Search Results

Search found 16682 results on 668 pages for 'search engines'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 97/668 | < Previous Page | 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104  | Next Page >

  • Enhanced Explorer for Windows XP? [closed]

    - by iceman
    Possible Duplicate: Replacement for Windows Explorer? Is there a better explorer for Windows XP with Konqueror-like features (like dual panes), etc. Specially an enhanced integrated search option like in Vista? There are different products which cumulatively present something similar like xplorer2, Google Desktop Search or Windows Grep. But what about one integrated product?

    Read the article

  • Searching within Gmail's nested labels [closed]

    - by Penang
    Consider this setup in my gmail inbox I have 3 lists mailing-lists/first-list mailing-lists/second-list mailing-lists/third-list if I want to search for all unread messages in any sublabel of mailing-lists, is there a better way to search than "is:unread label:mailing-list/first-list OR label:mailing-list/second-list OR label:mailing-list/third-list" something like "is:unread label:mailing-list/*" is what I'm looking for

    Read the article

  • Debugging iFilter plug-in (PDF indexing)

    - by Trevor Sullivan
    I have the official Adobe x64 iFilter PDF plug-in and the FoxIt Software iFilter PDF plug-in installed, and neither one seems to be allowing me to index the contents of PDF files. So far, I've: Added my data folder into the Indexing service configuration Ensured that PDF files are configured to index "file properties and contents" Rebuilt the index from scratch But, when I search, I can only search for PDF file names, not the contents of them. Any ideas on how to debug this issue?

    Read the article

  • How to Mount a USB "Thumb" Drive as "Fixed" in Windows (For Indexing)

    - by AMissico
    I have over 8GB in my "Code Library" that I maintain on a 64GB ScanDisk Ultra Backup USB Device. Windows Search 4.0 (installed on Windows XP) can index removable drives, but Windows 7 (which uses Windows Search 4.0) cannot because the USB device identifies itself as a Removable drive and Windows 7 refuses to index removable drives. How can I mount the USB Thumb Drive as Fixed instead of Removable? All suggestions welcome and greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • windows 7 start menu showing incorrect data

    - by madmik3
    Hi, I've tried to rebuild my search index but it does not seem to help. When i search for anything even command I either get an empty list or a list of short cuts with the names Programs Documents Files ... They all have the default white paper icon. If I click on them I get an error message that says Internet security settings prevented one or more files from being opened. Any ideas? thanks

    Read the article

  • Solr vs 'this' word

    - by s.arlashin
    There is a smal problem with solr. When I try to search text containing the word 'this' by issuing 'this' in the search console, solr doesn't find anything. However there are no problems with other words. Is it sort of reserved word or something like that?

    Read the article

  • warning: dict_ldap_lookup: Search error 1: Operations error

    - by drecute
    Please I need help with ldap search filter to use to retrieve the user email information from ldap. I'm running postfix_ldap of Ubuntu server 12.04. Everything seems to work fine, except getting the values returned from the search. Version 1 server_host = ldap://samba.example.com search_base = dc=company, dc=example, dc=com query_filter = mail=%s bind = no domain = example.com Version 2 server_host = ldap://samba.example.com search_base = dc=company, dc=example, dc=com query_filter = mail=%s bind_dn = cn=Users,dc=company,dc=example,dc=com domain = example.com mail logs Nov 26 11:13:26 mail postfix/smtpd[19662]: match_string: example.com ~? example.com Nov 26 11:13:26 mail postfix/smtpd[19662]: dict_ldap_lookup: No existing connection for LDAP source /etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf, reopening Nov 26 11:13:26 mail postfix/smtpd[19662]: dict_ldap_connect: Connecting to server ldap://samba.example.com Nov 26 11:13:26 mail postfix/smtpd[19662]: dict_ldap_connect: Actual Protocol version used is 3. Nov 26 11:13:26 mail postfix/smtpd[19662]: dict_ldap_connect: Binding to server ldap://samba.example.com with dn cn=Users,dc=company,dc=example,dc=com Nov 26 11:13:26 mail postfix/smtpd[19662]: warning: dict_ldap_connect: Unable to bind to server ldap://samba.example.com with dn cn=Users,dc=company,dc=example,dc=com: 49 (Invalid credentials) Nov 26 11:13:26 mail postfix/smtpd[19662]: warning: ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf lookup error for "[email protected]" Nov 26 11:13:26 mail postfix/smtpd[19662]: maps_find: virtual_alias_maps: [email protected]: search aborted Nov 26 11:13:26 mail postfix/smtpd[19662]: mail_addr_find: [email protected] -> (try again) Nov 26 11:13:26 mail postfix/smtpd[19662]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from col0-omc3-s2.col0.hotmail.com[65.55.34.140]: 451 4.3.0 <[email protected]>: Temporary lookup failure; from=<[email protected]> to=<[email protected]> proto=ESMTP helo=<col0-omc3-s2.col0.hotmail.com> Nov 26 11:13:26 mail postfix/smtpd[19662]: > col0-omc3-s2.col0.hotmail.com[65.55.34.140]: 451 4.3.0 <[email protected]>: Temporary lookup failure here's another log with successful search result but fialed to get the values of the result Nov 26 12:04:56 mail postfix/smtpd[20463]: dict_ldap_lookup: Using existing connection for LDAP source /etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf Nov 26 12:04:56 mail postfix/smtpd[20463]: dict_ldap_lookup: /etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf: Searching with filter [email protected] Nov 26 12:04:56 mail postfix/smtpd[20463]: dict_ldap_get_values[1]: Search found 1 match(es) Nov 26 12:04:56 mail postfix/smtpd[20463]: dict_ldap_get_values[1]: Leaving dict_ldap_get_values Nov 26 12:04:56 mail postfix/smtpd[20463]: dict_ldap_lookup: Search returned nothing Nov 26 12:04:56 mail postfix/smtpd[20463]: maps_find: virtual_alias_maps: [email protected]: not found Nov 26 12:04:56 mail postfix/smtpd[20463]: dict_ldap_lookup: In dict_ldap_lookup Nov 26 12:04:56 mail postfix/smtpd[20463]: dict_ldap_lookup: /etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf: Skipping lookup of key 'tola.akintola': domain mismatch Nov 26 12:04:56 mail postfix/smtpd[20463]: maps_find: virtual_alias_maps: tola.akintola: not found Nov 26 12:04:56 mail postfix/smtpd[20463]: dict_ldap_lookup: In dict_ldap_lookup Nov 26 12:04:56 mail postfix/smtpd[20463]: dict_ldap_lookup: /etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf: Skipping lookup of key '@example.com': domain mismatch Nov 26 12:04:56 mail postfix/smtpd[20463]: maps_find: virtual_alias_maps: @example.com: not found Nov 26 12:04:56 mail postfix/smtpd[20463]: mail_addr_find: [email protected] -> (not found) My refined ldap-aliases.cf looks like this: server_host = ldap://samba.example.com server_port = 3268 search_base = dc=company, dc=example, dc=com query_filter = mail=%s result_attribute = uid bind_dn = cn=Administrator,cn=Users,dc=company,dc=example,dc=com bind_pw = pass domain = example.com So I'll like to know what ldap filter is appropriate to get this to work. Thanks for helping out.

    Read the article

  • Inference engine to calculate matching set according to internal rules

    - by Zecrates
    I have a set of objects with attributes and a bunch of rules that, when applied to the set of objects, provides a subset of those objects. To make this easier to understand I'll provide a concrete example. My objects are persons and each has three attributes: country of origin, gender and age group (all attributes are discrete). I have a bunch of rules, like "all males from the US", which correspond with subsets of this larger set of objects. I'm looking for either an existing Java "inference engine" or something similar, which will be able to map from the rules to a subset of persons, or advice on how to go about creating my own. I have read up on rule engines, but that term seems to be exclusively used for expert systems that externalize the business rules, and usually doesn't include any advanced form of inferencing. Here are some examples of the more complex scenarios I have to deal with: I need the conjunction of rules. So when presented with both "include all males" and "exclude all US persons in the 10 - 20 age group," I'm only interested in the males outside of the US, and the males within the US that are outside the 10 - 20 age group. Rules may have different priorities (explicitly defined). So a rule saying "exclude all males" will override a rule saying "include all US males." Rules may be conflicting. So I could have both an "include all males" and an "exclude all males" in which case the priorities will have to settle the issue. Rules are symmetric. So "include all males" is equivalent to "exclude all females." Rules (or rather subsets) may have meta rules (explicitly defined) associated with them. These meta rules will have to be applied in any case that the original rule is applied, or if the subset is reached via inferencing. So if a meta rule of "exclude the US" is attached to the rule "include all males", and I provide the engine with the rule "exclude all females," it should be able to inference that the "exclude all females" subset is equivalent to the "include all males" subset and as such apply the "exclude the US" rule additionally. I can in all likelihood live without item 5, but I do need all the other properties mentioned. Both my rules and objects are stored in a database and may be updated at any stage, so I'd need to instantiate the 'inference engine' when needed and destroy it afterward.

    Read the article

  • How to setup Lucene/Solr for a B2B web app?

    - by Bill Paetzke
    Given: 1 database per client (business customer) 5000 clients Clients have between 2 to 2000 users (avg is ~100 users/client) 100k to 10 million records per database Users need to search those records often (it's the best way to navigate their data) Possibly relevant info: Several new clients each week (any time during business hours) Multiple web servers and database servers (users can login via any web server) Let's stay agnostic of language or sql brand, since Lucene (and Solr) have a breadth of support For Example: Joel Spolsky said in Podcast #11 that his hosted web app product, FogBugz On-Demand, uses Lucene. He has thousands of on-demand clients. And each client gets their own database. They use an index per client and store it in the client's database. I'm not sure on the details. And I'm not sure if this is a serious mod to Lucene. The Question: How would you setup Lucene search so that each client can only search within its database? How would you setup the index(es)? Where do you store the index(es)? Would you need to add a filter to all search queries? If a client cancelled, how would you delete their (part of the) index? (this may be trivial--not sure yet) Possible Solutions: Make an index for each client (database) Pro: Search is faster (than one-index-for-all method). Indices are relative to the size of the client's data. Con: I'm not sure what this entails, nor do I know if this is beyond Lucene's scope. Have a single, gigantic index with a database_name field. Always include database_name as a filter. Pro: Not sure. Maybe good for tech support or billing dept to search all databases for info. Con: Search is slower (than index-per-client method). Flawed security if query filter removed. One last thing: I would also accept an answer that uses Solr (the extension of Lucene). Perhaps it's better suited for this problem. Not sure.

    Read the article

  • Searchlogic cannot sort search result

    - by jaycode
    Imagine a code: search = Project.search( :title_or_description_or_child_name_or_child_age_or_inspiration_or_decorating_style_or_favorite_item_or_others_like_any => keys, :galleries_id_like_any => @g, :styles_id_like_any => @st, :tags_like_any => @t ) search.all returns the rows correctly. But search.descend_by_views returns nil. Is this gem buggy? What else should I use then?

    Read the article

  • Global Search In Android

    - by Sunil
    Hi, I want Messaging (Sms/Mms) application to be part of the global search i.e., when I type a word in the omni search box (on home screen), it should show me the messages which has that word. Currently, we have local search within messaging app which works fine but how do I make messaging globally searchable. I tried refereing searchable dictornary example and also some online resource but didn't help. Please provide me the steps to make messaging application part of global search. Regards, Sunil.

    Read the article

  • Search functionality in a lightbox

    - by Salil
    Hi All, I have a page on which there is a link search. onclicking search i open a LIGHTBOX where i get a textfield and Search button. Now i want when i enter keyword in textfield and enter on submit button a result should be shown in a lighbox only. is it possible w/o ajax or i have to use ajax form only. just curious why we used get request instead of post request for Search functionality.

    Read the article

  • What is difference between "Office SharePoint Server Search" and "Windows SharePoint Services Searc

    - by Keshaw Khandelwal
    Hi, I have MOSS 2007 environment with multiple WFE servers. can any one know what is difference between "Office SharePoint Server Search" and "Windows SharePoint Services Search ". Which service i have to start ? If i have to Start "Office SharePoint Server Search" then what is the meaning of giving "Windows SharePoint Services Search " in Central Administration. ---Keshaw

    Read the article

  • I simple search controller that stores search history, should I use resource routing or non-resource?

    - by vfilby
    I am learning rails and am toying with a simple web-app that integrates with flickr to search photos based on user given criteria and store the query in a search history table. I am seeking the best or 'rails' way of handling this. Should I setup a controller and non-resource routes that handle the search and store the data in a custom table; or should I create a resource for queries with a resource route and an additional path for search?

    Read the article

  • Using - Instead of + in WordPress Search Permalink

    - by poer
    Options +FollowSymLinks RewriteEngine On RewriteCond %{THE_REQUEST} ^[A-Z]+ /(#[^?& ]*)??([^& ]*&)?s=([^& ]+)[^ ]* HTTP/ RewriteRule ^$ http://wordpressblog.com/search/%3? [R=301,L] Currently I use the above .htaccess mod_rewrite rule to convert default WordPress search permalink: http://wordpressblog.com/?s=key+word into nice permalink like this: http://wordpressblog.com/search/key+word My question is: What part of the mod_rewrite rule above that I need to change to get a nicer permalink like this one: http://wordpressblog.com/search/key-word.html Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Why this search can not generate correct result?

    - by user482742
    Hi, All: Below is to find same customer and if he is in list, the number add one. If he is not in the list, just add him in the list. I use Search function to do this, but failed and generated incorrect records. It can not find the customer or the right number of customers. But if I use For..loop to iterate the list, it does well and can find the customer and add new customer in that for..loop search procedure. (I did not paste for ..loop search procedrue here). Another problem is that there is no difference between setting list.sorted true and false. It seems Search function is not correct. This search function is from an example of delphi textbook. The below is with Delphi 7. Thank you. Procedure Form1.create; begin list:=Tstringlist.create; list.sorted:=true; // Search function will generate exactly Same and Incorrect //records no matter list.sorted is set true or false. list.duplicates:=dupignore; .. end; Procedure addcustomer; var .. begin while p1.MatchAgain do begin //p1 is regular expression customer:=p1.MatchedExpression; if (search(customer)=false) then begin list.Add(customer+'=1'); end; allcustomer:=allcustomer+1; .. end; Function Tform1.search(customer: string): boolean; var fre:string; num:integer; L:integer; R:integer; M: Integer; CompareResult: Integer; found: boolean; begin result:=false; found:=false; L := 0; R := List.Count - 1; while (L <= R) and ( not found ) do begin M := (L + R) div 2; CompareResult := Comparetext(list.Names[m]), customer); if (compareresult=0) then begin fre:=list.ValueFromIndex [m]; num:=strtoint(fre); num:=num+1; list.ValueFromIndex[m]:=inttostr(num); Found := True; Result := true; exit; end else if compareresult > 0 then r := m - 1 else l := m + 1; end; end;

    Read the article

  • Outlook 2007 OST File Indexing and OneNote 2007 Indexing are Broken

    - by Matt
    I'm running Outlook 2007 under Windows 7 Home Premium RTM. My OST file was previously being properly indexed but eventually searches significantly slowed down so I suspected a problem. Searching and indexing appears broken in OneNote 2007 as well as search time is now significantly longer. I brought up the Outlook 2007 Search Options dialog and noticed that my mailbox (running from an Exchange 2007 server) wasn't listed in the "Index messages in these data files:" list box. Next I ran the Windows "Find and fix problem with windows search" wizard which reported no errors. Then I brought up the Windows Indexing Options dialog which shows Outlook listed (as shown here): then clicked Advanced and Rebuilt the index. No dice - the listbox in the Outlook 2007 dialog still didn't show my mailbox. When I clicked the Modify button in the Indexing Options dialog I see the following: When I hover over the "oneindex://..." entry, the alt text indicates "This location is currently unavailable". When I delete it and rebuild the index, this entry returns. UPDATE: Comparison of the last screenshot above with a working PC shows that on the broken PC, the lower half of the dialog lists Outlook but neither Outlook or OneNote are showing in the upper half. The working PC has Outlook and OneNote in both parts of the dialog.

    Read the article

  • How can I fix Office Sharepoint Search service?

    - by unknown (yahoo)
    For some reason, in operations server services, Office Sharepoint Search Service is MISSING! Which means I cant get Shared services working, which in turn I cannot get, and I do not think I have ever got Usage and reporting to see who is visiting my website, counter and with what OS/ browser ETC. I dont think I have ever seen this work in the 2 years trying with sharepoint. So in essense I have two problems, most important SEARCH, second usage reports. When trying to search, all i get is unknown error. Nothing is in my event viewer at all. I have tried http://www.cjvandyk.com/blog/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=96 , in the comments on that site, on other person reports search is missing entirely and is going to uninstall. Im tired of uninstall sharepoint and resinstalling to fix an odd off issue. I have things setup with Team foundation server that took forever to get work and reinstallation is not my solution. As for usage reporting, this is what microsoft responds to the " Both Windows SharePoint Services Usage logging and Office SharePoint Usage Processing must be enabled to view usage reports. Please contact your administrator to ensure that these services are enabled. " error I cannot do all the steps since SSP needs to be setup which i cant above.

    Read the article

  • osx bash grep - finding search terms in a large file with one single line

    - by unsynchronized
    Is there simple unix command line i can enter which lets me isolate say 512 bytes either side of a search term, even if there is only one "line" in a very large text file? Ok, this should be easy. Famous last words. I'm not that familiar with grep, but it seems it is mainly used to filter out lines in the input that contain search terms. I have a very large json file that I downloaded that i want to search for a particular term. before you click the link - it's over 244MB so be warned - it is from the internet wayback machine and contains lists of zip files of archived photos. i am trying to find mine. Their web interface is broken, so i found the json file that they make public here - it's the last one on the list. when i grep looking for my username, it finds it, but proceeds to dump that line to the console. the problem is that line is 244MB long, and it's the only line in the file. i tried using less, but could not get that to do much - it's very slow, and seems to have the same issue. is there simple unix command line i can enter which lets me isolate say 512 bytes either side of a search term?

    Read the article

  • Tool for search, watch and download youtube videos on Ubuntu

    - by Mike
    I am looking for a tool like MacTubes for Ubuntu. MacTubes is a mac app that can search, watch and download youtube videos. The great advantage of this app is that it searches youtube and shows all videos available there and allows you to select all and download everything fast and easy. MacTubes is so awesome that it also converts the video to MP4 and downloads the HD version of a video when available. I use this on my mac, but my sister uses Linux and I am looking for something like that for her. I have tried Miro, but Miro's search feature is bad as hell. I search for something using MacTubes and it shows me 1600 results. The same search under Miro shows me 40 results. Miro never shows more than one page of results. I prefer it to be an application with a GUI, instead of command line, because my sister's proficiency in Linux is not that good. Any suggestions? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Parking domains and avoiding so called "search engine penalities"

    - by senthilkumar-c
    I have purchased two domains from one particular registrar and hosting from GoDaddy. Assume they are domain1.com and domain2.com Assume my hosting IP address is 111.111.111.111 I added both domain1.com and domain2.com in my domain management control panel and gave the same two nameservers for both domains at my registrar's control panel. So, now, both domains should show the same website. When I ping "domain1.com" or "domain2.com" the results say - Pinging domain1.com [111.111.111.111] with 32 bytes of data: Pinging domain2.com [111.111.111.111] with 32 bytes of data: respectively. So, they both point to the same hosting IP. BUT, internally, I have configured IIS to point them to different folders so that different websites are shown. (My hosting plan is expensive and I intend to use the space and bandwidth for many websites). But still, technically, all domains point to same IP address. Is this a bad thing? Is this what is called "domain parking"? I read some search engine forum posts that two domains pointing to the same IP/Website will be penalised by search engines and stuff. I have also read that simply "parking" the domains won't attract penality. I don't know whether what I have done is parking or the so called "wrong" thing. Can someone shed light on what I have done and what I should do? I don't want to be blacklisted by any search engine. P.S. I know this is not a search engine forum, but I am new to website hosting and domains and I am very weak in nearly all technical terms and concepts relating to web hosting and domains. I thought this will be a good place to understand these things.

    Read the article

  • Is hidden content (display: none;) -indexed- by search engines? [closed]

    - by user568458
    Possible Duplicate: How bad is it to use display: none in CSS? We've established on this site before (in this question) that, since there are so many legitimate uses for hiding content with display: none; when creating interactive features, that sites aren't automatically penalised for content that is hidden this way (so long as it doesn't look algorithmically spammy). Google's Webmaster guidelines also make clear that a good practice when using content that is initially legitimately hidden for interactivity purposes is to also include the same content in a <noscript> tag, and Google recommend that if you design and code for users including users with screen readers or javascript disabled, then 9 times out of 10 good relevant search rankings will follow (though their specific advice seems more written for cases where javascript writes new content to the page). JavaScript: Place the same content from the JavaScript in a tag. If you use this method, ensure the contents are exactly the same as what’s contained in the JavaScript, and that this content is shown to visitors who do not have JavaScript enabled in their browser. So, best practice seems pretty clear. What I can't find out is, however, the simple factual matter of whether hidden content is indexed by search engines (but with potential penalties if it looks 'spammy'), or, whether it is ignored, or, whether it is indexed but with a lower weighting (like <noscript> content is, apparently). (for bonus points it would be great to know if this varies or is consistent between display: none;, visibility: hidden;, etc, but that isn't crucial). This is different to the other questions on display:none; and SEO - those are about good and bad practice and the answers are discussions of good and bad practice, I'm interested simply in the factual 'Yes or no' question of whether search engines index, or ignore, content that is in display: none; - something those other questions' answers aren't totally clear on. One other question has an answer, "Yes", supported by a link to an article that doesn't really clear things up: it establishes that search engines can spot that text is hidden, it discusses (again) whether hidden text causes sites to be marked as spam, and ultimately concludes that in mid 2011, Google's policy on hidden text was evolving, and that they hadn't at that time started automatically penalising display:none; or marking it as spam. It's clear that display: none; isn't always spam and isn't always treated as spam (many Google sites use it...): but this doesn't clear up how, or if, it is indexed. What I will do will be to follow the guidelines and make sure that all the content that is initially hidden which regular users can explore using javascript-driven interactivity is also structured in way that noscript/screenreader users can use. So I'm not interested in best practice, opinions etc because best practice seems to be really clear: accessibility best practices boosts SEO. But I'd like to know what exactly will happen: whether any display: none; content I have alongside <noscript> or otherwise accessibility-optimised content will be be ignored, or indexed again, or picked up to compare against the <noscript> content but not indexed... etc.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104  | Next Page >