Search Results

Search found 8340 results on 334 pages for 'merge join'.

Page 90/334 | < Previous Page | 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97  | Next Page >

  • Postgres Stored procedure using iBatis

    - by Om Yadav
    --- The error occurred while applying a parameter map. --- Check the newSubs-InlineParameterMap. --- Check the statement (query failed). --- Cause: org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: ERROR: wrong record type supplied in RETURN NEXT Where: PL/pgSQL function "getnewsubs" line 34 at return next the function detail is as below.... CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION getnewsubs(timestamp without time zone, timestamp without time zone, integer) RETURNS SETOF record AS $BODY$declare v_fromdt alias for $1; v_todt alias for $2; v_domno alias for $3; v_cursor refcursor; v_rec record; v_cpno bigint; v_actno int; v_actname varchar(50); v_actid varchar(100); v_cpntypeid varchar(100); v_mrp double precision; v_domname varchar(100); v_usedt timestamp without time zone; v_expirydt timestamp without time zone; v_createdt timestamp without time zone; v_ctno int; v_phone varchar; begin open v_cursor for select cpno,c.actno,usedt from cpnusage c inner join account s on s.actno=c.actno where usedt = $1 and usedt < $2 and validdomstat(s.domno,v_domno) order by c.usedt; fetch v_cursor into v_cpno,v_actno,v_usedt; while found loop if isactivation(v_cpno,v_actno,v_usedt) IS TRUE then select into v_actno,v_actname,v_actid,v_cpntypeid,v_mrp,v_domname,v_ctno,v_cpno,v_usedt,v_expirydt,v_createdt,v_phone a.actno,a.actname as name,a.actid as actid,c.descr as cpntypeid,l.mrp as mrp,s.domname as domname,c.ctno as ctno,b.cpno,b.usedt,b.expirydt,d.createdt,a.phone from account a inner join cpnusage b on a.actno=b.actno inner join cpn d on b.cpno=d.cpno inner join cpntype c on d.ctno=c.ctno inner join ssgdom s on a.domno=s.domno left join price_class l ON l.price_class_id=b.price_class_id where validdomstat(a.domno,v_domno) and b.cpno=v_cpno and b.actno=v_actno; select into v_rec v_actno,v_actname,v_actid,v_cpntypeid,v_mrp,v_domname,v_ctno,v_cpno,v_usedt,v_expirydt,v_createdt,v_phone; return next v_rec; end if; fetch v_cursor into v_cpno,v_actno,v_usedt; end loop; return ; end;$BODY$ LANGUAGE 'plpgsql' VOLATILE; ALTER FUNCTION getnewsubs(timestamp without time zone, timestamp without time zone, integer) OWNER TO radius If i am running the function from the console it is running fine and giving me the correct response. But when using through java causing the above error. Can ay body help in it..Its very urgent. Please response as soon as possible. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Which will be the best query OR there is an another one?

    - by serhan
    SELECT k.id,k.adsoyad, COUNT(DISTINCT(e.id)) as iletisimbilgisisay, COUNT(DISTINCT(f.id)) AS ilangonderensay, COUNT(DISTINCT(g.id)) AS emlaksahibisay, isNULL(MAX(eb.yonetici_kisi),0) AS yoneticiid FROM dbo.kisiler k LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.emlaklar e ON e.iletisimbilgisi=k.id LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.emlaklar f ON f.ilangonderen=k.id LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.emlaklar g ON g.emlaksahibi=k.id LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.emlakcibilgileri eb ON eb.yonetici_kisi=k.id GROUP BY k.id,k.adsoyad ORDER BY yoneticiid DESC, iletisimbilgisisay DESC, ilangonderensay DESC total execution time (above) 28 SELECT id,adsoyad, (select COUNT(id) FROM dbo.emlaklar WHERE iletisimbilgisi=k.id) AS iletisimbilgisisay, (select COUNT(id) FROM dbo.emlaklar WHERE emlaksahibi=k.id) AS emlaksahibisay, (select COUNT(id) FROM dbo.emlaklar WHERE ilangonderen=k.id) AS ilangonderensay, (Select isNULL(MAX(id),0) FROM dbo.emlakcibilgileri WHERE yonetici_kisi=k.id) AS yoneticiid FROM dbo.kisiler k total execution time 4 my tables are emlaklar: id int, ilangonderen int,iletisimbilgisi int,emlaksahibi int kisiler: id int,kisiadi emlakcibilgileri: id int,yonetici_kisi int,firma and ilangonderen,iletisimbilgisi,emlaksahibi,yonetici_kisi => kisiler.id

    Read the article

  • Performance of VIEW vs. SQL statement

    - by Matt W.
    I have a query that goes something like the following: select <field list> from <table list> where <join conditions> and <condition list> and PrimaryKey in (select PrimaryKey from <table list> where <join list> and <condition list>) and PrimaryKey not in (select PrimaryKey from <table list> where <join list> and <condition list>) The sub-select queries both have multiple sub-select queries of their own that I'm not showing so as not to clutter the statement. One of the developers on my team thinks a view would be better. I disagree in that the SQL statement uses variables passed in by the program (based on the user's login Id). Are there any hard and fast rules on when a view should be used vs. using a SQL statement? What kind of performance gain issues are there in running SQL statements on their own against regular tables vs. against views. (Note that all the joins / where conditions are against indexed columns, so that shouldn't be an issue.) EDIT for clarification... Here's the query I'm working with: select obj_id from object where obj_id in( (select distinct(sec_id) from security where sec_type_id = 494 and ( (sec_usergroup_id = 3278 and sec_usergroup_type_id = 230) or (sec_usergroup_id in (select ug_gi_id from user_group where ug_ui_id = 3278) and sec_usergroup_type_id = 231) ) and sec_obj_id in ( select obj_id from object where obj_ot_id in (select of_ot_id from obj_form left outer join obj_type on ot_id = of_ot_id where ot_app_id = 87 and of_id in (select sec_obj_id from security where sec_type_id = 493 and ( (sec_usergroup_id = 3278 and sec_usergroup_type_id = 230) or (sec_usergroup_id in (select ug_gi_id from user_group where ug_ui_id = 3278) and sec_usergroup_type_id = 231) ) ) and of_usage_type_id = 131 ) ) ) ) or (obj_ot_id in (select of_ot_id from obj_form left outer join obj_type on ot_id = of_ot_id where ot_app_id = 87 and of_id in (select sec_obj_id from security where sec_type_id = 493 and ( (sec_usergroup_id = 3278 and sec_usergroup_type_id = 230) or (sec_usergroup_id in (select ug_gi_id from user_group where ug_ui_id = 3278) and sec_usergroup_type_id = 231) ) ) and of_usage_type_id = 131 ) and obj_id not in (select sec_obj_id from security where sec_type_id = 494) )

    Read the article

  • ValueError: too many values to unpack in a tuple

    - by falosi
    Please put some light on why am getting a too many to unpack (ValueError in my for loop).Have tried deb naislist = [('CONTROL FILE', '0', '0', '0'), ('REDO LOG', '0', '0', '0'), ('ARCHIVED LOG', '.69', '.59', '3'), ('BACKUP PIECE', '46.54', '0', '192'), ('IMAGE COPY', '0', '0', '0'), ('FLASHBACK LOG', '10.15', '6.31', '82'), ('FOREIGN ARCHIVED LOG', '0', '0', '0')] print "size of naislist is ",len((naislist)) heading = ('MAIN MENU', 'LEVELS', 'LEVEL2', 'LEVEL3') rearrange = dict(zip((0, 1, 2, 3), (len(str(x)) for x in heading))) for tu, x in naislist: rearrange.update((i, max(rearrange[i], len(str(el)))) for i, el in enumerate(tu)) rearrange[4] = max(rearrange[4], len(str(x))) forkit = '|'. join('%%-%ss' % rearrange[i] for i in xrange(0, 4)) print '\n'.join((forkit % heading, '-|-'.join(rearrange[i] * '-' for i in xrange(4)), '\n'.join(forkit % (a, b, c, d) for (a, b, c), d in naislist)))

    Read the article

  • Use where condition with unjoined table

    - by Dragos D
    I have the following problem: I am trying to retreive a sum value based on one condition. Problem is that I can't join the conditional value since my tables aren't joined. Here is my syntax: SELECT SUM(value) FROM value v join day d on v.day_id = d.day_id join budget b on d.budget_id = b.budget_id join unit u on v.unit_id = u.unit_id where #output.class = (SELECT distinct s.class FROM sale s where s.id = #output.sale_id) AND u.unit_name in ('electronics') With this sybtax I get no error but neither values. Can you please tell me where I do wrong?

    Read the article

  • Where to put conditionals in ANSI-syntax SQL queries

    - by RenderIn
    What's the difference between these two queries? I've been resistant to jumping on the ANSI-syntax bandwagon because I have not been able to unravel various syntactical ambiguities. Is 1) returning the product of the join and only then filtering out those joined records which have weight = 500? And is 2) filtering out those prior to the join? Is 2 bad syntax? Why might I use that? 1: SELECT SOMETHING FROM FOO INNER JOIN BAR ON FOO.NAME = BAR.NAME WHERE BAR.WEIGHT < 500 2: SELECT SOMETHING FROM FOO INNER JOIN BAR ON FOO.NAME = BAR.NAME AND BAR.WEIGHT < 500

    Read the article

  • magento category tree menu query being called on every page

    - by user1173309
    I have this query being called on every page in Magento CE 1.6.2, to find out where is it being called from, I have disabled all modules, removed the customizations done but it's still being called, this query is slowing up the page loading time and am at my wit's end trying to find out how can I stop it from being executed. The query is given below, for simplcitiy, I have removed lot of category id' to keep the sql short, it would be great if I could get solutions or hints to stop this query being called. SELECT e.*, IF(at_is_active.value_id 0, at_is_active.value, at_is_active_default.value) AS is_active, IF(at_include_in_menu.value_id 0, at_include_in_menu.value, at_include_in_menu_default.value) AS include_in_menu, core_url_rewrite.request_path FROM catalog_category_entity AS e INNER JOIN catalog_category_entity_int AS at_is_active_default ON (at_is_active_default.entity_id = e.entity_id) AND (at_is_active_default.attribute_id = '119') AND at_is_active_default.store_id = 0 LEFT JOIN catalog_category_entity_int AS at_is_active ON (at_is_active.entity_id = e.entity_id) AND (at_is_active.attribute_id = '119') AND (at_is_active.store_id = 1) INNER JOIN catalog_category_entity_int AS at_include_in_menu_default ON (at_include_in_menu_default.entity_id = e.entity_id) AND (at_include_in_menu_default.attribute_id = '934') AND at_include_in_menu_default.store_id = 0 LEFT JOIN catalog_category_entity_int AS at_include_in_menu ON (at_include_in_menu.entity_id = e.entity_id) AND (at_include_in_menu.attribute_id = '934') AND (at_include_in_menu.store_id = 1) LEFT JOIN core_url_rewrite ON (core_url_rewrite.category_id=e.entity_id) AND (core_url_rewrite.is_system=1 AND core_url_rewrite.product_id IS NULL AND core_url_rewrite.store_id='1' AND id_path LIKE 'category/%') WHERE (e.entity_type_id = '9') AND (e.entity_id IN('105', '125', '284', '285', '286', '288', '289', '185', '463', '464', '465', '625')) AND (e.entity_id NOT IN('140', '145', '530', '531', '775')) AND (IF(at_is_active.value_id 0, at_is_active.value, at_is_active_default.value) = '1') AND (IF(at_include_in_menu.value_id 0, at_include_in_menu.value, at_include_in_menu_default.value) = '1') Cheers Arjun

    Read the article

  • Too Many Left Outer Joins in Entity Framework 4?

    - by Adam
    I have a product entity, which has 0 or 1 "BestSeller" entities. For some reason when I say: db.Products.OrderBy(p = p.BestSeller.rating).ToList(); the SQL I get has an "extra" outer join (below). And if I add on a second 0 or 1 relation ship, and order by both, then I get 4 outer joins. It seems like each such entity is producing 2 outer joins rather than one. LINQ to SQL behaves exactly as you'd expect, with no extra join. Has anyone else experienced this, or know how to fix it? SELECT [Extent1].[id] AS [id], [Extent1].[ProductName] AS [ProductName] FROM [dbo].[Products] AS [Extent1] LEFT OUTER JOIN [dbo].[BestSeller] AS [Extent2] ON [Extent1].[id] = [Extent2].[id] LEFT OUTER JOIN [dbo].[BestSeller] AS [Extent3] ON [Extent2].[id] = [Extent3].[id] ORDER BY [Extent3].[rating] ASC

    Read the article

  • MySQL Count If using 4 tables or Perl

    - by user1726133
    Hi I have a relatively convoluted query that relies on 4 different tables, unfortunately I do not have control of this data, but I do have to query it. I ran this simpler query and it works using just table 1 and table 2 SELECT actor, receiver, count(IF(t2.group1 = "anxiety behavior", 1,0)) AS 'anxiety' FROM ethogram_edited_obs_behaviors t1 JOIN ethogram_behaviors t2 on t1.behavior = t2.behavior_code GROUP BY actor; Below are the 4 tables I need and the query I tried that didn't work Table 1 | Table 2 | Table 3 | Table 4 Actor | Behavior | Behavior | type of Behavior | subject | sex | subject |subject_code er frown | frown anxiety behavior | Eric M | Eric | er Here is the query that is failing SELECT actor, count(IF(t2.group1 = "anxiety behavior", 1,0) AND(t3.sex = "M", 1,0)) AS 'anxiety', FROM ethogram_edited_obs_behaviors t1 JOIN ethogram_behaviors t2 on t1.behavior = t2.behavior_code JOIN subject_code t3 on t1.actor = t3.behavior_code1 JOIN subjects t4 on t3.subject = t4.yerkes_code GROUP BY actor; Any help would be much appreciated!! Thanks :) P.S. if this is easier to do in Perl tips also much appreciated

    Read the article

  • Linq to Entity Dynamic where clause

    - by GodSmart
    I have Linq to Entity query like you can see below I am using it five times in my code, everything that change is where clause. is it possible to create a method and pass just where values, not to write all code five times. Thank you items = from t1 in _entities.table1 join t2 in _entities.Table2 on t1.column1 equals t2.column1 join t3 in _entities.Table3 on t1.column2 equals t3.column2 join t4 in _entities.Table4 on t1.column3 equals t4.column3 where **t1.column5 == Something** select new { t1.column7, t2.column8, t3.column9, t4.column10 };

    Read the article

  • MySQL different versions other results.

    - by kuba
    hey, i have 2 version of mysql on windows 5.1.39-community and on linux 5.1.39-log i execute a query: SELECT `o`.`idOffer`, `o`.`offer_date`, `p`.`factory`, `c`.`short` AS `company`, `s`.`name` AS `subcategory`, `ct`.`name` AS `category`, count( (select count(1) from product where idProduct=idOffer group by idOffer) ) as b FROM `Offer` AS `o` LEFT JOIN `Product` AS `p` ON o.idOffer = p.idOffer LEFT JOIN `company` AS `c` ON o.company = c.id LEFT JOIN `Subcategory` AS `s` ON s.idSubcategory = o.idSubcategory LEFT JOIN `Category` AS `ct` ON ct.idCategory = s.idCategory WHERE (o.idOffer = p.idOffer) GROUP BY `o`.`idOffer` on windows it works as it suppose, but on linux it says: ERROR 1242 (21000): Subquery returns more than 1 row is it any way to get it worked on linux without any mysql updates/downgrades ?

    Read the article

  • Currently using View, Should I use a hard table instead?

    - by 1001010101
    I am currently debating whether my table, mapping_uGroups_uProducts, which is a view formed by the following table: CREATE ALGORITHM=UNDEFINED DEFINER=`root`@`localhost` SQL SECURITY DEFINER VIEW `db`.`mapping_uGroups_uProducts` AS select distinct `X`.`upID` AS `upID`,`Z`.`ugID` AS `ugID` from ((`db`.`mapping_uProducts_Products` `X` join `db`.`productsInfo` `Y` on((`X`.`pID` = `Y`.`pID`))) join `db`.`mapping_uGroups_Groups` `Z` on((`Y`.`gID` = `Z`.`gID`))); My current query is: SELECT upID FROM uProductsInfo \ JOIN fs_uProducts USING (upID) column \ JOIN mapping_uGroups_uProducts USING (upID) -- could be faster if we use hard table and index \ JOIN mapping_fs_key USING (fsKeyID) \ WHERE fsName="OVERALL" \ AND ugID=1 \ ORDER BY score DESC \ LIMIT 0,30; which is pretty slow. (for 30 results, it requires about 10 secondes). I think the reason for my query being so slow is definitely due to the fact that that particular query relies on a VIEW which has no index to speed things up. +----+-------------+----------------+--------+----------------+---------+---------+---------------------------------------+-------+---------------------------------+ | id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra | +----+-------------+----------------+--------+----------------+---------+---------+---------------------------------------+-------+---------------------------------+ | 1 | PRIMARY | mapping_fs_key | const | PRIMARY,fsName | fsName | 386 | const | 1 | Using temporary; Using filesort | | 1 | PRIMARY | <derived2> | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 19706 | Using where | | 1 | PRIMARY | uProductsInfo | eq_ref | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 4 | mapping_uGroups_uProducts.upID | 1 | Using index | | 1 | PRIMARY | fs_uProducts | ref | upID | upID | 4 | db.uProductsInfo.upID | 221 | Using where | | 2 | DERIVED | X | ALL | PRIMARY | NULL | NULL | NULL | 40772 | Using temporary | | 2 | DERIVED | Y | eq_ref | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 4 | db.X.pID | 1 | Distinct | | 2 | DERIVED | Z | ref | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 4 | db.Y.gID | 2 | Using index; Distinct | +----+-------------+----------------+--------+----------------+---------+---------+---------------------------------------+-------+---------------------------------+ 7 rows in set (0.48 sec) The explain here looks pretty cryptic, and I don't know whether I should drop view and write a script to just insert everything in the view to a hard table. ( obviously, it will lose the flexibility of the view since the mapping changes quite frequently). Does anyone have any idea to how I can optimize my schema better?

    Read the article

  • SQL Server 2008 vs 2005 udf xml perfomance problem.

    - by user344495
    Ok we have a simple udf that takes a XML integer list and returns a table: CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[udfParseXmlListOfInt] ( @ItemListXml XML (dbo.xsdListOfInteger) ) RETURNS TABLE AS RETURN ( --- parses the XML and returns it as an int table --- SELECT ListItems.ID.value('.','INT') AS KeyValue FROM @ItemListXml.nodes('//list/item') AS ListItems(ID) ) In a stored procedure we create a temp table using this UDF INSERT INTO @JobTable (JobNumber, JobSchedID, JobBatID, StoreID, CustID, CustDivID, BatchStartDate, BatchEndDate, UnavailableFrom) SELECT JOB.JobNumber, JOB.JobSchedID, ISNULL(JOB.JobBatID,0), STO.StoreID, STO.CustID, ISNULL(STO.CustDivID,0), AVL.StartDate, AVL.EndDate, ISNULL(AVL.StartDate, DATEADD(day, -8, GETDATE())) FROM dbo.udfParseXmlListOfInt(@JobNumberList) TMP INNER JOIN dbo.JobSchedule JOB ON (JOB.JobNumber = TMP.KeyValue) INNER JOIN dbo.Store STO ON (STO.StoreID = JOB.StoreID) INNER JOIN dbo.JobSchedEvent EVT ON (EVT.JobSchedID = JOB.JobSchedID AND EVT.IsPrimary = 1) LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.Availability AVL ON (AVL.AvailTypID = 5 AND AVL.RowID = JOB.JobBatID) ORDER BY JOB.JobSchedID; For a simple list of 10 JobNumbers in SQL2005 this returns in less than 1 second, in 2008 this run against the exact same data returns in 7 min. This is on a much faster machine with more memory. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • ruby on rails has_many through relationship

    - by BennyB
    Hi i'm having a little trouble with a has_many through relationship for my app and was hoping to find some help. So i've got Users & Lectures. Lectures are created by one user but then other users can then "join" the Lectures that have been created. Users have their own profile feed of the Lectures they have created & also have a feed of Lectures friends have created. This question however is not about creating a lecture but rather "Joining" a lecture that has been created already. I've created a "lecturerelationships" model & controller to handle this relationship between Lectures & the Users who have Joined (which i call "actives"). Users also then MUST "Exit" the Lecture (either by clicking "Exit" or navigating to one of the header navigation links). I'm grateful if anyone can work through some of this with me... I've got: Users.rb model Lectures.rb model Users_controller Lectures_controller then the following model lecturerelationship.rb class lecturerelationship < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessible :active_id, :joinedlecture_id belongs_to :active, :class_name => "User" belongs_to :joinedlecture, :class_name => "Lecture" validates :active_id, :presence => true validates :joinedlecture_id, :presence => true end lecturerelationships_controller.rb class LecturerelationshipsController < ApplicationController before_filter :signed_in_user def create @lecture = Lecture.find(params[:lecturerelationship][:joinedlecture_id]) current_user.join!(@lecture) redirect_to @lecture end def destroy @lecture = Lecturerelationship.find(params[:id]).joinedlecture current_user.exit!(@user) redirect_to @user end end Lectures that have been created (by friends) show up on a users feed in the following file _activity_item.html.erb <li id="<%= activity_item.id %>"> <%= link_to gravatar_for(activity_item.user, :size => 200), activity_item.user %><br clear="all"> <%= render :partial => 'shared/join', :locals => {:activity_item => activity_item} %> <span class="title"><%= link_to activity_item.title, lecture_url(activity_item) %></span><br clear="all"> <span class="user"> Joined by <%= link_to activity_item.user.name, activity_item.user %> </span><br clear="all"> <span class="timestamp"> <%= time_ago_in_words(activity_item.created_at) %> ago. </span> <% if current_user?(activity_item.user) %> <%= link_to "delete", activity_item, :method => :delete, :confirm => "Are you sure?", :title => activity_item.content %> <% end %> </li> Then you see I link to the the 'shared/join' partial above which can be seen in the file below _join.html.erb <%= form_for(current_user.lecturerelationships.build(:joinedlecture_id => activity_item.id)) do |f| %> <div> <%= f.hidden_field :joinedlecture_id %> </div> <%= f.submit "Join", :class => "btn btn-large btn-info" %> <% end %> Some more files that might be needed: config/routes.rb SampleApp::Application.routes.draw do resources :users do member do get :following, :followers, :joined_lectures end end resources :sessions, :only => [:new, :create, :destroy] resources :lectures, :only => [:create, :destroy, :show] resources :relationships, :only => [:create, :destroy] #for users following each other resources :lecturerelationships, :only => [:create, :destroy] #users joining existing lectures So what happens is the lecture comes in my activity_feed with a Join button option at the bottom...which should create a lecturerelationship of an "active" & "joinedlecture" (which obviously are supposed to be coming from the user & lecture classes. But the error i get when i click the join button is as follows: ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid in LecturerelationshipsController#create SQLite3::ConstraintException: constraint failed: INSERT INTO "lecturerelationships" ("active_id", "created_at", "joinedlecture_id", "updated_at") VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?) Also i've included my user model (seems the error is referring to it) user.rb class User < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessible :email, :name, :password, :password_confirmation has_secure_password has_many :lectures, :dependent => :destroy has_many :lecturerelationships, :foreign_key => "active_id", :dependent => :destroy has_many :joined_lectures, :through => :lecturerelationships, :source => :joinedlecture before_save { |user| user.email = email.downcase } before_save :create_remember_token validates :name, :presence => true, :length => { :maximum => 50 } VALID_EMAIL_REGEX = /\A[\w+\-.]+@[a-z\d\-.]+\.[a-z]+\z/i validates :email, :presence => true, :format => { :with => VALID_EMAIL_REGEX }, :uniqueness => { :case_sensitive => false } validates :password, :presence => true, :length => { :minimum => 6 } validates :password_confirmation, :presence => true def activity # This feed is for "My Activity" - basically lectures i've started Lecture.where("user_id = ?", id) end def friendactivity Lecture.from_users_followed_by(self) end # lECTURE TO USER (JOINING) RELATIONSHIPS def joined?(selected_lecture) lecturerelationships.find_by_joinedlecture_id(selected_lecture.id) end def join!(selected_lecture) lecturerelationships.create!(:joinedlecture_id => selected_lecture.id) end def exit!(selected_lecture) lecturerelationships.find_by_joinedlecture_id(selected_lecture.id).destroy end end Thanks for any and all help - i'll be on here for a while so as mentioned i'd GREATLY appreciate someone who may have the time to work through my issues with me...

    Read the article

  • SubSonic 3 LeftOuterJoin

    - by michaelpearce
    I have read in this forum that left outer join syntax is not supported by subsonic in an answer to a question on the topic by "Apocatastasis". I have the same issue in that when I create a query using the .LeftOuterJoin the resulting sql has an inner join rather than a left outer join. Can someone please confirm that LeftOuterJoin is indeed not supported and, if that is the case, why is it included in the active record syntax? Thanks Michael

    Read the article

  • Anything wrong with this MySQL quert? takes 10 seconds+ to load

    - by user345426
    I have a search that is taking 10 seconds+ to execute! Keep in mind it is also searching over 200,000 products in the database. I posted the explain and MySQL query here. 1 SIMPLE p ref PRIMARY,products_status,prod_prodid_status,product... products_status 1 const 9048 Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort 1 SIMPLE v ref PRIMARY,vendors_id,vendors_vendorid vendors_vendorid 4 rhinomar_rhinomartnew.p.vendors_id 1 1 SIMPLE s ref products_id products_id 4 rhinomar_rhinomartnew.p.products_id 1 1 SIMPLE pd ref PRIMARY,products,prod_desc_prodid_prodname prod_desc_prodid_prodname 4 rhinomar_rhinomartnew.p.products_id 1 1 SIMPLE p2c ref PRIMARY,ptc_catidx PRIMARY 4 rhinomar_rhinomartnew.p.products_id 1 Using where; Using index 1 SIMPLE c eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 4 rhinomar_rhinomartnew.p2c.categories_id 1 Using where MySQL Query: select p.products_id, p.products_image, p.products_price, p.products_weight, p.products_unit_quantity, s.specials_new_products_price, s.status, pd.products_name, pd.products_img_alt from products p left join vendors v ON v.vendors_id = p.vendors_id left join specials s on s.products_id = p.products_id left join products_description pd on pd.products_id = p.products_id left join products_to_categories p2c on p2c.products_id = p.products_id left join categories c on c.categories_id = p2c.categories_id where ( ( pd.products_name like '%apparel%' ) or p2c.categories_id IN (773, 132, 135, 136, 119, 122, 124, 125, 126, 1749, 1753, 1747, 123, 127, 130, 131, 178, 137, 140, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 832, 2045 ) or p.products_id = 'apparel' or p.products_model = 'apparel' or CONCAT(v.vendors_prefix, '-') = 'apparel' or CONCAT( v.vendors_prefix, '-', p.products_id ) = 'apparel' ) and p.products_status = '1' and c.categories_status = '1' group by p.products_id order by pd.products_name

    Read the article

  • How do I make my MySQL query with joins more concise?

    - by John Hoffman
    I have a huge MySQL query that depends on JOINs. SELECT m.id, l.name as location, CONCAT(u.firstName, " ", u.lastName) AS matchee, u.email AS mEmail, u.description AS description, m.time AS meetingTime FROM matches AS m LEFT JOIN locations AS l ON locationID=l.id LEFT JOIN users AS u ON (u.id=m.user1ID) WHERE m.user2ID=2 UNION SELECT m.id, l.name as location, CONCAT(u.firstName, " ", u.lastName) AS matchee, u.email AS mEmail, u.description AS description, m.time AS meetingTime FROM matches AS m LEFT JOIN locations AS l ON locationID=l.id LEFT JOIN users AS u ON (u.id=m.user2ID) WHERE m.user1ID=2 The first 3 lines of each sub-statement divided by UNION are identical. How can I abide by the DRY principle, not repeat those three lines, and make this query more concise?

    Read the article

  • has_many :through name suggestions

    - by user1084769
    I have three models, user, achievement, badge and I plan on using has_many :through instead of has_many_and_belongs_to since I will have a few extra fields in the join tables. According to a Railscast I watched, using this method requires coming up with new model names and not user_badge or user_achievement. For my User Achievement join what do you think of Accomplishment? For my User Badge join what do you think of Distinction?

    Read the article

  • how to bind parameters correctly in example below in mysqli?

    - by user1421767
    In old mysql code, I had a query below which worked perfectly which is below: $questioncontent = (isset($_GET['questioncontent'])) ? $_GET['questioncontent'] : ''; $searchquestion = $questioncontent; $terms = explode(" ", $searchquestion); $questionquery = " SELECT q.QuestionId, q.QuestionContent, o.OptionType, an.Answer, r.ReplyType, FROM Answer an INNER JOIN Question q ON q.AnswerId = an.AnswerId JOIN Reply r ON q.ReplyId = r.ReplyId JOIN Option_Table o ON q.OptionId = o.OptionId WHERE "; foreach ($terms as $each) { $i++; if ($i == 1){ $questionquery .= "q.QuestionContent LIKE `%$each%` "; } else { $questionquery .= "OR q.QuestionContent LIKE `%$each%` "; } } $questionquery .= "GROUP BY q.QuestionId, q.SessionId ORDER BY "; $i = 0; foreach ($terms as $each) { $i++; if ($i != 1) $questionquery .= "+"; $questionquery .= "IF(q.QuestionContent LIKE `%$each%` ,1,0)"; } $questionquery .= " DESC "; But since that old mysql is fading away that people are saying to use PDO or mysqli (Can't use PDO because of version of php I have currently got), I tried changing my code to mysqli, but this is giving me problems. In the code below I have left out the bind_params command, my question is that how do I bind the parameters in the query below? It needs to be able to bind multiple $each because the user is able to type in multiple terms, and each $each is classed as a term. Below is current mysqli code on the same query: $questioncontent = (isset($_GET['questioncontent'])) ? $_GET['questioncontent'] : ''; $searchquestion = $questioncontent; $terms = explode(" ", $searchquestion); $questionquery = " SELECT q.QuestionId, q.QuestionContent, o.OptionType, an.Answer, r.ReplyType, FROM Answer an INNER JOIN Question q ON q.AnswerId = an.AnswerId JOIN Reply r ON q.ReplyId = r.ReplyId JOIN Option_Table o ON q.OptionId = o.OptionId WHERE "; foreach ($terms as $each) { $i++; if ($i == 1){ $questionquery .= "q.QuestionContent LIKE ? "; } else { $questionquery .= "OR q.QuestionContent LIKE ? "; } } $questionquery .= "GROUP BY q.QuestionId, q.SessionId ORDER BY "; $i = 0; foreach ($terms as $each) { $i++; if ($i != 1) $questionquery .= "+"; $questionquery .= "IF(q.QuestionContent LIKE ? ,1,0)"; } $questionquery .= " DESC "; $stmt=$mysqli->prepare($questionquery); $stmt->execute(); $stmt->bind_result($dbQuestionId,$dbQuestionContent,$dbOptionType,$dbAnswer,$dbReplyType); $questionnum = $stmt->num_rows();

    Read the article

  • error in fill datagrid whit query

    - by Amir Tavakoli
    i have a data-gride-view and i add my query to this when write my query i catch this error: The schema returned by the new query differs from the base query and this my query: SELECT B.SettingKey, 'SysSettingsDep' AS TableName, B.SettingValue, B.SettingDesc FROM SysCustomer AS A INNER JOIN SysSettingsDep AS B ON A.SettingKey = B.SettingKey UNION SELECT C.SettingKey, 'SysSettingsMachine' AS TableName, C.SettingValue, C.SettingDesc FROM SysCustomer AS A INNER JOIN SysSettingsMachine AS C ON A.SettingKey = C.SettingKey UNION SELECT D.SettingKey, 'SysSettings' AS TableName, D.SettingValue, D.SettingDesc FROM SysCustomer AS A INNER JOIN SysSettings AS D ON A.SettingKey = D.SettingKey help me to solve this, tnx

    Read the article

  • Types in Union or Concat cannot be constructed with hierarchy

    - by user927777
    I am trying to run a query very similar to the following: (from bs in DataContext.TblBookShelf join b in DataContext.Book on bs.BookID equals b.BookID where bs.BookShelfID == bookShelfID select new BookItem { Categories = String.Join("<br/>", b.BookCategories.Select(x => x.Name).DefaultIfEmpty().ToArray()), Name = b.Name, ISBN = b.ISBN, BookType = "Shelf" }).Union(from bs in DataContext.TblBookShelf join bi in DataContext.TblBookInventory on bs.BookID equals bi.BookID select new BookItem { Categories = String.Join("<br/>", bi.BookCategories.Select(x => x.Name).DefaultIfEmpty().ToArray()), Name = bi.Name, ISBN = bi.ISBN, BookType = "Inventory" }); I am receiving "Types in Union or Concat cannot be constructed with hierarchy" after the statement executes, I need to to be able to get a list of categories to display with each book. If anyone could shed some light on a possible solution, it would be greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • combining results of two select statements

    - by ErnieStings
    I'm using T-SQL with ASP.NET, and c# and i'm pretty new to SQL. I was wondering how i could combine the results of two queries Query1: SELECT tableA.Id, tableA.Name, [tableB].Username AS Owner, [tableB].ImageUrl, [tableB].CompanyImageUrl, COUNT(tableD.UserId) AS NumberOfUsers FROM tableD RIGHT OUTER JOIN [tableB] INNER JOIN tableA ON [tableB].Id = tableA.Owner ON tableD.tableAId = tableA.Id GROUP BY tableA.Name, [tableB].Username, [tableB].ImageUrl, [tableB].CompanyImageUrl Query2: SELECT tableA.Id, tableA.Name, COUNT([tableC].Id) AS NumberOfPlans FROM [tableC] RIGHT OUTER JOIN tableA ON [tableC].tableAId = tableA.Id GROUP BY tableA.Id, tableA.Name Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • Checking sqlite datetime NULL with RoR

    - by Paul N
    RoR/SQL newbie here. My datetime column 'deleted_at' are all uninitialized. Running this query returns an error: SELECT * FROM variants v ON v.id = ovv0.variant_id INNER JOIN option_values_variants ovv1 ON v.id = ovv1.variant_id INNER JOIN option_values_variants ovv2 ON v.id = ovv2.variant_id INNER JOIN option_values_variants ovv3 ON v.id = ovv3.variant_id INNER JOIN option_values_variants ovv4 ON v.id = ovv4.variant_id WHERE v.deleted_at = NULL AND v.product_id = 1060500595 However, if I set my datetime values to 0, and set my query to v.deleted_at = 0, the correct variant is returned to me. How do I check for uninitialized/NULL datetimes?

    Read the article

  • Cannot locate record in delphi ADO query

    - by Danatela
    I can't locate any record in TADOQuery using PK. First, I was trying to use standard Locate method: PPUQuery.Locate('ID', SpPlansQuery['PPONREC'], []); It always returns False, but manual search (passing the whole query matching ID with given PPONREC which is really slow) finds the desired row. I tried using loPartialKey and switched CursorLocation of query to clUseServer, but it didn't help. Next, I tried to filter my PPUQuery: PPUQuery.Filter := 'ID = ' + VarToStr(SpPlansQuery['PPONREC']); PPUQuery.Filtered := True; PPUQuery.First; But after that the PPUQuery.Eof is True and PPUQuery.RecordCount equals 0. Underlying database is Oracle 9 and the ID is of type INTEGER and is PK of table TPORDER_CMK. PPUQuery.SQL is: SELECT tp.*, la.*, lm.*, ld.*, ld1.*, to_cmk.* FROM ppu_plan.tporder_cmk tp JOIN PPU_PLAN.LARTICLES la ON TP.ARTICLE = LA.ID JOIN PPU_PLAN.LMATERIAL lm ON TP.MATERIAL = lm.id JOIN PPU_PLAN.LCADEP ld ON TP.CADEP = LD.ID JOIN PPU_PLAN.LCADEP ld1 ON TP.PRODUCER = LD1.ID JOIN PPU_PLAN.TORDER_CMK to_cmk ON TP.order_id=TO_cmk.ID WHERE TP.PLAN_ID = :pplan_id What should I try next and how to solve this problem?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97  | Next Page >