What is technically more advanced: Brainf*ck or Assembler?
Posted
by el ka es
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by el ka es
Published on 2010-03-29T19:26:47Z
Indexed on
2010/03/29
19:33 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 477
I wondered which of these languages is more powerful.
With powerful I don't mean the readability, assembler would be naturally the winner here, but something resulting from, for example, the following factors:
- Which of them is more high-level? (Both aren't really but one has to be more)
- Who would be the possibly fastest in compiled state? (There is no BF compiler out there as far as I know but it wouldn't be hard writing one I suppose)
- Which of the both has the better code length/code action ratio? What I mean is
If you get to distracted by the, compared to Brainf*ck, improved readability of assembler, just think of writing plain binary/machine code as what assembler assembles to.
Both languages are so basic that it should be possible to answer the question(s) in a rather objective view, I hope.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner