I have a following gcc compilation warning

Posted by thetna on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by thetna
Published on 2010-03-11T20:51:20Z Indexed on 2010/03/11 20:54 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 185

Filed under:

gcc-warning

symbol.h:179: note: expected ‘uintptr_t *’ but argument is of type ‘PRECEDENCE’

The corresponding code is :

176 void            symbol_SetCount(SYMBOL, unsigned long);
177 unsigned long   symbol_GetCount(SYMBOL);
178 
179 size_t             symbol_Ordering(uintptr_t*, SYMBOL);
180 
181 void            symbol_CheckIndexInRange(int);
182 void            symbol_CheckNoVariable(SYMBOL);

SYMBOL is defined as:

typedef size_t SYMBOL

Any effort will be highly appreciated.

Related posts about gcc-warning

Which GCC warning must be disabled?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Using GCC 3.3.6, I get the following warning: choosing ... over ... because conversion sequence for the argument is better. Now, I want to disable this warning as described in gcc warning options by providing an argument like -Wno-theNameOfTheWarning But I don't know the name of the warning… >>> More
Why gcc4 warn and how to avoid it

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I have a function declared as: void event_add_card (EventAddr addr, EventType type, unsigned char card); and union typedef union EventData { float money; /**< money info */ unsigned char card; /**< new card */ } EventData; When i compile following code: EventData… >>> More
Conflicting PACKAGE_NAME and other macros when using autotools.

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
When using autotools (with a config.h file) for both a library and a software built on that library the compiler complains about a redefinition of some macros (PACKAGE_NAME, PACKAGE_TARNAME and so on). How can I prevent this? The config.h file is needed in the library to propagate it's setting to… >>> More
I have having following warning in gcc compilation in 32 bit architecture but not having any such wa

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
symbol.c: In function 'symbol_FPrint': symbol.c:1209: warning: format '%ld' expects type 'long int', but argument 3 has type 'SYMBOL' symbol.c: In function 'symbol_FPrintOtter': symbol.c:1236: warning: format '%ld' expects type 'long int', but argument 3 has type 'SYMBOL' symbol.c:1239: warning:… >>> More
warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘xyz’

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I'm getting a number of these warnings when compiling a few binaries: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘strcpy’ warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘strlen’ warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘exit’ To try… >>> More

Developer IT

I have a following gcc compilation warning - Developer IT

I have a following gcc compilation warning

gcc-warning

Related posts about gcc-warning

Which GCC warning must be disabled?

Why gcc4 warn and how to avoid it

Conflicting PACKAGE_NAME and other macros when using autotools.

I have having following warning in gcc compilation in 32 bit architecture but not having any such wa

warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘xyz’

Categories cloud