Search Results

Search found 530 results on 22 pages for 'visitor'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 1/22 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • % new visitor vs. % returning visitor

    - by Torben Gundtofte-Bruun
    I'm not sure how to interpret the results in Google Analytics. I understand that some metrics should be high, and some should be low. But this one I don't get: % new visitor vs. % returning visitor: It's good that users are returning, but surely it's also good to get new, fresh visitors. How do I evaluate this %-vs-% ratio? The higher the better: visits unique visitors pageviews pages per visit avg. visit duration The lower the better: bounce rate drop-offs

    Read the article

  • C++ visitor pattern handling templated string types?

    - by Steve the Plant
    I'm trying to use the visitor pattern to serialize the contents of objects. However one snag I'm hitting is when I'm visiting strings. My strings are of a templated type, similar to STL's basic_string. So something like: basic_string<char_type, memory_allocator, other_possible_stuff> \\ many variations possible! Since I can have very many different templated string types, I can't go and add them to my visitor interface. It would be ridiculous. But I can't add templates to my VisitString method because C++ prevents using templates parameters in virtual methods. So what are my options to work around this?

    Read the article

  • Visitor and templated virtual methods

    - by Thomas Matthews
    In a typical implementation of the Visitor pattern, the class must account for all variations (descendants) of the base class. There are many instances where the same method content in the visitor is applied to the different methods. A templated virtual method would be ideal in this case, but for now, this is not allowed. So, can templated methods be used to resolve virtual methods of the parent class? Given (the foundation): struct Visitor_Base; // Forward declaration. struct Base { virtual accept_visitor(Visitor_Base& visitor) = 0; }; // More forward declarations struct Base_Int; struct Base_Long; struct Base_Short; struct Base_UInt; struct Base_ULong; struct Base_UShort; struct Visitor_Base { virtual void operator()(Base_Int& b) = 0; virtual void operator()(Base_Long& b) = 0; virtual void operator()(Base_Short& b) = 0; virtual void operator()(Base_UInt& b) = 0; virtual void operator()(Base_ULong& b) = 0; virtual void operator()(Base_UShort& b) = 0; }; struct Base_Int : public Base { void accept_visitor(Visitor_Base& visitor) { visitor(*this); } }; struct Base_Long : public Base { void accept_visitor(Visitor_Base& visitor) { visitor(*this); } }; struct Base_Short : public Base { void accept_visitor(Visitor_Base& visitor) { visitor(*this); } }; struct Base_UInt : public Base { void accept_visitor(Visitor_Base& visitor) { visitor(*this); } }; struct Base_ULong : public Base { void accept_visitor(Visitor_Base& visitor) { visitor(*this); } }; struct Base_UShort : public Base { void accept_visitor(Visitor_Base& visitor) { visitor(*this); } }; Now that the foundation is laid, here is where the kicker comes in (templated methods): struct Visitor_Cout : public Visitor { template <class Receiver> void operator() (Receiver& r) { std::cout << "Visitor_Cout method not implemented.\n"; } }; Intentionally, Visitor_Cout does not contain the keyword virtual in the method declaration. All the other attributes of the method signatures match the parent declaration (or perhaps specification). In the big picture, this design allows developers to implement common visitation functionality that differs only by the type of the target object (the object receiving the visit). The implementation above is my suggestion for alerts when the derived visitor implementation hasn't implement an optional method. Is this legal by the C++ specification? (I don't trust when some says that it works with compiler XXX. This is a question against the general language.)

    Read the article

  • Changing a Container while using Visitor

    - by Florian
    Hi everyone, I implemented the Visitor pattern in C++ using a STL-like iterator for storing the Visitor's current position in the container. Now I would like to change the container while I iterate over it, and I'm especially interested in deleting items from the container, even the one I'm currently visiting. Now obviously this will invalidate the Visitors internal iterator, because it was pointing to exactly this item. Currently, I store a list of all iterators in the container and update them, as soon as anything is added to or removed from the list. So in a way this is similar to the Observer pattern applied to the iterator (as Observer) and the list (as Observable). Alternatively I considered having the visitor() methods return some hint to the Visitor about what happend to the current item and how to proceed iterating, but that doesn't sound like such a good idea either, because the visit() implementation shouldn't really care about finding the next item. So, my question is: What's the best way to keep a visitor working, even when items are added to the container or removed from it. Regards, Florian

    Read the article

  • Using child visitor in C#

    - by Thomas Matthews
    I am setting up a testing component and trying to keep it generic. I want to use a generic Visitor class, but not sure about using descendant classes. Example: public interface Interface_Test_Case { void execute(); void accept(Interface_Test_Visitor v); } public interface Interface_Test_Visitor { void visit(Interface_Test_Case tc); } public interface Interface_Read_Test_Case : Interface_Test_Case { uint read_value(); } public class USB_Read_Test : Interface_Read_Test_Case { void execute() { Console.WriteLine("Executing USB Read Test Case."); } void accept(Interface_Test_Visitor v) { Console.WriteLine("Accepting visitor."); } uint read_value() { Console.WriteLine("Reading value from USB"); return 0; } } public class USB_Read_Visitor : Interface_Test_Visitor { void visit(Interface_Test_Case tc) { Console.WriteLine("Not supported Test Case."); } void visit(Interface_Read_Test_Case rtc) { Console.WriteLine("Not supported Read Test Case."); } void visit(USB_Read_Test urt) { Console.WriteLine("Yay, visiting USB Read Test case."); } } // Code fragment USB_Read_Test test_case; USB_Read_Visitor visitor; test_case.accept(visitor); What are the rules the C# compiler uses to determine which of the methods in USB_Read_Visitor will be executed by the code fragment? I'm trying to factor out dependencies of my testing component. Unfortunately, my current Visitor class contains visit methods for classes not related to the testing component. Am I trying to achieve the impossible?

    Read the article

  • Visitor Pattern can be replaced with Callback functions?

    - by getit
    Is there any significant benefit to using either technique? In case there are variations, the Visitor Pattern I mean is this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visitor_pattern And below is an example of using a delegate to achieve the same effect (at least I think it is the same) Say there is a collection of nested elements: Schools contain Departments which contain Students Instead of using the Visitor pattern to perform something on each collection item, why not use a simple callback (Action delegate in C#) Say something like this class Department { List Students; } class School { List Departments; VisitStudents(Action<Student> actionDelegate) { foreach(var dep in this.Departments) { foreach(var stu in dep.Students) { actionDelegate(stu); } } } } School A = new School(); ...//populate collections A.Visit((student)=> { ...Do Something with student... }); *EDIT Example with delegate accepting multiple params Say I wanted to pass both the student and department, I could modify the Action definition like so: Action class School { List Departments; VisitStudents(Action<Student, Department> actionDelegate, Action<Department> d2) { foreach(var dep in this.Departments) { d2(dep); //This performs a different process. //Using Visitor pattern would avoid having to keep adding new delegates. //This looks like the main benefit so far foreach(var stu in dep.Students) { actionDelegate(stu, dep); } } } }

    Read the article

  • Building a control-flow graph from an AST with a visitor pattern using Java

    - by omegatai
    Hi guys, I'm trying to figure out how to implement my LEParserCfgVisitor class as to build a control-flow graph from an Abstract-Syntax-Tree already generated with JavaCC. I know there are tools that already exist, but I'm trying to do it in preparation for my Compilers final. I know I need to have a data structure that keeps the graph in memory, and I want to be able to keep attributes like IN, OUT, GEN, KILL in each node as to be able to do a control-flow analysis later on. My main problem is that I haven't figured out how to connect the different blocks together, as to have the right edge between each blocks depending on their nature: branch, loops, etc. In other words, I haven't found an explicit algorithm that could help me build my visitor. Here is my empty Visitor. You can see it works on basic langage expressions, like if, while and basic operations (+,-,x,^,...) public class LEParserCfgVisitor implements LEParserVisitor { public Object visit(SimpleNode node, Object data) { return data; } public Object visit(ASTProgram node, Object data) { data = node.childrenAccept(this, data); return data; } public Object visit(ASTBlock node, Object data) { } public Object visit(ASTStmt node, Object data) { } public Object visit(ASTAssignStmt node, Object data) { } public Object visit(ASTIOStmt node, Object data) { } public Object visit(ASTIfStmt node, Object data) { } public Object visit(ASTWhileStmt node, Object data) { } public Object visit(ASTExpr node, Object data) { } public Object visit(ASTAddExpr node, Object data) { } public Object visit(ASTFactExpr node, Object data) { } public Object visit(ASTMultExpr node, Object data) { } public Object visit(ASTPowerExpr node, Object data) { } public Object visit(ASTUnaryExpr node, Object data) { } public Object visit(ASTBasicExpr node, Object data) { } public Object visit(ASTFctExpr node, Object data) { } public Object visit(ASTRealValue node, Object data) { } public Object visit(ASTIntValue node, Object data) { } public Object visit(ASTIdentifier node, Object data) { } } Can anyone give me a hand? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Need help make these classes use Visitor Pattern and generics

    - by Shervin
    Hi. I need help to generify and implement the visitor pattern. We are using tons of instanceof and it is a pain. I am sure it can be modified, but I am not sure how to do it. Basically we have an interface ProcessData public interface ProcessData { public setDelegate(Object delegate); public Object getDelegate(); //I am sure these delegate methods can use generics somehow } Now we have a class ProcessDataGeneric that implements ProcessData public class ProcessDataGeneric implements ProcessData { private Object delegate; public ProcessDataGeneric(Object delegate) { this.delegate = delegate; } } Now a new interface that retrieves the ProcessData interface ProcessDataWrapper { public ProcessData unwrap(); } Now a common abstract class that implements the wrapper so ProcessData can be retrieved @XmlSeeAlso( { ProcessDataMotorferdsel.class,ProcessDataTilskudd.class }) public abstract class ProcessDataCommon implements ProcessDataWrapper { protected ProcessData unwrapped; public ProcessData unwrap() { return unwrapped; } } Now the implementation public class ProcessDataMotorferdsel extends ProcessDataCommon { public ProcessDataMotorferdsel() { unwrapped = new ProcessDataGeneric(this); } } similarly public class ProcessDataTilskudd extends ProcessDataCommon { public ProcessDataTilskudd() { unwrapped = new ProcessDataGeneric(this); } } Now when I use these classes, I always need to do instanceof ProcessDataCommon pdc = null; if(processData.getDelegate() instanceof ProcessDataMotorferdsel) { pdc = (ProcessDataMotorferdsel) processData.getDelegate(); } else if(processData.getDelegate() instanceof ProcessDataTilskudd) { pdc = (ProcessDataTilskudd) processData.getDelegate(); } I know there is a better way to do this, but I have no idea how I can utilize Generics and the Visitor Pattern. Any help is GREATLY appreciated.

    Read the article

  • What would you do if you just had this code dumped in your lap?

    - by chickeninabiscuit
    Man, I just had this project given to me - expand on this they say. This is an example of ONE function: <?php //500+ lines of pure wonder. function page_content_vc($content) { global $_DBH, $_TPL, $_SET; $_SET['ignoreTimezone'] = true; lu_CheckUpdateLogin(); if($_SESSION['dash']['VC']['switch'] == 'unmanned' || $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['switch'] == 'touchscreen') { if($content['page_name'] != 'vc') { header('Location: /vc/'); die(); } } if($_GET['l']) { unset($_SESSION['dash']['VC']); if($loc_id = lu_GetFieldValue('ID', 'Location', $_GET['l'])) { if(lu_CheckPermissions('vc', $loc_id)) { $timezone = lu_GetFieldValue('Time Zone', 'Location', $loc_id, 'ID'); if(strlen($timezone) > 0) { $_SESSION['time_zone'] = $timezone; } $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['loc_ID'] = $loc_id; header('Location: /vc/'); die(); } } } if($_SESSION['dash']['VC']['loc_ID']) { $timezone = lu_GetFieldValue('Time Zone', 'Location', $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['loc_ID'], 'ID'); if(strlen($timezone) > 0) { $_SESSION['time_zone'] = $timezone; } $loc_id = $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['loc_ID']; $org_id = lu_GetFieldValue('record_ID', 'Location', $loc_id); $_TPL->assign('loc_id', $loc_id); $location_name = lu_GetFieldValue('Location Name', 'Location', $loc_id); $_TPL->assign('LocationName', $location_name); $customer_name = lu_GetFieldValue('Customer Name', 'Organisation', $org_id); $_TPL->assign('CustomerName', $customer_name); $enable_visitor_snap = lu_GetFieldValue('VisitorSnap', 'Location', $loc_id); $_TPL->assign('EnableVisitorSnap', $enable_visitor_snap); $lacps = explode("\n", lu_GetFieldValue('Location Access Control Point', 'Location', $loc_id)); array_walk($lacps, 'trim_value'); if(count($lacps) > 0) { if(count($lacps) == 1) { $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['lacp'] = $lacps[0]; } else { if($_GET['changeLACP'] && in_array($_GET['changeLACP'], $lacps)) { $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['lacp'] = $_GET['changeLACP']; header('Location: /vc/'); die(); } else if(!in_array($_SESSION['dash']['VC']['lacp'], $lacps)) { $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['lacp'] = $lacps[0]; } $_TPL->assign('LACP_array', $lacps); } $_TPL->assign('current_LACP', $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['lacp']); $_TPL->assign('showContractorSearch', true); /* if($contractorStaff = lu_GetTableRow('ContractorStaff', $org_id, 'record_ID', 'record_Inactive != "checked"')) { foreach($contractorStaff['rows'] as $contractor) { $lacp_rights = lu_OrganiseCustomDataFunctionMultiselect($contractor[lu_GetFieldName('Location Access Rights', 'ContractorStaff')]); if(in_array($_SESSION['dash']['VC']['lacp'], $lacp_rights)) { $_TPL->assign('showContractorSearch', true); } } } */ } $selectedOptions = explode(',', lu_GetFieldValue('Included Fields', 'Location', $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['loc_ID'])); $newOptions = array(); foreach($selectedOptions as $selOption) { $so_array = explode('|', $selOption, 2); if(count($so_array) > 1) { $newOptions[$so_array[0]] = $so_array[1]; } else { $newOptions[$so_array[0]] = "Both"; } } if($newOptions[lu_GetFieldName('Expected Length of Visit', 'Visitor')]) { $alert = false; if($visitors = lu_OrganiseVisitors( lu_GetTableRow('Visitor', 'checked', lu_GetFieldName('Checked In', 'Visitor'), lu_GetFieldName('Location for Visit', 'Visitor').'="'.$_SESSION['dash']['VC']['loc_ID'].'" AND '.lu_GetFieldName('Checked Out', 'Visitor').' != "checked"'), false, true, true)) { foreach($visitors['rows'] as $key => $visitor) { if($visitor['expected'] && $visitor['expected'] + (60*30) < time()) { $alert = true; } } } if($alert == true) { $_TPL->assign('showAlert', 'red'); } else { //$_TPL->assign('showAlert', 'green'); } } $_TPL->assign('switch', $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['switch']); if($_SESSION['dash']['VC']['switch'] == 'touchscreen') { $_TPL->assign('VC_unmanned', true); } if($_GET['check'] == 'in') { if($_SESSION['dash']['VC']['switch'] == 'touchscreen') { lu_CheckInTouchScreen(); } else { lu_CheckIn(); } } else if($_GET['check'] == 'out') { if($_SESSION['dash']['VC']['switch'] == 'touchscreen') { lu_CheckOutTouchScreen(); } else { lu_CheckOut(); } } else if($_GET['switch'] == 'unmanned') { $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['switch'] = 'unmanned'; if($_GET['printing'] == true && (lu_GetFieldValue('Printing', 'Location', $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['loc_ID']) != "No" && lu_GetFieldValue('Printing', 'Location', $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['loc_ID']) != "")) { $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['printing'] = true; } else { $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['printing'] = false; } header('Location: /vc/'); die(); } else if($_GET['switch'] == 'touchscreen') { $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['switch'] = 'touchscreen'; if($_GET['printing'] == true && (lu_GetFieldValue('Printing', 'Location', $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['loc_ID']) != "No" && lu_GetFieldValue('Printing', 'Location', $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['loc_ID']) != "")) { $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['printing'] = true; } else { $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['printing'] = false; } header('Location: /vc/'); die(); } else if($_GET['switch'] == 'manned') { if($_POST['password']) { if(md5($_POST['password']) == $_SESSION['dash']['password']) { unset($_SESSION['dash']['VC']['switch']); //setcookie('email', "", time() - 3600); //setcookie('location', "", time() - 3600); header('Location: /vc/'); die(); } else { $_TPL->assign('switchLoginError', 'Incorrect Password'); } } $_TPL->assign('switchLogin', 'true'); } else if($_GET['m'] == 'visitor') { lu_ModifyVisitorVC(); } else if($_GET['m'] == 'enote') { lu_ModifyEnoteVC(); } else if($_GET['m'] == 'medical') { lu_ModifyMedicalVC(); } else if($_GET['print'] == 'label' && $_GET['v']) { lu_PrintLabelVC(); } else { unset($_SESSION['dash']['VC']['checkin']); unset($_SESSION['dash']['VC']['checkout']); $_TPL->assign('icon', 'GroupCheckin'); if($_SESSION['dash']['VC']['switch'] != 'unmanned' && $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['switch'] != 'touchscreen') { $staff_ids = array(); if($staffs = lu_GetTableRow('Staff', $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['loc_ID'], 'record_ID')) { foreach($staffs['rows'] as $staff) { $staff_ids[] = $staff['ID']; } } if($_GET['view'] == "tomorrow") { $dateStart = date('Y-m-d', mktime(0, 0, 0, date("m") , date("d")+1, date("Y"))); $dateEnd = date('Y-m-d', mktime(0, 0, 0, date("m") , date("d")+1, date("Y"))); } else if($_GET['view'] == "month") { $dateStart = date('Y-m-d', mktime(0, 0, 0, date("m"), date("d"), date("Y"))); $dateEnd = date('Y-m-d', mktime(0, 0, 0, date("m"), date("d")+30, date("Y"))); } else if($_GET['view'] == "week") { $dateStart = date('Y-m-d', mktime(0, 0, 0, date("m"), date("d"), date("Y"))); $dateEnd = date('Y-m-d', mktime(0, 0, 0, date("m"), date("d")+7, date("Y"))); } else { $dateStart = date('Y-m-d'); $dateEnd = date('Y-m-d'); } if(lu_GetFieldValue('Enable Survey', 'Location', $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['loc_ID']) == 'checked' && lu_GetFieldValue('Add Survey', 'Location', $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['loc_ID']) == 'checked') { $_TPL->assign('enableSurvey', true); } //lu_GetFieldName('Checked In', 'Visitor') //!= "checked" //date('d/m/Y'), lu_GetFieldName('Date of Visit', 'Visitor') if($visitors = lu_OrganiseVisitors(lu_GetTableRow('Visitor', $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['loc_ID'], lu_GetFieldName('Location for Visit', 'Visitor'), lu_GetFieldName('Checked In', 'Visitor').' != "checked" AND '.lu_GetFieldName('Checked Out', 'Visitor').' != "checked" AND '.lu_GetFieldName('Date of Visit', 'Visitor').' >= "'.$dateStart.'" AND '.lu_GetFieldName('Date of Visit', 'Visitor').' <= "'.$dateEnd.'"'))) { foreach($visitors['days'] as $day => $visitors_day) { foreach($visitors_day['rows'] as $key => $visitor) { $visitors['days'][$day]['rows'][$key]['visiting'] = lu_GetTableRow('Staff', $visitor['record_ID'], 'ID'); $visitors['days'][$day]['rows'][$key]['visiting']['notify'] = $_DBH->getRow('SELECT * FROM lu_notification WHERE ent_ID = "'.$visitor['record_ID'].'"'); } } //array_dump($visitors); $_TPL->assign('visitors', $visitors); } if($_GET['conGroup']) { if($_GET['action'] == 'add') { $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['conGroup'][$_GET['conGroup']] = $_GET['conGroup']; } else { unset($_SESSION['dash']['VC']['conGroup'][$_GET['conGroup']]); } } if(count($_SESSION['dash']['VC']['conGroup']) > 0) { if($conGroupResult = lu_GetTableRow('ContractorStaff', '1', '1', ' ID IN ('.implode(',', $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['conGroup']).')')) { if($_POST['_submit'] == 'Check-In Group >>') { $form = lu_GetForm('VisitorStandard'); $standarddata = array(); foreach($form['items'] as $key=>$item) { $standarddata[$key] = $_POST[lu_GetFieldName($item['name'], 'Visitor')]; } foreach($conGroupResult['rows'] as $conStaff) { $data = $standarddata; foreach($form['items'] as $key=>$item) { if($key != 'ID' && $key != 'record_ID' && $conStaff[lu_GetFieldName(lu_GetNameField($key, 'Visitor'), 'ContractorStaff')]) { $data[$key] = $conStaff[lu_GetFieldName(lu_GetNameField($key, 'Visitor'), 'ContractorStaff')]; } } $data['record_ID'] = $data[lu_GetFieldName('Visiting', 'Visitor')]; $data[lu_GetFieldName('Date of Visit', 'Visitor')] = date('Y-m-d'); $data[lu_GetFieldName('Time of Visit', 'Visitor')] = date('H:i'); $data[lu_GetFieldName('Checked In', 'Visitor')] = 'checked'; $data[lu_GetFieldName('Location for Visit', 'Visitor')] = $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['loc_ID']; $data[lu_GetFieldName('ConStaff ID', 'Visitor')] = $conStaff['ID']; $data[lu_GetFieldName('From', 'Visitor')] = lu_GetFieldValue('Legal Name', 'Contractor', $conStaff[lu_GetFieldName('Contractor', 'ContractorStaff')]); $id = lu_UpdateData($form, $data); lu_VisitorCheckIn($id); //array_dump($data); //array_dump($id); } unset($_SESSION['dash']['VC']['conGroup']); header('Location: /vc/'); die(); } if(count($conGroupResult['rows'])) { foreach($conGroupResult['rows'] as $key => $cstaff) { $conGroupResult['rows'][$key]['contractor'] = lu_GetTableRow('Contractor', $cstaff[lu_GetFieldName('Contractor', 'ContractorStaff')], 'ID'); } $_TPL->assign('conGroupResult', $conGroupResult); } $conGroupForm = lu_GetForm('VisitorConGroup'); $conGroupForm = lu_OrganiseVisitorForm($conGroupForm, $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['loc_ID'], 'Contractor'); $secure_options_array = lu_GetSecureOptions($org_id); if($secure_options_array[$_SESSION['dash']['VC']['loc_ID']]) { $conGroupForm['items'][lu_GetFieldName('Secure Area', 'Visitor')]['options']['values'] = $secure_options_array[$_SESSION['dash']['VC']['loc_ID']]; $conGroupForm['items'][lu_GetFieldName('Secure Area', 'Visitor')]['name'] = 'Secure Area'; } else { unset($conGroupForm['items'][lu_GetFieldName('Secure Area', 'Visitor')]); } if($secure_options_array) { $form['items'][lu_GetFieldName('Secure Area', 'Visitor')]['options']['values'] = $secure_options_array; $form['items'][lu_GetFieldName('Secure Area', 'Visitor')]['name'] = 'Secure Area'; } else { unset($form['items'][lu_GetFieldName('Secure Area', 'Visitor')]); } $_TPL->assign('conGroupForm', $conGroupForm); $_TPL->assign('hideFormCancel', true); } } if($_GET['searchVisitors']) { $_TPL->assign('searchVisitorsQuery', $_GET['searchVisitors']); $where = ''; if($_GET['searchVisitorsIn'] == 'Yes') { $where .= ' AND '.lu_GetFieldName('Checked In', 'Visitor').' = "checked"'; $_TPL->assign('searchVisitorsIn', 'Yes'); } else { $where .= ' AND '.lu_GetFieldName('Checked In', 'Visitor').' != "checked"'; $_TPL->assign('searchVisitorsIn', 'No'); } if($_GET['searchVisitorsOut'] == 'Yes') { $where = ''; $where .= ' AND '.lu_GetFieldName('Checked Out', 'Visitor').' = "checked"'; $_TPL->assign('searchVisitorsOut', 'Yes'); } else { $where .= ' AND '.lu_GetFieldName('Checked Out', 'Visitor').' != "checked"'; $_TPL->assign('searchVisitorsOut', 'No'); } if($searchVisitors = lu_OrganiseVisitors(lu_GetTableRow('Visitor', $_GET['searchVisitors'], '#search#', lu_GetFieldName('Location for Visit', 'Visitor').'="'.$_SESSION['dash']['VC']['loc_ID'].'"'.$where))) { foreach($searchVisitors['rows'] as $key => $visitor) { $searchVisitors['rows'][$key]['visiting'] = lu_GetTableRow('Staff', $visitor['record_ID'], 'ID'); } $_TPL->assign('searchVisitors', $searchVisitors); } else { $_TPL->assign('searchVisitorsNotFound', true); } } else if($_GET['searchStaff']) { if($_POST['staff_id']) { if(lu_CheckPermissions('staff', $_POST['staff_id'])) { $_DBH->query('UPDATE '.lu_GetTableName('Staff').' SET '.lu_GetFieldName('Current Location', 'Staff').' = "'.$_POST['current_location'].'" WHERE ID="'.$_POST['staff_id'].'"'); } } $locations = lu_GetTableRow('Location', $org_id, 'record_ID'); if(count($locations['rows']) > 1) { $_TPL->assign('staffLocations', $locations); } $loc_ids = array(); foreach($locations['rows'] as $location) { $loc_ids[] = $location['ID']; } // array_dump($locations); // array_dump($_POST); $_TPL->assign('searchStaffQuery', $_GET['searchStaff']); $where = ' AND record_Inactive != "checked"'; if($_GET['searchStaffIn'] == 'Yes' && $_GET['searchStaffOut'] != 'Yes') { $where .= ' AND ('.lu_GetFieldName('Staff Status', 'Staff').' = "" OR '.lu_GetFieldName('Staff Status', 'Staff').' = "On-Site")'. $_TPL->assign('searchStaffIn', 'Yes'); $_TPL->assign('searchStaffOut', 'No'); } else if($_GET['searchStaffOut'] == 'Yes' && $_GET['searchStaffIn'] != 'Yes') { $where .= ' AND ('.lu_GetFieldName('Staff Status', 'Staff').' != "" AND '.lu_GetFieldName('Staff Status', 'Staff').' != "On-Site")'. $_TPL->assign('searchStaffOut', 'Yes'); $_TPL->assign('searchStaffIn', 'No'); } else { $_TPL->assign('searchStaffOut', 'Yes'); $_TPL->assign('searchStaffIn', 'Yes'); } if($searchStaffs = lu_GetTableRow('Staff', $_GET['searchStaff'], '#search#', 'record_ID IN ('.implode(',', $loc_ids).')'.$where, lu_GetFieldName('First Name', 'Staff').','.lu_GetFieldName('Surname', 'Staff'))) { $_TPL->assign('searchStaffs', $searchStaffs); } else { $_TPL->assign('searchStaffNotFound', true); } } else if($_GET['searchContractor']) { $_TPL->assign('searchContractorQuery', $_GET['searchContractor']); //$where = ' AND '.lu_GetTableName('ContractorStaff').'.record_Inactive != "checked"'; $where = ' '; if($_GET['searchContractorIn'] == 'Yes' && $_GET['searchContractorOut'] != 'Yes') { $where .= ' AND ('.lu_GetFieldName('Onsite Status', 'ContractorStaff').' = "Onsite")'; $_TPL->assign('searchContractorIn', 'Yes'); $_TPL->assign('searchContractorOut', 'No'); } else if($_GET['searchContractorOut'] == 'Yes' && $_GET['searchContractorIn'] != 'Yes') { $where .= ' AND ('.lu_GetFieldName('Onsite Status', 'ContractorStaff').' != "Onsite")'. $_TPL->assign('searchContractorOut', 'Yes'); $_TPL->assign('searchContractorIn', 'No'); } else { $_TPL->assign('searchContractorOut', 'Yes'); $_TPL->assign('searchContractorIn', 'Yes'); } $join = 'LEFT JOIN '.lu_GetTableName('Contractor').' ON '.lu_GetTableName('Contractor').'.ID = '.lu_GetTableName('ContractorStaff').'.'.lu_GetFieldName('Contractor', 'ContractorStaff'); $extrasearch = array ( lu_GetTableName('Contractor').'.'.lu_GetFieldName('Legal Name', 'Contractor') ); if($searchContractorResult = lu_GetTableRow('ContractorStaff', $_GET['searchContractor'], '#search#', lu_GetTableName('ContractorStaff').'.record_ID = "'.$org_id.'" '.$where, lu_GetFieldName('First Name', 'ContractorStaff').','.lu_GetFieldName('Surname', 'ContractorStaff'), $join, $extrasearch)) { /* foreach($searchContractorResult['rows'] as $key=>$contractor) { $lacp_rights = lu_OrganiseCustomDataFunctionMultiselect($contractor[lu_GetFieldName('Location Access Rights', 'ContractorStaff')]); if(!in_array($_SESSION['dash']['VC']['lacp'], $lacp_rights)) { unset($searchContractorResult['rows'][$key]); } } */ if(count($searchContractorResult['rows'])) { foreach($searchContractorResult['rows'] as $key => $cstaff) { /* if($cstaff[lu_GetFieldName('Onsite_Status', 'Contractor')] == 'Onsite')) { if($visitor['rows'][0][lu_GetFieldName('ConStaff ID', 'Visitor')]) { $_DBH->query('UPDATE '.lu_GetTableName('ContractorStaff').' SET '.lu_GetFieldName('Onsite Status', 'ContractorStaff').' = "" WHERE ID="'.$visitor['rows'][0][lu_GetFieldName('ConStaff ID', 'Visitor')].'"'); } } */ if($cstaff[lu_GetFieldName('SACN Expiry Date', 'ContractorStaff')] != '0000-00-00') { if(strtotime($cstaff[lu_GetFieldName('SACN Expiry Date', 'ContractorStaff')]) < time()) { $searchContractorResult['rows'][$key]['sacn_expiry'] = true; } else { $searchContractorResult['rows'][$key]['sacn_expiry'] = false; } } else { $searchContractorResult['rows'][$key]['sacn_expiry'] = false; } if($cstaff[lu_GetFieldName('Induction Valid Until', 'ContractorStaff')] != '0000-00-00') { if(strtotime($cstaff[lu_GetFieldName('Induction Valid Until', 'ContractorStaff')]) < time()) { $searchContractorResult['rows'][$key]['induction_expiry'] = true; } else { $searchContractorResult['rows'][$key]['induction_expiry'] = false; } } else { $searchContractorResult['rows'][$key]['induction_expiry'] = false; } $searchContractorResult['rows'][$key]['contractor'] = lu_GetTableRow('Contractor', $cstaff[lu_GetFieldName('Contractor', 'ContractorStaff')], 'ID'); } $_TPL->assign('searchContractorResult', $searchContractorResult); } else { $_TPL->assign('searchContractorNotFound', true); } } else { $_TPL->assign('searchContractorNotFound', true); } } $occupancy = array(); $occupancy['staffNumber'] = $_DBH->getOne('SELECT count(*) FROM '.lu_GetTableName('Staff').' WHERE record_ID = "'.$_SESSION['dash']['VC']['loc_ID'].'" AND record_Inactive != "checked" AND '.lu_GetFieldName('Ignore Counts', 'Staff').' != "checked"'); $occupancy['staffNumberOnsite']= $_DBH->getOne( 'SELECT count(*) FROM '.lu_GetTableName('Staff').' WHERE ( (record_ID = "'.$_SESSION['dash']['VC']['loc_ID'].'" AND ('.lu_GetFieldName('Staff Status', 'Staff').' = "" OR '.lu_GetFieldName('Staff Status', 'Staff').' = "On-Site")) OR '.lu_GetFieldName('Current Location', 'Staff').' = "'.$_SESSION['dash']['VC']['loc_ID'].'") AND record_Inactive != "checked" AND '.lu_GetFieldName('Ignore Counts', 'Staff').' != "checked"'); $occupancy['visitorsOnsite'] = $_DBH->getOne('SELECT count(*) FROM '.lu_GetTableName('Visitor').' WHERE '.lu_GetFieldName('Location for Visit', 'Visitor').' = "'.$_SESSION['dash']['VC']['loc_ID'].'" AND '.lu_GetFieldName('Checked In', 'Visitor').' = "checked" AND '.lu_GetFieldName('Checked Out', 'Visitor').' != "checked"'); $_TPL->assign('occupancy', $occupancy); if($enotes = lu_GetTableRow('Enote', $org_id, 'record_ID', lu_GetFieldName('Note Emailed', 'Enote').' = "0000-00-00" AND '.lu_GetFieldName('Note Passed On', 'Enote').' != "Yes"')) { $_TPL->assign('EnoteNotice', true); } if($medical = lu_GetTableRow('MedicalRoom', $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['loc_ID'], 'record_ID', 'record_Inactive != "Yes"')) { $_TPL->assign('MedicalNotice', true); } if(lu_GetFieldValue('Printing', 'Location', $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['loc_ID']) != "No" && lu_GetFieldValue('Printing', 'Location', $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['loc_ID']) != "") { $_TPL->assign('UnmannedPrinting', true); } } else { if($_SESSION['dash']['VC']['printing'] == true) { $_TPL->assign('UnmannedPrinting', true); } } // enable if contractor check-in buttons should be enabled if(lu_GetFieldValue('Enable Contractor Check In', 'Location', $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['loc_ID']) == "checked") { $_TPL->assign('ContractorCheckin', true); } } if($_SESSION['dash']['entity_id'] && $_GET['fixupCon'] == 'true') { $conStaffs = lu_GetTableRow('ContractorStaff', $_SESSION['dash']['ModifyConStaffs']['org_ID'], 'record_ID', '', lu_GetFieldName('First Name', 'ContractorStaff').','.lu_GetFieldName('Surname', 'ContractorStaff')); foreach($conStaffs['rows'] as $key => $cstaff) { if($cstaff[lu_GetFieldName('Site Access Card Number', 'ContractorStaff')] && $cstaff[lu_GetFieldName('Site Access Card Type', 'ContractorStaff')]) { echo $cstaff['ID'].' '; $_DBH->query('UPDATE '.lu_GetTableName('Visitor').' SET '.lu_GetFieldName('Site Access Card Number', 'Visitor').' = "'.$cstaff[lu_GetFieldName('Site Access Card Number', 'ContractorStaff')].'", '.lu_GetFieldName('Site Access Card Type', 'Visitor').' = "'.$cstaff[lu_GetFieldName('Site Access Card Type', 'ContractorStaff')].'" WHERE '.lu_GetFieldName('ConStaff ID', 'Visitor').'="'.$cstaff['ID'].'"'); } } } } else { if($_SESSION['dash']['staffs']) { foreach($_SESSION['dash']['staffs']['rows'] as $staff) { if($staff[lu_GetFieldName('Reception Manager', 'Staff')] == 'checked') { $loc_id = $staff['record_ID']; unset($_SESSION['dash']['VC']); if($loc_id = lu_GetFieldValue('ID', 'Location', $loc_id)) { $_SESSION['dash']['VC']['loc_ID'] = $loc_id; header('Location: /vc/'); die(); } } } } $_TPL->assign('mode', 'public'); } $content['page_content'] = $_TPL->fetch('modules/vc.htm'); return $content; } ?> die();die();die();die();die(); This question will probably be closed - i just need some support from my coding brothers and sisters. *SOB*

    Read the article

  • Java abstract visitor - guarantueed to succeed? If so, why?

    - by disown
    I was dealing with hibernate, trying to figure out the run-time class behind proxied instances by using the visitor pattern. I then came up with an AbstractVisitable approach, but I wonder if it will always produce correct results. Consider the following code: interface Visitable { public void accept(Visitor v); } interface Visitor { public void visit(Visitable visitorHost); } abstract class AbstractVisitable implements Visitable { @Override public void accept(Visitor v) { v.visit(this); } } class ConcreteVisitable extends AbstractVisitable { public static void main(String[] args) { final Visitable visitable = new ConcreteVisitable(); final Visitable proxyVisitable = (Visitable) Proxy.newProxyInstance( Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader(), new Class<?>[] { Visitable.class }, new InvocationHandler() { @Override public Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args) throws Throwable { return method.invoke(visitable, args); } }); proxyVisitable.accept(new Visitor() { @Override public void visit(Visitable visitorHost) { System.out.println(visitorHost.getClass()); } }); } } This makes a ConcreteVisitable which inherits the accept method from AbstractVisitable. In c++, I would consider this risky, since this in AbstractVisitable could be referencing to AbstractVisitable::this, and not ConcreteVisitable::this. I was worried that the code under certain circumstances would print class AbstractVisible. Yet the code above outputs class ConcreteVisitable, even though I hid the real type behind a dynamic proxy (the most difficult case I could come up with). Is the abstract visitor approach above guaranteed to work, or are there some pitfalls with this approach? What guarantees are given in Java with respect to the this pointer?

    Read the article

  • Understanding Visitor Pattern

    - by Nezreli
    I have a hierarchy of classes that represents GUI controls. Something like this: Control-ContainerControl-Form I have to implement a series of algoritms that work with objects doing various stuff and I'm thinking that Visitor pattern would be the cleanest solution. Let take for example an algorithm which creates a Xml representaion of a hierarchy of objects. Using 'classic' approach I would do this: public abstract class Control { public virtual XmlElement ToXML(XmlDocument document) { XmlElement xml = document.CreateElement(this.GetType().Name); // Create element, fill it with attributes declared with control return xml; } } public abstract class ContainerControl : Control { public override XmlElement ToXML(XmlDocument document) { XmlElement xml = base.ToXML(document); // Use forech to fill XmlElement with child XmlElements return xml; } } public class Form : ContainerControl { public override XmlElement ToXML(XmlDocument document) { XmlElement xml = base.ToXML(document); // Fill remaining elements declared in Form class return xml; } } But I'm not sure how to do this with visitor pattern. This is the basic implementation: public class ToXmlVisitor : IVisitor { public void Visit(Form form) { } } Since even the abstract classes help with implementation I'm not sure how to do that properly in ToXmlVisitor. Perhaps there is a better solution to this problem. The reason that I'm considering Visitor pattern is that some algorithms will need references not available in project where the classes are implemented and there is a number of different algorithms so I'm avoiding large classes. Any thoughts are welcome.

    Read the article

  • Using visitor pattern with large object hierarchy

    - by T. Fabre
    Context I've been using with a hierarchy of objects (an expression tree) a "pseudo" visitor pattern (pseudo, as in it does not use double dispatch) : public interface MyInterface { void Accept(SomeClass operationClass); } public class MyImpl : MyInterface { public void Accept(SomeClass operationClass) { operationClass.DoSomething(); operationClass.DoSomethingElse(); // ... and so on ... } } This design was, however questionnable, pretty comfortable since the number of implementations of MyInterface is significant (~50 or more) and I didn't need to add extra operations. Each implementation is unique (it's a different expression or operator), and some are composites (ie, operator nodes that will contain other operator/leaf nodes). Traversal is currently performed by calling the Accept operation on the root node of the tree, which in turns calls Accept on each of its child nodes, which in turn... and so on... But the time has come where I need to add a new operation, such as pretty printing : public class MyImpl : MyInterface { // Property does not come from MyInterface public string SomeProperty { get; set; } public void Accept(SomeClass operationClass) { operationClass.DoSomething(); operationClass.DoSomethingElse(); // ... and so on ... } public void Accept(SomePrettyPrinter printer) { printer.PrettyPrint(this.SomeProperty); } } I basically see two options : Keep the same design, adding a new method for my operation to each derived class, at the expense of maintainibility (not an option, IMHO) Use the "true" Visitor pattern, at the expense of extensibility (not an option, as I expect to have more implementations coming along the way...), with about 50+ overloads of the Visit method, each one matching a specific implementation ? Question Would you recommand using the Visitor pattern ? Is there any other pattern that could help solve this issue ?

    Read the article

  • How to solve cyclic dependencies in a visitor pattern

    - by Benjamin Rogge
    When programming at work we now and then face a problem with visitors and module/project dependencies. Say you have a class A in a module X. And there are subclasses B and C in module Y. That means that module Y is dependent on module X. If we want to implement a visitor pattern to the class hierarchy, thus introducing an interface with the handle Operations and an abstract accept method in A, we get a dependency from module Y to module X, which we cannot allow for architectural reasons. What we do is, use a direct comparison of the types (i.e. instanceof, since we program in Java), which is not satisfying. My question(s) would be: Do you encounter this kind of problem in your daily work (or do we make poor architectural choices) and if so, how is your approach to solve this?

    Read the article

  • Google analytics iframe code measuring visitor as two visitors

    - by Maarten
    I'm trying to measure visitors in an iframe and the site containing the iframe. What I would like is that visitors clicks in the iframe are seen being from the same visitor as the containing site, but somehow it is seen as two seperate visitors. I followed examples from http://www.blastam.com/blog/index.php/2011/02/google-analytics-cross-domain-tracking/, trimmed down to an even simpler version based on the comments about setDomainName not being needed anymore but with setDomainName I get the same result: a click on a page and a click on the iframe is seen as 2 clicks by 2 seperate visitors. This is the code in my iframe if (_gaq && gaAccount.length > 0){ _gaq.push(['_setAccount', gaAccount]); _gaq.push(['_setAllowLinker', true]); //_gaq.push(['_setDomainName', 'none']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview', 'mytestcountername']); } And this is the code in the containing page: <script type="text/javascript"> var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-9605474-4']); _gaq.push(['_setAllowLinker', true]); //_gaq.push(['_setDomainName', '.domain.nl']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); </script>

    Read the article

  • Determining whether a visitor reached two different pages in one visit

    - by Shaun
    I have a funnel that I would like to track. Tracking this funnel won't work with the default "goal funnel" tracking in Google due to the fact that I am mixing events and pageviews. As such, I've created a series of reports: Visits to demo pages - An inclusion filter on "Page". Triggers an Event on these pages - An inclusion filter on "Page" and "Event Category". Does not bounce - An inclusion filter on "Page" and an exclusion filter on "Exit Page" for these same pages. Reach our storefront - ?? Purchase something - An inclusion filter on "Page" and a report that shows "Transactions". At a basic level, I need to track users who reached demo pages, then reached any page on our store. Intuitively, I created a segment, used two inclusive "Page" filters (one for the demo pages and one for any page in our store), and combined them with an "AND" operator. I thought this was working until I tried to do the same thing in a dashboard widget and on a custom report. When I tried the same thing in those areas, I got zero results. I figured this might be because widgets and custom report filters function differently from segment filters (the options are different for all of them), so I tried applying my "demo page && store page" segment to a report that gave me a general page list. All I saw was a list of the specific pages. I tried simplifying things by creating a custom report that showed all visits to store pages, then applied a segment that filtered for users who visited demo pages. This got me the same numbers as my "demo page && store page" segment, but showed a list of demo pages. This has led me to believe that the "demo page && store page segment" approach and the "demo segment && store report" functionally behave the same. However, this experience has left me questioning whether they're giving me what I want. Are these methods showing me all users who reached both sets of pages? Is there a better/easier/more standard way of doing this aside from looking at visitor flow reports? I'm trying to avoid a combination of custom variables/events and using the horizontal funnel approach since it would consume a large number of our limited goals and seems more complicated than is necessary for tracking this funnel.

    Read the article

  • How to write the Visitor Pattern for Abstract Syntax Tree in Python?

    - by bodacydo
    My collegue suggested me to write a visitor pattern to navigate the AST. Can anyone tell me more how would I start writing it? As far as I understand, each Node in AST would have visit() method (?) that would somehow get called (from where?). That about concludes my understanding. To simplify everything, suppose I have nodes Root, Expression, Number, Op and the tree looks like this: Root | Op(+) / \ / \ Number(5) \ Op(*) / \ / \ / \ Number(2) Number(444) Can anyone think of how the visitor pattern would visit this tree to produce output: 5 + 2 * 444 Thanks, Boda Cydo.

    Read the article

  • Visitor pattern and compiler code generation, how to get children attributes?

    - by LeleDumbo
    I'd like to modify my compiler's code generator to use visitor pattern since the current approach must use multiple conditional statement to check the real type of a child before generating the corresponding code. However, I have problems to get children attributes after they're visited. For instance, in binary expression I use this: LHSCode := GenerateExpressionCode(LHSNode); RHSCode := GenerateExpressionCode(RHSNode); CreateBinaryExpression(Self,LHS,RHS); In visitor pattern the visit method is usually void, so I can't get the expression code from LHS and RHS. Keeping shared global variables isn't an option since expression code generation is recursive thus could erase previous values kept in the variables. I'll just show the binary expression as this is the most complicated part (for now): function TLLVMCodeGenerator.GenerateExpressionCode( Expr: TASTExpression): TLLVMValue; var BinExpr: TASTBinaryExpression; UnExpr: TASTUnaryExpression; LHSCode, RHSCode, ExprCode: TLLVMValue; VarExpr: TASTVariableExpression; begin if Expr is TASTBinaryExpression then begin BinExpr := Expr as TASTBinaryExpression; LHSCode := GenerateExpressionCode(BinExpr.LHS); RHSCode := GenerateExpressionCode(BinExpr.RHS); case BinExpr.Op of '<': Result := FBuilder.CreateICmp(ccSLT, LHSCode, RHSCode); '<=': Result := FBuilder.CreateICmp(ccSLE, LHSCode, RHSCode); '>': Result := FBuilder.CreateICmp(ccSGT, LHSCode, RHSCode); '>=': Result := FBuilder.CreateICmp(ccSGE, LHSCode, RHSCode); '==': Result := FBuilder.CreateICmp(ccEQ, LHSCode, RHSCode); '<>': Result := FBuilder.CreateICmp(ccNE, LHSCode, RHSCode); '/\': Result := FBuilder.CreateAnd(LHSCode, RHSCode); '\/': Result := FBuilder.CreateOr(LHSCode, RHSCode); '+': Result := FBuilder.CreateAdd(LHSCode, RHSCode); '-': Result := FBuilder.CreateSub(LHSCode, RHSCode); '*': Result := FBuilder.CreateMul(LHSCode, RHSCode); '/': Result := FBuilder.CreateSDiv(LHSCode, RHSCode); end; end else if Expr is TASTPrimaryExpression then if Expr is TASTBooleanConstant then with Expr as TASTBooleanConstant do Result := FBuilder.CreateConstant(Ord(Value), ltI1) else if Expr is TASTIntegerConstant then with Expr as TASTIntegerConstant do Result := FBuilder.CreateConstant(Value, ltI32) else if Expr is TASTUnaryExpression then begin UnExpr := Expr as TASTUnaryExpression; ExprCode := GenerateExpressionCode(UnExpr.Expr); case UnExpr.Op of '~': Result := FBuilder.CreateXor( FBuilder.CreateConstant(1, ltI1), ExprCode); '-': Result := FBuilder.CreateSub( FBuilder.CreateConstant(0, ltI32), ExprCode); end; end else if Expr is TASTVariableExpression then begin VarExpr := Expr as TASTVariableExpression; with VarExpr.VarDecl do Result := FBuilder.CreateVar(Ident, BaseTypeLLVMTypeMap[BaseType]); end; end; Hope you understand it :)

    Read the article

  • Allow visitor to print something they bought only 1 time

    - by steakbbq
    I am doing a website that needs to only let the customer print out what they bought 1 time. There are websites that currently do this and they mentioned Adobe Flash Player, Adobe AIR and the Sheet Music Plus AIR application. We would need to block programs like adobe distillation and any virtual printers while only allowing an instant print after purchase. I am not an adobe air developer. Would their be any other ways to accomplish this and what would be the easiest. Thank you. Would their be a way to not allow printing to a virtual printer ie adobe pdf?

    Read the article

  • Visitor-pattern vs inheritance for rendering

    - by akaltar
    I have a game engine that currently uses inheritance to provide a generic interface to do rendering: class renderable { public: void render(); }; Each class calls the gl_* functions itself, this makes the code hard to optimize and hard to implement something like setting the quality of rendering: class sphere : public renderable { public: void render() { glDrawElements(...); } }; I was thinking about implementing a system where I would create a Renderer class that would render my objects: class sphere { void render( renderer* r ) { r->renderme( *this ); } }; class renderer { renderme( sphere& sphere ) { // magically get render resources here // magically render a sphere here } }; My main problem is where should I store the VBOs and where should I Create them when using this method? Should I even use this approach or stick to the current one, perhaps something else? PS: I already asked this question on SO but got no proper answers.

    Read the article

  • Determining if a visitor left your server

    - by Jeepstone
    We have an Apache server running a PHP website. The site is an e-commerce shop. We currently use Barclays as the payment provider but are seeing a lot of customers drop out at the point at which we transfer them to the payment gateway (hosted with Barclays) I can see specific instances in the shop where orders have been created but not paid/failed but I need to ascertain if the user has definitely left our server (or just failed to reach Barclays). Is there anything in any of the server/access logs that states when a user transferred to a different domain?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >