Search Results

Search found 5 results on 1 pages for 'tote'.

Page 1/1 | 1 

• Resultset (getter/setter class) object not deleting old values at 2nd Time execution in swin

  - by user2384525

  I have summarizeData() method and called so many time for value retrieve. but first time is working file but 2nd time execution value is increasing in HashMap. void summarizeData() { HashMap outerMap = new HashMap(); ArrayList list = new ArrayList(dataClass.getData()); for (int indx = 0; indx < list.size(); indx++) { System.out.println("indx : " + indx); Resultset rs = new Resultset(); rs = (Resultset) list.get(indx); if (rs != null) { int id = rs.getTestCaseNumber(); if (id > 0) { Object isExists = outerMap.get(id); if (isExists != null) { //System.out.println("found entry so updating"); Resultset inRs = new Resultset(); inRs = (Resultset) isExists; if (inRs != null) { int totExec = inRs.getTestExecution(); int totPass = inRs.getTestCasePass(); int totFail = inRs.getTestCaseFail(); // System.out.println("totE :" + totExec + " totP:" + totPass + " totF:" + totFail); int newRsStat = rs.getTestCasePass(); if (newRsStat == 1) { totPass++; inRs.setTestCasePass(totPass); } else { totFail++; inRs.setTestCaseFail(totFail); } totExec++; // System.out.println("id : "+id+" totPass: "+totPass+" totFail:"+totFail); // System.out.println("key : " + id + " val : " + inRs.getTestCaseNumber() + " " + inRs.getTestCasePass() + " " + inRs.getTestCaseFail()); inRs.setTestExecution(totExec); outerMap.put(id, inRs); } } else { // System.out.println("not exist so new entry" + " totE:" + rs.getTestExecution() + " totP:" + rs.getTestCasePass() + " totF:" + rs.getTestCaseFail()); outerMap.put(id, rs); } } } else { System.out.println("rs null"); } } Output at 1st Execution: indx : 0 indx : 1 indx : 2 indx : 3 indx : 4 indx : 5 indx : 6 indx : 7 indx : 8 indx : 9 indx : 10 totE :1 totP:1 totF:0 indx : 11 totE :1 totP:1 totF:0 indx : 12 totE :1 totP:1 totF:0 indx : 13 totE :1 totP:1 totF:0 indx : 14 totE :1 totP:1 totF:0 indx : 15 totE :1 totP:1 totF:0 indx : 16 totE :1 totP:1 totF:0 indx : 17 totE :1 totP:1 totF:0 indx : 18 totE :1 totP:1 totF:0 indx : 19 totE :1 totP:1 totF:0 Output at 2nd Execution: indx : 0 indx : 1 indx : 2 indx : 3 indx : 4 indx : 5 indx : 6 indx : 7 indx : 8 indx : 9 indx : 10 totE :2 totP:2 totF:0 indx : 11 totE :2 totP:2 totF:0 indx : 12 totE :2 totP:2 totF:0 indx : 13 totE :2 totP:2 totF:0 indx : 14 totE :2 totP:2 totF:0 indx : 15 totE :2 totP:2 totF:0 indx : 16 totE :2 totP:2 totF:0 indx : 17 totE :2 totP:2 totF:0 indx : 18 totE :2 totP:2 totF:0 indx : 19 totE :2 totP:2 totF:0 while i required same output on every execution.

  Read the article

• How to map one class against multiple tables with SQLAlchemy?

  - by tote

  Lets say that I have a database structure with three tables that look like this: items - item_id - item_handle attributes - attribute_id - attribute_name item_attributes - item_attribute_id - item_id - attribute_id - attribute_value I would like to be able to do this in SQLAlchemy: item = Item('item1') item.foo = 'bar' session.add(item) session.commit() item1 = session.query(Item).filter_by(handle='item1').one() print item1.foo # => 'bar' I'm new to SQLAlchemy and I found this in the documentation (http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/05/mappers.html#mapping-a-class-against-multiple-tables): j = join(items, item_attributes, items.c.item_id == item_attributes.c.item_id). \ join(attributes, item_attributes.c.attribute_id == attributes.c.attribute_id) mapper(Item, j, properties={ 'item_id': [items.c.item_id, item_attributes.c.item_id], 'attribute_id': [item_attributes.c.attribute_id, attributes.c.attribute_id], }) It only adds item_id and attribute_id to Item and its not possible to add attributes to Item object. Is what I'm trying to achieve possible with SQLAlchemy? Is there a better way to structure the database to get the same behaviour of "dynamic columns"?

  Read the article

• Leave the CDs in the Office

  <b>Linux Journal:</b> "If you have ever experienced that, or would simply like to no longer need to tote that book of CDs with you every day, then this article is for you."

  Read the article

• Actionscript - combining AS2 assets into a single SWF

  - by Justin Bachorik

  Hi guys, I have a flash project that I'm trying to export as a single SWF. There's a main SWF file that loads about 6 other SWFs, and both the main and the child SWFs reference other external assets (images, sounds, etc). I'd like to package everything as a single .swf file so I don't have to tote the other assets around with the .swf. All the coding is done in the timeline, but the assets haven't been imported into the Flash Authoring environment and I don't have time to do that right now (there are too many references to them everywhere). I'm hoping that there's just an option I'm missing that allows this sort of packaged export, but I haven't found anything like that. I don't have access to Flex or mxmlc (and as the AS is timeline-based, they wouldn't necessarily help me). Any thoughts? Thanks! PS...if there's no way of doing exactly what I'm saying, I could deal with having all the assets in a "assets" folder or something like that, so I'd just be toting around main.swf and an assets folder. The problem here is that all the references to the assets assume that they're in the same folder as the main.swf file, so everything's assumed to be local...is there a way to change the scope of all external references in Flash (so, for example, all local references in the code are actually searched in /assets)?

  Read the article

• FireFox 6 Super Slow? Cache Settings Corruption

  - by Rick Strahl

  For those of you that follow me on Twitter, you've probably seen some of my tweets regarding major performance problems I've seen with the install of FireFox 6.0. FireFox 6.0 was released a couple of weeks ago and is treated as a 'force feed' update for FireFox 5.0. I'm not sure what the deal is with this braindead versioning that Mozilla is doing with major version releases coming out, what now every other month? Seriously that's retarded especially given the limited number of new features these releases bring, and the upgrade pain for plug-ins that the major version release causes. Anyway, after the FireFox updater bugged me long enough I finally gave in last week and updated to FireFox 6. Immediately after install I noticed terrible performance. Everything was running at a snail's pace with Web pages loading slowly and most content actually slowly 'painting' the page. A typical sign of content downloading slowly. However these are pages that should be mostly cached on my system and even repeated accesses ran just as slow. Just for a reality check I ran the same sites in Chrome (blazing fast) and IE (fast enough :-)) but FireFox - dog on a stick. Why so slow Boss? While complaining lots of people recommended to ditch FireFox - use Chrome, yada yada yada. Yeah, Chrome is fast and getting better but I have a number of plug-ins that I use in FF that I can't easily give up. So I suffered and started looking around more closely at what was happening. The first thing I noticed when accessing pages was that I continually saw accesses to the Google CDN downloading jQuery and jQuery UI. UI especially is pretty heavy in size and currently I'm in a location with a fairly slow IP connection where large files are a bit of an issue. However, seeing the CDN urls pop up repeatedly raised a flag with me. That stuff should be caching and it looked like each and every hit was reloading these scripts and various images over and over again. Fired up FireBug and sure enough I saw something like this on a repeated hit to my blog: Those two highlights are jquery and the main CSS file for the site and both are being loaded fully and taking a while to load. However, since this page had been loaded before, these items should be cached and show 304 requests instead of the full HTTP requests returning 200 result codes. In short it looked like FireFox was not caching ANY content at all and constantly reloading all page resources. No wonder things were running dog slow. Once I realized what the problem was I took a look in the about:config settings and lo and behold a bunch of the cache settings were set to not cache: In my case ALL the main cache flags were set to false for some reason that I can't figure out.  It appears that after the FireFox 6 update these flags somehow mysteriously changed and performance took a nose dive. Switching the .enable flags back to true and resetting all the cache settings tote default reverted performance back to the way it's supposed to be: reasonably fast and snappy as soon as content is cached and accessed again  from cache. I try not to muck with the about:config settings much (other than turning off the IPV6 option) but when there are problems access to these features can be really nice. However, I treat this as a last resort so it took me quite some time before I started looking through ALL the settings. This takes a while, not knowing what I was looking for exactly. If Web load performance is slow it's a good idea to check the cache settings. I have no idea what hosed these settings for me - I certainly didn't explicitly set them in about:config and while in FireFox's Options dialog I didn't see any option that would affect global caching like this, so this remains a mystery to me. Anyway, I hope that this is helpful to some, in case some of you end up running into a similar issue.© Rick Strahl, West Wind Technologies, 2005-2011Posted in FireFox   Tweet (function() { var po = document.createElement('script'); po.type = 'text/javascript'; po.async = true; po.src = 'https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(po, s); })();

  Read the article

1