Search Results

Search found 2947 results on 118 pages for 'partial specialization'.

Page 1/118 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

• ???????????????????Specialization?????????

  - by mamoru.kobayashi

  ???????????????????Oracle PartnerNetwork Specialized?? ??????????Specialization??6??????????????? ?????????????? ?????22????????40????Specialization????????? ¦??????????????? ·?????????? ?Oracle Data Warehousing? ?Oracle Exadata? ·?????????????? ?JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Financial Management? ?Primavera P6 Enterprise Project Portfolio Management? ·????????? ?Oracle Solaris? ?Oracle Linux? ????????2010?11?????????????Specialization?????? ??????????Specialization?????????????????????? ¦????????Specialization????????????????(????) ·?Oracle Data Warehousing?: ?????????????????????????????????? ·?Oracle Exadata?: ?????????????????????????????????? ·?JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Financial Management?: ?????????????????????????? ·?Primavera P6 Enterprise Project Portfolio Management?: IT???????????? ·?Oracle Solaris?: ???????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????? ???? ????????????????????????? ?????????????? ·?Oracle Linux?: ?????????????????????????????????? ????????????????

  Read the article

• Available OPN Specialization Categories & Specializations

  - by [email protected]

  DatabaseOracle Data Warehousing Specialization CriteriaOracle Database 11g Specialization CriteriaOracle Enterprise Linux Specialization CriteriaOracle Enterprise Manager Specialization Criteria MiddlewareOracle Service-Oriented Architecture Specialization CriteriaOracle Business Intelligence Foundation Specialization CriteriaOracle Enterprise ManagerOracle Enterprise Manager Specialization CriteriaOracle Enterprise LinuxOracle Enterprise Linux Specialization CriteriaAll Available Specializationshttps://competencycenter.oracle.com/opncc/glp_list.cc

  Read the article

• Oracle RightNow CX Cloud Service 2012 Specialization

  - by Richard Lefebvre

  Oracle RightNow CX Cloud Service 2012 Certified Implementation Specialist (1Z1-465) is now in beta. Partners who pass the exam will be identified to customers, Oracle, and other partners as Certified Implementation Specialists. This is also the final step towards completion of the business and competency requirements for company-level Oracle RightNow CX Cloud Service 2012 Specialization. To view the complete Specialization criteria table, click here

  Read the article

• Week 17: Specialization Flashback

  - by sandra.haan

  Remember when E.T. phoned home and Ferris had a day off? Or when Michael Jackson did the moonwalk and Madonna was the Material Girl? That's what we call an 80's flashback. Remember when we offered you 11 specializations? That's what we call a Specialization flashback considering we now have over 35 Specializations available. A lot has changed since we rolled-out OPN Specialized last year. Listen in as Nick Kritikos talks about the latest specializations available. Now get out of that DeLorean and take a look at the Specialization Guide to determine how your company can get Specialized. Until next time, The OPN Communications Team

  Read the article

• ENTERPRISE 2.0 SPECIALIZATION

  - by Claudia Costa

  Apply for ECM and WebCenter Specialization NOW! We have just finalized the new Enterprise 2.0 Knowledge Zone for partners who want to invest in ECM, WebCenter and Web2.0 technologies together with Oracle. This will enable you to get recognized by Oracle and be preferred by customers. Please click here for more information.   

  Read the article

• Thank you for all partners that attended to our Specialization campaign in Denmark

  - by user12875760

  Oracle’s Specialization Program is a trusted status and brand, which allows our most experienced and committed partners to differentiate themselves in the marketplace and gain a competitive edge by spotlighting their strengths and special skills.Partners can choose where they want to specialize from a wide range of Specializations from Oracle’s growing product portfolio. Click here to read more.

  Read the article

• Use a partial in a partial?

  - by Greg Wallace

  I'm a Rails newbie, so bear with me. I have a few places, some pages, some partials that use: <%= link_to "delete", post, method: :delete, data: { confirm: "You sure?" }, title: post.content %> Would it make sense to make this a partial since it is used repeatedly, sometimes in other partials too? Is it o.k. to put partials in partials?

  Read the article

• Who are the SOA experts? Specialization recognized by customers

  - by Jürgen Kress

  You are looking for the SOA experts to deliver an successful project - contact our Oracle SOA Specialized partners - you can recognize them by the logo, the plaques and in the solutions catalog: Plaques SOA Specialized We would like to offer you a nice SOA Specialization plaque  with your logo to proof your success. If you are a SOA Specialized partner and would like to request the plaque please send Brigitte an e-mail with the following information: Partner Name Partner logo (preferred eps file) Partner Status gold or platinum We recommend to mount the plaque at your office reception in addition you can use the SOA Specialization logos at your website Download Logo: Gold & Platinum Solutions Catalog Please make sure that your Oracle Partner Network administrator will add your achieved Specializations to the Oracle Solutions catalog We started to promote at our website www.oracle.com/soa the find a Specialized Partner who added their Service Oriented Architecture Specialization in the solutions catalog. For administration please visit manage solutions catalog within OPN For detailed tutorial and an faq please visit. http://tinyurl.com/Catalogorcl   For more information on SOA Specialization and special SOA please make sure that you read the SOA & Application Grid Specialization Guide and the SOA & Application Grid Specialization Checklist. Blog Twitter LinkedIn Mix Forum Wiki Website Technorati Tags: SOA Sepecialization,OPN,Oracle,SOA,Jürgen Kress,plaques,solutions catalog

  Read the article

• C++ template partial specialization error

  - by JP19

  Hi, The following code is giving me a compilation error: class Q64 is not a valid type for a template constant parameter template<int GRIDD, class T> INLINE T grid_residue(T amount) { T rem = amount%(GRIDD); if (rem > GRIDD/2) rem -= GRIDD; return rem; } template<int GRIDD, Q64> INLINE Q64 grid_residue(Q64 amount) { return Q64(grid_residue<GRIDD, int64_t>(to_int(amount))); } Whats wrong? I am trying to specialize grid_residue for class Q64. thanks

  Read the article

• Issue with class template partial specialization

  - by DeadMG

  I've been trying to implement a function that needs partial template specializations and fallen back to the static struct technique, and I'm having a number of problems. template<typename T> struct PushImpl<const T&> { typedef T* result_type; typedef const T& argument_type; template<int StackSize> static result_type Push(IStack<StackSize>* sptr, argument_type ref) { // Code if the template is T& } }; template<typename T> struct PushImpl<const T*> { typedef T* result_type; typedef const T* argument_type; template<int StackSize> static result_type Push(IStack<StackSize>* sptr, argument_type ptr) { return PushImpl<const T&>::Push(sptr, *ptr); } }; template<typename T> struct PushImpl { typedef T* result_type; typedef const T& argument_type; template<int StackSize> static result_type Push(IStack<StackSize>* sptr, argument_type ref) { // Code if the template is neither T* nor T& } }; template<typename T> typename PushImpl<T>::result_type Push(typename PushImpl<T>::argument_type ref) { return PushImpl<T>::Push(this, ref); } First: The struct is nested inside another class (the one that offers Push as a member func), but it can't access the template parameter (StackSize), even though my other nested classes all could. I've worked around it, but it would be cleaner if they could just access StackSize like a normal class. Second: The compiler complains that it doesn't use or can't deduce T. Really? Thirdly: The compiler complains that it can't specialize a template in the current scope (class scope). I can't see what the problem is. Have I accidentally invoked some bad syntax?

  Read the article

• partial classes/partial class file

  - by Ravisha

  In C# .net there is a provision to have two different class files and make them a single class using the keyword partial keyword.this helps it to keep [for ex]UI and logic seperate. of course we can have two classes to achieve this one for UI and other for logic. Can this be achieved in java some how?

  Read the article

• Partial upgrade on 12.04, how to stop nagging after locking to a working NVIDIA & xorg

  - by alsk

  How to stop the upgrade manager from offering updates and upgrades that potentially would harm my working 2D and 3D graphics? Finally, I got 12.04 working as it should: with nvidia-173 drivers by downgrading xorg and locking the version: On my 32-bit system on Athlon64, with (Albatron) NVIDIA GeForce FX5700XT, locked (/pinned) to xorg 1:7.6-7ubuntu7, xserver-xorg-core 2:11.1-0obuntu10.07, nvidia-173 173.14.35-0ubuntu0.2? An annoying thing left is that every time the updates are checked, I get warning of partial updates, and ambiguous options of "partial update" and "close". Ambiguous in that sense that if I click close, I will get option to update a few packages, which has been OK, while "partial update" would like to update my kernel to 3.2, alter xorg, remove nvidia-173 etc., and update mesa etc. This is not what I call appropriate, after locking XORG and NVIDIA drivers to working ones. One may say according to package management logic it may be correct, but to me as an user it makes little sense. Last Ubuntu that worked without big mess for me was 10.10, hence I will not put 12.10 to my "production" system, until I can be sure it will not trash the system again. P.S. Is there a recommended way to keep NVIDIA GeForce FX working with 3D on Ubuntu... in future?

  Read the article

• Making APIs Faster: Introducing Partial Response and Partial Update

  At Google, we strive to make the web faster . Today, we’re proud to take our first big step in making APIs faster by introducing two experimental features...

  Read the article

• SOA Specialization update

  - by Jürgen Kress

  SOA Specialization is taking off, more and more customers ask for Specialized Partners, make sure you start your own Specialization. To align the number of required Oracle Service-Oriented Architecture Certified Implementation Specialist we reduced them from 4 to 2 consultants. For details on Specialization please see SOA & Application Grid Specialization Guide  SOA & Application Grid Specialization Checklist Thanks for all the partners who became SOA Specialized in 2010! Accenture & Infosys Technologies Limited & Atos Origin & CedarCrestone, Inc. & FUJITSU & OPITZ CONSULTING GmbH& Zensar Technologies & ECS Team & Zirous Inc  Your company is missing? Make sure you add the SOA Specialization information in your solutions catalog For more information on SOA Specialization and the SOA Partner Community please feel free to register at www.oracle.com/goto/emea/soa (OPN account required) Blog Twitter LinkedIn Mix Forum Wiki Website Technorati Tags: SOA Specialization,SOA,soacommunity,OPN,Oracle,Jürgen Kress,solutions catalog

  Read the article

• Update Manager offers 900+ updates under partial upgrade mode

  - by TriforceLZG

  Today I checked for updates and got an error message telling me I must do a partial upgrade. I was shocked to see how many updates there were available. 900+ Updates! By using synaptic I found out that it wanted to remove core packages from my system, such as compiz and python, but also update some as well. I am very confused why package manager would want to do this all of a sudden, and why it wants to destroy my system. I really need an answer, because I now cannot update my system.

  Read the article

• Continuously asking for partial upgrade

  - by udinnet

  I just upgraded my Ubuntu 11.10 to 12.04 after the announcement of the final release of Ubuntu 12.04. The upgrade process went fine. But now when I run the update manager it asks for a partial upgrade. But the funny thing is it installs 84 new packages in installation step, remove all the 84 packages in the cleaning step!!! This is happening recursively(Every time I launch the update manager). Please can you suggest something? Logs can be found in the launchpad bug page. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/990449

  Read the article

• The Value of SOA Specialization - Fujitsu

  - by Jürgen Kress

  Thanks for the nice ink The Value of Specialization In my last post  I talked about Fujitsu's achievement in obtaining SOA and other specializations, but I have heard murmurings from other partners about what just is the value? I think Oracle have to do more to advertise the benefits to customers, we need to see customers asking for specialization for it to really work, but Oracle have made great promises about only recommending those partners who are specialized. For us there was another benefit. Oracle was sponsoring the 3rd Annual SOA Symposium in Berlin and invited us as their first specialized partner to take part. There is a great blog about the symposium on the SOA community blog site. This is real commitment from Oracle and we have other marketing opportunities being worked on with Jürgen. This does generate leads so my message to other Oracle Partners is, you need to do this, it is worthwhile.   Fujitsu - First SOA Specialized Partner Globally Just before Oracle Open World I found out that Fujitsu had achieved the first SOA Specialization globally. I think most partners know what the requirements are for Specialization and that in itself is challenging but the bureaucracy around the actual submission is an exercise in tenacity. I won’t go into that now; I have had my dig at Oracle this month, but enough to say the process could be improved. As a platinum partner we needed 5 specializations and we decided to go for SOA first. The reasoning behind this is that our Oracle Practice is known for being applications centric. We have always had an excellent technical capability but no one ever talked about that, it was just part and parcel of an implementation. However today we have just as many bids that are technology lead as there is applications lead, so it seemed a good plan to work on the areas we were not known for. We appointed a capability lead to be responsible for putting the team through the training and testing and Rosemary (Kell) was excellent, she ensured that everyone was on track and that it wasn’t just getting put into the ‘to do list’. In Fujitsu everyone in the Oracle Practice has an objective to achieve the competency tests in their area, so achieving the 2 pre sales, 2 sales and 1 support was no problem at all. We actually had 22 with the support capability proficiency.  The implementation specialist exams are much harder, more like OCP in the database area. We had help from the Oracle SOA Community; Jürgen Kress who runs this in EMEA is really motivational. At the time we started SOA was a beta exam which means you do not get the results immediately but again we put forward more than we needed. Manjit Chopra, Sukhraj Sahota, Emely Patra, Ian Scorrer and Sunny Sidhu all took the exam and eventually got the results they wanted they had passed. Congratulations. Here is Jurgen expalining why specialization is important. After the tests came the submissions where you need to include deals and experience, this was my bit, and persuading Oracle we really deserved the specialization. Finally we got the news we had been awarded the specialization, and a few days later that we were first globally. I am very proud. However there is no rest for the wicked and we plodded on to make the 5 specializations needed for Platinum and now we are working on the new Diamond status and I think SOA will be one of our 5 ‘super specializations’. This is a global Fujitsu initiative and I work closely with my colleague in Germany Jessika Weiss. It was nice to be able to have a press release about this and a comment from Judson Althoff  head of Oracle Alliances. For more information on SOA Specialization and the SOA Partner Community please feel free to register at www.oracle.com/goto/emea/soa (OPN account required) Blog Twitter LinkedIn Mix Forum Wiki Website Technorati Tags: SOA,SOA Community,OPN,Oracle,Fujitsu,Debra Lilley,Jürgen Kress,Specialization,SOA Specialization

  Read the article

• Getting NLog Running in Partial Trust

  - by grant.barrington

  To get things working you will need to: Strong name sign the assembly Allow Partially Trusted Callers In the AssemblyInfo.cs file you will need to add the assembly attribute for “AllowPartiallyTrustedCallers” You should now be able to get NLog working as part of a partial trust installation, except that the File target won’t work. Other targets will still work (database for example)   Changing BaseFileAppender.cs to get file logging to work In the directory \Internal\FileAppenders there is a file called “BaseFileAppender.cs”. Make a change to the function call “TryCreateFileStream()”. The error occurs here: Change the function call to be: private FileStream TryCreateFileStream(bool allowConcurrentWrite) { FileShare fileShare = FileShare.Read; if (allowConcurrentWrite) fileShare = FileShare.ReadWrite; #if DOTNET_2_0 if (_createParameters.EnableFileDelete && PlatformDetector.GetCurrentRuntimeOS() != RuntimeOS.Windows) { fileShare |= FileShare.Delete; } #endif #if !NETCF try { if (PlatformDetector.IsCurrentOSCompatibleWith(RuntimeOS.WindowsNT) || PlatformDetector.IsCurrentOSCompatibleWith(RuntimeOS.Windows)) { return WindowsCreateFile(FileName, allowConcurrentWrite); } } catch (System.Security.SecurityException secExc) { InternalLogger.Error("Security Exception Caught in WindowsCreateFile. {0}", secExc.Message); } #endif return new FileStream(FileName, FileMode.Append, FileAccess.Write, fileShare, _createParameters.BufferSize); }   Basically we wrap the call in a try..catch. If we catch a SecurityException when trying to create the FileStream using WindowsCreateFile(), we just swallow the exception and use the native System.Io.FileStream instead.

  Read the article

• Discover the Value of Specialization for your Business - Free, Live and Online!

  - by julien.haye

  Pre-qualified leads. New customers. Greater revenues. A higher market profile. And increased profitability. Specialization with Oracle can deliver all of this and more! Join us online at 14:00 CET on Monday January 24th 2011 for: a clear definition of the value of specialization with Oracle; full details on how and why Oracle proactively helps its specialized partners attract and engage with their ideal customers; all you need to know about OPN Specialized tools and resources; sessions tailored to specific regions, business models and Oracle solution areas; first-hand testimony from your peers about how specialization is helping them succeed. The event will also feature a networking lounge, interactive information booths staffed by Oracle experts, and live Q&A sessions! Click here now to register for this essential online event!

  Read the article

• asp.net MVC partial view

  - by DotnetSparrow

  Hi all: I have created a function for load event like this: $(function() { $('#dvGames').load( '<%= Url.Action("Partial3", "LiveGame") %>',{ gameDate: '2011-03-06' } ); }); and it works. Also, I have created a function for date change like this: $(function() { $('#datepicker').datepicker({ onSelect: function(dateText, inst) { $.ajax({ type: "POST", url: "/LiveGame/Partial3", data: "gameDate=" + dateText, success: function(result) { alert(result); var domElement = $(result); // create element from html $("#dvGames").append(domElement); // append to end of list } }); } }); }); but it doesnt work. neither it goes in controller action. My controller action is: public ActionResult Partial3(string gameDate) { return PartialView("Partial3"); } Please suggest me solution to this.

  Read the article

• "partial views" best practices for 'container' divs?

  - by ropstah

  What is the 'best' way to handle the html markup for partial views? (which are also refreshed using AJAX) The biggest issue I run into is where to place the 'container' div... Consider having a masterpage and a partial view. (class="" could be interchanged with id="" depending if the partial is guaranteed to be unique, however this isn't really important to the issue i think) Masterpage: <div id="place1" class="placeholder"> <!-- render partial --> </div> Partial: <div id="partial1" class="partial"> <!-- content --> </div> I feel that something isn't being done right. However I cannot remove the div in the masterpage, because I need that to 'encapsulate' the response from AJAX partial updates. And also I cannot move the div in the partial to the masterpage, because that would require to move 'partial' info to the masterpage... How do you handle this?

  Read the article

• Partial template specialization of free functions - best practices

  - by Poita_

  As most C++ programmers should know, partial template specialization of free functions is disallowed. For example, the following is illegal C++: template <class T, int N> T mul(const T& x) { return x * N; } template <class T> T mul<T, 0>(const T& x) { return T(0); } // error: function template partial specialization ‘mul<T, 0>’ is not allowed However, partial template specialization of classes/structs is allowed, and can be exploited to mimic the functionality of partial template specialization of free functions. For example, the target objective in the last example can be achieved by using: template <class T, int N> struct mul_impl { static T fun(const T& x) { return x * N; } }; template <class T> struct mul_impl<T, 0> { static T fun(const T& x) { return T(0); } }; template <class T, int N> T mul(const T& x) { return mul_impl<T, N>::fun(x); } It's more bulky and less concise, but it gets the job done -- and as far as users of mul are concerned, they get the desired partial specialization. My questions is: when writing templated free functions (that are intended to be used by others), should you automatically delegate the implementation to a static method function of a class, so that users of your library may implement partial specializations at will, or do you just write the templated function the normal way, and live with the fact that people won't be able to specialize them?

  Read the article

• One template specialization for multiple classes

  - by peper0

  Let's assume we have a template function "foo": template<class T> void foo(T arg) { ... } I can make specialization for some particular type, e.g. template<> void foo(int arg) { ... } If I wanted to use the same specialization for all builtin numeric types (int, float, double etc.) I would write those lines many times. I know that body can be thrown out to another function and just call of this is to be made in every specialization's body, however it would be nicer if i could avoid writting this "void foo(..." for every type. Is there any possibility to tell the compiler that I want to use this specialization for all this types?

  Read the article

• C++: Declaration of template class member specialization

  - by Ziv

  When I specialize a (static) member function/constant in a template class, I'm confused as to where the declaration is meant to go. Here's an example of what I what to do - yoinked directly from IBM's reference on template specialization: ===IBM Member Specialization Example=== template<class T> class X { public: static T v; static void f(T); }; template<class T> T X<T>::v = 0; template<class T> void X<T>::f(T arg) { v = arg; } template<> char* X<char*>::v = "Hello"; template<> void X<float>::f(float arg) { v = arg * 2; } int main() { X<char*> a, b; X<float> c; c.f(10); // X<float>::v now set to 20 } The question is, how do I divide this into header/cpp files? The generic implementation is obviously in the header, but what about the specialization? It can't go in the header file, because it's concrete, leading to multiple definition. But if it goes into the .cpp file, is code which calls X::f() aware of the specialization, or might it rely on the generic X::f()? So far I've got the specialization in the .cpp only, with no declaration in the header. I'm not having trouble compiling or even running my code (on gcc, don't remember the version at the moment), and it behaves as expected - recognizing the specialization. But A) I'm not sure this is correct, and I'd like to know what is, and B) my Doxygen documentation comes out wonky and very misleading (more on that in a moment a later question). What seems most natural to me would be something like this, declaring the specialization in the header and defining it in the .cpp: ===XClass.hpp=== #ifndef XCLASS_HPP #define XCLASS_HPP template<class T> class X { public: static T v; static void f(T); }; template<class T> T X<T>::v = 0; template<class T> void X<T>::f(T arg) { v = arg; } /* declaration of specialized functions */ template<> char* X<char*>::v; template<> void X<float>::f(float arg); #endif ===XClass.cpp=== #include <XClass.hpp> /* concrete implementation of specialized functions */ template<> char* X<char*>::v = "Hello"; template<> void X<float>::f(float arg) { v = arg * 2; } ...but I have no idea if this is correct. Any ideas? Thanks much, Ziv

  Read the article

• multiple partial views mvc 2

  - by nik1

  Hello World! Hi guys, I have a master page with two partial viewson it both of which submit to the AccountController. When I click Submit on either of the partial views the following happens: If I declare the partial views like Html.BeginForm("PartialAction1","Account") it redirects to that partial view on clicking submit instead bringing back the default HomeContoller Index view with validation errors. If I declare the partial view forms as Html.BeginForm() then it returns to the default index view of the home controller. But it actually fires both partial view actions inside the AccountController and thus returns validation errors for both partial views simultaneously. What I want is version 2 above with only one action firing instead of two. Am I missing, hopefully, something very simple? I hoping someone can help me or point me in the right direction. Here's the code from my master page for the partial views Html.Action("Login1","Account") Html.Action("Login2", "Account") Many Thanks!

  Read the article

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >