Search Results

Search found 316 results on 13 pages for 'specialization'.

Page 1/13 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

• ???????????????????Specialization?????????

  - by mamoru.kobayashi

  ???????????????????Oracle PartnerNetwork Specialized?? ??????????Specialization??6??????????????? ?????????????? ?????22????????40????Specialization????????? ¦??????????????? ·?????????? ?Oracle Data Warehousing? ?Oracle Exadata? ·?????????????? ?JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Financial Management? ?Primavera P6 Enterprise Project Portfolio Management? ·????????? ?Oracle Solaris? ?Oracle Linux? ????????2010?11?????????????Specialization?????? ??????????Specialization?????????????????????? ¦????????Specialization????????????????(????) ·?Oracle Data Warehousing?: ?????????????????????????????????? ·?Oracle Exadata?: ?????????????????????????????????? ·?JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Financial Management?: ?????????????????????????? ·?Primavera P6 Enterprise Project Portfolio Management?: IT???????????? ·?Oracle Solaris?: ???????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????? ???? ????????????????????????? ?????????????? ·?Oracle Linux?: ?????????????????????????????????? ????????????????

  Read the article

• Available OPN Specialization Categories & Specializations

  - by [email protected]

  DatabaseOracle Data Warehousing Specialization CriteriaOracle Database 11g Specialization CriteriaOracle Enterprise Linux Specialization CriteriaOracle Enterprise Manager Specialization Criteria MiddlewareOracle Service-Oriented Architecture Specialization CriteriaOracle Business Intelligence Foundation Specialization CriteriaOracle Enterprise ManagerOracle Enterprise Manager Specialization CriteriaOracle Enterprise LinuxOracle Enterprise Linux Specialization CriteriaAll Available Specializationshttps://competencycenter.oracle.com/opncc/glp_list.cc

  Read the article

• Oracle RightNow CX Cloud Service 2012 Specialization

  - by Richard Lefebvre

  Oracle RightNow CX Cloud Service 2012 Certified Implementation Specialist (1Z1-465) is now in beta. Partners who pass the exam will be identified to customers, Oracle, and other partners as Certified Implementation Specialists. This is also the final step towards completion of the business and competency requirements for company-level Oracle RightNow CX Cloud Service 2012 Specialization. To view the complete Specialization criteria table, click here

  Read the article

• Week 17: Specialization Flashback

  - by sandra.haan

  Remember when E.T. phoned home and Ferris had a day off? Or when Michael Jackson did the moonwalk and Madonna was the Material Girl? That's what we call an 80's flashback. Remember when we offered you 11 specializations? That's what we call a Specialization flashback considering we now have over 35 Specializations available. A lot has changed since we rolled-out OPN Specialized last year. Listen in as Nick Kritikos talks about the latest specializations available. Now get out of that DeLorean and take a look at the Specialization Guide to determine how your company can get Specialized. Until next time, The OPN Communications Team

  Read the article

• ENTERPRISE 2.0 SPECIALIZATION

  - by Claudia Costa

  Apply for ECM and WebCenter Specialization NOW! We have just finalized the new Enterprise 2.0 Knowledge Zone for partners who want to invest in ECM, WebCenter and Web2.0 technologies together with Oracle. This will enable you to get recognized by Oracle and be preferred by customers. Please click here for more information.   

  Read the article

• Thank you for all partners that attended to our Specialization campaign in Denmark

  - by user12875760

  Oracle’s Specialization Program is a trusted status and brand, which allows our most experienced and committed partners to differentiate themselves in the marketplace and gain a competitive edge by spotlighting their strengths and special skills.Partners can choose where they want to specialize from a wide range of Specializations from Oracle’s growing product portfolio. Click here to read more.

  Read the article

• Who are the SOA experts? Specialization recognized by customers

  - by Jürgen Kress

  You are looking for the SOA experts to deliver an successful project - contact our Oracle SOA Specialized partners - you can recognize them by the logo, the plaques and in the solutions catalog: Plaques SOA Specialized We would like to offer you a nice SOA Specialization plaque  with your logo to proof your success. If you are a SOA Specialized partner and would like to request the plaque please send Brigitte an e-mail with the following information: Partner Name Partner logo (preferred eps file) Partner Status gold or platinum We recommend to mount the plaque at your office reception in addition you can use the SOA Specialization logos at your website Download Logo: Gold & Platinum Solutions Catalog Please make sure that your Oracle Partner Network administrator will add your achieved Specializations to the Oracle Solutions catalog We started to promote at our website www.oracle.com/soa the find a Specialized Partner who added their Service Oriented Architecture Specialization in the solutions catalog. For administration please visit manage solutions catalog within OPN For detailed tutorial and an faq please visit. http://tinyurl.com/Catalogorcl   For more information on SOA Specialization and special SOA please make sure that you read the SOA & Application Grid Specialization Guide and the SOA & Application Grid Specialization Checklist. Blog Twitter LinkedIn Mix Forum Wiki Website Technorati Tags: SOA Sepecialization,OPN,Oracle,SOA,Jürgen Kress,plaques,solutions catalog

  Read the article

• C++ template partial specialization error

  - by JP19

  Hi, The following code is giving me a compilation error: class Q64 is not a valid type for a template constant parameter template<int GRIDD, class T> INLINE T grid_residue(T amount) { T rem = amount%(GRIDD); if (rem > GRIDD/2) rem -= GRIDD; return rem; } template<int GRIDD, Q64> INLINE Q64 grid_residue(Q64 amount) { return Q64(grid_residue<GRIDD, int64_t>(to_int(amount))); } Whats wrong? I am trying to specialize grid_residue for class Q64. thanks

  Read the article

• SOA Specialization update

  - by Jürgen Kress

  SOA Specialization is taking off, more and more customers ask for Specialized Partners, make sure you start your own Specialization. To align the number of required Oracle Service-Oriented Architecture Certified Implementation Specialist we reduced them from 4 to 2 consultants. For details on Specialization please see SOA & Application Grid Specialization Guide  SOA & Application Grid Specialization Checklist Thanks for all the partners who became SOA Specialized in 2010! Accenture & Infosys Technologies Limited & Atos Origin & CedarCrestone, Inc. & FUJITSU & OPITZ CONSULTING GmbH& Zensar Technologies & ECS Team & Zirous Inc  Your company is missing? Make sure you add the SOA Specialization information in your solutions catalog For more information on SOA Specialization and the SOA Partner Community please feel free to register at www.oracle.com/goto/emea/soa (OPN account required) Blog Twitter LinkedIn Mix Forum Wiki Website Technorati Tags: SOA Specialization,SOA,soacommunity,OPN,Oracle,Jürgen Kress,solutions catalog

  Read the article

• The Value of SOA Specialization - Fujitsu

  - by Jürgen Kress

  Thanks for the nice ink The Value of Specialization In my last post  I talked about Fujitsu's achievement in obtaining SOA and other specializations, but I have heard murmurings from other partners about what just is the value? I think Oracle have to do more to advertise the benefits to customers, we need to see customers asking for specialization for it to really work, but Oracle have made great promises about only recommending those partners who are specialized. For us there was another benefit. Oracle was sponsoring the 3rd Annual SOA Symposium in Berlin and invited us as their first specialized partner to take part. There is a great blog about the symposium on the SOA community blog site. This is real commitment from Oracle and we have other marketing opportunities being worked on with Jürgen. This does generate leads so my message to other Oracle Partners is, you need to do this, it is worthwhile.   Fujitsu - First SOA Specialized Partner Globally Just before Oracle Open World I found out that Fujitsu had achieved the first SOA Specialization globally. I think most partners know what the requirements are for Specialization and that in itself is challenging but the bureaucracy around the actual submission is an exercise in tenacity. I won’t go into that now; I have had my dig at Oracle this month, but enough to say the process could be improved. As a platinum partner we needed 5 specializations and we decided to go for SOA first. The reasoning behind this is that our Oracle Practice is known for being applications centric. We have always had an excellent technical capability but no one ever talked about that, it was just part and parcel of an implementation. However today we have just as many bids that are technology lead as there is applications lead, so it seemed a good plan to work on the areas we were not known for. We appointed a capability lead to be responsible for putting the team through the training and testing and Rosemary (Kell) was excellent, she ensured that everyone was on track and that it wasn’t just getting put into the ‘to do list’. In Fujitsu everyone in the Oracle Practice has an objective to achieve the competency tests in their area, so achieving the 2 pre sales, 2 sales and 1 support was no problem at all. We actually had 22 with the support capability proficiency.  The implementation specialist exams are much harder, more like OCP in the database area. We had help from the Oracle SOA Community; Jürgen Kress who runs this in EMEA is really motivational. At the time we started SOA was a beta exam which means you do not get the results immediately but again we put forward more than we needed. Manjit Chopra, Sukhraj Sahota, Emely Patra, Ian Scorrer and Sunny Sidhu all took the exam and eventually got the results they wanted they had passed. Congratulations. Here is Jurgen expalining why specialization is important. After the tests came the submissions where you need to include deals and experience, this was my bit, and persuading Oracle we really deserved the specialization. Finally we got the news we had been awarded the specialization, and a few days later that we were first globally. I am very proud. However there is no rest for the wicked and we plodded on to make the 5 specializations needed for Platinum and now we are working on the new Diamond status and I think SOA will be one of our 5 ‘super specializations’. This is a global Fujitsu initiative and I work closely with my colleague in Germany Jessika Weiss. It was nice to be able to have a press release about this and a comment from Judson Althoff  head of Oracle Alliances. For more information on SOA Specialization and the SOA Partner Community please feel free to register at www.oracle.com/goto/emea/soa (OPN account required) Blog Twitter LinkedIn Mix Forum Wiki Website Technorati Tags: SOA,SOA Community,OPN,Oracle,Fujitsu,Debra Lilley,Jürgen Kress,Specialization,SOA Specialization

  Read the article

• Discover the Value of Specialization for your Business - Free, Live and Online!

  - by julien.haye

  Pre-qualified leads. New customers. Greater revenues. A higher market profile. And increased profitability. Specialization with Oracle can deliver all of this and more! Join us online at 14:00 CET on Monday January 24th 2011 for: a clear definition of the value of specialization with Oracle; full details on how and why Oracle proactively helps its specialized partners attract and engage with their ideal customers; all you need to know about OPN Specialized tools and resources; sessions tailored to specific regions, business models and Oracle solution areas; first-hand testimony from your peers about how specialization is helping them succeed. The event will also feature a networking lounge, interactive information booths staffed by Oracle experts, and live Q&A sessions! Click here now to register for this essential online event!

  Read the article

• Partial template specialization of free functions - best practices

  - by Poita_

  As most C++ programmers should know, partial template specialization of free functions is disallowed. For example, the following is illegal C++: template <class T, int N> T mul(const T& x) { return x * N; } template <class T> T mul<T, 0>(const T& x) { return T(0); } // error: function template partial specialization ‘mul<T, 0>’ is not allowed However, partial template specialization of classes/structs is allowed, and can be exploited to mimic the functionality of partial template specialization of free functions. For example, the target objective in the last example can be achieved by using: template <class T, int N> struct mul_impl { static T fun(const T& x) { return x * N; } }; template <class T> struct mul_impl<T, 0> { static T fun(const T& x) { return T(0); } }; template <class T, int N> T mul(const T& x) { return mul_impl<T, N>::fun(x); } It's more bulky and less concise, but it gets the job done -- and as far as users of mul are concerned, they get the desired partial specialization. My questions is: when writing templated free functions (that are intended to be used by others), should you automatically delegate the implementation to a static method function of a class, so that users of your library may implement partial specializations at will, or do you just write the templated function the normal way, and live with the fact that people won't be able to specialize them?

  Read the article

• One template specialization for multiple classes

  - by peper0

  Let's assume we have a template function "foo": template<class T> void foo(T arg) { ... } I can make specialization for some particular type, e.g. template<> void foo(int arg) { ... } If I wanted to use the same specialization for all builtin numeric types (int, float, double etc.) I would write those lines many times. I know that body can be thrown out to another function and just call of this is to be made in every specialization's body, however it would be nicer if i could avoid writting this "void foo(..." for every type. Is there any possibility to tell the compiler that I want to use this specialization for all this types?

  Read the article

• C++: Declaration of template class member specialization

  - by Ziv

  When I specialize a (static) member function/constant in a template class, I'm confused as to where the declaration is meant to go. Here's an example of what I what to do - yoinked directly from IBM's reference on template specialization: ===IBM Member Specialization Example=== template<class T> class X { public: static T v; static void f(T); }; template<class T> T X<T>::v = 0; template<class T> void X<T>::f(T arg) { v = arg; } template<> char* X<char*>::v = "Hello"; template<> void X<float>::f(float arg) { v = arg * 2; } int main() { X<char*> a, b; X<float> c; c.f(10); // X<float>::v now set to 20 } The question is, how do I divide this into header/cpp files? The generic implementation is obviously in the header, but what about the specialization? It can't go in the header file, because it's concrete, leading to multiple definition. But if it goes into the .cpp file, is code which calls X::f() aware of the specialization, or might it rely on the generic X::f()? So far I've got the specialization in the .cpp only, with no declaration in the header. I'm not having trouble compiling or even running my code (on gcc, don't remember the version at the moment), and it behaves as expected - recognizing the specialization. But A) I'm not sure this is correct, and I'd like to know what is, and B) my Doxygen documentation comes out wonky and very misleading (more on that in a moment a later question). What seems most natural to me would be something like this, declaring the specialization in the header and defining it in the .cpp: ===XClass.hpp=== #ifndef XCLASS_HPP #define XCLASS_HPP template<class T> class X { public: static T v; static void f(T); }; template<class T> T X<T>::v = 0; template<class T> void X<T>::f(T arg) { v = arg; } /* declaration of specialized functions */ template<> char* X<char*>::v; template<> void X<float>::f(float arg); #endif ===XClass.cpp=== #include <XClass.hpp> /* concrete implementation of specialized functions */ template<> char* X<char*>::v = "Hello"; template<> void X<float>::f(float arg) { v = arg * 2; } ...but I have no idea if this is correct. Any ideas? Thanks much, Ziv

  Read the article

• New Endeca Commerce 3.1 Specialization Launched!

  - by Roxana Babiciu

  We’ve just launched the Endeca Commerce 3.1 Specialization! This is your chance to be recognized as a proficient Oracle partner in selling, implementing and/or developing Endeca Commerce 3.1 solutions.  Check the specialization criteria to make sure you qualify! Oracle partners who achieve this Specialization are differentiated in the marketplace through proven expertise in Oracle Endeca Commerce 3.1. Are you a member of the Endeca Community?  If not, this is the place to be for exchanging ideas and questions regarding Endeca Commerce use. Do check it out! Topics covered in the Specialization include: Application Configuration Record Design Pipeline Development Working with Search Features Experience Manager Concepts Overview of Query Types Application development with the Assembler API

  Read the article

• Partial template specialization: matching on properties of specialized template parameter

  - by Kenzo

  template <typename X, typename Y> class A {}; enum Property {P1,P2}; template <Property P> class B {}; class C {}; Is there any way to define a partial specialization of A such that A<C, B<P1> > would be A's normal template, but A<C, B<P2> > would be the specialization? Replacing the Y template parameter by a template template parameter would be nice, but is there a way to partially specialize it based on P then? template <typename X, template <Property P> typename Y> class A {}; // template <typename X> class A<X,template<> Y<P2> > {}; <-- not valid Is there a way by adding traits to a specialization template<> B<P2> and then using SFINAE in A?

  Read the article

• Doxygen for C++ template class member specialization

  - by Ziv

  When I write class templates, and need to fully-specialize members of those classes, Doxygen doesn't recognize the specialization - it documents only the generic definition, or (if there are only specializations) the last definition. Here's a simple example: ===MyClass.hpp=== #ifndef MYCLASS_HPP #define MYCLASS_HPP template<class T> class MyClass{ public: static void foo(); static const int INT_CONST; static const T TTYPE_CONST; }; /* generic definitions */ template<class T> void MyClass<T>::foo(){ printf("Generic foo\n"); } template<class T> const int MyClass<T>::INT_CONST = 5; /* specialization declarations */ template<> void MyClass<double>::foo(); template<> const int MyClass<double>::INT_CONST; template<> const double MyClass<double>::TTYPE_CONST; template<> const char MyClass<char>::TTYPE_CONST; #endif === MyClass.cpp === #include "MyClass.hpp" /* specialization definitions */ template<> void MyClass<double>::foo(){ printf("Specialized double foo\n"); } template<> const int MyClass<double>::INT_CONST = 10; template<> const double MyClass<double>::TTYPE_CONST = 3.141; template<> const char MyClass<char>::TTYPE_CONST = 'a'; So in this case, foo() will be documented as printing "Generic foo," INT_CONST will be documented as set to 5, with no mention of the specializations, and TTYPE_CONST will be documented as set to 'a', with no mention of 3.141 and no indication that 'a' is a specialized case. I need to be able to document the specializations - either within the documentation for MyClass<T>, or on new pages for MyClass<double>, MyClass<char>. How do I do this? Can Doxygen even handle this? Am I possibly doing something wrong in the declarations/code structure that's keeping Doxygen from understanding what I want? I should note two related cases: A) For templated functions, specialization works fine, e.g.: /* functions that are global/in a namespace */ template<class T> void foo(){ printf("Generic foo\n"); } template<> void foo<double>(){ printf("Specialized double foo\n"); } This will document both foo() and foo(). B) If I redeclare the entire template, i.e. template<> class MyClass<double>{...};, then MyClass<double> will get its own documentation page, as a seperate class. But this means actually declaring an entirely new class - there is no relation between MyClass<T> and MyClass<double> if MyClass<double> itself is declared. So I'd have to redeclare the class and all its members, and repeat all the definitions of class members, specialized for MyClass<double>, all to make it appear as though they're using the same template. Very awkward, feels like a kludge solution. Suggestions? Thanks much :) --Ziv

  Read the article

• std::basic_string full specialization (g++ conflict)

  - by SoapBox

  I am trying to define a full specialization of std::basic_string< char, char_traits<char>, allocator<char> > which is typedef'd (in g++) by the <string> header. The problem is, if I include <string> first, g++ sees the typedef as an instantiation of basic_string and gives me errors. If I do my specialization first then I have no issues. I should be able to define my specialization after <string> is included. What do I have to do to be able to do that? My Code: #include <bits/localefwd.h> //#include <string> // <- uncommenting this line causes compilation to fail namespace std { template<> class basic_string< char, char_traits<char>, allocator<char> > { public: int blah() { return 42; } size_t size() { return 0; } const char *c_str() { return ""; } void reserve(int) {} void clear() {} }; } #include <string> #include <iostream> int main() { std::cout << std::string().blah() << std::endl; } The above code works fine. But, if I uncomment the first #include <string> line, I get the following compiler errors: blah.cpp:7: error: specialization of ‘std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >’ after instantiation blah.cpp:7: error: redefinition of ‘class std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >’ /usr/include/c++/4.4/bits/stringfwd.h:52: error: previous definition of ‘class std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >’ blah.cpp: In function ‘int main()’: blah.cpp:22: error: ‘class std::string’ has no member named ‘blah’ Line 52 of /usr/include/c++/4.4/bits/stringfwd.h: template<typename _CharT, typename _Traits = char_traits<_CharT>, typename _Alloc = allocator<_CharT> > class basic_string; As far as I know this is just a forward delcaration of the template, NOT an instantiation as g++ claims. Line 56 of /usr/include/c++/4.4/bits/stringfwd.h: typedef basic_string<char> string; As far as I know this is just a typedef, NOT an instantiation either. So why are these lines conflicting with my code? What can I do to fix this other than ensuring that my code is always included before <string>?

  Read the article

• C++ explicit template specialization of templated constructor of templated class

  - by Victor Liu

  I have a class like template <class T> struct A{ template <class U> A(U u); }; I would like to write an explicit specialization of this for a declaration like A<int>::A(float); In the following test code, if I comment out the specialization, it compiles with g++. Otherwise, it says I have the wrong number of template parameters: #include <iostream> template <class T> struct A{ template <class U> A(T t, U *u){ *u += U(t); } }; template <> template <> A<int>::A<int,float>(int t, float *u){ *u += U(2*t); } int main(){ float f = 0; int i = 1; A<int>(i, &f); std::cout << f << std::endl; return 0; }

  Read the article

• Partial template specialization for more than one typename

  - by Matt Joiner

  In the following code, I want to consider functions (Ops) that have void return to instead be considered to return true. The type Retval, and the return value of Op are always matching. I'm not able to discriminate using the type traits shown here, and attempts to create a partial template specialization based on Retval have failed due the presence of the other template variables, Op and Args. How do I specialize only some variables in a template specialization without getting errors? Is there any other way to alter behaviour based on the return type of Op? template <typename Retval, typename Op, typename... Args> Retval single_op_wrapper( Retval const failval, char const *const opname, Op const op, Cpfs &cpfs, Args... args) { try { CallContext callctx(cpfs, opname); Retval retval; if (std::is_same<bool, Retval>::value) { (callctx.*op)(args...); retval = true; } else { retval = (callctx.*op)(args...); } assert(retval != failval); callctx.commit(cpfs); return retval; } catch (CpfsError const &exc) { cpfs_errno_set(exc.fserrno); LOGF(Info, "Failed with %s", cpfs_errno_str(exc.fserrno)); } return failval; }

  Read the article

• static member specialization of templated child class and templated base class

  - by b3nj1

  I'm trying to have a templated class (here C) that inherits from another templated class (here A) and perform static member specialization (of int var here), but I cant get the right syntax to do so (if it's possible #include <iostream> template<typename derived> class A { public: static int var; }; //This one works fine class B :public A<B> { public: B() { std::cout << var << std::endl; } }; template<> int A<B>::var = 9; //This one doesn't works template<typename type> class C :public A<C<type> > { public: C() { std::cout << var << std::endl; } }; //template<> template<typename type> int A<C<type> >::a = 10; int main() { B b; C<int> c; return 0; } I put an example that works with a non templated class (here B) and i can get the static member specialization of var, but for C that just doesn't work. Here is what gcc tells me : test.cpp: In constructor ‘C<type>::C()’: test.cpp:29:26: error: ‘var’ was not declared in this scope test.cpp: At global scope: test.cpp:34:18: error: template definition of non-template ‘int A<C<type> >::a’ I'm using gcc version 4.6.3, thanks for any help

  Read the article

• Top Partners 2010 Specialization Awards

  - by Paulo Folgado

  Portugal Top Partners 2010 Specialization Awards Be Recognized Caro Parceiro, Vão ter lugar mais uma vez os prémios Top Partners, que anualmente visam reconhecer as realizações dos parceiros Oracle em termos de negócio. Este ano, sob o signo de Partner Specialization Awards, pretendemos, a par com os resultados de negócio, premiar igualmente o esforço dos nossos parceiros em termos de especialização e de desenvolvimento da sua auto-suficiência. Outras das inovações deste ano é o processo ser baseado numa entrega de candidaturas dos parceiros, e de estas serem avaliadas, com base em critérios definidos, por um júri incluindo entidades externas. Categorias dos Prémios: ·       Database Partner of the Year ·       Middleware Partner of the Year ·       Applications Partner of the Year ·       ISV Partner of the Year ·       Midsize Partner of the Year ·       Industry Partner of the Year ·       Accelerate Partner of the Year   Um dos objectivos dos Top Partners 2010 Specialization Awards é destacar e incentivar a cooperação entre a Oracle e os seus parceiros. Por esta razão, para além dos vários critérios específicos, os parceiros têm de cumprir um conjunto de critérios gerais: ·       Cooperação com a Oracle ·       Investimento no desenvolvimento dos conhecimentos em Oracle ·       Aproximação conjunta ao mercado ·       Utilização activa dos recursos e ferramentas do Oracle PartnerNetwork através do Portal OPN   Os Top Partners 2010 Specialization Awards estão abertos a todos os parceiros em Portugal que estejam registados no OPN Specialized em uma ou mais especializações. As candidaturas podem ser enviadas até 31 de Maio de 2010. Be recognized! Para mais informação clique aqui

  Read the article

• Specialization of template after instantiation?

  - by Onur Cobanoglu

  Hi, My full code is too long, but here is a snippet that will reflect the essence of my problem: class BPCFGParser { public: ... ... class Edge { ... ... }; class ActiveEquivClass { ... ... }; class PassiveEquivClass { ... ... }; struct EqActiveEquivClass { ... ... }; struct EqPassiveEquivClass { ... ... }; unordered_map<ActiveEquivClass, Edge *, hash<ActiveEquivClass>, EqActiveEquivClass> discovered_active_edges; unordered_map<PassiveEquivClass, Edge *, hash<PassiveEquivClass>, EqPassiveEquivClass> discovered_passive_edges; }; namespace std { template <> class hash<BPCFGParser::ActiveEquivClass> { public: size_t operator()(const BPCFGParser::ActiveEquivClass & aec) const { } }; template <> class hash<BPCFGParser::PassiveEquivClass> { public: size_t operator()(const BPCFGParser::PassiveEquivClass & pec) const { } }; } When I compile this code, I get the following errors: In file included from BPCFGParser.cpp:3, from experiments.cpp:2: BPCFGParser.h:408: error: specialization of ‘std::hash<BPCFGParser::ActiveEquivClass>’ after instantiation BPCFGParser.h:408: error: redefinition of ‘class std::hash<BPCFGParser::ActiveEquivClass>’ /usr/include/c++/4.3/tr1_impl/functional_hash.h:44: error: previous definition of ‘class std::hash<BPCFGParser::ActiveEquivClass>’ BPCFGParser.h:445: error: specialization of ‘std::hash<BPCFGParser::PassiveEquivClass>’ after instantiation BPCFGParser.h:445: error: redefinition of ‘class std::hash<BPCFGParser::PassiveEquivClass>’ /usr/include/c++/4.3/tr1_impl/functional_hash.h:44: error: previous definition of ‘class std::hash<BPCFGParser::PassiveEquivClass>’ Now I have to specialize std::hash for these classes (because standard std::hash definition does not include user defined types). When I move these template specializations before the definition of class BPCFGParser, I get a variety of errors for a variety of different things tried, and somewhere (http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/misc-technical-issues.html) I read that: Whenever you use a class as a template parameter, the declaration of that class must be complete and not simply forward declared. So I'm stuck. I cannot specialize the templates after BPCFGParser definition, I cannot specialize them before BPCFGParser definition, how may I get this working? Thanks in advance, Onur

  Read the article

• Template specialization within template definition: is this supported for all compilers or standard

  - by cosmos

  This compiled on VS 2008, but it seems like non-standard usage of templates. template <class T> class Foo { public: void bar(Foo<int> arg) { // do some stuff here } // more code ... }; Is there an issue since the template specialization Foo<int> is contained within the definition of its own template class?

  Read the article

• C++ template function specialization using TCHAR on Visual Studio 2005

  - by Eli

  I'm writing a logging class that uses a templatized operator<< function. I'm specializing the template function on wide-character string so that I can do some wide-to-narrow translation before writing the log message. I can't get TCHAR to work properly - it doesn't use the specialization. Ideas? Here's the pertinent code: // Log.h header class Log { public: template <typename T> Log& operator<<( const T& x ); template <typename T> Log& operator<<( const T* x ); template <typename T> Log& operator<<( const T*& x ); ... } template <typename T> Log& Log::operator<<( const T& input ) { printf("ref"); } template <typename T> Log& Log::operator<<( const T* input ) { printf("ptr"); } template <> Log& Log::operator<<( const std::wstring& input ); template <> Log& Log::operator<<( const wchar_t* input ); And the source file // Log.cpp template <> Log& Log::operator<<( const std::wstring& input ) { printf("wstring ref"); } template <> Log& Log::operator<<( const wchar_t* input ) { printf("wchar_t ptr"); } template <> Log& Log::operator<<( const TCHAR*& input ) { printf("tchar ptr ref"); } Now, I use the following test program to exercise these functions // main.cpp - test program int main() { Log log; log << "test 1"; log << L"test 2"; std::string test3( "test3" ); log << test3; std::wstring test4( L"test4" ); log << test4; TCHAR* test5 = L"test5"; log << test4; } Running the above tests reveals the following: // Test results ptr wchar_t ptr ref wstring ref ref Unfortunately, that's not quite right. I'd really like the last one to be "TCHAR", so that I can convert it. According to Visual Studio's debugger, the when I step in to the function being called in test 5, the type is wchar_t*& - but it's not calling the appropriate specialization. Ideas? I'm not sure if it's pertinent or not, but this is on a Windows CE 5.0 device.

  Read the article

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >