fire and forget compared to http request
Posted
by cometta
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by cometta
Published on 2010-03-28T05:20:53Z
Indexed on
2010/03/28
5:23 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 558
Hi, i looking for opinion from you all. I have a web application that need to records data into another web application database. I not prefer to use http request GET on 2nd application because of latency issue. I looking for fast way to save records on 2nd application quickly, i came across the idea of "fire and forget" , will JMX suit for this scenario? from my understanding jmx will gurantee message delivery. Let say i need to call at least 1000 random requests per seconds to 2nd application should i use jmx? http request? or xmpp instead?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner