Search Results

Search found 15787 results on 632 pages for 'event dispatching'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 93/632 | < Previous Page | 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100  | Next Page >

  • Triggering jquery event function at page load

    - by lazysoundsystem
    Here's a little jQuery function that does what I want when a checkbox is clicked, but I have a basic gap in my knowledge: How to register this so that it deals with checkboxes that are already clicked when the page loads? $(document).ready(function() { $('fieldset input:checkbox').click(function() { if ($(this).attr('name') == 'foo') { // hide checkbox 'bar' } else { // show checkbox 'bar' } } }); If I use .trigger('click'), it clicks (or unclicks) all the boxes on page load. I can think of a few ways to do this that would involve repeating portions of the code, but I just know that jQuery already has an elegant answer for this...

    Read the article

  • Polling a web URL until event

    - by Jaxo
    I'm really sorry about the crappy title - if anybody has a better way of wording it, please edit it! I basically need to have a C# application run a function if the output of a URL is a certain value. For example, if the website says blue the background colour will be blue, red to make it red, etc. The problem is I don't want to spam my webserver with checks. The 4 bytes it downloads each time is negligible, but if I were to deploy this type of system on multiple computers, it would get slower and slower and the bandwidth would add up quickly. So my question is: How can my desktop application run a piece of code only when a web URL has a different output without checking each time? I can't use sockets, and any sort of LAN protocol won't end up working. My reasoning behind this potentially nefarious code is to be able to mute computers by updating a file on the website (as you may have seen in my previous question today, sorry!). I'd like it to be rather quick, and not have the refresh time minutes apart, a few seconds at the most would be ideal. How can I accomplish this? The website's code is easy, but getting the C# application to check when it changes is the part I'm stuck on. Nothing shows up on the website other than the command. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Adding on touch event to images inside gridview

    - by Steve
    I have a gridview where each item has a image and a textview (an app), i added the onItemClick to the gridview in order to launch the app, i also removed the orange selection and made selector in xml so when pressed the text would change to grey and on release it would return to white. My problem is that i need the image to apply an alpha value when pressed and restore the previous alpha on release i tested a lot of ways and none did worked correctly. I came close with the updated answer from the autor of the question: How to set alpha value for drawable in a StateListDrawable?, but some how the state pressed never gets called, i don´t know if this is because i am using the onitemClick to launch the app or not. Also i since i can´t define the alpha on imageview xml i don´t know what else to do Any help will be appreciated

    Read the article

  • OnClientClick event for keeping track of prints?

    - by Ram
    Hello, I am trying to keep track of prints that are made for a page. The page has Print this page link. And the code for it is like below: This is written in .cs file as there are many conditions for displaying this. And i am appending here using String Builder. sbOutput.AppendFormat("<td align=\"right\" valign=\"bottom\"><div style =\"float:right;text-align:right; valign:bottom;width:200px\"class=\"print_button notPrinted\"><a class=\"notPrinted\" href=\"#\" onclick=\"window.print();\">PRINT THIS COUPON </a><img src=\"images/print-icon-34x34.gif\" class=\"notPrinted\" align=\"absmiddle\" /></div> </td></tr></table>", couponid, Userid, locationid); Do i have to use onclientclick or something else?? Thanks so much in advance.

    Read the article

  • how to hook a callback to click event of star rating control

    - by mohang
    I am using jQuery star rating control found at http://www.fyneworks.com/jquery/star-rating/#tab-Overview . I am using 5 stars, each star having a particular value from 1 to 5. The control is getting displayed and behaving properly. However, I have a requirement of getting the value of the star clicked, immediately after a star is clicked. I do not know how to do it. I appreciate your help.

    Read the article

  • Label Text Changed Event

    - by Rajesh
    In my page if the text of a Label has been Changed I need to fire some function using JQuery as .Change() is restricted to only <input> and <select> I use a function like $("#ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_lblMsg").html("Duplicate record can't be saved.") .trigger('labelchanged') $("#ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_lblMsg").on('labelchanged', function () { alert('changed!'); } }); but the above function is not triggered when the text of the label has been changed kindly anyone point me what could be I am missing in the above function

    Read the article

  • Why is textbox.focus throwing the lostfocus event?

    - by cost
    I've seen a few similar questions on SO but nothing that seems to actually address the issue. Here's a simplified version of the function. Private Sub Check_Quantity(sender As System.Object, e As System.Windows.RoutedEventArgs) _ Handles textbox_quantity.LostFocus Dim worked As Boolean = Integer.TryParse(textbox_quantity.Text, quantity) If Not worked Then MsgBox("Enter a valid number for the quantity") textbox_quantity.Focus() textbox_quantity.SelectAll() quantity = 0 End If End Sub It's important to note that this is WPF. What I want to do is very simple. When someone finishes with the textbox the program checks that what they entered is a number. If it does it sticks this in an integer. If not, it tells them to fix it and keeps the focus on the textbox. The issue is a few things, but what it comes down to is this function runs in an infinite loop. This same function works fine in WinForms, but not in WPF. On some other questions people have said that the messagebox appearing causes focus to be lost, but in testing this isn't true. It still loops regardless of if the messagebox is called or not. The problem is the call to textbox_quantity.Focus(). Without that it works fine. Regardless of whether it's there or not though, focus is not set to the textbox, though textbox_quantity.Focus() still returns a value of true. Any thought of what's going on and maybe how I could fix it?

    Read the article

  • Event handling C# / Registering a callback

    - by Jeff Dahmer
    Events can only return void and recieve object sender/eventargs right? If so then craptastic.... how can I pass a function pointer to another obj, like: public bool ACallBackFunc(int n) { return n > 0; } public void RegisterCallback(Something s) { s.GiveCallBack(this.ACallBackFunc); } Something::GiveCallBack(Action? funcPtr) I tried using Action, but I need it to return some value and Actions can only return void. Also, we do not know what kind of a callback we will be recieving; it could return anything and have any params! Reflection will have to be used somehow I reckon.

    Read the article

  • Call functions in an event/function chain?

    - by acidzombie24
    I have 3 functions. They can be called in any order (later they may need specific order). The return value of one function should be the first param of the next. How do i do this? what i am thinking is something like the below. Whats the best way to do this? string void fn(string sz, data d, eventhdl nextFunc) { //do stuff if(nextFunc == null) return ret; else return nextFunc(ret, d, nextFunc.Next); }

    Read the article

  • Why do people run Java GUI's on the Event Queue

    - by asmo
    In Java, to create and show a new JFrame, I simply do this: public static void main(String[] args) { new JFrame().setVisible(true); } However, I have seen many people doing it like this: public static void main(String[] args) { EventQueue.invokeLater(new Runnable() { public void run() { new JFrame().setVisible(true); } }); } Why? Are there any advantages?

    Read the article

  • C++ Win/Linux thread syncronization Event

    - by JP
    Hello I have some code that is cross-platform by unsing #ifdef OS, I have a Queue protected by a CriticalSection on Windows, and by a pthread_mutex_t on Linux. I would like to implement a Wait(timeout) call that would block a thread until something has been enqueued. I though about using WaitForSingleObject on windows but it don't seem to support CriticalSection. Which Win32 and which Linux functions should I use to Wait and Signal for a condition to happen. Thank

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to access the SMIL timer from javascript?

    - by Will
    I'm trying to use SMIL to animate the typing of text into a field embedded in a SVG. I tried the following code in both Chrome and a SMIL-enable Firefox nightly, but it has no effect: <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <foreignObject> <html:input type="text" value=""> <set attributeName="value" to="Hello World" begin="0" dur="10s" fill="freeze" /> </html:input> </foreignObject> </svg> The text field appears, but remains empty. So, I thought I would register for the beginEvent and do the substitution manually. To test the events, I added: <rect id="rect" x="0" y="0" width="10" height="10"> <animate id="dx" attributeName="x" attributeType="XML" begin="0s" dur="1s" fill="freeze" from="0" to="-10" /> </rect> As well as the javascript that made sense from the event model: window.addEventListener( 'load', function() { function listen( id ) { var elem = document.getElementById( id ) elem.addEventListener( 'beginEvent', function() { console.log( 'begin ' + id ) }, false ) elem.addEventListener( 'endEvent', function() { console.log( 'end ' + id ) }, false ) } listen( 'rect' ) listen( 'dx' ) }) But there's no events fired on either the rect or the animate in either browser. The next logical step seems to be to simulate the animation (ala. FakeSmile), but I want to use the browser's animation timer if at all possible.

    Read the article

  • Win32 reset event like synchronization class with boost C++

    - by fgungor
    I need some mechanism reminiscent of Win32 reset events that I can check via functions having the same semantics with WaitForSingleObject() and WaitForMultipleObjects() (Only need the ..SingleObject() version for the moment) . But I am targeting multiple platforms so all I have is boost::threads (AFAIK) . I came up with the following class and wanted to ask about the potential problems and whether it is up to the task or not. Thanks in advance. class reset_event { bool flag, auto_reset; boost::condition_variable cond_var; boost::mutex mx_flag; public: reset_event(bool _auto_reset = false) : flag(false), auto_reset(_auto_reset) { } void wait() { boost::unique_lock<boost::mutex> LOCK(mx_flag); if (flag) return; cond_var.wait(LOCK); if (auto_reset) flag = false; } bool wait(const boost::posix_time::time_duration& dur) { boost::unique_lock<boost::mutex> LOCK(mx_flag); bool ret = cond_var.timed_wait(LOCK, dur) || flag; if (auto_reset && ret) flag = false; return ret; } void set() { boost::lock_guard<boost::mutex> LOCK(mx_flag); flag = true; cond_var.notify_all(); } void reset() { boost::lock_guard<boost::mutex> LOCK(mx_flag); flag = false; } }; Example usage; reset_event terminate_thread; void fn_thread() { while(!terminate_thread.wait(boost::posix_time::milliseconds(10))) { std::cout << "working..." << std::endl; boost::this_thread::sleep(boost::posix_time::milliseconds(1000)); } std::cout << "thread terminated" << std::endl; } int main() { boost::thread worker(fn_thread); boost::this_thread::sleep(boost::posix_time::seconds(1)); terminate_thread.set(); worker.join(); return 0; } EDIT I have fixed the code according to Michael Burr's suggestions. My "very simple" tests indicate no problems. class reset_event { bool flag, auto_reset; boost::condition_variable cond_var; boost::mutex mx_flag; public: explicit reset_event(bool _auto_reset = false) : flag(false), auto_reset(_auto_reset) { } void wait() { boost::unique_lock<boost::mutex> LOCK(mx_flag); if (flag) { if (auto_reset) flag = false; return; } do { cond_var.wait(LOCK); } while(!flag); if (auto_reset) flag = false; } bool wait(const boost::posix_time::time_duration& dur) { boost::unique_lock<boost::mutex> LOCK(mx_flag); if (flag) { if (auto_reset) flag = false; return true; } bool ret = cond_var.timed_wait(LOCK, dur); if (ret && flag) { if (auto_reset) flag = false; return true; } return false; } void set() { boost::lock_guard<boost::mutex> LOCK(mx_flag); flag = true; cond_var.notify_all(); } void reset() { boost::lock_guard<boost::mutex> LOCK(mx_flag); flag = false; } };

    Read the article

  • Event triggering inside prototype

    - by shivesh
    When I try to call "Test" function I get an error. How to fix that? (no jquery!) Browser:firefox error: TypeError: this.Test is not a function <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <title>Untitled Document</title> <script type="text/javascript"> MyClass = function(){ } MyClass.prototype = { Init: function(){ var txt = document.getElementById("text"); if (txt.addEventListener) { txt.addEventListener("keyup", this.Foo, true) } }, Foo: function(){ this.Test(); }, Test: function(){ alert('OK'); } } window.onload = function(){ obj = new MyClass; obj.Init(); } </script> </head> <body> <textarea id="text" rows="10"> </textarea> </div> </body>

    Read the article

  • Execution sequence inside a jquery event handler

    - by user576358
    I have a big issue with the execution squence inside this jquery handler : Was wondering if anyone has come accross this before: I have a simple form: <form action='foo.cgi' id='myForm' > <input type=text name='name' /> <input type=submit value='Find it!'/> </form> when user clicks on Find it! would like to change the cursor to 'progress' before the data is returned through an ajax call: $(document).ready(function(){ $("#myForm ").submit(function(){ $("body").css("cursor", "progress") ; htmlobj=$.ajax({url:server_url,..........); } } However: The cursor [line 2 above ] does not change until data is returned through ajax - Seems like line 3. gets executed before 2. Any help is greatly appreciated

    Read the article

  • jQuery: Apply css to image on click event

    - by DasRakel
    I want basically the same as http://stackoverflow.com/questions/530701/jquery-select-image a row of images that you can select one of. But I'm trying to style the one I select, and store it. var selectedicon = ""; function selecticon(){ $('#iconselect').children().click(function(){ $(".selectedicon").removeclass("selectedicon"); selectedicon = $(this).attr("src"); $(this).addclass("selectedicon"); }); } on this <div id="iconselect"> <img src="/red-dot.png" class="selectedicon" /> <img src="/green-dot.png" /> <img src="/blue-dot.png" /> <img src="/orange-dot.png" /> </div> What am I doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • Sharepoint: Add Calender Event

    - by Sbee
    I am creating a booking module using MOSS 2007.What i would like to know is that is it possible to create a webart that will show only the Daily view ,which will be connected to the central Calender.. Basically what im trying to achieve is this. Each Room must have its own webpart that shows the bookings only associated with that room,so ultimately you might have two rooms that are booked at 8:PM(Same Day) showing on the central Booking calender..... Help would be appreciated

    Read the article

  • how to get change event on created fields in jquery

    - by frosty
    I have some jquery code the creates an quantity text box. Like so <input type="text" value="1000" class="qty" name="[0].Quantity"> I wish to add some validation to this text box but can hit the method. I believe i need to utlise Live(). But can't quite figure out how this is implemented. This is where i'm at $(document).ready(function () { $(".qty").change(checkValue); }); function checkValue() { alert("on change"); }

    Read the article

  • Javascript append to onClick event

    - by John Hartsock
    Guys I have the following Code which I know doesnt work correctly. Yes I know how to do this in JQuery but In this case I cannot use jquery. Please no jquery answers. <form> <input type="text" name="input1" onclick="alert('hello')"> <input type="text" name="input2"> <input type="text" name="input3"> </form> <script type="text\javascript"> window.onload = function () { var currentOnClick; for (var i = 0; i < document.forms[0].elements.length; i++) { currentOnClick = document.forms[0].elements[i].onclick; document.forms[0].elements[i].onclick = function () { if (currentOnClick) { currentOnClick(); } alert("hello2"); } } } </script> What Im trying to do is iterate through the form's elements and add to the onclick function. But due to the fact that in my last iteration currentOnClick is null this does not run as expected. I want to preserve each of the elements onclick methods and play them back in the new fuction Im creating. What I want: When input1 is clicked, alert "hello" then alert "hello2" When Input2 is clicked, alert "hello2" When Input3 is clicked, alert "hello2"

    Read the article

  • HTML5 click event

    - by RichadC
    I made an array of squares ctx.fillStyle = "rgb(0,0,0)"; for(x=0;x<=25;x++){ for(y=0;y<=25;y++){ ctx.fillRect(x, y, 20, 20); } } and I want a square to change its colour when clicked. How can I do that? I'm don't know much HTML5 and need some help. Thanks

    Read the article

  • "javascript: void(0)" links sometimes break event handlers in internet explorer

    - by internet man
    A while back I ran in to a problem where after clicking an anchor with "javascript: void(0)" events just stopped firing. I read that following a link puts the page in a different state and in that different state events don't fire. Even though the link is not real, it sometimes confuses IE. Anyway, I removed the "javascript: void(0)"'s and the problem has not been seen again. Now, in a different application I am seeing the same thing... kinda. Clicking the "javascript: void(0)" sometimes has no ill effect. But then for some reason or another after clicking the bad link the page will stop working. Once this happens it will continue to happen consistently until the client machine is rebooted. After reboot, you are back to it sometimes happening. Crazy right? Reboot fixing a web page!?!?! So, my question is has anyone seen this before? Can anyone give an explanation for this issue? Any documentation on this issue? I can't seem to find anything on it again. Does this even make sense? I already know "javascript: void(0)" is bad practice... I am just looking to understand the issue. Specifically, this is IE7. Thanks for reading!

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100  | Next Page >