Search Results

Search found 57907 results on 2317 pages for 'database access'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 92/2317 | < Previous Page | 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99  | Next Page >

  • SQL-Calculate percentages from database table values

    - by Howard
    Hi, Im trying to calculate the percentages of selected fields from tables. Within the fields that data is numeric but I want to show the percentage value. Please help. private void btnpics_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { try { myCon.Open(); string queryString = "SELECT FoodType.Description,FoodType.Calories, FoodType.Carbohydrate, FoodType.Fat, FoodType.Protein FROM [FoodType], [Meal] WHERE (Meal.UserID =" + userid.Text + ") AND (Meal.MealDate =" + date.Text + ");"; MessageBox.Show(queryString); loadDataGrid(queryString); } catch (Exception ex) { MessageBox.Show(ex.Message); } }

    Read the article

  • Unaccounted for database size

    - by Nazadus
    I currently have a database that is 20GB in size. I've run a few scripts which show on each tables size (and other incredibly useful information such as index stuff) and the biggest table is 1.1 million records which takes up 150MB of data. We have less than 50 tables most of which take up less than 1MB of data. After looking at the size of each table I don't understand why the database shouldn't be 1GB in size after a shrink. The amount of available free space that SqlServer (2005) reports is 0%. The log mode is set to simple. At this point my main concern is I feel like I have 19GB of unaccounted for used space. Is there something else I should look at? Normally I wouldn't care and would make this a passive research project except this particular situation calls for us to do a backup and restore on a weekly basis to put a copy on a satellite (which has no internet, so it must be done manually). I'd much rather copy 1GB (or even if it were down to 5GB!) than 20GB of data each week. sp_spaceused reports the following: Navigator-Production 19184.56 MB 3.02 MB And the second part of it: 19640872 KB 19512112 KB 108184 KB 20576 KB while I've found a few other scripts (such as the one from two of the server database size questions here, they all report the same information either found above or below). The script I am using is from SqlTeam. Here is the header info: * BigTables.sql * Bill Graziano (SQLTeam.com) * graz@<email removed> * v1.11 The top few tables show this (table, rows, reserved space, data, index, unused, etc): Activity 1143639 131 MB 89 MB 41768 KB 1648 KB 46% 1% EventAttendance 883261 90 MB 58 MB 32264 KB 328 KB 54% 0% Person 113437 31 MB 15 MB 15752 KB 912 KB 103% 3% HouseholdMember 113443 12 MB 6 MB 5224 KB 432 KB 82% 4% PostalAddress 48870 8 MB 6 MB 2200 KB 280 KB 36% 3% The rest of the tables are either the same in size or smaller. No more than 50 tables. Update 1: - All tables use unique identifiers. Usually an int incremented by 1 per row. I've also re-indexed everything. I ran the dbcc shrink command as well as updating the usage before and after. And over and over. An interesting thing I found is that when I restarted the server and confirmed no one was using it (and no maintenance procs are running, this is a very new application -- under a week old) and when I went to run the shrink, every now and then it would say something about data changed. Googling yielded too few useful answers with the obvious not applying (it was 1am and I disconnected everyone, so it seems impossible that was really the case). The data was migrated via C# code which basically looked at another server and brought things over. The quantity of deletes, at this point in time, are probably under 50k in rows. Even if those rows were the biggest rows, that wouldn't be more than 100M I would imagine. When I go to shrink via the GUI it reports 0% available to shrink, indicating that I've already gotten it as small as it thinks it can go. Update 2: sp_spaceused 'Activity' yields this (which seems right on the money): Activity 1143639 134488 KB 91072 KB 41768 KB 1648 KB Fill factor was 90. All primary keys are ints. Here is the command I used to 'updateusage': DBCC UPDATEUSAGE(0); Update 3: Per Edosoft's request: Image 111975 2407773 19262184 It appears as though the image table believes it's the 19GB portion. I don't understand what this means though. Is it really 19GB or is it misrepresented? Update 4: Talking to a co-worker and I found out that it's because of the pages, as someone else here has also state the potential for that. The only index on the image table is a clustered PK. Is this something I can fix or do I just have to deal with it? The regular script shows the Image table to be 6MB in size. Update 5: I think I'm just going to have to deal with it after further research. The images have been resized to be roughly 2-5KB each and on a normal file system doesn't consume much space but on SqlServer it seems to consume considerably more. The real answer, in the long run, will likely be separating that table in to another partition or something similar.

    Read the article

  • Multi-tenant Access Control: Repository or Service layer?

    - by FreshCode
    In a multi-tenant ASP.NET MVC application based on Rob Conery's MVC Storefront, should I be filtering the tenant's data in the repository or the service layer? 1. Filter tenant's data in the repository: public interface IJobRepository { IQueryable<Job> GetJobs(short tenantId); } 2. Let the service filter the repository data by tenant: public interface IJobService { IList<Job> GetJobs(short tenantId); } My gut-feeling says to do it in the service layer (option 2), but it could be argued that each tenant should in essence have their own "virtual repository," (option 1) where this responsibility lies with the repository. Which is the most elegant approach: option 1, option 2 or is there a better way? Update: I tried the proposed idea of filtering at the repository, but the problem is that my application provides the tenant context (via sub-domain) and only interacts with the service layer. Passing the context all the way to the repository layer is a mission. So instead I have opted to filter my data at the service layer. I feel that the repository should represent all data physically available in the repository with appropriate filters for retrieving tenant-specific data, to be used by the service layer. Final Update: I ended up abandoning this approach due to the unnecessary complexities. See my answer below.

    Read the article

  • Bang Notation and Dot Notation in VBA and MS-Access

    - by Nitrodist
    While perusing an application that I'm documenting, I've run across some examples of bang notation in accessing object properties/methods, etc. and in other places they use dot notation for what seems like the same purpose. Is there a difference or preference to using one or the other? Some simple googling only reveals limited information on the subject with some people actually using it in opposite cases. Perhaps there is a coding standards section from MS somewhere that indicates the method of madness?

    Read the article

  • Help with this query in Access

    - by DiegoMaK
    ID- DATE- NAME 10100- 2010/04/17- Name1 10100- 2010/04/14- Name2 10200- 2010/04/17- Name3 10200- 2010/04/16- Name4 10200- 2010/04/15- Name5 10400- 2010/04/01- Name6 I have this fields(and others too) in one table. I need to do a query which return the ID with your respective name where more recently date for example the results for desired query in that data example will be. 10100- 2010/04/17- Name1 10200- 2010/04/17- Name3 10400- 2010/04/01- Name6 Ommiting ID with older dates. Then I need one query for that. thanks.

    Read the article

  • transactions in MS Access

    - by arcticpenguin
    Let's say I have the following code in a form that is triggered on some click event. DoCmd.SetWarnings False DoCmd.OpenQuery "AddSomeStuff" DoCmd.OpenQuery "UpdateSomeOtherStuff" DoCmd.OpenQuery "DeleteABunchOfCrap" DoCmd.SetWarnings True Can I assume that the three update queries I executed (in SQL Server) are not transactional in that they are run is separate transactions?

    Read the article

  • MS Access Force report footer to bottom of page

    - by LanguaFlash
    I am trying to make a report for a proposal. I would like to keep a professional look and always force the terms section to the bottom of the page. I could use the page footer but I only want the terms to show on the last page. My idea is somehow with VBA to set the height of a dummy group such that it forces the report footer to the bottom. The problem is that you can't explicitly set the height of a section. Anyone else out there with another idea (That works)? :-) Thanks, Jeff

    Read the article

  • Query Access and VB.NET

    - by yae
    Hi all: I have 2 tables: "products" and "pieces" PRODUCTS idProd product price PIECES id idProdMain idProdChild quant idProdMain and idProdChild are vinculated with the table: "products". Other considerations is that 1 product can have some pieces and 1 product can be a piece. Price product equal a sum of quantity * price of all their pieces. EXAMPLE: TABLE PRODUCTS (idProd - product - price) 1 - Computer - 300€ 2 - Hard Disk - 100€ 3 - Memory - 50€ 4 - Main Board - 100€ 5 - Software - 50€ 6 - CDroms 100 un. - 30€ TABLE PIECES (id - idProdMain - idProdChild - Quant.) 1 - 1 - 2 - 1 2 - 1 - 3 - 2 3 - 1 - 4 - 1 WHAT I NEED? I need update the price of the main product when the price of the product child (piece) is changed. Following the previous example, if I change the price of this product "memory" (is a piece too) to 60€, then product "Computer" will must change his price to 320€ How I can do it using queries? Already I have tried this to obatin the price of the main product, but not runs. This query not returns any value SELECT Sum(products.price*pieces.quant) AS Expr1 FROM products LEFT JOIN pieces ON (products.idProd = pieces.idProdChild) AND (products.idProd = pieces.idProdChild) AND (products.idProd = pieces.idProdMain) WHERE (((pieces.idProdMain)=5));

    Read the article

  • MS ACCESS: How can i count distinct value using access query?

    - by Sadat
    here is the current complex query given below. SELECT DISTINCT Evaluation.ETCode, Training.TTitle, Training.Tcomponent, Training.TImpliment_Partner, Training.TVenue, Training.TStartDate, Training.TEndDate, Evaluation.EDate, Answer.QCode, Answer.Answer, Count(Answer.Answer) AS [Count], Questions.SL, Questions.Question FROM ((Evaluation INNER JOIN Training ON Evaluation.ETCode=Training.TCode) INNER JOIN Answer ON Evaluation.ECode=Answer.ECode) INNER JOIN Questions ON Answer.QCode=Questions.QCode GROUP BY Evaluation.ETCode, Answer.QCode, Training.TTitle, Training.Tcomponent, Training.TImpliment_Partner, Training.Tvenue, Answer.Answer, Questions.Question, Training.TStartDate, Training.TEndDate, Evaluation.EDate, Questions.SL ORDER BY Answer.QCode, Answer.Answer; There is an another column Training.TCode. I need to count distinct Training.TCode, can anybody help me? If you need more information please let me know

    Read the article

  • Linking indivuidal queries in a unbound listbox in ACCESS 2007

    - by Jeremy
    I have created a unbound listbox. I have the box showing a list of queries i want the use to be able to select. My problem is I don't understand how to get the submit button to select the currently selected query and run it. So how do I link the submit button to the listbox and have each item in the box submit it's own query.

    Read the article

  • Help Me With This Access Query

    - by yae
    I have 2 tables: "products" and "pieces" PRODUCTS idProd product price PIECES id idProdMain idProdChild quant idProdMain and idProdChild are related with the table: "products". Other considerations is that 1 product can have some pieces and 1 product can be a piece. Price product equal a sum of quantity * price of all their pieces. "Products" table contains all products (p EXAMPLE: TABLE PRODUCTS (idProd - product - price) 1 - Computer - 300€ 2 - Hard Disk - 100€ 3 - Memory - 50€ 4 - Main Board - 100€ 5 - Software - 50€ 6 - CDroms 100 un. - 30€ TABLE PIECES (id - idProdMain - idProdChild - Quant.) 1 - 1 - 2 - 1 2 - 1 - 3 - 2 3 - 1 - 4 - 1 WHAT I NEED? I need update the price of the main product when the price of the product child (piece) is changed. Following the previous example, if I change the price of this product "memory" (is a piece too) to 60€, then product "Computer" will must change his price to 320€ How I can do it using queries? Already I have tried this to obatin the price of the main product, but not runs. This query not returns any value: SELECT Sum(products.price*pieces.quant) AS Expr1 FROM products LEFT JOIN pieces ON (products.idProd = pieces.idProdChild) AND (products.idProd = pieces.idProdChild) AND (products.idProd = pieces.idProdMain) WHERE (((pieces.idProdMain)=5)); MORE INFO The table "products" contains all the products to sell that it is in the shop. The table "pieces" is to take a control of the compound products. To know those who are the products children. For example of compound product: computers. This product is composed by other products (motherboard, hard disk, memory, cpu, etc.)

    Read the article

  • Copying a field to another table in Access

    - by Jacques Tardie
    I'm a bit embarassed asking this here, but here goes: I've got two tables, which you can see here: http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/4562/query.jpg I need to copy the effortid from the one table into the other, making sure that the values still maintain the correction relationships. The primary key for each is a combination of loggerid & datetime. What's the best way to do this? Thanks in advance, and don't make fun :)

    Read the article

  • access: print report question

    - by I__
    here's the design view of my report: how do i force it to print only one set of these per page, because currently it is printing like this: i want it it print only one set of these controls per page

    Read the article

  • Linking individual queries in a unbound listbox in ACCESS 2007

    - by Jeremy
    I have created a unbound listbox. I have the box showing a list of queries I want the use to be able to select. My problem is I don't understand how to get the submit button to select the currently selected query and run it. So how do I link the submit button to the listbox and have each item in the box submit its own query.

    Read the article

  • Importing/Exporting Relationships in MS Access

    - by lamcro
    I have a couple of mdb files with the exact table structure. I have to change the primary key of the main table from autonumber to number in all of them, which means I have to: Drop the all the relationships the main table has Change the main table Create the relationships again,... for all the tables. Is there any way to export the relationships from one file and importing them to all the rest? I am sure this can be done with some macro/vb code. Does anyone has an example I could use? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • MS-ACCESS query to match first few characters in string comparision

    - by neobee
    What query is suitable to compare two tables specied below, however only part of string in location(table1) will matches with the Location(table2). Location(table1) Location(table2) india- north USxcs India-west Indiaasd India- east Indiaavvds India- south Africassdcasv US- north Africavasvdsa us-west UKsacvavsdv uk- east Indiacascsa uk- south UScssca Africa-middle Indiacsasca Africa-south Africaccc Africa-east UKcac only 1st two characters of location(table1) and 1st two characters of location(table2) should match. Please help only any four characters of location(table1)and any two characters of location(table2)should match.

    Read the article

  • Access violation exception from Delphi's Supports -> QueryInterface

    - by Sharon
    Hi, I have the following piece of code: for i := 0 to FControlList.Count - 1 do if Supports(IMyControl(FControlList[i]), IMyControlEx) then begin MyControlEx := IMyControl(FControlList[i]) as IMyControlEx; MyControlEx.DoYourMagic(Self, SomeData); end; This code is called many times during my application execution, but in some specific cases it fails inside the Supports() method. And more specifically - it seems to fall inside the QueryInterface() call within the Supports() method. I checked that FControlList is not nil and FControlList[i] is not nil and it still happens. Any idea will be appreciated!!!

    Read the article

  • VB.NET - ASP.NET - MS-Access - SQL Statement

    - by Brian
    I have a button which when pressed, sets the user's rights in the db. (If Administrator UserTypeID is set to '2' and if Customer it is set to '1'). However when I run the below code, everything remains the same. I think it's from the SQL statement but I;m not sure. Can anyone help please? Protected Sub btnSetUser_Click(sender As Object, e As System.EventArgs) Handles btnSetUser.Click Dim conn As New OleDbConnection("Provider=Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0;Data Source=C:\Users\Brian\Documents\Visual Studio 2010\WebSites\WebSite3\db.mdb;") Dim cmd As OleDbCommand = New OleDbCommand("UPDATE [User] SET [UserTypeID] WHERE Username=?", conn) conn.Open() cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("@Username", txtUser.Text) If ddUserType.SelectedItem.Text = "Administrator" Then cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("@UserTypeID", "2") cmd.ExecuteNonQuery() lblSetUser.Text = txtUser.Text + "was set to Administrator." ElseIf ddUserType.SelectedItem.Text = "Customer" Then cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("@UserTypeID", "1") cmd.ExecuteNonQuery() lblSetUser.Text = txtUser.Text + "was set to Customer." End If conn.Close() End Sub End Class

    Read the article

  • Access: strange results with queries against MDB file

    - by Craig Johnston
    I am running the following SQL against an MDB file, a copy of which is located here: http://hotfile.com/dl/40641614/2353dfc/test.mdb.html (perfectly clean file, no macros or viruses) SELECT datediff("d", MAX(invoice.date), Now) As Date_Diff , MAX(invoice.date) AS max_invoice_date , customer.number AS customer_number FROM invoice INNER JOIN customer ON invoice.customer_number = customer.number GROUP BY customer.number If the the following was added: HAVING datediff("d", MAX(invoice.date), Now) > 365 would this simply exclude rows with Date_Diff <= 365? What should be the effect of the HAVING clause here?

    Read the article

  • Invoices for Printing in MS-Access

    - by Nitrodist
    The application that I'm currently working on has a funky set up for the invoices that they print. The form is the invoice that is printed out. I took a look at the Northwind DB and what it does is and it actually generates a report based on the record's information. What are the limitations of using Forms vs. Reports for printing out reports? One of the limitations that I've run into so far is that the printed page is jam packed with information (all required) to fit on a single page, yet there is lots of wasted space for some stuff since elements on the page don't shrink or grow due to what's inputted into the textboxes. How are invoices designed for your applications? How do you handle space restraints for creating invoices?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99  | Next Page >