Why does the destructor of the class called twice ?

Posted by dicaprio on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by dicaprio
Published on 2010-04-13T06:49:46Z Indexed on 2010/04/13 6:53 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 178

Filed under:

destructor

Apologies if the question sounds silly, I was following experts in SO and trying some examples myself, and this is one of them. I did try the search option but didn't find an answer for this kind.


class A
{
    public:
         A(){cout t;
    t.push_back(A()); // After this line , when the scope of the object is lost.
}

Why does the destructor of the class called twice ?

Related posts about destructor

Declaring refrences /objects in Destructor of a class

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Does it make any sense of declaring objects or refrences in a destructor of a class in C++? I mean class A { A() { } ~A() { //Declaring refrences or objects here // } } >>> More
An interesting case of delete and destructor (C++)

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I have a piece of code where I can call destructor multiple times and access member functions even the destructor was called with member variables' values preserved. I was still able to access member functions after I called delete but the member variables were nullified (all to 0). And I can't double… >>> More
Can a destructor be recursive?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Is this program well-defined, and if not, why exactly? #include <iostream> #include <new> struct X { int cnt; X (int i) : cnt(i) {} ~X() { std::cout << "destructor called, cnt=" << cnt << std::endl; if ( cnt-- > 0 ) … >>> More
GCC destructor behaviour

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I've noticed a difference in behaviour for gcc's destructor when compiled under linux and crosscompiled with mingw. On linux the destructor will not get called unless the program terminates normally by itself (returns from main). I guess that kind of makes sense if you take signal handlers into account… >>> More
Does a C++ destructor always or only sometimes call data member destructors?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I'm trying to validate my understanding of C++ destructors. I've read many times that C++ supplies a default destructor if I don't write one myself. But does this mean that if I DO write a destructor that the compiler WON'T still provide the default cleanup of stack-allocated class fields? My hunch… >>> More

Developer IT

Why does the destructor of the class called twice ? - Developer IT

Why does the destructor of the class called twice ?

destructor

Related posts about destructor

Declaring refrences /objects in Destructor of a class

An interesting case of delete and destructor (C++)

Can a destructor be recursive?

GCC destructor behaviour

Does a C++ destructor always or only sometimes call data member destructors?

Categories cloud