Search Results

Search found 13 results on 1 pages for 'thetna'.

Page 1/1 | 1 

  • Getting following warning while compiling

    - by thetna
    warning: passing argument 1 of 'bsearch' makes pointer from integer without a cast and the corresponding code is Parent =bsearch((const size_t)ParentNum, ClauseVector, Size, sizeof(CLAUSE),pcheck_CompareNumberAndClause); the compilar is gcc. here CLAUSE is defined as *CLAUSE.

    Read the article

  • Some issue with bufferedReader

    - by thetna
    I have a java function as follows: public HashMap<String, ArrayList<Double>> embedWords(BufferedReader buffR1 { ArrayList<String > arrayList = new ArrayList<String>(); arrayList = getWords(buffR1); System.out.println("Word size:"+ arrayList.size());

    Read the article

  • Some stupid warnings

    - by thetna
    I have a number of C source files(both .c and .h files). header files contains a number of functions. Out of those functions, only partially are used in a source .C file.Suppose a.h,b.h are header files and a.c and b.c are .c files. a.h is included in a.c. But only a number of functions those are in a.

    Read the article

  • I have a following gcc compilation warning

    - by thetna
    symbol.h:179: note: expected ‘uintptr_t *’ but argument is of type ‘PRECEDENCE’ The corresponding code is : 176 void symbol_SetCount(SYMBOL, unsigned long); 177 unsigned long symbol_GetCount(SYMBOL); 178 179 size_t symbol_Ordering(uintptr_t*, SYMBOL); 180 181 void

    Read the article

  • Function defined but not used warning in C

    - by thetna
    I have a number of C source files(both .c and .h files). header files contains a number of functions. Out of those functions, only partially are used in a source .C file.Suppose a.h,b.h are header files and a.c and b.c are .c files. a.h is included in a.c. But only a number of functions those are in

    Read the article

  • recommending gcc to inline the function

    - by thetna
    I don't know how feasible it is and how sensible is this question here. Is there any changes that we can make in makefile to recommend GCC inline all the function although the functions are not inlined during the declaration or nowhere in the source file.

    Read the article

  • Function defined but not used in C

    - by thetna
    I have following code: static __inline__ LIST list_List(POINTER P) { return list_Cons(P,list_Nil()); } After compilation I got following warning: inlining is unlikely but function size may grow I removed the inline and changed into the following : static LIST list_List(POINTER P) {

    Read the article

  • Supressing inlining warning

    - by thetna
    I am getting inling warning such as : warning: inlining failed in call to ‘symbol_Arity’: call is unlikely and code size would grow To get rid of this i changed the makefile adding the -Winline to get rid of this. I don't get any inlining warning. But , i don't know how wise is it to do in

    Read the article

1