Search Results

Search found 479 results on 20 pages for 'sitemap'.

Page 1/20 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • The Sitemap Paradox

    - by Jeff Atwood
    We use a sitemap on Stack Overflow, but I have mixed feelings about it. Web crawlers usually discover pages from links within the site and from other sites. Sitemaps supplement this data to allow crawlers that support Sitemaps to pick up all URLs in the Sitemap and learn about those URLs using the associated metadata. Using the Sitemap protocol does not guarantee that web pages are included in search engines, but provides hints for web crawlers to do a better job of crawling your site. Based on our two years' experience with sitemaps, there's something fundamentally paradoxical about the sitemap: Sitemaps are intended for sites that are hard to crawl properly. If Google can't successfully crawl your site to find a link, but is able to find it in the sitemap it gives the sitemap link no weight and will not index it! That's the sitemap paradox -- if your site isn't being properly crawled (for whatever reason), using a sitemap will not help you! Google goes out of their way to make no sitemap guarantees: "We cannot make any predictions or guarantees about when or if your URLs will be crawled or added to our index" citation "We don't guarantee that we'll crawl or index all of your URLs. For example, we won't crawl or index image URLs contained in your Sitemap." citation "submitting a Sitemap doesn't guarantee that all pages of your site will be crawled or included in our search results" citation Given that links found in sitemaps are merely recommendations, whereas links found on your own website proper are considered canonical ... it seems the only logical thing to do is avoid having a sitemap and make damn sure that Google and any other search engine can properly spider your site using the plain old standard web pages everyone else sees. By the time you have done that, and are getting spidered nice and thoroughly so Google can see that your own site links to these pages, and would be willing to crawl the links -- uh, why do we need a sitemap, again? The sitemap can be actively harmful, because it distracts you from ensuring that search engine spiders are able to successfully crawl your whole site. "Oh, it doesn't matter if the crawler can see it, we'll just slap those links in the sitemap!" Reality is quite the opposite in our experience. That seems more than a little ironic considering sitemaps were intended for sites that have a very deep collection of links or complex UI that may be hard to spider. In our experience, the sitemap does not help, because if Google can't find the link on your site proper, it won't index it from the sitemap anyway. We've seen this proven time and time again with Stack Overflow questions. Am I wrong? Do sitemaps make sense, and we're somehow just using them incorrectly?

    Read the article

  • problem with Webmaster Google Sitemap

    - by Alex
    I have a wp mu 3.6.1 with domain mapping (0.5.4.3) with w3tc (0.9.3) and Google XML Sitemaps (4.0 BETA). I have 4 different sitemaps. sub-1.com/sitemap.xml sub-2.com/sitemap.xml sub-3.com/sitemap.xml sub-4.com/sitemap.xml on google webmaster i got 59 errors & 14 warnings. Sitemap errorsErrors: We encountered an error while trying to access your Sitemap. Please ensure your Sitemap follows our guidelines and can be accessed at the location you provided and then resubmit. General HTTP error: 404 not found Sitemap: sub-2.com/sitemap-pt-post-2011-02.xml etc (but when i click on my sitemap links they work fine) Sitemap errorsWarnings: URLs not accessible When we tested a sample of the URLs from your Sitemap, we found that some URLs were not accessible to Googlebot due to an HTTP status error. All accessible URLs will still be submitted. Sitemap: sub-2.com/sitemap-misc.xml HTTP Error: 404 URL: /sitemap.html (but when i click on my sitemap links they work fine) Sitemap errorsIndex errors URLs not accessible When we tested a sample of the URLs from your Sitemap, we found that some URLs were not accessible to Googlebot due to an HTTP status error. All accessible URLs will still be submitted. HTTP Error: 404 URL: /sitemap-pt-post-2010-09.xml (but when i click on my sitemap links they work fine) Web pages 3,276 Submitted 3,247 Indexed what do I have to put on network adminperformance(w3tc)page cachecache preloadSitemap URL: ? i have add "/sitemap.xml" my robots.txt: http://pastebin.com/3K2U0mQa my .htaccess: http://pastebin.com/efJJ6zwy How can I make it work right?

    Read the article

  • Splitting a sitemap by content type

    - by James
    I currently am tasked with submitting our website sitemap to the search engines every week. We have a module which does offer sitemap generation but we find using it does not work very well as not all pages are included and it does not split the sitemap by content. I've used various (online and offline) tools to generate the sitemaps which is not the problem. The problem is that after every generation (which takes most of each Monday) I have to manually go through the sitemap and categorise the links in to products, pages, categories and sub categories. I've experimented successfully with XSL to split the sitemap but it is still a labour intensive process. Does anyone know of a good method to split the sitemap? Currently there are around 20,000 links (iirc) in total.

    Read the article

  • How to create sitemap for my shopping site?

    - by John Sanjay
    I have one shopping site related to Home Goods and I need to create and submit the sitemap of my site in Google Webmaster Tool. I know there are several online tools to generate XML sitemap but some one told me that, Shopping site's sitemaps are different than other sites which means we have to submit sitemaps in two format. One is static page site map and another one is dynamic product page sitemap. Is it true? If so how create sitemaps in these two formats?

    Read the article

  • Yahoo sitemap validation

    - by Joel
    Hello, I am trying to submit sitemap.xml (index) to Yahoo Site Explorer but with no luck. I tried using website feed option in the site explorer to submit the sitemap, but I got validation errors. However, when submitting the same sitemap to google webmaster tools, the sitemap was validated successfully. Could it be for the fact that I am using sitemap with image tag: <image:image> <image:loc>http://www.domain.com/pic.jpg</image:loc> <image:title>picture</image:title> </image:image> When I tried validating the sitemap with inline tools such as http://www.xml-sitemaps.com/validate-xml-sitemap.html and http://www.w3.org/2001/03/webdata/xsv the error I received was: Attempt to load a schema document from http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1 (source: new namespace) for http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1, failed: Not recognised as W3C XML Schema or RDDL: html However, the declaration of the sitemap I use in the top of the document is the same as suggested by Google on their official page at http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=178636 : <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"> <url> Any ideas how to resolve this issue? Thanks, Joel Thanks, Joel

    Read the article

  • Sitemap structure for network of subdomains

    - by HaCos
    I am working on a project that's a network of 2 domains (domain.gr & domain.com.cy) of subdomains similar to Hubpages [each user gets a profile under a different subdomain & there is a personal blog for that user as well] and I think there is something wrong with our sitemap submission. Sometimes it takes weeks in order a new profiles to get indexed. We make use of one Webmasters account in order to manage all network and we don't want to create different accounts for each subdomain since there are more than 1000 already. According to this post http://goo.gl/KjMCjN, I end up on a structure of 5 sitemaps with the following structure : 1st sitemap will be for indexing the others. 2nd sitemap for all users profile under the domain.gr 3nd sitemap for all users profile under the domain.com.cy 4th sitemap for all posts under the *.domain.gr - news sitemap http://goo.gl/8A8S9f 5th sitemap for all posts under the *.domain.com.cy - news sitemap again Now my questions: Should we create news sitemaps or just list all post in 2nd & 3rd sitemap? Does links ordering has anything to do? Eg: Most recent user created be first in sitemap or doesn't make any different and we just need to make sure that lastmod date is correct? Does anyone guess how Hubpages submit their sitemap in Webmasters so maybe we could follow there way? Any alternative or better way to index this kind of schema? PS: Our network is multi language - Greek & English are available. We make use of hreflang tags on the head of each page to separate country target of each version.

    Read the article

  • adding tagged / dynamic pages in sitemap

    - by sam
    ive got a blog thats been running for about a year ive made about 200 posts, and there should be about 220 pages to index (additional pages for about / contact ect). When i go to crawl the site i get 1900 pages because of all the pages that are related to tags ive used in my blogs these 70% of these pages only contain one blog post. When submitting my site map to google should i exclude all pages with /tagged/ in the url so ill only be submitting unqiue pages, or should i submit the full site map ?

    Read the article

  • best/simplest way to inform search engine of sitemap location

    - by Don
    AFAIK, there are 2 ways to make search engines aware of a sitemap's location: Include an absolute link to it in robots.txt Submit it to them directly. The relevant URLs are: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/ping?sitemap=SITEMAP_URL http://www.bing.com/webmaster/ping.aspx?sitemap=SITEMAP_URL Where SITEMAP_URL is the absolute URL of the sitemap. Currently, I do both. Regarding (2), I have a job that runs automatically every day which submits the sitemap to Bing and Google. I don't think there's any reason to do (1) and (2), but I'm paranoid, so I do. I imagine you can avoid both (1) and (2) if you just make your sitemap accessible at a conventional URL (like robots.txt). What's the simplest and most reliable way to ensure that search engines can find your sitemap?

    Read the article

  • My Xmap generated sitemap is not being submitted

    - by user2014989
    I m using Joomla Xmap component for creating sitemap. Here is the URL of my Xmap generated Sitemap: http://www.acethehimalaya.com/index.php?option=com_xmap&sitemap=1&view=xml I tried to submit my sitemap to Google but the problem I'm facing is that the URL doesn't get submitted and I'm having the issue that it says the sitemap is empty. Can Xmap generated sitemaps not be submitted, or am I doing anything wrong?

    Read the article

  • Sitemaps - do I need to submit each sitemap in sitemap_index.xml to Google Webmaster tools?

    - by iSumitG
    I am having a Wordpress blog on my CentOS server. There is no sitemap.xml in the root directory but there is sitemap_index.xml file in the root directory which contains the following code: <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://mywebsite.com/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-seo/css/xml-sitemap-xsl.php"?> <sitemapindex xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"> <sitemap> <loc> http://mywebsite.com/post-sitemap.xml </loc> <lastmod> 2012-12-18T19:47:47+00:00 </lastmod> </sitemap> <sitemap> <loc> http://mywebsite.com/page-sitemap.xml </loc> <lastmod> 2012-12-18T17:32:49+00:00 </lastmod> </sitemap> </sitemapindex> My question: Which sitemap should I submit to Google Webmasters Tools? Options are: Only sitemap_index.xml Only post-sitemap.xml and page-sitemap.xml All 3 (sitemap_index.xml, post-sitemap.xml and page-sitemap.xml) Any other, please let me know.

    Read the article

  • Validating sitemap with Yahoo Explorer

    - by Joel
    Hello, I have a sitemap index on my website, which I successfully validated with "Google webmasters tools". The declarations at the top are: <sitemapindex xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/siteindex.xsd" xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"> This index lists 2 sitemaps . One of them contains "images" tags after using the http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1 schema declaration. When submitting this sitemap index to Yahoo explorer, I get error: ERROR: FF_30000 “Not an accepted feed format file. Please consult the documentaiton for supported file formats.” Any ideas? Joel

    Read the article

  • Is an xml sitemap good or bad [closed]

    - by Frederik Heyninck
    Possible Duplicate: Are there any clear indicators that my sitemap file is beneficial? The good: You provide search engines with all the urls in your site But, does the search engine search further than the provided urls in the xml site map? If you have a website with a forum does every post need to be in the sitemap? What if remove the sitemap afterwords, will the search engine need to start over?

    Read the article

  • How to create a good sitemap for dynamic website

    - by Saif Bechan
    I have a website with dynamic content and different kind of pages. I have some pages that rarely change, and I have pages like blogs that change often. The blog pages also have links for sorting, for example sorting on date, asc, desc. On some of the pages I also have links to different tabbed content, and links that are just anchor links. Now when I use a xml sitemap generator then all the links are thrown into the site, and so I don't think all the links are really relevant. The blogposts up until now are also taken into the sitemap. Is this really necessary? I think the links to the blogposts can be indexed just fine. Is the best way to make a sitemap just to manually assign the main menu links to the sitemap, or is indexing everything really recommended?

    Read the article

  • How to create a good sitemap for dynamic website

    - by Saif Bechan
    I have a website with dynamic content and different kind of pages. I have some pages that rarely change, and I have pages like blogs that change often. The blog pages also have links for sorting, for example sorting on date, asc, desc. On some of the pages I also have links to different tabbed content, and links that are just anchor links. Now when I use a xml sitemap generator then all the links are thrown into the site, and so I don't think all the links are really relevant. The blogposts up until now are also taken into the sitemap. Is this really necessary? I think the links to the blogposts can be indexed just fine. Is the best way to make a sitemap just to manually assign the main menu links to the sitemap, or is indexing everything really recommended?

    Read the article

  • Google Site Search (commercial) not indexing files in sitemap

    - by melat0nin
    I have a client for whom we have purchased Google Site Search. It works well for HTML pages served by the CMS, but files aren't being reliably indexed. I wrote a script to generate an XML feed (sitemap) of all the files in the CMS which I've plugged in to Google Webmaster Tools for the site. It says that for that sitemap 923 URLs have been submitted, but only 26 have been indexed. The client relies heavily on searching within files, which is why we decided to use Google search, so this is a bit of a problem. Many of the files aren't linked to from any page on the site, as they are old and therefore don't merit having a page of their own. But they still need to be accessible through search for archiving purposes. The file archive xml can be found at www.sniffer.org.uk/file-archive and the standard xml sitemap (of pages) can be found at www.sniffer.org.uk/sitemap.xml. Any thought would be much appreciated!

    Read the article

  • Google Sitemap Limits?

    - by Anonymous -
    I've read in multiple places that Google's sitemap limits sits at 50,000 URLs per sitemap - though it's my understanding that you can submit multiple sitemaps to overcome this problem. I've also found that Google follow the sitemap protocol found here. My question is - is there anywhere where Google directly comment on the specifications and limits of sitemaps they accept? All the information I've found isn't behind any Google domain.

    Read the article

  • Update Google Sitemap for Mobile

    - by dimo414
    I have a series of utilities to generate Google sitemaps for my whole site. These files are massive, and slow to build. We want to start telling Google these pages are mobile-crawl-able too, by adding them to mobile sitemaps, but the documentation is unclear if I need to specify physically different files for my mobile URLs than for my normal ones. If this is my current sitemap: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?> <urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"> <url> <loc>http://mobile.example.com/article100.html</loc> </url> </urlset> Can I simply change it to: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?> <urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:mobile="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-mobile/1.0"> <url> <loc>http://mobile.example.com/article100.html</loc> <mobile:mobile/> </url> </urlset> Or do I need to create new files with the additional markup, alongside my existing files?

    Read the article

  • Updating Google sitemap for mobile

    - by dimo414
    I have a series of utilities to generate Google sitemaps for my whole site. These files are massive, and slow to build. We want to start telling Google these pages are mobile-crawl-able too, by adding them to mobile sitemaps, but the documentation is unclear if I need to specify physically different files for my mobile URLs than for my normal ones. If this is my current sitemap: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?> <urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"> <url> <loc>http://mobile.example.com/article100.html</loc> </url> </urlset> Can I simply change it to: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?> <urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:mobile="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-mobile/1.0"> <url> <loc>http://mobile.example.com/article100.html</loc> <mobile:mobile/> </url> </urlset> Or do I need to create new files with the additional markup, alongside my existing files?

    Read the article

  • Which kind of public sitemap should I build for a search based navigation site

    - by Noam
    I have a search based navigation web-site. Each query has filters as well as sort-by. The search results point to end-pages inside the site. Each of those pages has many outlinks to other end-pages. Currently I have a XML sitemap which directs crawlers to all the end pages. I'm trying to add a silo sitemap directory to improve SEO. Assuming this is the right direction I have a couple of options: end pages sorted alphabetically. Pages by major search filters, and then divide alphabetically. Pages for every filter and cross option between them and the sort-by. Which would you recommend and why? NOTE: I'm not referring to a XML sitemap.

    Read the article

  • Trade off: Lower the number of URLs in sitemap from 43k to 23k or update the sitemap.xml only weekly basis

    - by Tobias
    we rewrote the sitemap creation process. Now the sitemap contains 43.000 URLs. 20k more than before. We have daily changing in URLs. The script that is creating the complete sitemap takes more than 30h. So we can not build it every day. Lets say that increasing the speed of the script is not possible. What should I do? A: Stay with the 23k URLs and update it daily B: Increase number of URLs to 43k and update it weekly

    Read the article

  • Sitemap.xml generator

    - by miller55
    I need some sitemap generator that support unlimited pages. Also is there some generator that support that i remove some pages from crowing. For example i have some pages like reviews pages which are generate automatically when someone add review. They all look like: mysite.com/review_1.hml mysite.com/review_2.hml and so on ...... so i dont want to sitemap generate those pages. Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • Google sitemap HrefLang tag without the main site url

    - by Rashmi Pandit
    We have websites with multilingual content. e.g. http://www.example.com/about-us/ http://www.example.com/en-HK/about-us/ http://www.example.com/en-GB/about-us/ http://www.example.com/zn-CH/about-us/ We need to configure the hreflang tags in sitemap for Google to know that there are alternate links for the same pages in different languages. I know for the above example that my sitemap url tag would look like this: <url> <loc>http://www.example.com/about-us</loc> <xhtml:link rel="alternate" hreflang="en-GB" href="http://www.example.com/en-GB/about-us"/> <xhtml:link rel="alternate" hreflang="en-HK" href="http://www.example.com/en-HK/about-us"/> <xhtml:link rel="alternate" hreflang="zn-CH" href="http://www.example.com/zn-CH/about-us"/> <changefreq>daily</changefreq> <priority>0.8</priority> </url> However, if I don't have the main url but just the last three ones with en-HK, en-GB and zn-CH, then how should my url tag look? Should I just skip the loc tag and keep the three xhtml:link tags? Or can I specify any url in the loc tag and put the remaining two in xhtml:link tags? I am new to Google sitemaps. Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks, Rashmi Edit: From the answer posted on http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18423624/sitemap-for-domain-with-multilanguage-site/18423803#18423803, for my example with sites in en-HK, en-GB and zn-CH, should there be three url tags, with each of them assigned to loc with the other two in xhtml:link?

    Read the article

  • Which kind of sitemap directory should I build for a search based navigation site

    - by Noam
    I have a search based navigation web-site. Each query has filters as well as sort-by. The search results point to end-pages inside the site. Each of those pages has many outlinks to other end-pages. Currently I have a XML sitemap which directs crawlers to all the end pages. I'm trying to add a silo sitemap directory to improve SEO. Assuming this is the right direction I have a couple of options: end pages sorted alphabetically. Pages by major search filters, and then divide alphabetically. Pages for every filter and cross option between them and the sort-by. Which would you recommend and why?

    Read the article

  • What are some client-side sitemap generators?

    - by BHare
    Most of the sitemap generators I've found all scan my internal files and base it on that. However using apache and htaccess I have many aliases for things for example: /brand/model/photos/ is empty directory wise, but on the web it relocates it to a zenphoto gallery using htaccess. http://www.xml-sitemaps.com/ does What I need, but I'd like to have more control over it and I need it to be dynamic and run weekly or daily. Allow for specific change frequencies based on the file/directory. I also want to be able to make a "pretty" sitemap html file. Counting the photo gallery I have around 300 links, without the photo gallery more like 100. I have MySQL, PHP 5.3 installed.

    Read the article

  • Modify code to change timestamp timezone in sitemap

    - by Aahan Krish
    Below is the code from a plugin I use for sitemaps. I would like to know if there's a way to "enforce" a different timezone on all date variable and functions in it. If not, how do I modify the code to change the timestamp to reflect a different timezone? Say for example, to America/New_York timezone. Please look for date to quickly get to the appropriate code blocks. Code on Pastebin. <?php /** * @package XML_Sitemaps */ class WPSEO_Sitemaps { ..... /** * Build the root sitemap -- example.com/sitemap_index.xml -- which lists sub-sitemaps * for other content types. * * @todo lastmod for sitemaps? */ function build_root_map() { global $wpdb; $options = get_wpseo_options(); $this->sitemap = '<sitemapindex xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9">' . "\n"; $base = $GLOBALS['wp_rewrite']->using_index_permalinks() ? 'index.php/' : ''; // reference post type specific sitemaps foreach ( get_post_types( array( 'public' => true ) ) as $post_type ) { if ( $post_type == 'attachment' ) continue; if ( isset( $options['post_types-' . $post_type . '-not_in_sitemap'] ) && $options['post_types-' . $post_type . '-not_in_sitemap'] ) continue; $count = $wpdb->get_var( $wpdb->prepare( "SELECT COUNT(ID) FROM $wpdb->posts WHERE post_type = %s AND post_status = 'publish' LIMIT 1", $post_type ) ); // don't include post types with no posts if ( !$count ) continue; $n = ( $count > 1000 ) ? (int) ceil( $count / 1000 ) : 1; for ( $i = 0; $i < $n; $i++ ) { $count = ( $n > 1 ) ? $i + 1 : ''; if ( empty( $count ) || $count == $n ) { $date = $this->get_last_modified( $post_type ); } else { $date = $wpdb->get_var( $wpdb->prepare( "SELECT post_modified_gmt FROM $wpdb->posts WHERE post_status = 'publish' AND post_type = %s ORDER BY post_modified_gmt ASC LIMIT 1 OFFSET %d", $post_type, $i * 1000 + 999 ) ); $date = date( 'c', strtotime( $date ) ); } $this->sitemap .= '<sitemap>' . "\n"; $this->sitemap .= '<loc>' . home_url( $base . $post_type . '-sitemap' . $count . '.xml' ) . '</loc>' . "\n"; $this->sitemap .= '<lastmod>' . htmlspecialchars( $date ) . '</lastmod>' . "\n"; $this->sitemap .= '</sitemap>' . "\n"; } } // reference taxonomy specific sitemaps foreach ( get_taxonomies( array( 'public' => true ) ) as $tax ) { if ( in_array( $tax, array( 'link_category', 'nav_menu', 'post_format' ) ) ) continue; if ( isset( $options['taxonomies-' . $tax . '-not_in_sitemap'] ) && $options['taxonomies-' . $tax . '-not_in_sitemap'] ) continue; // don't include taxonomies with no terms if ( !$wpdb->get_var( $wpdb->prepare( "SELECT term_id FROM $wpdb->term_taxonomy WHERE taxonomy = %s AND count != 0 LIMIT 1", $tax ) ) ) continue; // Retrieve the post_types that are registered to this taxonomy and then retrieve last modified date for all of those combined. $taxobj = get_taxonomy( $tax ); $date = $this->get_last_modified( $taxobj->object_type ); $this->sitemap .= '<sitemap>' . "\n"; $this->sitemap .= '<loc>' . home_url( $base . $tax . '-sitemap.xml' ) . '</loc>' . "\n"; $this->sitemap .= '<lastmod>' . htmlspecialchars( $date ) . '</lastmod>' . "\n"; $this->sitemap .= '</sitemap>' . "\n"; } // allow other plugins to add their sitemaps to the index $this->sitemap .= apply_filters( 'wpseo_sitemap_index', '' ); $this->sitemap .= '</sitemapindex>'; } /** * Build a sub-sitemap for a specific post type -- example.com/post_type-sitemap.xml * * @param string $post_type Registered post type's slug */ function build_post_type_map( $post_type ) { $options = get_wpseo_options(); ............ // We grab post_date, post_name, post_author and post_status too so we can throw these objects into get_permalink, which saves a get_post call for each permalink. while ( $total > $offset ) { $join_filter = apply_filters( 'wpseo_posts_join', '', $post_type ); $where_filter = apply_filters( 'wpseo_posts_where', '', $post_type ); // Optimized query per this thread: http://wordpress.org/support/topic/plugin-wordpress-seo-by-yoast-performance-suggestion // Also see http://explainextended.com/2009/10/23/mysql-order-by-limit-performance-late-row-lookups/ $posts = $wpdb->get_results( "SELECT l.ID, post_content, post_name, post_author, post_parent, post_modified_gmt, post_date, post_date_gmt FROM ( SELECT ID FROM $wpdb->posts {$join_filter} WHERE post_status = 'publish' AND post_password = '' AND post_type = '$post_type' {$where_filter} ORDER BY post_modified ASC LIMIT $steps OFFSET $offset ) o JOIN $wpdb->posts l ON l.ID = o.ID ORDER BY l.ID" ); /* $posts = $wpdb->get_results("SELECT ID, post_content, post_name, post_author, post_parent, post_modified_gmt, post_date, post_date_gmt FROM $wpdb->posts {$join_filter} WHERE post_status = 'publish' AND post_password = '' AND post_type = '$post_type' {$where_filter} ORDER BY post_modified ASC LIMIT $steps OFFSET $offset"); */ $offset = $offset + $steps; foreach ( $posts as $p ) { $p->post_type = $post_type; $p->post_status = 'publish'; $p->filter = 'sample'; if ( wpseo_get_value( 'meta-robots-noindex', $p->ID ) && wpseo_get_value( 'sitemap-include', $p->ID ) != 'always' ) continue; if ( wpseo_get_value( 'sitemap-include', $p->ID ) == 'never' ) continue; if ( wpseo_get_value( 'redirect', $p->ID ) && strlen( wpseo_get_value( 'redirect', $p->ID ) ) > 0 ) continue; $url = array(); $url['mod'] = ( isset( $p->post_modified_gmt ) && $p->post_modified_gmt != '0000-00-00 00:00:00' ) ? $p->post_modified_gmt : $p->post_date_gmt; $url['chf'] = 'weekly'; $url['loc'] = get_permalink( $p ); ............. } /** * Build a sub-sitemap for a specific taxonomy -- example.com/tax-sitemap.xml * * @param string $taxonomy Registered taxonomy's slug */ function build_tax_map( $taxonomy ) { $options = get_wpseo_options(); .......... // Grab last modified date $sql = "SELECT MAX(p.post_date) AS lastmod FROM $wpdb->posts AS p INNER JOIN $wpdb->term_relationships AS term_rel ON term_rel.object_id = p.ID INNER JOIN $wpdb->term_taxonomy AS term_tax ON term_tax.term_taxonomy_id = term_rel.term_taxonomy_id AND term_tax.taxonomy = '$c->taxonomy' AND term_tax.term_id = $c->term_id WHERE p.post_status = 'publish' AND p.post_password = ''"; $url['mod'] = $wpdb->get_var( $sql ); $url['chf'] = 'weekly'; $output .= $this->sitemap_url( $url ); } } /** * Build the <url> tag for a given URL. * * @param array $url Array of parts that make up this entry * @return string */ function sitemap_url( $url ) { if ( isset( $url['mod'] ) ) $date = mysql2date( "Y-m-d\TH:i:s+00:00", $url['mod'] ); else $date = date( 'c' ); $output = "\t<url>\n"; $output .= "\t\t<loc>" . $url['loc'] . "</loc>\n"; $output .= "\t\t<lastmod>" . $date . "</lastmod>\n"; $output .= "\t\t<changefreq>" . $url['chf'] . "</changefreq>\n"; $output .= "\t\t<priority>" . str_replace( ',', '.', $url['pri'] ) . "</priority>\n"; if ( isset( $url['images'] ) && count( $url['images'] ) > 0 ) { foreach ( $url['images'] as $img ) { $output .= "\t\t<image:image>\n"; $output .= "\t\t\t<image:loc>" . esc_html( $img['src'] ) . "</image:loc>\n"; if ( isset( $img['title'] ) ) $output .= "\t\t\t<image:title>" . _wp_specialchars( html_entity_decode( $img['title'], ENT_QUOTES, get_bloginfo('charset') ) ) . "</image:title>\n"; if ( isset( $img['alt'] ) ) $output .= "\t\t\t<image:caption>" . _wp_specialchars( html_entity_decode( $img['alt'], ENT_QUOTES, get_bloginfo('charset') ) ) . "</image:caption>\n"; $output .= "\t\t</image:image>\n"; } } $output .= "\t</url>\n"; return $output; } /** * Get the modification date for the last modified post in the post type: * * @param array $post_types Post types to get the last modification date for * @return string */ function get_last_modified( $post_types ) { global $wpdb; if ( !is_array( $post_types ) ) $post_types = array( $post_types ); $result = 0; foreach ( $post_types as $post_type ) { $key = 'lastpostmodified:gmt:' . $post_type; $date = wp_cache_get( $key, 'timeinfo' ); if ( !$date ) { $date = $wpdb->get_var( $wpdb->prepare( "SELECT post_modified_gmt FROM $wpdb->posts WHERE post_status = 'publish' AND post_type = %s ORDER BY post_modified_gmt DESC LIMIT 1", $post_type ) ); if ( $date ) wp_cache_set( $key, $date, 'timeinfo' ); } if ( strtotime( $date ) > $result ) $result = strtotime( $date ); } // Transform to W3C Date format. $result = date( 'c', $result ); return $result; } } global $wpseo_sitemaps; $wpseo_sitemaps = new WPSEO_Sitemaps();

    Read the article

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >