Search Results

Search found 5 results on 1 pages for 'wirrbel'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 1/1 | 1 

  • Haskell's cabal dependency problem with happy

    - by wirrbel
    I have problems installing ghc-mod on my linux machine. cabal worries about "happy" not being available in versione = 1.17: $ cabal install ghc-mod Resolving dependencies... [1 of 1] Compiling Main ( /tmp/haskell-src-exts-1.14.0-1357/haskell-src-exts-1.14.0/Setup.hs, /tmp/haskell-src-exts-1.14.0-1357/haskell-src-exts-1.14.0/dist/setup/Main.o ) Linking /tmp/haskell-src-exts-1.14.0-1357/haskell-src-exts-1.14.0/dist/setup/setup ... Configuring haskell-src-exts-1.14.0... setup: The program happy version =1.17 is required but it could not be found. Failed to install haskell-src-exts-1.14.0 cabal: Error: some packages failed to install: ghc-mod-3.1.3 depends on haskell-src-exts-1.14.0 which failed to install. haskell-src-exts-1.14.0 failed during the configure step. The exception was: ExitFailure 1 hlint-1.8.53 depends on haskell-src-exts-1.14.0 which failed to install. However, it even is installed in v. 1.19, as you can see here: $ cabal install happy Resolving dependencies... [1 of 1] Compiling Main ( /tmp/happy-1.19.0-1124/happy-1.19.0/Setup.lhs, /tmp/happy-1.19.0-1124/happy-1.19.0/dist/setup/Main.o ) Linking /tmp/happy-1.19.0-1124/happy-1.19.0/dist/setup/setup ... Configuring happy-1.19.0... Building happy-1.19.0... Preprocessing executable 'happy' for happy-1.19.0... [ 1 of 18] Compiling NameSet ( src/NameSet.hs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/NameSet.o ) [ 2 of 18] Compiling Target ( src/Target.lhs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/Target.o ) [ 3 of 18] Compiling AbsSyn ( src/AbsSyn.lhs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/AbsSyn.o ) [ 4 of 18] Compiling ParamRules ( src/ParamRules.hs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/ParamRules.o ) [ 5 of 18] Compiling GenUtils ( src/GenUtils.lhs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/GenUtils.o ) [ 6 of 18] Compiling ParseMonad ( src/ParseMonad.lhs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/ParseMonad.o ) [ 7 of 18] Compiling Lexer ( src/Lexer.lhs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/Lexer.o ) [ 8 of 18] Compiling Parser ( dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/Parser.hs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/Parser.o ) [ 9 of 18] Compiling AttrGrammar ( src/AttrGrammar.lhs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/AttrGrammar.o ) [10 of 18] Compiling AttrGrammarParser ( dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/AttrGrammarParser.hs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/AttrGrammarParser.o ) [11 of 18] Compiling Grammar ( src/Grammar.lhs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/Grammar.o ) [12 of 18] Compiling First ( src/First.lhs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/First.o ) [13 of 18] Compiling LALR ( src/LALR.lhs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/LALR.o ) [14 of 18] Compiling Paths_happy ( dist/build/autogen/Paths_happy.hs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/Paths_happy.o ) [15 of 18] Compiling ProduceCode ( src/ProduceCode.lhs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/ProduceCode.o ) [16 of 18] Compiling ProduceGLRCode ( src/ProduceGLRCode.lhs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/ProduceGLRCode.o ) [17 of 18] Compiling Info ( src/Info.lhs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/Info.o ) [18 of 18] Compiling Main ( src/Main.lhs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/Main.o ) Linking dist/build/happy/happy ... Installing executable(s) in /home/hope/.cabal/bin Installed happy-1.19.0 Any ideas? cabal-install version 1.16.0.2 using version 1.16.0 of the Cabal library

    Read the article

  • s expression representation for c

    - by wirrbel
    Experimenting with various lisps lately (clojure especially) i have wondered if there are any s expression based representations of (subsets) of c, so you could use lisp/closure to write macros and then convert the s-expression c tree to pure c. I am not asking for a to-c-compilers of lisp/scheme/clojure but more of using lisps to transform a c syntax tree. Little background to why i am asking this question: i find myself to really enjoy certain clojure macros like the threading macros -> doto etc. And i feel that they would be great in a non FP environment as well.

    Read the article

  • LuaJit FFI and hiding C implementation details

    - by wirrbel
    I would like to extend an application using LuaJit FFI. Having seen http://luajit.org/ext_ffi_tutorial.html this is surprisingly easy when comparing this to the Lua C API. So far so good. However I do not plainly want to wrap C functions but provide a higher level API to users writing scripts for the application. Especially I do not want users to be able to access "primitives", i.e. the ffi.* namespace. Is this possible or will that ffi namespace be available to user's Lua scripts? On the issue of Sandboxing Lua I found http://lua-users.org/wiki/SandBoxes which is not talking about FFI though. Furthermore, the plan I have described above is assuming that the introduction of abstraction layers happens on the lua side of code. Is this an advisable approach or would you rather abstract functionality on the statically compiled code (on the C-side)?

    Read the article

  • XSLT and possible alternatives [on hold]

    - by wirrbel
    I had a look at XSLT for transforming one XML file into another one (HTML, etc.). Now while I see that there are benefits to XSLT (being a standardized and used tool) I am reluctant for a couple of reasons XSLT processors seem to be quite huge / resource hungry XML is a bad notation for programming and thats what XSLT is all about. It do not want to troll XSLT here though I just want to point out what I dislike about it to give you an idea of what I would expect from an alternative. Having some Lisp background I wonder whether there are better ways for tree-structure transformations based upon some lisp. I have seen references to DSSSL, sadly most links about DSSSL are dead so its already challenging to see some code that illustrates it. Is DSSSL still in use? I remember that I had installed openjade once when checking out docbook stuff. Jeff Atwood's blog post seems to hint upon using Ruby instead of XSLT. Are there any sane ways to do XML transformations similar to XSLT in a non-xml programming language? I would be open for input on Useful libraries for scripting languages that facilitate XML transformations especially (but not exclusively) lisp-like transformation languages, or Ruby, etc. A few things I found so far: A couple of places on the web have pointed out Linq as a possible alternative. Quite generally I any kind of classifications, also from those who have had the best XSLT experience. For scheme http://cs.brown.edu/~sk/Publications/Papers/Published/kk-sxslt/ and http://www.okmij.org/ftp/Scheme/xml.html

    Read the article

  • Macro vs. Static functions in Header

    - by wirrbel
    for a lot of quick tasks where one could employ a function f(x,y), in plain C, macros are used. I would like to ask specifically about these cases, that are solvable by a function call (i.e. macros used for inlining functions, not for code expansion of arbitrary code). Typically C functions are not inlined since they might be linked to from other C files. However, static C functions are only visible from within the C file they are defined in. Therefore they can be inlined by compilers. I have heard that a lot of macros should be replaced by turning them into static functions, because this produces safer code. Are there cases where this is a not good idea? Again: Not asking about Code-Production macros with ## alike constructs that cannot at all be expressed as a function.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

1