit http://archive.canonical.com precise Release.gpg Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/multiverse Translation-en_GB Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/multiverse Translation-en Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/multiverse Translation-en_GB.UTF-8 Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/restricted Translation-en_GB Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/restricted Translation-en Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/restricted Translation-en_GB.UTF-8 Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/universe Translation-en_GB Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/universe Translation-en Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/universe Translation-en_GB.UTF-8 Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise Release.gpg Hit http://archive.canonical.com precise Release Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise Release Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/main Sources Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted Sources Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/main i386 Packages Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted i386 Packages Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse i386 Packages Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/main TranslationIndex Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse TranslationIndex Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted TranslationIndex Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/main Translation-en_GB Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/main Translation-en Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse Translation-en_GB Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse Translation-en Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted Translation-en_GB Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted Translation-en Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security Release.gpg Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates Release.gpg Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security Release Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates Release Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/main amd64 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted amd64 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe amd64 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse amd64 Packages :W: Failed to fetch http://archive.canonical.com/dists/precise/Release Unable to find expected entry 'main/binary-amd64/Packages' in Release file (Wrong sources.list entry or malformed file) E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead. Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/main i386 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted i386 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe i386 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse i386 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/main TranslationIndex Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse TranslationIndex Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted TranslationIndex Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe TranslationIndex Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main amd64 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted amd64 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe amd64 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse amd64 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main i386 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted i386 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe i386 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse i386 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main TranslationIndex Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse TranslationIndex Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted TranslationIndex Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe TranslationIndex Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/main Translation-en Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse Translation-en Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted Translation-en Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe Translation-en Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main Translation-en_GB Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main Translation-en Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse Translation-en_GB Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse Translation-en Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted Translation-en_GB Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted Translation-en Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe Translation-en_GB Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe Translation-en And here is my /etc/apt/sources.list: ###### Ubuntu Main Repos deb http://filepile.fastit.net/ubuntu/ precise main restricted universe multiverse # deb http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise main restricted universe multiverse deb http://archive.canonical.com/ precise main restricted universe multiverse ###### Ubuntu Update Repos deb http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-security main restricted universe multiverse deb http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates main restricted universe multiverse deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise main restricted multiverse deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise main restricted multiverse Thanks for your help!

  Read the article

• `svn checkout` on the SVN server causes the repo to break with a 301 error

  - by Phillip Oldham

  We have an nginx server which proxies to a standard set-up of Apache+SVN. The nginx set-up is a very simple proxy: server { server_name svn.ourdomain.tld; location / { proxy_pass http://localhost:8080; } } Apache is set-up as follows: <Location /> DAV svn SVNParentPath /var/svn AuthType Basic AuthName "Authentication Required" AuthUserFile /var/svn/.auth Require valid-user </Location> ...which allows us to access repositories using something like http://svn.ourdomain.tld/repo. We've been running this set-up now for about 2 years without issue. Recently we've found that we need to check out one of the repositories onto the server itself, however whenever we do so it seems to break the repo. From that point on, it will only respond with a 301 Moved Permanently error. We've tried: svn co file:///path/to/repo svn co svn://localhost/repo svn co svn://svn.ourdomain.tld/repo svn co svn+ssh://localhost/repo svn co svn+ssh://svn.ourdomain.tld/repo svn co http://localhost/repo svn co http://svn.ourdomain.tld/repo Also tried bypassing nginx, and get the same error: svn co http://localhost:8080/repo svn co http://svn.ourdomain.tld:8080/repo Checking out from a different machine works as expected until we attempt to check out on the server, after that it refuses with the same 301 error. What is more confusing is that this repository server also hosts our HudsonCI server, which can pulls and builds our projects hourly. This leads us to suspect that it's the svn client which is causing an error in communication. Its also very confusing that removing then re-creating the repo using svnadmin doesn't reset the error - the repo is still unavailable even though it's "new"! Restarting apache and subversion (svnserve) has no effect on this, or the original error. Version information: OS: 64-bit CentOS 4.2, 2.6.27 kernel svn client: 1.4.2 (same for both server and remote clients) svn server: 1.4.2 httpd: 2.2.3 UPDATE: This also happens with svn export when run on the repo server. Ran from any other box/client, there isn't a problem. Here's the workflow, to help clarify the error: [~repo-server~]# svnadmin create {repo}; chown -Rf www:www {repo} [remote-client]# svn checkout http://svn.ourdomain.tld/repo [remote-client]# svn add file; svn ci -m '' [~repo-server~]# cd /var/www; svn export file:///path/to/repo/trunk ourproject [remote-client]# svn update fails with 301 error I can also confirm that the hostname of the box doesn't have an effect here, which is very odd: whether or not svn.ourdomain.tld is added to /etc/hosts it still breaks - we thought it could be an issue with localhost routing, but that doesn't seem to be the case. Are we missing something in the documentation which states you can't checkout a repo when the server is on the same box? How can we stop the repos becoming corrupt when we checkout locally?

  Read the article

• apache2 mod_proxy without 301 moved permanently?

  - by Guy Sensei

  Is it possible to not send a 301 moved permanently response to the client when using mod_proxy? I would like the client to deal with the reverse proxy as opaquely as possible. My Virtual Host Settings- relevant snippet ProxyPreserveHost On ProxyPass /GTM http://192.168.1.27/GTM ProxyPassReverse /GTM http://192.168.1.27/GTM wget localhost/GTM --2011-09-27 21:54:22-- localhost/GTM Resolving localhost... ::1, 127.0.0.1 Connecting to localhost|::1|:80... failed: Connection refused. Connecting to localhost|127.0.0.1|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 301 Moved Permanently Location: localhost/GTM/ [following] --2011-09-27 21:54:22-- localhost/GTM/ Reusing existing connection to localhost:80. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK

  Read the article

• 301 redirect from non www to www issue

  - by esmitex

  I have been trying to set a 301 redirect from a non www to a www domain since yesterday but it only cause problems on my site. I first tried it from the control panel of the website, then by modifying the .htaccess file with the following: Options +FollowSymlinks RewriteEngine on rewritecond %{http_host} ^mydomain.com [nc] rewriterule ^(.*)$ http://www.mydomain.com/$1 [r=301,nc] My site is based on wordpress, the first problem that occurred was that I could not access my backend anymore… when I was trying to log in the page would just reload itself and then there was an endless loop and the whole site was unaccessible. After removing these few lines, everything was fine.

  Read the article

• http 301 redirection issue

  - by Guilhem Soulas

  I'm a little bit lost with a redirection. I want mysite.com, www.mysite.com and www.mysite.co.uk to redirect to mysite.co.uk. In Apache, I wrote this for mysite.co.uk in order to redirect www to the root domain: RewriteEngine on RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www RewriteRule ^/(.*) http://mysite.co.uk/$1 [L,R=301] And for mysite.com, I wrote this redirect to mysite.co.uk: ServerName www.mysite.com RewriteEngine on RewriteRule ^/(.*) http://mysite.co.uk/$1 [L,R=301] This way, I can make the redirection work properly from www.mysite.com to mysite.co.uk, but it doesn't work for mysite.com too mysite.co.uk (without the www) at the same time. Could someone tell me how to make all my redirections work in all cases?

  Read the article

• Ranking hit after site migration

  - by Ben

  I migrated my site from its old domain over a month ago. I followed Google Webmaster Tools completely, including 301 redirects from every existing URL to the new domain, and then submitting a change of address. Traffic continued as normal, but then a few days after submitting the change of address traffic plummeted to about 20-30% of what it was previously. Most of my traffic comes from organic search, and I can see that for the keywords I had targeted before and performed well with and am now ranking much much lower for. In some cases for low competition keywords I've only lost a few places, for higher competition terms I have really suffered. This has started to pick up a bit (one of my keywords I have risen from 195 to 100 in the last week), but it seems to be a very slow process. How seamless is this process normally? I was under the impression that this would not affect my rankings too severely, but it has now been a month since the move and recovery seems to be very slow, if at all. Is it likely that I've missed something? The only change is that I have moved what was the home page to be more of a sub-page, and now in its place is a magazine-style home page. I understand that links to the old site will now be pointing to the latter which means that rankings for some keywords attributed to the old home page will take a hit, but even on other pages that seem to fit in exactly the same page structure as the previous site I have seen a drop in rankings.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  | Next Page >