vrrp - Developer IT

How to configuration keepalived on Amazon EC2?

- by oeegee

I rad some article. Keepalived over GRE tunnel for failover on VPS environment http://blog.killtheradio.net/how-tos/keepalived-haproxy-and-failover-on-the-cloud-or-any-vps-without-multicast/ but, I don't know how to configuration? and How to call this architecture? only I Know that How to config Master/Backup configuration at keepalived. What I want to know that How does work keepalived? I want to design this.... XMPP Server(EC2) | ------------------------------------------------- keepalived Master(EC2) - keepalived Backup(EC2) HAProxy #1 HAProxy#2 ------------------------------------------------- | Casandra#1 Casandra#2 Casandra#3 Casandra#4 Thanks! but What I want to know how to work on keepalived with unicast patche modul. ELB is expansive. and this is first totaly design. [Flow] ELB -- XMPP Server -- ELB -- Casandra ELB | XMPP#1 XMPP#2 XMPP#3 XMPP#4 | ELB | Casandra#1 Casandra#2 Casandra#3 Casandra#4 and change first design. [Flow] ELB -- XMPP Server -- HAProxy Master(Casandra Farm) -- Casandra ELB | XMPP#1 XMPP#2 XMPP#3 XMPP#4 | ------------------------------------------------- keepalived Master(EC2) - keepalived Backup(EC2) HAProxy#1 HAProxy#2 ------------------------------------------------- | Casandra#1 Casandra#2 Casandra#3 Casandra#4 this is second. [Flow] ELB -- HAProxy(XMPP Farm) -- XMPP Server -- HAProxy(Casandra Farm) -- Casanda It's OK? ELB | HAProxy#1 HAProxy#2 HAProxy#3 HAProxy#4 XMPP#1 XMPP#2 XMPP#3 XMPP#4 | Casandra#1 Casandra#2 Casandra#3 Casandra#4

Read the article

Router failover not detecting outside interface link lost

- by Matt

Suppose I have two routers configured in master/slave configuration. They look something like this (addresses are not real ones) 123.123.123.10 <===> [eth0] Router 1 (10.1.1.2) [eth1] ===> +----------+ | 10.1.1.1 | ===> LAN 172.123.123.10 <===> [eth0] Router 2 (10.1.1.3) [eth1] ===> +----------+ The 10.1.1.1 is the default route for the Network (10.1.1.0). What's slightly different in this config to other's I've seen is that I don't have an external virtual IP. Also, the 10.1.1.1 addresses are in real life, public IP's (not private ones shown here). This is more of a router setup than a firewall setup so I'm not using NAT here. Now the issue that I'm having is that I can't see any way to configure UCARP or VRRP to monitor both eth0 & eth1 and fail over to the backup router should either of them go down. What I'm seeing is that if Router1 is the master and I unplug eth0 on router1, it doesn't fail over to router 2. However, it will if instead I unplug eth1 of router 1. In VRRP I see there is a cluster group, but it seems that for this to work you need to have virtual ip's or vrrp instances rather than actual interfaces assigned to it. I hope my explanation is clear. How do I get around this?

Read the article

Multimaster Keepalived Configuration (Virtual IP with Load Balancing)

- by Rad Akefirad

Here are requirements: 1. High Availability 2. Load Balancing First configuration 1. Two linux servers have been configured with one static IP for each: 10.17.243.11, 10.17.243.12 2. Keepalived has been installed and configured with one VRRP instance to provide one virtual IP (10.17.243.10 as VIP, 10.17.243.11 as master and 10.17.243.12 as backup). 3. Everything works fine. The VIP is assigned to the master server (10.17.243.11) as long as it is up and running. As soon as it goes down, the VIP will be assigned to the backup server (10.17.243.12). 4. The problem here is all communication goes to the master server. Second configuration 1. I found active-active configuration for Keepalived which is possible by defining more than one VRRP instance. So that both server have two IPs (real 10.17.243.11 and virtual 10.17.243.10 for server #1 and real 10.17.243.12 and virtual 10.17.243.20 for server #2. 2. Everything works fine. we have two VIPs which are accessible (HA). But all communication coming to each IP still goes to one single machine (either server #1 or #2 depending on the IP). However I found some tricks on the DNS to overcome this limitation. But it's not acceptable in our case. Question: Is there any way to have one virtual IP which is assigned to both servers? By that I mean both servers are handling some part of workload (like the thing we do in web server load balancing)? By using either keepalived or some other tools? Thanks in advance.

Read the article

UCARP: prevent the original master from taking over the VIP when it comes back after failure?

- by quanta

Keepalived can do this by combining the nopreempt option and the BACKUP state on the both nodes: Prevent VRRP Master from becoming Master once it has failed Prevent master to fall back to master after failure How about the UCARP? Name : ucarp Arch : x86_64 Version : 1.5.2 Release : 1.el5.rf Size : 81 k Repo : installed Summary : Common Address Redundancy Protocol (CARP) for Unix URL : http://www.ucarp.org/ License : BSD Description: UCARP allows a couple of hosts to share common virtual IP addresses in order : to provide automatic failover. It is a portable userland implementation of the : secure and patent-free Common Address Redundancy Protocol (CARP, OpenBSD's : alternative to the patents-bloated VRRP). : Strong points of the CARP protocol are: very low overhead, cryptographically : signed messages, interoperability between different operating systems and no : need for any dedicated extra network link between redundant hosts. If I don't use the --preempt option and set the --advskew to the same value, both nodes become master. /etc/sysconfig/carp/vip-010.conf # Virtual IP configuration file for UCARP # The number (from 001 to 255) in the name of the file is the identifier # $Id: vip-001.conf.example 1527 2004-07-09 15:23:54Z dude $ # Set the same password on all mamchines sharing the same virtual IP PASSWORD="pa$$w0rd" # You are required to have an IPADDR= line in the configuration file for # this interface (so no DHCP allowed) BIND_INTERFACE="eth0" # Do *NOT* use a main interface for the virtual IP, use an ethX:Y alias # with the corresponding /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethX:Y file # already configured and ith ONBOOT=no VIP_INTERFACE="eth0:0" # If you have extra options to add, see "ucarp --help" output # (the lower the "-k <val>" the higher priority and "-P" to become master ASAP) OPTIONS="-z -k 255" /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:0 DEVICE=eth0:0 ONBOOT=no BOOTPROTO= IPADDR=192.168.6.8 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 USERCTL=yes IPV6INIT=no node 1: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 link/ether c6:9b:8e:af:a7:69 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.6.192/24 brd 192.168.6.255 scope global eth0 inet 192.168.6.8/24 brd 192.168.6.255 scope global secondary eth0:0 inet6 fe80::c49b:8eff:feaf:a769/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever node 2: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 link/ether 00:30:48:f7:0f:81 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.6.38/24 brd 192.168.6.255 scope global eth1 inet 192.168.6.8/24 brd 192.168.6.255 scope global secondary eth1:0 inet6 fe80::230:48ff:fef7:f81/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

Read the article

Hp Procurve Switch : port filtered

- by user117140

My HP Procurve switch is blocking port 22 and I dont know how to unblock it.Please let me know From the server, see port 22 is blocked [root@server ~]#nmap -p22,80,443 10.247.172.70 Starting Nmap 4.11 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2012-04-16 14:12 IST mass_dns: warning: Unable to determine any DNS servers. Reverse DNS is disabled. Try using --system-dns or specify valid servers with --dns_servers Interesting ports on 10.247.172.70: PORT STATE SERVICE 22/tcp filtered ssh ------------------> see 80/tcp filtered http 443/tcp filtered https This is blocked on cisco switch but I dont have any clue how this is done. I know that vlan is configured on switch. vlan 54 ip ospf 10.247.172.65 area 0.0.0.10 vrrp vrid 54 owner virtual-ip-address 10.247.172.65 255.255.255.192 priority 255 enable exit exit Please let me know how to unblock ssh port 22 access on this switch?

Developer IT