Search Results

Search found 7443 results on 298 pages for 'elements'.

Page 98/298 | < Previous Page | 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105  | Next Page >

  • XPath to find an element with a similar sibling

    - by user364902
    Suppose I have this XML: <x> <e a='1' b='A'/> <e a='1' b='B'/> <e a='1' b='A'/> </x> I'd like to write an xpath to find any elements e which: Have attribute @b = 'A' Have the same value for attribute @a The xpath can't reference the literal value of attribute @a, however. It can reference the literal value of attribute @b. Or more generally, I want to find if there are any instances where there are two or more elements e[@b=A'] with the same value for attribute @a. Is this possible?

    Read the article

  • Binding to an XElement

    - by twreid
    I need help binding to an XElement. Basically I am making a editor for certain elements in a web.config and I extract them as XElements and my View binds to a Collection of DataItems which has a property that contains my XElement. When I do Text="{Binding Path=Data, Mode=OneWay, NotifyOnSourceUpdated=True}"/> I get all the text of the Element, but If I try Text="{Binding Path=Data.Elements[], Mode=OneWay, NotifyOnSourceUpdated=True}"/> It doesn't work the TextBox is empty. I am trying to find a way to Template different sections dynamically to make them easier to edit instead of editing raw XMl.

    Read the article

  • Array with multiple types?

    - by aleluja
    Hello, I was wondering if there is a way to make an array which would have multiple types of data fields. So far I was using aMyArray: array of array [0..1] of TPoint; But now, it is not enough for me. I need to add 3 more elements to the existing 2 "Point" elements making it an array like aMyArray: array of (TPoint,TPoint,real,real,real) So each element of aMyArray would have 5 'children', 2 of which are of a TPoint type and 3 of them are 'real' type. Is this possible to implement somehow?

    Read the article

  • Partition loop understanding

    - by user1795732
    Why the loop body of the partition method never throws an ArrayIndexOutOfBounds Exception? public static int partition( int[] a, low, high ) { int k = low, m = low; /* loop invariant: * low <= k <= m <= high and * all elements in a[low..k-1] are RED (i.e., < pivot) and * all elements in a[k..m-1] are BLUE (i.e., >= pivot) */ while (m != high) { if (a[m] >= pivot) // a[m] is BLUE { } else { // a[m] is RED swap(a,k,m); k = k+1; } m = m+1; } return k; }

    Read the article

  • jquery switch element classes

    - by Sobakinet
    Please take a look here: http://jsfiddle.net/ZUd27/7/ What I need: There are several elements. One of them is active and visible. If I hover over any inactive element, it becomes visible and active. The previously active element becomes inactive. On mouseout, nothing happens - the last hovered element stays active. My problems: The first active element always stays active (in DOM?). It becomes invisible, but on next mouseover nothing happens. Other elements don't behave as they should. If one of them is active, on next mousein it becomes invisible. thx

    Read the article

  • How to get the innerHTML of a XML document (AJAX)?

    - by JCOC611
    After an AJAX query, a XML file is returned. I'm able to "parse" that file, but when it comes to getting the "innerHTML" (or in this case "innerXML" lol) of an element, I fail. If the XML element, let's say "content", only contained text I could do: content.childNodes[0].nodeValue (assuming that content references the XML element "content"). But that element contains other elements: <stackoverflow reason="tribute to this page"> <content> <div><span><p>Some more HTML elements</p></span></div> </content> </stackoverflow> I need to copy the content of <content> to an existing <div> in the page, how could I do that? Ex. myDiv.innerHTML = content.innerHTML;

    Read the article

  • Changing the way widgets are rendered/displayed in a form on the template

    - by user334017
    I have a form with a few other embedded forms and some various widgets. The widgets are all saved in an array $form['elements'] and for some of them, I want to display labels and things, but for others I only want to display the basic rendering. foreach($form['elements'] as $elem) echo $elem->render(); this displays everything about the widget. The way it is right now, I couldn't for example call $elem['..'] because the different subforms appear in a random order and have different variable names. I assume I could still put some checks in the template, but it seems easier to fix this in the widget class, like override one of the render functions or something. How would I go about doing this or do you have any links that could help me understand how do do this? on a side note, one of my widgets is the sfWidgetFormChoice and I have no clue where it actually renders or how renderer_classes work

    Read the article

  • how can I create macro definitions for the lines commented in the code.

    - by yaprak
    #include <stdio.h> //Here use a macro definition that assigns a value to SIZE (for example 5) int main() { int i; int array[SIZE]; int sum=0; for(i=0; i<SIZE; i++) { //Here use a macro definition named as CALCSUM to make the //following addition operation for the array printf("Enter a[%d] = ",i); scanf("%d", &array[i]); sum+=array[i]; //Here use a macro definition named as VERBOSE to print //what program does to the screen printf("The user entered %d\n", array[i]); // // //If the macro definition CALCSUM is not used, the program //should assign 0 to the i-th element of the array array[i]=0; //Here, again use VERBOSE to print what program does to the screen printf("a[%d] is assigned to zero\n", i); // // } //If CALCSUM is defined, print the summation of the array elements to the screen printf("Summation of the array is %d\n",sum); // //If CALCSUM is not defined, but VERBOSE mode is used, print the following printf("All the elements in the array are assigned to zero\n"); // printf("Program terminated\n"); return 0; } When CALCSUM is defined, the program will sum up the values of each element in the given array. If CALCSUM is not defined, each array element will be assigned to zero. Besides, when VERBOSE mode is defined, the program will make print statements pointed out active. [root@linux55]# gcc code.c [root@linux55]# ./a.out Program terminated [root@linux55]# gcc code.c -D CALCSUM [root@linux55]# ./a.out Enter a[0] = 3 Enter a[1] = 0 Enter a[2] = 2 Enter a[3] = 5 Enter a[4] = 9 Summation of the array is 19 Program terminated [root@linux55]# gcc code.c -D CALCSUM -D VERBOSE [root@linux55]# ./a.out Enter a[0] = 2 The user entered 2 Enter a[1] = 10 The user entered 10 Enter a[2] = 3 The user entered 3 Enter a[3] = 8 The user entered 8 Enter a[4] = 1 The user entered 1 Summation of the array is 24 Program terminated [root@linux55]# gcc code.c -D VERBOSE [root@linux55]# ./a.out a[0] is assigned to 0 a[1] is assigned to 0 a[2] is assigned to 0 a[3] is assigned to 0 a[4] is assigned to 0 All the elements in the array is assigned to zero Program terminated

    Read the article

  • How to perform dynamic formatting with perl during write?

    - by Bee
    I have a format which is defined like below: format STDOUT = ------------------------------------ |Field1 | Field2 | Field3 | ------------------------------------ |@<<<<<<<<<<| @<<<<<<<<<<<| @<<<<< |~~ shift(@list1),shift(@list2),shift(@list3) ------------------------------------ . write STDOUT; So the questions are as below: Is it possible to make the list of values printed dynamic? e.g. If list 1 contains 12 elements, and if $flag1 is defined, then print only elements 0..10 instead of all 12. I tried doing this by passing $flag as a parameter to the sub which generates the report. However, the last defined FORMAT seems to always take precedence and the final write when it happens, applies the last format no matter what the condition is. Is it possible to also add/hide fields using the same process. e.g. If $flag2 is defined, then add an additional field Field4 to the list?

    Read the article

  • Javascript Function wont submit form..

    - by Josh K
    Here is my function: function processCheck() { var numberClicked = 0; var frm = document.getElementById('form'); for (var i=0; i<form.elements.length; i++) { if (frm.elements[i].checked) numberClicked++; } if(numberClicked != 8) alert('Must choose 8 Teams'); else frm.submit(); } My forms name is 'form', here is my input: echo "<input type='button' name='submit' value='Update' onclick='processCheck()' />"; When i click the button and there is anything but 8 boxes selected it displays the alert, if there is 8 boxes it does nothing (<-- The problem). I have the form action set to another page.

    Read the article

  • An array of structures in C...

    - by 00010000
    For the life of me I can't figure out the proper syntax for creating an array of structures in C. I tried this: struct foo { int x; int y; } foo[][] = { { { 1, 2 }, { 4, 5 }, { -1, -1 } }, { { 55, 44 } { 100, 200 }, } }; So for example foo[1][0].x == 100, foo[0][1].y == 5, etc. But GCC spits out a lot of errors. If anyone could provide the proper syntax that'd be great. EDIT: Okay, I tried this: struct foo { const char *x; int y; }; struct foo bar[2][] = { { { "A", 1 }, { "B", 2 }, { NULL, -1 }, }, { { "AA", 11 }, { "BB", 22 }, { NULL, -1 }, }, { { "ZZ", 11 }, { "YY", 22 }, { NULL, -1 }, }, { { "XX", 11 }, { "UU", 22 }, { NULL, -1 }, }, }; But GCC gives me "elements of array bar have incomplete type" and "excess elements in array initializer".

    Read the article

  • Finding whether a value is equal to the value of any array element in MATLAB

    - by James
    Hi, Can anyone tell me if there is a way (in MATLAB) to check whether a certain value is equal to any of the values stored within another array? The way I intend to use it is to check whether an element index in one matrix is equal to the values stored in another array (where the stored values are the indexes of the elements which meet a certain criteria). So, if the indices of the elements which meet the criteria are stored in the matrix below: criteriacheck = [3 5 6 8 20]; Going through the main array (called array) & checking if the index matches: for i = 1:numel(array) if i == 'Any value stored in criteriacheck' ... "Do this" end Does anyone have an idea of how I might go about this? Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • Weird behaviour of jquery's hide/show with the 'slide' effect. How to change?

    - by Tommy
    When doing $('.mydiv').show('slide', {direction:up}, 1500); //syntax may be a little off jQuery seems to - just before starting the animation - make room for the soon to be showed div. This creates a non-smooth effect making all elements below the showed div shift away in one big go. I would like to see the elements below the div move away as the div is animated/showed. The jQuery native hide()/show() function works like this, how come the slide effect of hide/show doesn't? Anyone knows how to fix it?

    Read the article

  • MVC Validator numberOfInvalids not working

    - by user965445
    I dynamically add some elements to a form so I know I need to re-parse the form. Even if I have old invalid elements they don't get identified in numberOfInvalids It always comes back = 0 even though the invalid fields are highlighted on the page. var form = $("#form"); //Form Savingform.submit(function (e) { e.preventDefault(); form.removeData("validator"); form.removeData("unobtrusiveValidation"); $.validator.unobtrusive.parse(form); var val = form.validate(); if (val.numberOfInvalids() == 0) { $.blockUI({ fadeIn: 1000 }); AjaxRequest({ data: $(this).serializeArray(), success: function (data, status, xhr) { alert('sucess save or submit, use "'); }, complete: function () { $.unblockUI(); } }); } });

    Read the article

  • HTML5 drag & drop: The dragged element content is missing in Webkit browsers.

    - by Cibernox
    I'm trying to implement something similar to a cart where you can drop items from a list. This items (<li> elements) has some elements inside (divs, span, and that stuff). The drag and drop itself works great. But the dragged element's image doesn't show its content in Webkit browsers. My list element has a border an a background color. In Firefox, the image is the whole item. In Webkit browsers, only the dragged element without content. I see the background and border, but without text inside. I tried to make a copy of the element and force it to be the image, but doesn't work. var dt = ev.originalEvent.dataTransfer; dt.setDragImage( $(ev.target).clone()[0], 0, 0); I have a simplified example that exhibit the same behavior: http://jsfiddle.net/ksnJf/1/

    Read the article

  • Are browsers permitted to render <ol>s in any order?

    - by ctford
    As I understand the XML spec, the significance of the order of child elements is not guaranteed. XML parsers tend to keep child elements in the same order as they occur in the XML document, but they are under no obligation to do so. If that's so, then are browsers free to render the <li>s in an <ol> in a different order than they occur in the XHTML? Or is it specified in the XHTML spec somewhere that order has to be preserved? I realise that all major browsers will respect the order of my <li>s. I'm just interested in the academic question of whether or not they are technically obliged to.

    Read the article

  • Targeting an iFrame once with jQuery

    - by user275074
    Hi, I have a series of frames (4) which are used in a page to create loading of dynamic content through Ajax calls. In each of these frames I target parent level elements and update them with there respective content e.g. $("#loadingGrid1",top.document).show(); $("#frameSkills",top.document).hide(); In jQuery is there a way to instead of targeting specific elements on the parent page multiple times, simply target the page once into a variable e.g. var parentPage=$('#frameSkills',top.document); And then use this variable to apply content like $(parentPage #loadingGrid1).hide() Hope I've explained what I'm after enough. Basically, I'm having to call "top.document" in every jQuery selector I make and it seems like a waste of energy.

    Read the article

  • How to place two <g> side by side in an svg?

    - by A_user
    Hello all I am new to html5 and svg tag.I want to ask a question about svg html element. Here is my code <html> <div> <svg width = "1335" height = "400"> // I want to have two svg:g side by side one of more width and second of less width such that width of svg = first g + second g <g> // All the elements inside g should have same width as g </g> <g> </g> </svg> <div> </html> I have tried it using transform.But failed. Is it possible to have two g elements side by side as I can't set x and y of g ? Can any one guide me of doingthis another way.

    Read the article

  • Prevent "jQuery( html )" from triggering the browser to request images and other referenced content

    - by Chris Dutrow
    Using jQuery to create new DOM elements from text. Example: jQuery('<div><img src="/some_image.gif"></img></div>'); When this statement is executed, it causes the browser to request the file 'some_img.gif' from the server. Is there a way to execute this statement so that the resulting jQuery object can be used from DOM traversal, but not actually cause the browser to hit the server with requests for images and other referenced content? Example: var jquery_elememnts = jQuery('<div><img class="a_class" src="/some_image.gif"></img></div>'); var img_class = jquery_elememnts.find('img').attr('class'); The only idea I have now is to use regex to remove all of the 'src' tags from image elements and other things that will trigger the browser requests before using jQuery to evaluate the HTML. How can jQuery be used to evaluate HTML without triggering the browser to make requests to the server for referenced content inside the evaluated HTML? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • C# How to Identify Caller for Template Events

    - by mikeknoop
    I have a ListBox container data bound and templatized as so: <ListBox x:Name="ListBox" ItemsSource="{Binding Source={StaticResource List}}" ItemTemplate="{StaticResource ListTemplate}"> </ListBox> Within my ListTemplate resource, I define a Grid which contains a few child elements. I have setup a click event handler on one of child elements. The event hander is not row-specific, and I need a (best practice) way of identifying which row in the ListBox the event fired upon. From my data source, I have an unique ID which corresponds to the row. I do not currently expose this ID in the data binding, though could. Ideally I would like the event handler to be able to identify the ID of the row the event was fired upon. Thank you!

    Read the article

  • JQuery .each() backwards

    - by Jack Mills
    Hi, I'm using JQuery to select some elements on a page and then move them around in the DOM. The problem I'm having is I need to select all the elements in the reverse order that JQuery naturally wants to select them. For example: <ul> <li>Item 1</li> <li>Item 2</li> <li>Item 3</li> <li>Item 4</li> <li>Item 5</li> </ul> I want to select all the li items and use the .each() command on them but I want to start with Item 5, then Item 4 etc. Is this possible? Thanks

    Read the article

  • In B-trees which element gets promoted when the node splits

    - by Phenom
    Let's say there is a B-tree of order 8. This means it can have 8 pointers and 7 elements. Say the letters A through G are stored in this B-tree. So this B-tree is just a single node containing 7 elements. Then you try to insert J into the tree. There's no room, so you have to split the node and create a new root node. Which element gets promoted up into the root node?

    Read the article

  • Translate sequence in macro parameters to separate macros

    - by Alex Tiger
    How to acces each element in macro if the definition is like MACRO(name, seq) and the code is like: MACRO("TheName", (Elem1) (Elem2) (Elem3) ) I want to generate the next code: MACRO("TheName", ELEMMACRO(Elem1) ELEMMACRO(Elem2) ELEMMACRO(Elem3) ) Or something like that. In other words, I want to process every parameter separately (I don't care of definition, even if it will be something like MACRO("TheName", Elem1, Elem2, Elem3 ) There could be more elements, there could be less. I have tried V_ARGS (I need it only for gcc), but I can only copy all the elements by that, not to process them separately. What can I do? P.S. Because of some reasons, I can't use Boost.

    Read the article

  • Is there a way to have element behind a div (links) clickable in areas where the div is "transparent

    - by Adam
    I have a block element that is positioned absolutely and some other elements on page that are positioned fixed. The effect is the block on top floats over the page which works well. The links in the elements at the bottom underneath are not clickable. They shouldn't be when the content of the div is over them, but when the "marginal" areas which are transparent are over the links they are visible, but clicks only register to the covering div. The problem only happens when the padding covers the div. But if I just rely on the margin the bottom margin is ignored by browser so the scroll doesn't go high enough up. To solve this I resort to padding at the bottom. This is the problem. Is there a clean way around this? I realize I could have the underneath elements doubled and place on top, but opacity set to 0. That is an undesirable solution however. Sample of the problem: <!DOCTYPE html> <html lang='en' xml:lang='en' xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'> <head> <style> #top, #bottom { position: fixed; border: 1 px solid #333; background-color: #eee; left: 100px; padding: 8px; } #top { top: 0; z-index: 1; } #bottom { bottom: 0; z-index: 2; } #contentWrapper { position: absolute; margin: 100px 0 0 0; /* Padding is used to make sure the scroll goes up further on the page */ padding: 0 0 100px 0; width: 600px; z-index: 3; } #content { border: 1 px solid #333; background-color: #eee; height: 1000px; } </style> </head> <body> <div id='top'><a href="#">Top link</a></div> <div id='bottom'><a href="#">Bottom link</a></div> <div id='contentWrapper'> <div id='content'>Some content</div> </div> </body> </html>

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105  | Next Page >