Search Results

Search found 4539 results on 182 pages for 'steve weeks'.

Page 1/182 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • Problem getting weeks in a month with NSCalendar...

    - by AngrySpade
    I am creating a calendar control of sorts... One thing I need to know is how many weeks are there in a Month... So NSCalendar rangeOfUnit:inUnit:forDate Seems to be exactly what I need... Except I am noticing something that seems off and I can't quite figure out why this is happening... The following code... NSCalendar *calendar = [NSCalendar currentCalendar]; NSDateComponents *dateComponents = [[NSDateComponents alloc] init]; [dateComponents setYear: 2010]; [dateComponents setDay: 1]; for (int x=1; x<=12; x++) { [dateComponents setMonth: x]; NSDate *date = [calendar dateFromComponents:dateComponents]; NSLog(@"Date: %@", date); NSRange range = [calendar rangeOfUnit: NSWeekCalendarUnit inUnit: NSMonthCalendarUnit forDate:date]; NSLog(@"%d Weeks in Month %d", range.length, [dateComponents month]); } Is returning the following debug messages... 2010-03-14 13:08:10.350 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-14 13:08:10.351 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 1 2010-03-14 13:08:10.352 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-02-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-14 13:08:10.352 Scrap[4256:207] 4 Weeks in Month 2 2010-03-14 13:08:10.353 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-03-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-14 13:08:10.353 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 3 2010-03-14 13:08:10.354 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-04-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-14 13:08:10.355 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 4 2010-03-14 13:08:10.356 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-05-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-14 13:08:10.357 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 5 2010-03-14 13:08:10.358 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-06-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-14 13:08:10.358 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 6 2010-03-14 13:08:10.359 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-07-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-14 13:08:10.360 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 7 2010-03-14 13:08:10.361 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-08-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-14 13:08:10.364 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 8 2010-03-14 13:08:10.364 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-09-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-14 13:08:10.365 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 9 2010-03-14 13:08:10.366 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-10-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-14 13:08:10.366 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 10 2010-03-14 13:08:10.367 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-11-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-14 13:08:10.367 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 11 2010-03-14 13:08:10.369 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-12-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-14 13:08:10.369 Scrap[4256:207] 52 Weeks in Month 12 I cant quite figure out why I get 52 weeks in month 12. Any clues? Edit on 3/20/2010: Seeing as how I couldnt use rangeOfUnit:inUnit:forDate to calculate the number of weeks in a month. I decided to figure out a different way of calculating the same value. I figured I should do this in a non-Gregorian localized way, so I attempted to start with getting the number of days in a week, but I got the result of 28 days in a week. So I started writing more code to figure out why... I wanted to make sure that the type of NSCalendar that I was playing with was in fact what I was supposed to be getting... And that led me to finding some differences... NSCalendar *currentCalendar = [NSCalendar currentCalendar]; NSLog(@"Calendar with 'currentCalendar' Identifier: %@", [currentCalendar calendarIdentifier]); NSCalendar *calendarWithIdentifier = [[[NSCalendar alloc] initWithCalendarIdentifier: NSGregorianCalendar] autorelease]; NSLog(@"Calendar created with identifier Identifier: %@", [calendarWithIdentifier calendarIdentifier]); NSDate *now = [[NSDate alloc] init]; NSDateComponents *currentMonth = [currentCalendar components: NSMonthCalendarUnit | NSYearCalendarUnit fromDate: now]; NSDate *currentMonthDate = [currentCalendar dateFromComponents: currentMonth]; NSRange daysInWeekRange = [currentCalendar rangeOfUnit: NSDayCalendarUnit inUnit: NSWeekCalendarUnit forDate: currentMonthDate]; NSLog(@"CurrentCalendar: Length:%u Location:%u", daysInWeekRange.length, daysInWeekRange.location); currentMonth = [calendarWithIdentifier components: NSMonthCalendarUnit | NSYearCalendarUnit fromDate: now]; currentMonthDate = [calendarWithIdentifier dateFromComponents: currentMonth]; daysInWeekRange = [calendarWithIdentifier rangeOfUnit: NSDayCalendarUnit inUnit: NSWeekCalendarUnit forDate: currentMonthDate]; NSLog(@"GregorianCalendar: Length:%u Location:%u", daysInWeekRange.length, daysInWeekRange.location); And that got me the following log results... 2010-03-20 21:02:27.245 Scrap[52189:207] Calendar with 'currentCalendar' Identifier: gregorian 2010-03-20 21:02:27.246 Scrap[52189:207] Calendar created with identifier Identifier: gregorian 2010-03-20 21:02:27.248 Scrap[52189:207] CurrentCalendar: Length:28 Location:1 2010-03-20 21:02:27.249 Scrap[52189:207] GregorianCalendar: Length:7 Location:1 Taking direction from @CarlNorum's experience, I compiled the code snippet as a 10.6 Cocoa application, and I got the following... 2010-03-20 21:05:35.636 ScrapCocoa[52238:a0f] Calendar with 'currentCalendar' Identifier: gregorian 2010-03-20 21:05:35.636 ScrapCocoa[52238:a0f] Calendar created with identifier Identifier: gregorian 2010-03-20 21:05:35.637 ScrapCocoa[52238:a0f] CurrentCalendar: Length:6 Location:1 2010-03-20 21:05:35.638 ScrapCocoa[52238:a0f] GregorianCalendar: Length:7 Location:1 I saw hope in that creating a NSCalendar Instance explicitly as a Gregorian Calendar would lead to better results in my original problem... So I modified that original code NSCalendar *currentCalendar = [NSCalendar currentCalendar]; NSLog(@"Calendar with 'currentCalendar' Identifier: %@", [currentCalendar calendarIdentifier]); NSCalendar *calendarWithIdentifier = [[[NSCalendar alloc] initWithCalendarIdentifier: NSGregorianCalendar] autorelease]; NSLog(@"Calendar created with identifier Identifier: %@", [calendarWithIdentifier calendarIdentifier]); NSDateComponents *dateComponents = [[[NSDateComponents alloc] init] autorelease]; [dateComponents setYear: 2010]; [dateComponents setDay: 1]; for (int x=1; x<=12; x++) { [dateComponents setMonth: x]; NSDate *date = [currentCalendar dateFromComponents: dateComponents]; NSRange range = [currentCalendar rangeOfUnit: NSWeekCalendarUnit inUnit: NSMonthCalendarUnit forDate: date]; NSLog(@"CurrentCalendar Date: %@", date); NSLog(@"CurrentCalendar: %d Weeks in Month %d", range.length, [dateComponents month]); date = [calendarWithIdentifier dateFromComponents: dateComponents]; range = [calendarWithIdentifier rangeOfUnit: NSWeekCalendarUnit inUnit: NSMonthCalendarUnit forDate: date]; NSLog(@"GregorianCalendar Date: %@", date); NSLog(@"GregorianCalendar: %d Weeks in Month %d", range.length, [dateComponents month]); } Unfortunately using a calendar created that way did not return a different result. 2010-03-20 21:15:40.465 Scrap[52367:207] Calendar with 'currentCalendar' Identifier: gregorian 2010-03-20 21:15:40.466 Scrap[52367:207] Calendar created with identifier Identifier: gregorian 2010-03-20 21:15:40.468 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:15:40.468 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 1 2010-03-20 21:15:40.469 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:15:40.470 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 1 2010-03-20 21:15:40.471 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-02-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:15:40.471 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar: 4 Weeks in Month 2 2010-03-20 21:15:40.472 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-02-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:15:40.473 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar: 4 Weeks in Month 2 2010-03-20 21:15:40.473 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-03-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:15:40.474 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 3 2010-03-20 21:15:40.475 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-03-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:15:40.475 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 3 2010-03-20 21:15:40.476 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-04-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.477 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 4 2010-03-20 21:15:40.478 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-04-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.479 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 4 2010-03-20 21:15:40.480 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-05-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.480 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 5 2010-03-20 21:15:40.482 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-05-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.482 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 5 2010-03-20 21:15:40.483 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-06-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.483 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 6 2010-03-20 21:15:40.484 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-06-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.485 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 6 2010-03-20 21:15:40.485 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-07-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.486 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 7 2010-03-20 21:15:40.486 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-07-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.487 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 7 2010-03-20 21:15:40.488 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-08-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.488 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 8 2010-03-20 21:15:40.489 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-08-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.489 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 8 2010-03-20 21:15:40.490 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-09-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.491 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 9 2010-03-20 21:15:40.491 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-09-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.492 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 9 2010-03-20 21:15:40.493 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-10-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.493 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 10 2010-03-20 21:15:40.494 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-10-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.494 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 10 2010-03-20 21:15:40.495 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-11-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.496 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 11 2010-03-20 21:15:40.496 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-11-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.497 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 11 2010-03-20 21:15:40.498 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-12-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:15:40.498 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar: 52 Weeks in Month 12 2010-03-20 21:15:40.499 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-12-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:15:40.500 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar: 52 Weeks in Month 12 Compiling the code for Cocoa just for kicks, was actually amusing... As the results are really really different 2010-03-20 21:11:24.610 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] Calendar with 'currentCalendar' Identifier: gregorian 2010-03-20 21:11:24.611 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] Calendar created with identifier Identifier: gregorian 2010-03-20 21:11:24.613 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:11:24.613 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar: 6 Weeks in Month 1 2010-03-20 21:11:24.614 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:11:24.615 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 1 2010-03-20 21:11:24.616 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-02-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:11:24.616 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 2 2010-03-20 21:11:24.617 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-02-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:11:24.618 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar: 4 Weeks in Month 2 2010-03-20 21:11:24.619 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-03-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:11:24.619 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 3 2010-03-20 21:11:24.620 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-03-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:11:24.621 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 3 2010-03-20 21:11:24.622 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-04-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.622 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 4 2010-03-20 21:11:24.623 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-04-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.623 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 4 2010-03-20 21:11:24.624 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-05-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.625 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar: 6 Weeks in Month 5 2010-03-20 21:11:24.625 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-05-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.626 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar: 6 Weeks in Month 5 2010-03-20 21:11:24.627 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-06-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.627 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 6 2010-03-20 21:11:24.628 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-06-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.628 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 6 2010-03-20 21:11:24.629 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-07-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.630 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 7 2010-03-20 21:11:24.630 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-07-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.631 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 7 2010-03-20 21:11:24.632 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-08-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.632 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 8 2010-03-20 21:11:24.633 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-08-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.633 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar: 6 Weeks in Month 8 2010-03-20 21:11:24.634 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-09-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.635 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 9 2010-03-20 21:11:24.636 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-09-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.636 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 9 2010-03-20 21:11:24.637 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-10-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.637 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar: 6 Weeks in Month 10 2010-03-20 21:11:24.638 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-10-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.639 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 10 2010-03-20 21:11:24.640 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-11-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.640 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 11 2010-03-20 21:11:24.641 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-11-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.641 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 11 2010-03-20 21:11:24.642 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-12-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:11:24.642 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 12 2010-03-20 21:11:24.643 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-12-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:11:24.644 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 12 I think this is when I give up...

    Read the article

  • Problem getting weeks in a month...

    - by AngrySpade
    I am creating a calendar control of sorts... One thing I need to know is how many weeks are there in a Month... So NSCalendar rangeOfUnit:inUnit:forDate Seems to be exactly what I need... Except I am noticing something that seems off and I can't quite figure out why this is happening... The following code... NSCalendar *calendar = [NSCalendar currentCalendar]; NSDateComponents *dateComponents = [[NSDateComponents alloc] init]; [dateComponents setYear: 2010]; [dateComponents setDay: 1]; for (int x=1; x<=12; x++) { [dateComponents setMonth: x]; NSDate *date = [calendar dateFromComponents:dateComponents]; NSLog(@"Date: %@", date); NSRange range = [calendar rangeOfUnit: NSWeekCalendarUnit inUnit: NSMonthCalendarUnit forDate:date]; NSLog(@"%d Weeks in Month %d", range.length, [dateComponents month]); } Is returning the following debug messages... 2010-03-14 13:08:10.350 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-14 13:08:10.351 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 1 2010-03-14 13:08:10.352 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-02-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-14 13:08:10.352 Scrap[4256:207] 4 Weeks in Month 2 2010-03-14 13:08:10.353 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-03-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-14 13:08:10.353 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 3 2010-03-14 13:08:10.354 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-04-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-14 13:08:10.355 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 4 2010-03-14 13:08:10.356 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-05-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-14 13:08:10.357 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 5 2010-03-14 13:08:10.358 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-06-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-14 13:08:10.358 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 6 2010-03-14 13:08:10.359 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-07-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-14 13:08:10.360 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 7 2010-03-14 13:08:10.361 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-08-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-14 13:08:10.364 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 8 2010-03-14 13:08:10.364 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-09-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-14 13:08:10.365 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 9 2010-03-14 13:08:10.366 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-10-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-14 13:08:10.366 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 10 2010-03-14 13:08:10.367 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-11-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-14 13:08:10.367 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 11 2010-03-14 13:08:10.369 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-12-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-14 13:08:10.369 Scrap[4256:207] 52 Weeks in Month 12 I cant quite figure out why I get 52 weeks in month 12. Any clues? Edit on 3/20/2010: Seeing as how I couldnt use rangeOfUnit:inUnit:forDate to calculate the number of weeks in a month. I decided to figure out a different way of calculating the same value. I figured I should do this in a non-Gregorian localized way, so I attempted to start with getting the number of days in a week, but I got the result of 28 days in a week. So I started writing more code to figure out why... I wanted to make sure that the type of NSCalendar that I was playing with was in fact what I was supposed to be getting... And that led me to finding some differences... NSCalendar *currentCalendar = [NSCalendar currentCalendar]; NSLog(@"Calendar with 'currentCalendar' Identifier: %@", [currentCalendar calendarIdentifier]); NSCalendar *calendarWithIdentifier = [[[NSCalendar alloc] initWithCalendarIdentifier: NSGregorianCalendar] autorelease]; NSLog(@"Calendar created with identifier Identifier: %@", [calendarWithIdentifier calendarIdentifier]); NSDate *now = [[NSDate alloc] init]; NSDateComponents *currentMonth = [currentCalendar components: NSMonthCalendarUnit | NSYearCalendarUnit fromDate: now]; NSDate *currentMonthDate = [currentCalendar dateFromComponents: currentMonth]; NSRange daysInWeekRange = [currentCalendar rangeOfUnit: NSDayCalendarUnit inUnit: NSWeekCalendarUnit forDate: currentMonthDate]; NSLog(@"CurrentCalendar: Length:%u Location:%u", daysInWeekRange.length, daysInWeekRange.location); currentMonth = [calendarWithIdentifier components: NSMonthCalendarUnit | NSYearCalendarUnit fromDate: now]; currentMonthDate = [calendarWithIdentifier dateFromComponents: currentMonth]; daysInWeekRange = [calendarWithIdentifier rangeOfUnit: NSDayCalendarUnit inUnit: NSWeekCalendarUnit forDate: currentMonthDate]; NSLog(@"GregorianCalendar: Length:%u Location:%u", daysInWeekRange.length, daysInWeekRange.location); And that got me the following log results... 2010-03-20 21:02:27.245 Scrap[52189:207] Calendar with 'currentCalendar' Identifier: gregorian 2010-03-20 21:02:27.246 Scrap[52189:207] Calendar created with identifier Identifier: gregorian 2010-03-20 21:02:27.248 Scrap[52189:207] CurrentCalendar: Length:28 Location:1 2010-03-20 21:02:27.249 Scrap[52189:207] GregorianCalendar: Length:7 Location:1 Taking direction from @CarlNorum's experience, I compiled the code snippet as a 10.6 Cocoa application, and I got the following... 2010-03-20 21:05:35.636 ScrapCocoa[52238:a0f] Calendar with 'currentCalendar' Identifier: gregorian 2010-03-20 21:05:35.636 ScrapCocoa[52238:a0f] Calendar created with identifier Identifier: gregorian 2010-03-20 21:05:35.637 ScrapCocoa[52238:a0f] CurrentCalendar: Length:6 Location:1 2010-03-20 21:05:35.638 ScrapCocoa[52238:a0f] GregorianCalendar: Length:7 Location:1 I saw hope in that creating a NSCalendar Instance explicitly as a Gregorian Calendar would lead to better results in my original problem... So I modified that original code NSCalendar *currentCalendar = [NSCalendar currentCalendar]; NSLog(@"Calendar with 'currentCalendar' Identifier: %@", [currentCalendar calendarIdentifier]); NSCalendar *calendarWithIdentifier = [[[NSCalendar alloc] initWithCalendarIdentifier: NSGregorianCalendar] autorelease]; NSLog(@"Calendar created with identifier Identifier: %@", [calendarWithIdentifier calendarIdentifier]); NSDateComponents *dateComponents = [[[NSDateComponents alloc] init] autorelease]; [dateComponents setYear: 2010]; [dateComponents setDay: 1]; for (int x=1; x<=12; x++) { [dateComponents setMonth: x]; NSDate *date = [currentCalendar dateFromComponents: dateComponents]; NSRange range = [currentCalendar rangeOfUnit: NSWeekCalendarUnit inUnit: NSMonthCalendarUnit forDate: date]; NSLog(@"CurrentCalendar Date: %@", date); NSLog(@"CurrentCalendar: %d Weeks in Month %d", range.length, [dateComponents month]); date = [calendarWithIdentifier dateFromComponents: dateComponents]; range = [calendarWithIdentifier rangeOfUnit: NSWeekCalendarUnit inUnit: NSMonthCalendarUnit forDate: date]; NSLog(@"GregorianCalendar Date: %@", date); NSLog(@"GregorianCalendar: %d Weeks in Month %d", range.length, [dateComponents month]); } Unfortunately using a calendar created that way did not return a different result. 2010-03-20 21:15:40.465 Scrap[52367:207] Calendar with 'currentCalendar' Identifier: gregorian 2010-03-20 21:15:40.466 Scrap[52367:207] Calendar created with identifier Identifier: gregorian 2010-03-20 21:15:40.468 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:15:40.468 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 1 2010-03-20 21:15:40.469 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:15:40.470 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 1 2010-03-20 21:15:40.471 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-02-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:15:40.471 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar: 4 Weeks in Month 2 2010-03-20 21:15:40.472 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-02-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:15:40.473 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar: 4 Weeks in Month 2 2010-03-20 21:15:40.473 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-03-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:15:40.474 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 3 2010-03-20 21:15:40.475 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-03-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:15:40.475 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 3 2010-03-20 21:15:40.476 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-04-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.477 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 4 2010-03-20 21:15:40.478 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-04-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.479 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 4 2010-03-20 21:15:40.480 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-05-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.480 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 5 2010-03-20 21:15:40.482 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-05-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.482 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 5 2010-03-20 21:15:40.483 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-06-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.483 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 6 2010-03-20 21:15:40.484 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-06-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.485 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 6 2010-03-20 21:15:40.485 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-07-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.486 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 7 2010-03-20 21:15:40.486 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-07-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.487 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 7 2010-03-20 21:15:40.488 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-08-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.488 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 8 2010-03-20 21:15:40.489 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-08-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.489 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 8 2010-03-20 21:15:40.490 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-09-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.491 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 9 2010-03-20 21:15:40.491 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-09-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.492 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 9 2010-03-20 21:15:40.493 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-10-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.493 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 10 2010-03-20 21:15:40.494 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-10-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.494 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 10 2010-03-20 21:15:40.495 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-11-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.496 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 11 2010-03-20 21:15:40.496 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-11-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:15:40.497 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 11 2010-03-20 21:15:40.498 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-12-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:15:40.498 Scrap[52367:207] CurrentCalendar: 52 Weeks in Month 12 2010-03-20 21:15:40.499 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-12-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:15:40.500 Scrap[52367:207] GregorianCalendar: 52 Weeks in Month 12 Compiling the code for Cocoa just for kicks, was actually amusing... As the results are really really different 2010-03-20 21:11:24.610 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] Calendar with 'currentCalendar' Identifier: gregorian 2010-03-20 21:11:24.611 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] Calendar created with identifier Identifier: gregorian 2010-03-20 21:11:24.613 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:11:24.613 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar: 6 Weeks in Month 1 2010-03-20 21:11:24.614 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:11:24.615 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 1 2010-03-20 21:11:24.616 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-02-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:11:24.616 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 2 2010-03-20 21:11:24.617 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-02-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:11:24.618 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar: 4 Weeks in Month 2 2010-03-20 21:11:24.619 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-03-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:11:24.619 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 3 2010-03-20 21:11:24.620 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-03-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:11:24.621 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 3 2010-03-20 21:11:24.622 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-04-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.622 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 4 2010-03-20 21:11:24.623 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-04-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.623 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 4 2010-03-20 21:11:24.624 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-05-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.625 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar: 6 Weeks in Month 5 2010-03-20 21:11:24.625 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-05-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.626 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar: 6 Weeks in Month 5 2010-03-20 21:11:24.627 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-06-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.627 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 6 2010-03-20 21:11:24.628 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-06-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.628 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 6 2010-03-20 21:11:24.629 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-07-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.630 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 7 2010-03-20 21:11:24.630 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-07-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.631 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 7 2010-03-20 21:11:24.632 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-08-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.632 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 8 2010-03-20 21:11:24.633 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-08-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.633 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar: 6 Weeks in Month 8 2010-03-20 21:11:24.634 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-09-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.635 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 9 2010-03-20 21:11:24.636 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-09-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.636 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 9 2010-03-20 21:11:24.637 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-10-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.637 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar: 6 Weeks in Month 10 2010-03-20 21:11:24.638 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-10-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.639 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 10 2010-03-20 21:11:24.640 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-11-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.640 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 11 2010-03-20 21:11:24.641 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-11-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-20 21:11:24.641 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 11 2010-03-20 21:11:24.642 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar Date: 2010-12-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:11:24.642 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] CurrentCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 12 2010-03-20 21:11:24.643 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar Date: 2010-12-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-20 21:11:24.644 ScrapCocoa[52313:a0f] GregorianCalendar: 5 Weeks in Month 12 I think this is when I give up...

    Read the article

  • Nostalgia Lane: Steve Jobs Introduces the iPhone in 2007 [Classic Video]

    - by Asian Angel
    With the five year anniversary of the iPhone approaching, here is a look back at when it all started with this classic introductory presentation by Steve Jobs. Steve Jobs introduces iPhone in 2007 [YouTube] How to Banish Duplicate Photos with VisiPic How to Make Your Laptop Choose a Wired Connection Instead of Wireless HTG Explains: What Is Two-Factor Authentication and Should I Be Using It?

    Read the article

  • The Steve Jobs Chronicles – Charlie and the Apple Factory [Video]

    - by Asian Angel
    Charlie and four other lucky children found the five golden tickets that Apple CEO Steve Jobs placed in random iPhone boxes. These tickets let the children have a once in a lifetime opportunity to explore the mysteries of the Apple Factory, but will they find out the true secrets of Apple’s success? Wait!! What is Bill Gates doing sneaking around the Apple Factory?! Charlie and the Apple Factory [via Geeks are Sexy] Latest Features How-To Geek ETC How to Get Amazing Color from Photos in Photoshop, GIMP, and Paint.NET Learn To Adjust Contrast Like a Pro in Photoshop, GIMP, and Paint.NET Have You Ever Wondered How Your Operating System Got Its Name? Should You Delete Windows 7 Service Pack Backup Files to Save Space? What Can Super Mario Teach Us About Graphics Technology? Windows 7 Service Pack 1 is Released: But Should You Install It? Save Files Directly from Your Browser to the Cloud in Chrome and Iron The Steve Jobs Chronicles – Charlie and the Apple Factory [Video] Google Chrome Updates; Faster, Cleaner Menus, Encrypted Password Syncing, and More Glowing Chess Set Combines LEDs, Chess, and DIY Electronics Fun Peaceful Alpine River on a Sunny Day [Wallpaper] Fast Society Creates Mini and Mobile Temporary Social Networks

    Read the article

  • Steve Jobs Goes On Medical. iPad 2 and iPhone 5 On Track.

    - by Gopinath
    Here is a bit of disappointing news for Apple fan boys. Steve Jobs is again going on medical leave as he wants to concentrate on his health for sometime. In an email to the employees of Apple Steve said, At my request, the board of directors has granted me a medical leave of absence so I can focus on my health..I will continue as CEO and be involved in major strategic decisions for the company.I have great confidence that Tim and the rest of the executive management team will do a terrific job executing the exciting plans we have in place for 2011   In the mail, Steve also said that plans for the product releases scheduled in 2011 will not be affected. This means as rumoured iPad 2 In April, iPhone 5 In June With New Hardware. There is not much information on the medical complications Steve is facing now, but many are thinking  its linked to the liver transplant he had in 2009. What ever may be reason, we wish for this speedy recovery. Here is the full content of the email Steve Jobs sent to all employees: Team, At my request, the board of directors has granted me a medical leave of absence so I can focus on my health. I will continue as CEO and be involved in major strategic decisions for the company. I have asked Tim Cook to be responsible for all of Apple’s day to day operations. I have great confidence that Tim and the rest of the executive management team will do a terrific job executing the exciting plans we have in place for 2011. I love Apple so much and hope to be back as soon as I can. In the meantime, my family and I would deeply appreciate respect for our privacy. Steve This article titled,Steve Jobs Goes On Medical. iPad 2 and iPhone 5 On Track., was originally published at Tech Dreams. Grab our rss feed or fan us on Facebook to get updates from us.

    Read the article

  • MDX using EXISTING, AGGREGATE, CROSSJOIN and WHERE

    - by James Rogers
    It is a well-published approach to using the EXISTING function to decode AGGREGATE members and nested sub-query filters.  Mosha wrote a good blog on it here and a more recent one here.  The use of EXISTING in these scenarios is very useful and sometimes the only option when dealing with multi-select filters.  However, there are some limitations I have run across when using the EXISTING function against an AGGREGATE member:   The AGGREGATE member must be assigned to the Dimension.Hierarchy being detected by the EXISTING function in the calculated measure. The AGGREGATE member cannot contain a crossjoin from any other dimension or hierarchy or EXISTING will not be able to detect the members in the AGGREGATE member.   Take the following query (from Adventure Works DW 2008):   With   member [Week Count] as 'count(existing([Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].members))'    member [Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[CM] as 'AGGREGATE({[Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].&[47]&[2004],[Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].&[48]&[2004],[Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].&[49]&[2004],[Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].&[50]&[2004]})'   select   {[Week Count]} on columns from   [Adventure Works]     where   [Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[CM]   Here we are attempting to count the existing fiscal weeks in slicer.  This is useful to get a per-week average for another member. Many applications generate queries in this manner (such as Oracle OBIEE).  This query returns the correct result of (4) weeks. Now let's put a twist in it.  What if the querying application submits the query in the following manner:   With   member [Week Count] as 'count(existing([Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].members))'    member [Customer].[Customer Geography].[CM] as 'AGGREGATE({[Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].&[47]&[2004],[Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].&[48]&[2004],[Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].&[49]&[2004],[Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].&[50]&[2004]})'   select   {[Week Count]} on columns from   [Adventure Works]     where   [Customer].[Customer Geography].[CM]   Here we are attempting to count the existing fiscal weeks in slicer.  However, the AGGREGATE member is built on a different dimension (in name) than the one EXISTING is trying to detect.  In this case the query returns (174) which is the total number of [Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].members defined in the dimension.   Now another twist, the AGGREGATE member will be named appropriately and contain the hierarchy we are trying to detect with EXISTING but it will be cross-joined with another hierarchy:   With   member [Week Count] as 'count(existing([Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].members))'    member [Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[CM] as 'AGGREGATE({[Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].&[47]&[2004],[Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].&[48]&[2004],[Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].&[49]&[2004],[Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].&[50]&[2004]}*    {[Customer].[Customer Geography].[Country].&[Australia],[Customer].[Customer Geography].[Country].&[United States]})'  select   {[Week Count]} on columns from   [Adventure Works]    where   [Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[CM]   Once again, we are attempting to count the existing fiscal weeks in slicer.  Again, in this case the query returns (174) which is the total number of [Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].members defined in the dimension. However, in 2008 R2 this query returns the correct result of 4 and additionally , the following will return the count of existing countries as well (2):   With   member [Week Count] as 'count(existing([Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].members))'   member [Country Count] as 'count(existing([Customer].[Customer Geography].[Country].members))'  member [Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[CM] as 'AGGREGATE({[Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].&[47]&[2004],[Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].&[48]&[2004],[Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].&[49]&[2004],[Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].&[50]&[2004]}*    {[Customer].[Customer Geography].[Country].&[Australia],[Customer].[Customer Geography].[Country].&[United States]})'  select   {[Week Count]} on columns from   [Adventure Works]    where   [Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[CM]   2008 R2 seems to work as long as the AGGREGATE member is on at least one of the hierarchies attempting to be detected (i.e. [Date].[Fiscal Weeks] or [Customer].[Customer Geography]). If not, it seems that the engine cannot find a "point of entry" into the aggregate member and ignores it for calculated members.   One way around this would be to put the sets from the AGGREGATE member explicitly in the WHERE clause (slicer).  I realize this is only supported in SSAS 2005 and 2008.  However, after talking with Chris Webb (his blog is here and I highly recommend following his efforts and musings) it is a far more efficient way to filter/slice a query:   With   member [Week Count] as 'count(existing([Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].members))'    select   {[Week Count]} on columns from   [Adventure Works]    where   ({[Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].&[47]&[2004],[Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].&[48]&[2004],[Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].&[49]&[2004],[Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].&[50]&[2004]}   ,{[Customer].[Customer Geography].[Country].&[Australia],[Customer].[Customer Geography].[Country].&[United States]})   This query returns the correct result of (4) weeks.  Additionally, we can count the cross-join members of the two hierarchies in the slicer:   With   member [Week Count] as 'count(existing([Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].members)*existing([Customer].[Customer Geography].[Country].members))'    select   {[Week Count]} on columns from   [Adventure Works]    where   ({[Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].&[47]&[2004],[Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].&[48]&[2004],[Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].&[49]&[2004],[Date].[Fiscal Weeks].[Fiscal Week].&[50]&[2004]}   ,{[Customer].[Customer Geography].[Country].&[Australia],[Customer].[Customer Geography].[Country].&[United States]})   We get the correct number of (8) here.

    Read the article

  • Steve Jobs Goes On Medical. iPad 2 and iPhone 5 On Track.

    - by Gopinath
    Here is a bit of disappointing news for Apple fan boys. Steve Jobs is again going on medical leave as he wants to concentrate on his health for sometime. In an email to the employees of Apple Steve said, At my request, the board of directors has granted me a medical leave of absence so I can focus on my health..I will continue as CEO and be involved in major strategic decisions for the company.I have great confidence that Tim and the rest of the executive management team will do a terrific job executing the exciting plans we have in place for 2011   Seems to the plans for release of much anticipated iPad 2 and iPhone 5 will not be affected by Steve’s absence -as rumoured iPad 2 In April, iPhone 5 In June With New Hardware. Here is the full content of the email Steve Jobs sent to all employees: Team, At my request, the board of directors has granted me a medical leave of absence so I can focus on my health. I will continue as CEO and be involved in major strategic decisions for the company. I have asked Tim Cook to be responsible for all of Apple’s day to day operations. I have great confidence that Tim and the rest of the executive management team will do a terrific job executing the exciting plans we have in place for 2011. I love Apple so much and hope to be back as soon as I can. In the meantime, my family and I would deeply appreciate respect for our privacy. Steve This article titled,Steve Jobs Goes On Medical. iPad 2 and iPhone 5 On Track., was originally published at Tech Dreams. Grab our rss feed or fan us on Facebook to get updates from us.

    Read the article

  • Steve Jobs Proposes New Apple Campus.It’s As Beautiful As An iPad.

    - by Gopinath
    After the launch of iOS 5, OS X Lion and iCloud Steve Jobs proposed Apple’s plans for construction of a new campus in Cupertino. In a presentation to Cupertino City Council, Steve proposed to construct a spaceship style beautiful building that can house 12000 employees. Apple recently purchased 150 acres of land from HP and others in Cupertino and this land will be used for their new campus. The architectural design of the new campus looks awesome just like their products: iPad / iPhone.It’s a four storied circular building with all curved glasses that can accommodate 12000 employees.,  “We do have a shot at building the best office building in the world,” Jobs told the Council members, “Architecture students will come here to see this.”. The facility is going to be eco-friendly with 80% of landscaping with most of the parking going to underground. The current campus has 3700 trees and Apple is planning to increase them to 6000 trees. The campus will be powered with its own renewable energy source and electric grid as backup. Steve described It’s a pretty amazing building. It’s a little like a spaceship landed. It’s got this gorgeous courtyard in the middle… It’s a circle. It’s curved all the way around. If you build things, this is not the cheapest way to build something Check out the embedded video of Steve Jobs at the City Council meeting An Apple Fan boy quickly photoshopped the new campus to something more interesting This article titled,Steve Jobs Proposes New Apple Campus.It’s As Beautiful As An iPad., was originally published at Tech Dreams. Grab our rss feed or fan us on Facebook to get updates from us.

    Read the article

  • Community Megaphone Podcast #5 with Steve Michelotti

    - by Dane Morgridge
    Show 5 is finally up with special guest Steve Michelotti.  We talked about ASP.Net MVC, how to get started in the community and more! Steve Michelotti is a Microsoft ASP.NET MVP and an Architect/Developer for Applied Information Sciences (AIS). He has consulted at Advertising.com/AOL where he was the Tech Lead for one of the highest volume .NET applications in the world. He previously was the Chief Technologist at e.magination. Steve is a frequent presenter at developer user groups and Code Camps along the East Coast and holds the MCSD, MCPD, and MCT certifications. Steve has been on Microsoft Channel9 and his published articles include Visual Studio Magazine and his blog: www.geekswithblogs.net/michelotti. Audio: http://www.communitymegaphonepodcast.com/Content/Audio/Show-5-Steve-Michelotti.mp3 Show Url: http://www.communitymegaphonepodcast.com/Show/5/Steve-Michelotti Rss: http://feed.communitymegaphonepodcast.com/cm-podcast

    Read the article

  • FullCalendar displaying last weeks events below this weeks events

    - by Brian
    I am developing an application to manage an On-Call calendar, using FullCalendar to render it. Most events are 1 week long, starting at 8:00 AM Tuesday and ending the following Tuesday at 8:00 AM. Another event, presumably with a different person on-call, will follow that event. During a hallway usability test, someone commented that the month calendar view was difficult to read because the previous weeks event is not at the top of the stack, instead rendering below the event that starts during that week. When being viewed, the eye perceives that it should go down 1 line to view the remaining timeline because the event from last week is there, instead of moving down to the following week. I investigated what I believe to be the problem: function segCmp(a, b) { return (b.msLength - a.msLength) * 100 + (a.event.start - b.event.start); } sorts the events for a row, but uses the length of the event in the calculation. Since the current week's event will have a longer duration, it always get sorted to the top. To test, I changed the start dates to Wednesday so the durations are closer. This cause the events to render how I would expect, with last weeks events at the top and this weeks at the bottom. I thought that if one of the events in the compare doesn't start that week, then it should only be compared based on the start times. I modified the function to be: function segCmp(a, b) { if (a.isStart == false || b.isStart == false) { return (a.event.start - b.event.start); } return (b.msLength - a.msLength) * 100 + (a.event.start - b.event.start); } This solved my problem, and the rendering now looks good - and passes the hallway test. What I don't know is if this would have an impact in other areas. I have taken a look at the other views (month, week, day) and they all seem to be rendering properly as well. I am just not familiar with FullCalendar enough to file a bug or feature request on this, or if this would even be considered a bug. I am wondering if what I modified is correct, or if it is not what a better modification would be to fix this issue. Thanks! Below I have the json results for what should be displayed: [{"title":"Person 1 - OnCall (OSS On Call)","id":12,"allDay":false,"start":"2010-11-30T15:00:00.0000000Z","end":"2010-12-07T15:00:00.0000000Z","editable":false,"className":"fc-event-title-calendar","url":"/TimeManagement/Edit/12"}, {"title":"Person 2 - OnCall (OSS On Call)","id":13,"allDay":false,"start":"2010-12-07T15:00:00.0000000Z","end":"2010-12-14T15:00:00.0000000Z","editable":false,"className":"fc-event-title-calendar","url":"/TimeManagement/Edit/13"}, {"title":"Person 3 - OnCall (OSS On Call)","id":14,"allDay":false,"start":"2010-12-14T15:00:00.0000000Z","end":"2010-12-21T15:00:00.0000000Z","editable":false,"className":"fc-event-title-calendar","url":"/TimeManagement/Edit/14"}, {"title":"Person 4 - OnCall (OSS On Call)","id":15,"allDay":false,"start":"2010-12-21T15:00:00.0000000Z","end":"2010-12-28T15:00:00.0000000Z","editable":false,"className":"fc-event-title-calendar","url":"/TimeManagement/Edit/15"}, {"title":"Person 5 - OnCall (OSS On Call)","id":16,"allDay":false,"start":"2010-12-28T15:00:00.0000000Z","end":"2011-01-04T15:00:00.0000000Z","editable":false,"className":"fc-event-title-calendar","url":"/TimeManagement/Edit/16"}, {"title":"Person 6 - OnCall (OSS On Call)","id":17,"allDay":false,"start":"2011-01-04T15:00:00.0000000Z","end":"2011-01-11T15:00:00.0000000Z","editable":false,"className":"fc-event-title-calendar","url":"/TimeManagement/Edit/17"}, {"title":"Christmas","id":2,"allDay":true,"start":"2010-12-25T07:00:00.0000000Z","end":null,"editable":false,"className":"fc-event-title-calendar","url":"/TimeManagement/Edit/2"}, {"title":"New Years Eve","id":3,"allDay":true,"start":"2010-12-31T07:00:00.0000000Z","end":null,"editable":false,"className":"fc-event-title-calendar","url":"/TimeManagement/Edit/3"}, {"title":"New Years Day","id":4,"allDay":true,"start":"2011-01-01T07:00:00.0000000Z","end":null,"editable":false,"className":"fc-event-title-calendar","url":"/TimeManagement/Edit/4"}]

    Read the article

  • Steve Ballmer réfute la disparition des PC au profit des tablettes, quel sera l'avenir des appareils

    Mise à jour du 04.06.2010 par Katleen Steve Ballmer réfute la disparition des PCs au profit des tablettes en réponse à Steve Jobs, quel sera alors l'avenir des appareils numériques ? Suite au passage de Steve Jobs sur le grill des journalistes lors de la conférence D8, Steve Ballmer (CEO de Microsoft) s'est lui aussi assis dans la même chaise hier, où il a répondu aux questions de l'équipe de Wall Street Journal. «Quand nous étions une nation agraire, toutes les voitures étaient des camions. Mais à partir du moment où la population a commencé à migrer vers les villes, les gens ont commencé à utiliser des voitures. Je pense que les PC vont connaître le même sort que les camions. De moins en moins de ...

    Read the article

  • Community Profile: Steve Blackwell on Fusion Middleware in Avocent's Trellis DCIM Project

    - by OTN ArchBeat
    Steve Blackwell is VP of engineering at Avocent. I had a chance to sit down with Steve during Oracle OpenWorld 2013 to ask him about Avocent's Trellis project, a three-year Data Center Infrastructure Management (DCIM) undertaking built on Oracle Fusion Middleware, including Oracle WebLogic Suite, Oracle Coherence, Oracle Complex Event Processing, and Oracle Service Bus. Steve shares a lot of background and technical detail on the project in this video, so check it out.

    Read the article

  • The Social Business Thought Leaders - Steve Denning

    - by kellsey.ruppel
    How is the average organization doing? Not very well according to a number of recent books and reports. A few indicators provide quite a gloomy picture: Return on assets and invested capitals dropped to 25% of its value in 1965 in the entire US market (see The Shift Index by John Hagel) Firms are dying faster and faster with the average lifespan of companies listed in the S&P 500 index gone from 67 years in the 1920s to 15 years today (see Creative Disruption by Richard Foster) Employee engagement ratio, a high level indicator of an organization’s health proved to affect performance outcomes, does not exceed on average 20%-30% (see Employee Engagement, Gallup or The Engagement Gap, Towers Perrin) In one of the most enjoyable keynotes of the Social Business Forum 2012, Steve Denning (Author of Radical Management and Independent Management Consultant) explained why this is happening and especially what leaders should do to reverse the worrying trends. In this Social Business Thought Leaders series, we asked Steve to collapse some key suggestions in a 2 minutes video that we strongly recommend. Steve discusses traditional management - that set of principles and practices born in the early 20th century and largely inspired by thinkers such as Frederick Taylor and Henry Ford - as the main responsible for the declining performance of modern organizations. While so many things have changed in the last 100 or so years, most companies are in fact still primarily focused on maximizing profits and efficiency, cutting costs, coordinating individuals top-down through command and control. The issue is, in a knowledge intensive, customer centred, turbulent market like the one we are experiencing, similar concepts are not just alienating employees' passion but also destroying the last source of competitive differentiation left: creativity and the innovative potential. According to Steve Denning, in a phase change from old industrial to a creative, collaborative, knowledge economy, the answer is hidden in a whole new business ecosystem that puts the individual (both the employee and the customer) at the center of the organization. He calls this new paradigm Radical Management and in the video interview he articulates the huge challenges and amazing rewards our enterprises are facing during this inevitable transition.

    Read the article

  • Steve Jobs élu CEO le plus influent du monde, d'après le top 30 annuel de Barrons

    Steve Jobs élu CEO le plus influent du monde, d'après le top 30 annuel de Barrons Comme chaque année, le magazine financier Barrons publie son top 30 des patrons les plus influents. Et, à son avis, le CEO qui apporte le plus de valeur à son entreprise est Steve Jobs. Le dirigeant d'Apple mène donc le classement. Son nom vaudrait même 25 milliards de dollars ! «Quand il a un souci de santé, l'action Apple tremble», explique le magazine. Steve Jobs aurait même l'aura d'une divinité pour certains, tant ses présentations sont mythiques. L'homme agace ou fascine, mais il ne laisse pas indifférent. Ses détracteurs le disent capable "de faire passer un grille-pain pour la 8e merveille du monde et de persuader les fidè...

    Read the article

  • NSCalendar: Problem getting weeks in a month...

    - by AngrySpade
    I am creating a calendar control of sorts... One thing I need to know is how many weeks are there in a Month... So NSCalendar rangeOfUnit:inUnit:forDate Seems to be exactly what I need... Except I am noticing something that seems off and I can't quite figure out why this is happening... The following code... NSCalendar *calendar = [NSCalendar currentCalendar]; NSDateComponents *dateComponents = [[NSDateComponents alloc] init]; [dateComponents setYear: 2010]; [dateComponents setDay: 1]; for (int x=1; x<=12; x++) { [dateComponents setMonth: x]; NSDate *date = [calendar dateFromComponents:dateComponents]; NSLog(@"Date: %@", date); NSRange range = [calendar rangeOfUnit: NSWeekCalendarUnit inUnit: NSMonthCalendarUnit forDate:date]; NSLog(@"%d Weeks in Month %d", range.length, [dateComponents month]); } Is returning the following debug messages... 2010-03-14 13:08:10.350 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-14 13:08:10.351 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 1 2010-03-14 13:08:10.352 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-02-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-14 13:08:10.352 Scrap[4256:207] 4 Weeks in Month 2 2010-03-14 13:08:10.353 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-03-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-14 13:08:10.353 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 3 2010-03-14 13:08:10.354 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-04-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-14 13:08:10.355 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 4 2010-03-14 13:08:10.356 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-05-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-14 13:08:10.357 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 5 2010-03-14 13:08:10.358 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-06-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-14 13:08:10.358 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 6 2010-03-14 13:08:10.359 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-07-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-14 13:08:10.360 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 7 2010-03-14 13:08:10.361 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-08-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-14 13:08:10.364 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 8 2010-03-14 13:08:10.364 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-09-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-14 13:08:10.365 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 9 2010-03-14 13:08:10.366 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-10-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-14 13:08:10.366 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 10 2010-03-14 13:08:10.367 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-11-01 00:00:00 -0400 2010-03-14 13:08:10.367 Scrap[4256:207] 5 Weeks in Month 11 2010-03-14 13:08:10.369 Scrap[4256:207] Date: 2010-12-01 00:00:00 -0500 2010-03-14 13:08:10.369 Scrap[4256:207] 52 Weeks in Month 12 I cant quite figure out why I get 52 weeks in month 12. Any clues?

    Read the article

  • Steve Ballmer démissionne du conseil d'administration de Microsoft pour mieux se consacrer à ses affaires

    Steve Ballmer démissionne du conseil d'administration de Microsoft pour mieux se consacrer à ses affairesIl y a presque un an, Steve Ballmer, ex PDG de Microsoft, avait annoncé qu'il quitterait Microsoft dans 12 mois, le temps que la firme prépare sa succession. Dans une lettre adressée à son successeur Satya Nadella, il a annoncé sa démisson de son poste de membre du conseil d'administration. C'était en 2000 qu'il fut nommé comme PDG de Microsoft à la succession de Bill Gates. Même s'il a longuement...

    Read the article

  • Steve Miranda is the Next Guest on The Bill Kutik Radio Show®

    - by Jay Richey, HCM Product Marketing
    Be sure to catch Steve Miranda, Senior Vice President for Oracle Fusion Development, tomorrow on The Bill Kutik Radio Show®.  Bill will be asking the tough questions once again and Steve will be answering.  It is sure to be a lively discussion, with more details on Fusion and Oracle's co-existence strategy with PeopleSoft, E-Business Suite, and JD Edwards HCM applications.  Wednesday, March 28, at noon ET, 9 am PT.  Listen live, afterward to the replay, or download from iTunes. http://www.knowledgeinfusion.com/ondemand/docs/DOC-9903 Produced by Knowledge Infusion and hosted by independent industry analyst Bill Kutik, the bi-weekly interview show provides leading HR business content and insight into up-to-the-minute trends.

    Read the article

  • La reconnaissance vocale sera l'avenir de l'informatique, d'après le co-fondateur d'Apple Steve Wozniak

    La reconnaissance vocale sera l'avenir de l'informatique, d'après le co-fondateur d'Apple Steve Wozniak La reconnaissance vocale pourrait bientôt émerger, selon Steve Wozniak, co-fondateur d'Apple. Elle serait même "la prochaine frontière" de l'informatique, et ouvrirait la porte à "l'interprétation de nombreuses variétés de commandes différentes", selon lui. Cette technologie pourrait profondément modifier l'utilisation domestique des ordinateurs, et même révolutionner l'informatique telle que nous la connaissons aujourd'hui. L'homme n'a tout de fois pas été plus prolixe sur le sujet, préférant poursuivre en dénigrant Microsoft et tout particulièrement son OS Windows, pour lequel il "ressent...

    Read the article

  • Steve Jobs explique pourquoi Apple a choisi H.264 au lieu de Theora

    La lettre ouverte de Steve Jobs concernant Flash a fait grand bruit, et, comme on va le voir ici, pas seulement chez les acteurs concernés de près ou de loin par Flash. En effet, Hugo Roy (1), qui se définit lui-même comme étant un "Free Software hacktivist @FSFE" (2) a réagi en postant une lettre ouverte adressée à Steve Jobs (3) dont voici un extrait de la version française de sa lettre (4) Citation: Puis-je vous rappeler que H.264 n?est pas un standard ouvert? Ce codec vidéo est couvert par d...

    Read the article

  • Follow Steve Jobs WWDC 2010 Keynote Live Blogging On Popular Websites

    - by Gopinath
    As Apple’s WWDC 2010 is around the corner, we thought of providing links of popular blogs that cover the event live blogging. I would not have prepared this list if Gizmodo is live blogging this event. Gizmodo had done exceptionally well in covering the live events of Apple and providing great insights from live events. But this time, Gizmodo is kicked out of WWDC event as they spoiled Apple’s party by revealing the secrets of next version of iPhone. So I thought just like me many of you guys would be searching for popular blogs that cover the Steve Jobs keynote live from WWDC 2010. Here are here few popular blogs and links to their live blogging pages: gdgt live WWDC coverage Technolizer WWDC Live Blogging The Apple Blog WWDC Live Coverage Mac Observer WWDC 2010 Live Blog Coverage MacRumors WWDC Live Event Coverage Ars Technica Wired NYT Mac Life   I love the watch live of Steve Jobs key note, but I could not figure out any websites that offer live streaming of this event. If you happen to find any site that offer live streaming of the event, let us hear in the comments. Join us on Facebook to read all our stories right inside your Facebook news feed.

    Read the article

  • Intro On AppFabric on EndPoint.tv (Steve & Danny)

    - by Benny Mathew
    http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/Endpoint/endpointtv-Pro-Windows-Server-AppFabric/   Here is a nice intro to Windows Server Appfabric by a good friend and colleague Steve and Danny.Cutting through all the hype and misunderstandings especially between AppFabric in the Cloud vs. Windows Server AppFabric. Also on when to position BizTalk versus Windows Server AppFabric.

    Read the article

  • SQLPeople Interviews - Steve Fibich and Cindy Gross

    - by andyleonard
    Introduction Late last year I announced an exciting new endeavor called SQLPeople . At the end of 2010 I announced the 2010 SQLPeople Person of the Year . Check out these new interviews from some cool SQLPeople ! Interviews To Date Cindy Gross Steve Fibich Tim Mitchell Jeremiah Peschka Crys Manson Ben McEwan Thomas LaRock Lori Edwards Brent Ozar Michael Coles Rob Farley Jamie Thomson Conclusion I plan to post two or three interviews each week for the forseeable future. SQLPeople is just one of the...(read more)

    Read the article

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >