Search Results

Search found 7 results on 1 pages for 'ujjain'.

Page 1/1 | 1 

• Unable to configure a service to run at startup with update-rc.d

  - by ujjain

  I would like to have transmission-daemon and vnstat automatically run at startup. I was able to configure this for apache2 and proftpd with exactly the same commands. 795 sudo update-rc.d transmission-daemon remove 797 sudo update-rc.d -f transmission-daemon remove 798 sudo update-rc.d transmission-daemon defaults 799 sudo update-rc.d vnstat remove 800 sudo update-rc.d -f vnstat remove 801 sudo update-rc.d -f vnstat defaults 802 sudo update-rc.d -f vnstat enable 805 reboot 807 history root@htpc:/home/administrator# sudo update-rc.d -f transmission-daemon remove Removing any system startup links for /etc/init.d/transmission-daemon ... /etc/rc0.d/K20transmission-daemon /etc/rc1.d/K20transmission-daemon /etc/rc2.d/S20transmission-daemon /etc/rc3.d/S20transmission-daemon /etc/rc4.d/S20transmission-daemon /etc/rc5.d/S20transmission-daemon /etc/rc6.d/K20transmission-daemon root@htpc:/home/administrator# sudo update-rc.d -f transmission-daemon defaults Adding system startup for /etc/init.d/transmission-daemon ... /etc/rc0.d/K20transmission-daemon -> ../init.d/transmission-daemon /etc/rc1.d/K20transmission-daemon -> ../init.d/transmission-daemon /etc/rc6.d/K20transmission-daemon -> ../init.d/transmission-daemon /etc/rc2.d/S20transmission-daemon -> ../init.d/transmission-daemon /etc/rc3.d/S20transmission-daemon -> ../init.d/transmission-daemon /etc/rc4.d/S20transmission-daemon -> ../init.d/transmission-daemon /etc/rc5.d/S20transmission-daemon -> ../init.d/transmission-daemon root@htpc:/home/administrator# service vnstat status * vnStat daemon is not running root@htpc:/home/administrator# service transmission-daemon status * transmission-daemon is not running root@htpc:/home/administrator# service transmission-daemon start * Starting bittorrent daemon transmission-daemon [ OK ] root@htpc:/home/administrator# service vnstat start * Starting vnStat daemon vnstatd [ OK ] root@htpc:/home/administrator# service apache2 status Apache2 is running (pid 1137). root@htpc:/home/administrator#

  Read the article

• How to obtain a list of installed packages based on a backup?

  - by ujjain

  I have made a backup of my entire computer and I reinstalled the OS right now. I know I should have listed dpkg -l to obtain a list of packages, but I have not done so. I only made a tarball of the entire disk. I wonder how I can find a list of packages based on this data. I would like to have the same packages installed that I had on my previous set-up. But there seems no longer a way to gain a list of packages, since I already reinstalled Ubuntu on the computer and only have the tarball back-up.

  Read the article

• What causes this logrotate behavior in Puppet?

  - by ujjain

  After running logrotate, Puppet starts writing it's logs into /var/log/puppet/masterhttp.log-20130616. How come it doesn't keep logging in /var/log/puppet/masterhttp.log? It seems normal behavior is renaming the original log-file and start with a clean fresh log-file to start writing in that log file, keeping the other file as a log-archive. [root@puppetmaster puppet]# ls -al total 97520 drwxr-x---. 2 puppet puppet 4096 Jun 16 03:24 . drwxr-xr-x. 12 root root 4096 Jul 1 09:11 .. -rw-r--r--. 1 puppet puppet 0 Jun 16 03:24 masterhttp.log -rw-rw----. 1 puppet puppet 99847187 Jul 1 09:19 masterhttp.log-20130616 [root@puppetmaster init.d]# cat /etc/logrotate.d/puppet /var/log/puppet/*log { missingok notifempty create 0644 puppet puppet sharedscripts postrotate pkill -USR2 -u puppet -f /usr/sbin/puppetmasterd || true [ -e /etc/init.d/puppet ] && /etc/init.d/puppet reload > /dev/null 2>&1 || true endscript } [root@puppetmaster init.d]# How can I make Puppet log to /var/log/puppet/masterhttp.log and not to /var/log/puppet/masterhttp.log-20130616? Even restarting puppet doesn't make it log into /var/log/puppet/masterhttp.log instead of /var/log/puppet/masterhttp.log-20130616.

  Read the article

• What is the difference between the Linux and Linux LVM partition type?

  - by ujjain

  Fdisk shows multiple partition types. What is the difference between choosing 83) Linux and 8e) Linux LVM? Choosing 83) Linux also works fine for using LVM, even creating a physical volume on /dev/sdb without a partition table works. Does picking a partition type in fdisk really matter? What is the difference in picking Linux or Linux LVM as partition type? [root@tst-01 ~]# fdisk /dev/sdb WARNING: DOS-compatible mode is deprecated. It's strongly recommended to switch off the mode (command 'c') and change display units to sectors (command 'u'). Command (m for help): l 0 Empty 24 NEC DOS 81 Minix / old Lin bf Solaris 1 FAT12 39 Plan 9 82 Linux swap / So c1 DRDOS/sec (FAT- 2 XENIX root 3c PartitionMagic 83 Linux c4 DRDOS/sec (FAT- 3 XENIX usr 40 Venix 80286 84 OS/2 hidden C: c6 DRDOS/sec (FAT- 4 FAT16 <32M 41 PPC PReP Boot 85 Linux extended c7 Syrinx 5 Extended 42 SFS 86 NTFS volume set da Non-FS data 6 FAT16 4d QNX4.x 87 NTFS volume set db CP/M / CTOS / . 7 HPFS/NTFS 4e QNX4.x 2nd part 88 Linux plaintext de Dell Utility 8 AIX 4f QNX4.x 3rd part 8e Linux LVM df BootIt 9 AIX bootable 50 OnTrack DM 93 Amoeba e1 DOS access a OS/2 Boot Manag 51 OnTrack DM6 Aux 94 Amoeba BBT e3 DOS R/O b W95 FAT32 52 CP/M 9f BSD/OS e4 SpeedStor c W95 FAT32 (LBA) 53 OnTrack DM6 Aux a0 IBM Thinkpad hi eb BeOS fs e W95 FAT16 (LBA) 54 OnTrackDM6 a5 FreeBSD ee GPT f W95 Ext'd (LBA) 55 EZ-Drive a6 OpenBSD ef EFI (FAT-12/16/ 10 OPUS 56 Golden Bow a7 NeXTSTEP f0 Linux/PA-RISC b 11 Hidden FAT12 5c Priam Edisk a8 Darwin UFS f1 SpeedStor 12 Compaq diagnost 61 SpeedStor a9 NetBSD f4 SpeedStor 14 Hidden FAT16 <3 63 GNU HURD or Sys ab Darwin boot f2 DOS secondary 16 Hidden FAT16 64 Novell Netware af HFS / HFS+ fb VMware VMFS 17 Hidden HPFS/NTF 65 Novell Netware b7 BSDI fs fc VMware VMKCORE 18 AST SmartSleep 70 DiskSecure Mult b8 BSDI swap fd Linux raid auto 1b Hidden W95 FAT3 75 PC/IX bb Boot Wizard hid fe LANstep 1c Hidden W95 FAT3 80 Old Minix be Solaris boot ff BBT 1e Hidden W95 FAT1 Command (m for help):

  Read the article

• Bacula vs. BackupPC [closed]

  - by ujjain

  I have been googling about the differences between them. Bacula has lots of roles BackupPC is easier to configure Bacula works with agent, not rsync (great for Windows backups) It seems that Bacula is most often compared to Amanda though, while BackupPC seems a perfectly lovely and popular backup distribution to. I currently backup my servers with rsnapshot, but I am looking for a professional scalable solution that could also back-up 50 hosts without problems. Preferably a solution that can offer bare metal restores for my Linux servers. I am not looking to reinstall the exact same version of Plesk, the software, etc... Update: I see this ranks high in Google, I found a good article: http://www.serverfocus.org/backuppc-vs-bacula-vs-amanda. I personally think that BackupPC is good for smaller environment, but Bacula, despite the high learning curve, is better for environments that requilre scaling.

  Read the article

• How can I copy files from a DVD skipping corrupt files?

  - by ujjain

  I have so far tried the following software solutions without success. Windows Explorer Copy (default) TeraCopy Roadkil's Unstoppable Copier Unstoppable Copier stops copying as a whole, it keeps continuing the same file after 20 minutes, despite any settings. I have spent much time Googling, but the one program ("Unstoppable Copier") that people recommended, did not to the trick as it keeps choking on the same file despite a setting of "Fasteset Data Recovery", "Maximum Retries 0" and "Undamaged Files First". The back side of the DVD has some scratches. What options do I have? I have access to both Ubuntu and Windows 7.

  Read the article

• Remote Desktop Solution without VPN, with locked PC

  - by ujjain

  Sometimes I work from home and I use either of these 2 methods: Teamviewer VPN + Remote desktop When I connect with VPN I am however unable to browse any websites on my own computer, which can be very inconvenient when I am basically waiting an hour for somebody else to finish his job to do a 5 minute job. It would be nice if I could still continue browsing. A solution for this is Teamviewer. With Teamviewer I can manage the other computer, without suffering the restrictions of using the VPN. Everybody in the working area however, can see me using my computer remotely and this is not a good situation either, especially during work hours. I would like a solution that allows me to continue browsing normally and still control my remote workstation, without other people seeing every move I make on the workstation.

  Read the article

1