Search Results

Search found 13514 results on 541 pages for 'springsource tool suite'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 91/541 | < Previous Page | 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98  | Next Page >

  • Why is Reflector such an essential utility?

    - by c152driver
    Reading the brouhaha surrounding Reflector going paid got me thinking about the product and its uses. Many people seem to consider it an essential tool. I have to admit, I haven't used Reflector in years. I mean, there's documentation for both the .Net APIs and the third party components I use. In the past, whenever a colleague pulled Reflector out of his tool belt, I got the sense he was headed into the weeds. Reading all the passion around Reflector is leading me to question if I'm really missing something here. Why do you need something like Reflector so often that you consider it an essential tool? I can see it being needed on very rare occasions, but not enough to be considered an essential tool. Please enlighten me.

    Read the article

  • Skipping intermediate Ubuntu OS upgrade to latest one,How do I upgrade from 9.04 to 10.04.2?

    - by Yadnesh
    I'm currently runing Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty. I want to upgrade to 10.04.02, but whenever I use the Update manager to do this, it fails with the error "An upgrade from 'jaunty' to 'lucid' is not supported with this tool". I also tried to run sudo do-release-upgrade -d, but it fails with the same error message: Checking for a new ubuntu release Done Upgrade tool signature Done Upgrade tool Done downloading extracting 'lucid.tar.gz' authenticate 'lucid.tar.gz' against 'lucid.tar.gz.gpg' tar: Removing leading `/' from member names Reading cache Checking package manager Can not upgrade An upgrade from 'jaunty' to 'lucid' is not supported with this tool.

    Read the article

  • gnome-control-center can't set display resolution under openbox

    - by Andy
    I'm running Ubuntu 11.10 with Openbox on my laptop. Since I need to plug different external displays into it and Openbox environment doesn't automatically pick them up, I thought the best solution I can come up with is to use gnome-control-center and it's display settings tool from within Openbox. But although this tool does detect monitors correctly, it can't do any change -- clicking Apply button just doesn't seem to do anything. So my questions are: 1) how to get this tool working? 2) how to run "Displays" tool directly from command-line, skipping control center? 3) is there a better way to automatically detect and set resolutions on internal/external monitors under Openbox? Please note I tried arandr too and it doesn't even work for my environment (doesn't detect external display plugging in at all). For what it's worth, my laptop is Lenovo G560, Ubuntu is x64 version with all the updates rolled over. Thanks for your consideration.

    Read the article

  • B2B Customer Case Study Presentation at OOW 2012!

    - by Nitesh Jain
    Real life B2B customer talking about consolidation to Oracle B2B and SOA Suite. Hear Kevin Clugage, IT Director, Stryker and B2B Team present on consolidating legacy B2B networks on a global B2B infrastructure using Oracle B2B and SOA Suite. This session will discuss B2B industry trends, product overview, Stryker's case study and will elaborate on the benefits of using Oracle B2B to solve your partner integration needs today. Oracle B2B is Drummond Certified and has customers using the product in Supply Chain, Travel, Transport, Healthcare, Hightech and Telecom industries. We are excited about our session, and look forward to see you there! Wed, Oct 3, 3:30 PM – 4:30 PM – Moscone West – 3003 CON5003 – Delivering a High-Value Global B2B Network with Oracle SOA Suite 11g https://blogs.oracle.com/SOA/entry/b2b_customer_case_study_presentation

    Read the article

  • SQL Server Developer Tools &ndash; Codename Juneau vs. Red-Gate SQL Source Control

    - by Ajarn Mark Caldwell
    So how do the new SQL Server Developer Tools (previously code-named Juneau) stack up against SQL Source Control?  Read on to find out. At the PASS Community Summit a couple of weeks ago, it was announced that the previously code-named Juneau software would be released under the name of SQL Server Developer Tools with the release of SQL Server 2012.  This replacement for Database Projects in Visual Studio (also known in a former life as Data Dude) has some great new features.  I won’t attempt to describe them all here, but I will applaud Microsoft for making major improvements.  One of my favorite changes is the way database elements are broken down.  Previously every little thing was in its own file.  For example, indexes were each in their own file.  I always hated that.  Now, SSDT uses a pattern similar to Red-Gate’s and puts the indexes and keys into the same file as the overall table definition. Of course there are really cool features to keep your database model in sync with the actual source scripts, and the rename refactoring feature is now touted as being more than just a search and replace, but rather a “semantic-aware” search and replace.  Funny, it reminds me of SQL Prompt’s Smart Rename feature.  But I’m not writing this just to criticize Microsoft and argue that they are late to the party with this feature set.  Instead, I do see it as a viable alternative for folks who want all of their source code to be version controlled, but there are a couple of key trade-offs that you need to know about when you choose which tool set to use. First, the basics Both tool sets integrate with a wide variety of source control systems including the most popular: Subversion, GIT, Vault, and Team Foundation Server.  Both tools have integrated functionality to produce objects to upgrade your target database when you are ready (DACPACs in SSDT, integration with SQL Compare for SQL Source Control).  If you regularly live in Visual Studio or the Business Intelligence Development Studio (BIDS) then SSDT will likely be comfortable for you.  Like BIDS, SSDT is a Visual Studio Project Type that comes with SQL Server, and if you don’t already have Visual Studio installed, it will install the shell for you.  If you already have Visual Studio 2010 installed, then it will just add this as an available project type.  On the other hand, if you regularly live in SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS) then you will really enjoy the SQL Source Control integration from within SSMS.  Both tool sets store their database model in script files.  In SSDT, these are on your file system like other source files; in SQL Source Control, these are stored in the folder structure in your source control system, and you can always GET them to your file system if you want to browse them directly. For me, the key differentiating factors are 1) a single, unified check-in, and 2) migration scripts.  How you value those two features will likely make your decision for you. Unified Check-In If you do a continuous-integration (CI) style of development that triggers an automated build with unit testing on every check-in of source code, and you use Visual Studio for the rest of your development, then you will want to really consider SSDT.  Because it is just another project in Visual Studio, it can be added to your existing Solution, and you can then do a complete, or unified single check-in of all changes whether they are application or database changes.  This is simply not possible with SQL Source Control because it is in a different development tool (SSMS instead of Visual Studio) and there is no way to do one unified check-in between the two.  You CAN do really fast back-to-back check-ins, but there is the possibility that the automated build that is triggered from the first check-in will cause your unit tests to fail and the CI tool to report that you broke the build.  Of course, the automated build that is triggered from the second check-in which contains the “other half” of your changes should pass and so the amount of time that the build was broken may be very, very short, but if that is very, very important to you, then SQL Source Control just won’t work; you’ll have to use SSDT. Refactoring and Migrations If you work on a mature system, or on a not-so-mature but also not-so-well-designed system, where you want to refactor the database schema as you go along, but you can’t have data suddenly disappearing from your target system, then you’ll probably want to go with SQL Source Control.  As I wrote previously, there are a number of changes which you can make to your database that the comparison tools (both from Microsoft and Red Gate) simply cannot handle without the possibility (or probability) of data loss.  Currently, SSDT only offers you the ability to inject PRE and POST custom deployment scripts.  There is no way to insert your own script in the middle to override the default behavior of the tool.  In version 3.0 of SQL Source Control (Early Access version now available) you have that ability to create your own custom migration script to take the place of the commands that the tool would have done, and ensure the preservation of your data.  Or, even if the default tool behavior would have worked, but you simply know a better way then you can take control and do things your way instead of theirs. You Decide In the environment I work in, our automated builds are not triggered off of check-ins, but off of the clock (currently once per night) and so there is no point at which the automated build and unit tests will be triggered without having both sides of the development effort already checked-in.  Therefore having a unified check-in, while handy, is not critical for us.  As for migration scripts, these are critically important to us.  We do a lot of new development on systems that have already been in production for years, and it is not uncommon for us to need to do a refactoring of the database.  Because of the maturity of the existing system, that often involves data migrations or other additional SQL tasks that the comparison tools just can’t detect on their own.  Therefore, the ability to create a custom migration script to override the tool’s default behavior is very important to us.  And so, you can see why we will continue to use Red Gate SQL Source Control for the foreseeable future.

    Read the article

  • In-depth Coverage for Oracle Workflow

    - by Steven Chan (Oracle Development)
    I'm lucky to work with many talented people in the Applications Technology Group, and many of them contribute articles to this blog.  Some team members have their own blogs.  If you work with Oracle Workflow, here's one that you should be following: Oracle E-Business Suite - Workflow This blog is updated every few months by our development team with in-depth technical articles about Oracle Workflow-related topics.  For example, articles posted there include: Implementing a post-notification function to perform custom validation E-Business Suite Proactive Support - Workflow Analyzer Asynchronous Business Event Subscriptions - Troubleshooting Tips Oracle E-Busienss Suite RCD - Applications Technology Releases 12.1 and 12.2 SMTP Authentication Feature in R12.1.3 Configurable User LOV in Worklist UI Oracle Business Event and Subsciptions Execution Flow Understanding AQs in Workflow SSL in Oracle Workflow Leveraging Oracle Workflow for Declarative PageFlow If you have suggestions about Workflow topics that you'd like to see covered there, drop them a line.

    Read the article

  • SOA Galore: New Books for Technical Eyes Only

    - by Bob Rhubart
    In my part of the world the weather has taken its seasonal turn toward the kind of cold, damp, miserable stuff that offers a major motivation to stay indoors. While I plan on spending some of that indoor time working my way through the new 50th anniversary James Bond box set, I will also devote some time to improving my mind rather than my martini-mixing skills by catching up on my reading. If you're in a similar situation, you might want to spend some of your time  with these new technical books written by community members: Oracle SOA Suite 11g Administrator's Handbook by Ahmed Aboulnaga and Arun Pareek. Oracle BPM Suite 11g: Advanced BPMN Topics by Mark Nelson and Tanya Williams Oracle SOA Suite 11g Developer's Cookbook by Antony Reynolds and Matt Wright (Coming in December; available for pre-order).

    Read the article

  • The Birth of SSAS Compare

    - by Red Gate Software BI Tools Team
    Noemi Moreno, Red Gate Business Intelligence Specialist Software vendors – even Microsoft – tend to forget about the needs of business intelligence developers. We are a rare and rather invisible species. For example, BIDS remained in VS 2008 until SQL Server 2012. It took until this release before we got something as simple as an “undo” function. Before I joined Red Gate as a BI specialist, I worked on SQL Development. I’ll never forget the time I discovered Red Gate’s SQL Compare tool and how it reduced the task of preparing a database release from a couple of days to ten minutes. When I moved to SSAS, MDX and cubes, I became frustrated with the deployment process because I couldn’t find a tool that made Cube releases as easy as they are with SQL Compare. This became my quest. I pitched the idea to a few people in Red Gate’s regular Down Tools Week, when everyone puts down their day-to-day tasks and works on their own projects. My task was to reason with a roomful of cynical developers, hardened to the blandishments of project managers, for help to develop a tool that would compare two different SSAS databases and create the script to process only the objects that needed processing, thereby reducing release time to only a few minutes. I walked to the podium and gave them the full story of the distressed BI specialists, doomed to spend tedious hours preparing deployment scripts. A few developers recovered from their torpor to cast a languid eye at my presentation. It wasn’t enough. In a sudden impulse, I blurted out a promise to perform a flamenco dance for just the team if the tool was able to successfully compare two SSAS databases and generate a script by the end of the week. I was lucky enough that some of them believed me and jumped in: David Pond (Dev), Matt Burton (Dev), Tilman Bregler (Dev), Shobana Sekar (Test), Ruchija Raj (Test), Nick Sutherland (Product Manager) and Irma Tanovic (BI). They didn’t know that Irma and I would be away on a conference in Amsterdam and would leave them without our support. But to my surprise, they had a working tool by the time we came back – basic, and with a few bugs, but a working tool nonetheless! Seeing it compare a very basic SSAS database, detect the changes and generate the scripts was amazing! Something that normally takes half a day was done in under a minute. Since then, a few months have passed and a BI Tools team has been created at Red Gate to work full time on BI tools for BI developers, starting with SSAS Compare. How cool is that? So download the free beta and give us your feedback. And the flamenco? I still need to deliver that. Tilman reminds me every day! I need to get the full flamenco costume.

    Read the article

  • links for 2011-02-15

    - by Bob Rhubart
    Why the hybrid cloud model is the best approach | Cloud Computing - InfoWorld Although some cloud providers look at the hybrid model as blasphemy, there are strong reasons for them to adopt it, says David Linthicum.  (tags: davidlinthicum cloud) Exadata Part V: Monitoring with Database Control The Oracle Instructor Uwe Hesse shows how "we can use Oracle Enterprise Manager Database Control to monitor an Exadata Database Machine, especially the Storage Servers (Cells). " (tags: oracle exadata) ATG Live Webcast Feb. 24th: Using the EBS 12 SOA Adapter (Oracle E-Business Suite Technology) "This live one-hour webcast will offer a review of the Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) capabilities within E-Business Suite R12 focusing on the E-Business Suite Adapter." (tags: oracle soa) Oracle Forms Migration to ADF - Webinar vom ORACLE Partner PITSS (Oracle Fusion Middleware für den Finanzsektor) "Join Oracle's Grant Ronald and PITSS to see a software architecture comparison of Oracle Forms and ADF and a live step-by-step presentation on how to achieve a successful migration." (tags: oracle adf)

    Read the article

  • Best approach for saving highlighted areas on geographical map.

    - by Mohsen
    I am designing an application that allow users to highlight areas of a geographical map using a tool that is like brush or a pen. The tool basically draw a circle with a single click and continue drawing those circles with move move. Here is an example of drawing made by moving the tool. It is pretty much same as Microsoft Paint. Regardless of programming language what is best approach (most inexpensive approach) for saving this kind of data?

    Read the article

  • What open source POSIX compliance test suites are available?

    - by Richard Pennington
    I'm working on a small open source project, ELLCC, that uses clang/LLVM as a cross compiler for various target processors. For the runtime environment, I'm using the NetBSD libraries and porting them to target Linux and standalone systems. I want to run a POSIX compliance test suite on the code. I've found the Open POSIX Test Suite, which looks like a good start, but it hasn't been updated since 2005. I've done some preliminary testing (with gcc and ecc under Linux), and it looks like it needs a few updates for modern compilers. My questions are: Does the Open POSIX Test Suite live on somewhere in a more up to date form? Are there other open source alternatives?

    Read the article

  • UPDATE: Planning Bulletin for JRE 7: What EBS Customers Can Do Today

    - by user793044
      An initiative to certify Oracle E-Business Suite with JRE 7 desktop clients is underway.  We have tested EBS 11.5.10.2, 12.0, and 12.1 with JRE 7. We have fixes for nearly all of the compatibility issues now, and are working hard to produce the remaining fixes quickly. Go to the Oracle E-Business Suite Technology Blog to read the latest information about: When will JRE 7 be certified with Oracle E-Business Suite? What can customers do to prepare for the JRE 7 certification? What else will be required by the final certified configuration? Where will the official patch requirements be documented?

    Read the article

  • News from OpenWorld: Innovation Across Fusion Middleware Product Portfolio

    - by Tanu Sood
    Oracle today announced that it continues to drive innovation across its Oracle Fusion Middleware product suite and extend industry’s #1 business innovation platform for the enterprise and the cloud.   Innovations across Oracle Fusion Middleware product portfolio help customers and partners to innovate, cut costs, and reduce complexity. Oracle Fusion Middleware components include  Oracle SOA Suite, Oracle WebLogic Server, Oracle WebCenter, Oracle Business Intelligence, Oracle Identity Management and Oracle Data Integration. Additional Resources: Press Release: Oracle announces Identity Management 11g Release 2 Press Release: Oracle announces Oracle Identity Governance Suite Press Release: Oracle announces Oracle Privileged Account Manager Website: Oracle Identity Management On-Demand webcast: Identity Management 11gR2 Launch Oracle Magazine: Security on the Move

    Read the article

  • Oracle Fusion Middleware 11g (11.1.1.3.0) ?????????

    - by Hiroyuki Yoshino
    ????Media Pack??????????????????????1, 2???????????????? ??????????????????????Oracle Fusion Middleware 11g (11.1.1.3.0)??????????????????????????FAQ????????????????????????????????? (?????????????????????????????) ????FAQ????????? Q. Oracle Fusion Middleware?????·????????????????? A. ??·??????????????????????·?????Oracle??????????????SOA Suite 11g R1 (11.1.1.2.0)???·??????? ?????????????????Oracle??????????????????????????????????SOA Suite 11g R1 (11.1.1.3.0)?SOA Suite 11g R1 (11.1.1.2.0)????????????????????????????? ??Oracle Technology Network???????·??????·???????????????????????????????? Q. ??????????????????????????????? A. ?????????????????????????????? Product Version Required Product WebLogic Server Repository Creation Utility JDeveloper 11.1.1.2 10.3.2 11.1.1.2.1 11.1.1.2.0 11.1.1.3 10.3.3 11.1.1.3.0 11.1.1.3.0 ????? ??????????????????????????

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98  | Next Page >