Why aren't we programming on the GPU???

Posted by Chris on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Chris
Published on 2010-04-03T00:06:26Z Indexed on 2010/04/03 0:13 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 709

So I finally took the time to learn CUDA and get it installed and configured on my computer and I have to say, I'm quite impressed!

Here's how it does rendering the Mandelbrot set at 1280 x 678 pixels on my home PC with a Q6600 and a GeForce 8800GTS (max of 1000 iterations):

Maxing out all 4 CPU cores with OpenMP: 2.23 fps

Running the same algorithm on my GPU: 104.7 fps

And here's how fast I got it to render the whole set at 8192 x 8192 with a max of 1000 iterations:

Serial implemetation on my home PC: 81.2 seconds

All 4 CPU cores on my home PC (OpenMP): 24.5 seconds

32 processors on my school's super computer (MPI with master-worker): 1.92 seconds

My home GPU (CUDA): 0.310 seconds

4 GPUs on my school's super computer (CUDA with static domain decomposition): 0.0547 seconds

So here's my question - if we can get such huge speedups by programming the GPU instead of the CPU, why is nobody doing it??? I can think of so many things we could speed up like this, and yet I don't know of many commercial apps that are actually doing it.

Also, what kinds of other speedups have you seen by offloading your computations to the GPU?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about GPGPU

  • GPGPU

    as seen on Daniel Moth - Search for 'Daniel Moth'
    WhatGPU obviously stands for Graphics Processing Unit (the silicon powering the display you are using to read this blog post). The extra GP in front of that stands for General Purpose computing.So, altogether GPGPU refers to computing we can perform on GPU for purposes beyond just drawing on the screen… >>> More

  • gpgpu vs. physX for physics simulation

    as seen on Game Development - Search for 'Game Development'
    Hello First theoretical question. What is better (faster)? Develop your own gpgpu techniques for physics simulation (cloth, fluids, colisions...) or to use PhysX? (If i say develop i mean implement existing algorithms like navier-strokes...) I don't care about what will take more time to develop… >>> More

  • Financial applications on GPGPU

    as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
    I want to know what sort of financial applications can be implemented using a GPGPU. I'm aware of Option pricing/ Stock price estimation using Monte Carlo simulation on GPGPU using CUDA. Can someone enumerate the various possibilities of utilizing GPGPU for any application in Finance domain, >>> More

  • Best approach for GPGPU/CUDA/OpenCL in Java?

    as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
    General-purpose computing on graphics processing units (GPGPU) is a very attractive concept to harness the power of the GPU for any kind of computing. I'd love to use GPGPU for image processing, particles, and fast geometric operations. Right now, it seems the two contenders in this space are CUDA… >>> More

  • GPGPU programming with OpenGL ES 2.0

    as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
    I am trying to do some image processing on the GPU, e.g. median, blur, brightness, etc. The general idea is to do something like this framework from GPU Gems 1. I am able to write the GLSL fragment shader for processing the pixels as I've been trying out different things in an effect designer app… >>> More

Related posts about gpu-programming