Is it possible to implement a C# constructor without using the class name?

Posted by Nick Brooks on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Nick Brooks
Published on 2010-04-11T20:29:48Z Indexed on 2010/04/11 20:33 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 248

Filed under:
|
|

When looking at disassembled .NET assemblies I notice that constructors are defined as ".ctor". Is that possible to do in the actual code?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about c#

Related posts about constructors