Search Results

Search found 3 results on 1 pages for 'user1219721'.

Page 1/1 | 1 

• allow infiniband for non root users

  - by user1219721

  I got Infiniband running on RHEL 6.3 [root@master ~]# ibv_devinfo hca_id: mthca0 transport: InfiniBand (0) fw_ver: 4.7.927 node_guid: 0017:08ff:ffd0:6f1c sys_image_guid: 0017:08ff:ffd0:6f1f vendor_id: 0x08f1 vendor_part_id: 25208 hw_ver: 0xA0 board_id: VLT0060010001 phys_port_cnt: 2 port: 1 state: PORT_ACTIVE (4) max_mtu: 2048 (4) active_mtu: 2048 (4) sm_lid: 2 port_lid: 3 port_lmc: 0x00 link_layer: InfiniBand port: 2 state: PORT_DOWN (1) max_mtu: 2048 (4) active_mtu: 512 (2) sm_lid: 0 port_lid: 0 port_lmc: 0x00 link_layer: InfiniBand but it's only working as root. when trying from a non-super user, I got nothing : [nicolas@master ~]$ ibv_devices device node GUID ------ ---------------- mthca0 001708ffffd06f1c So, how to allow regular users to use infiniband ?

  Read the article

• using i7 "gamer" cpu in a HPC cluster

  - by user1219721

  I'm running WRF weather model. That's a ram intensive, highly parallel application. I need to build a HPC cluster for that. I use 10GB infiniband interconnect. WRF doesn't depends of core count, but on memory bandwidth. That's why a core i7 3820 or 3930K performs better than high-grade xeons E5-2600 or E7 Seems like universities uses xeon E5-2670 for WRF. It costs about $1500. Spec2006 fp_rates WRF bench shows $580 i7 3930K performs the same with 1600MHz RAM. What's interesting is that i7 can handle up to 2400MHz ram, doing a great performance increase for WRF. Then it really outperforms the xeon. Power comsumption is a bit higher, but still less than 20€ a year. Even including additional part I'll need (PSU, infiniband, case), the i7 way is still 700 €/cpu cheaper than Xeon. So, is it ok to use "gamer" hardware in a HPC cluster ? or should I do it pro with xeon ? (This is not a critical application. I can handle downtime. I think I don't need ECC?)

  Read the article

• Nohup over ssh won't return

  - by user1219721

  I am trying to do [me@myPc]$ ssh me@server "nohup myBashScript.sh &" My goal is to launch the process on the server, and then immediately return. It is not working: The job is started on server, but I still get the output on myPc and bash wait for completion prior to asking me for another command. Why ? It's not supposed to ! Any way to avoid that ? myPc is RHEL6.2 server is ubuntu 10.04 and both runs openssh

  Read the article

1