Search Results

Search found 9 results on 1 pages for 'stupiddeveloper'.

Page 1/1 | 1 

• Nullable ToString()

  - by StupidDeveloper

  I see everywhere constructions like: int? myVar = null; string test = myVar.HasValue ? myVar.Value.ToString() : string.Empty; Why not use simply: string test = myVar.ToString(); Isn't that exactly the same ? At least Reflector says that: public override string ToString() { if (!this.HasValue) { return ""; } return this.value.ToString(); } So, is that correct (the shorter version) or am I missing something?

  Read the article

• How to disable listbox's click event

  - by StupidDeveloper

  I have a listbox which acts as a list of items. If you click on some item, it's contents are shown in the panel on the right (few textboxes etc.). I need to have a validation on these controls as all of them are required fields. And I do have it. The problem is that, even when the validators are not valid, user can click the listbox and change active index (that doesn't have impact on the panel on the right, as SelectedIndexChanged isn't fired). The validators are standard RequiredFieldValidator with their Display property set to "Dynamic". So, what I want is to disallow the user clicking on the listbox and changing the index untill all validators are Valid. What would be your solution for that? Is that even possible?

  Read the article

• union on the same table

  - by StupidDeveloper

  I have a table: ID | Id1 | Id2 1 | 100 | 12 2 | 196 | 140 3 | 196 | 141 4 | 150 | 140 5 | 150 | 199 I want to write a query that will give me a table containing records with the same ID2 and with id1 equal to 196 or 150. I thought about union: select * from table where itemId = 196 union select * from table where itemId = 150 but that doesn't cover the ID2 requirement. How should I do that?

  Read the article

• Page.Request behaviour

  - by StupidDeveloper

  I have a page and few controls. I'm doing a normal postback. On InitializeCulture event of the page the Page.Request object contains e.g. controls with their values - and that's great. But on the other hand, when I'm trying to access this collection on the Page_Load or OnInit events, it's way smaller and doesn't have any of the controls that have been there before. Can anyone tell me what happens with Page.Request between these events?

  Read the article

• Proper disposing of MD5CryptoServiceProvider

  - by StupidDeveloper

  Which one of the below 2 code pieces is not calling dispose and therefore is bad practice: ... using(MD5CryptoServiceProvider p = new MD5CryptoServiceProvider()) { return p.ComputeHash(...); } ... or ... return new MD5CryptoServiceProvider()).ComputeHash(...); ... ?

  Read the article

• Active Record's SessionScope in BL or DL ?

  - by StupidDeveloper

  Imagine that I have 3 projects: DL, BL and WS. DL contains Active Record implementation with all the mappings, BL has some logic (calling various DL methods) and finally WebService project exposes some BL methods (using some DTO mappings). The questions are: Should I put all data related methods in DL or is it allowed to use SessionScope in BL ? There are some complicated stuff that is right now done on BL. Should/can BL operate on classes-mappings of the Active record? The question is where should be the translation to DTO be made (at the BL level? ) ?

  Read the article

• Attach to Property's setter

  - by StupidDeveloper

  I haven't found similiar post so I'm asking this. Let's say I defined somewhere an application wide available static Property (I mean it's not local) and in one class I would like to know when this property is being changed. Apart from aop (transparentproxy etc.) which I think doesn't suit me well here (and I can't add that to project anyway), what are the options here? One solution I can think of, which is probably a very nasty one, is to use some event that would be executed in the setter and just attach it in the class(es) which needs that. Something like: public static event EventHandler CurrentNumberChanged= delegate {}; public static int CurrentNumber { get { return currentNumber; } set { currentNumber = value; CurrentNumberChanged(null, EventArgs.Empty); } } I know it's really unsafe to use such events ( read here ). And since I would use it in asp.net makes it even more ugly. Do you have any advices ?

  Read the article

• How to find which control made the asyncpostback ?

  - by StupidDeveloper

  I know how to find which control made the postback, it's something like: string postBackControl = Request.Params.Get("__EVENTTARGET") == null ? string.Empty : Request.Params.Get("__EVENTTARGET"); but how can I find the one that made async postback?

  Read the article

• Best practice for creating objects used in for/foreach loops

  - by StupidDeveloper

  Hi! What's the best practice for dealing with objects in for or foreach loops? Should we create one object outside the loops and recreate it all over again (using new... ) or create new one for every loop iteration? Example: foreach(var a in collection) { SomeClass sc = new SomeClass(); sc.id = a; sc.Insert(); } or SomeClass sc = null; foreach(var a in collection) { sc = new SomeClass(); sc.id = a; sc.Insert(); } Which is better?

  Read the article

1