How does volatile actually work?

Posted by FredOverflow on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by FredOverflow
Published on 2010-04-22T20:58:44Z Indexed on 2010/04/23 14:53 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 310

Filed under:

java

|

volatile

|

concurrency

Marking a variable as volatile in Java ensures that every thread sees the value that was last written to it instead of some stale value. I was wondering how this is actually achieved. Does the JVM emit special instructions that flush the CPU cashes or something?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about java

Tomcat 6: Access Control Exception?

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
I'm trying to setup a tomcat6 server, and I'm trying to match another setup someone else established. However, my deployment (default Ubuntu install) uses a policy.d/ directory structure, and the established server just uses a catalina.policy file. I've tried setting every entry in policy.d to match… >>> More
Problem in creation MDB Queue connection at Jboss StartUp

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I am not able to create a Queue connection in JBOSS4.2.3GA Version & Java1.5, as I am using MDB as per the below details. I am putting this MDB in a jar file(named utsJar.jar) and copied it in deploy folder of JBOSS, In the test env. this MDB works well but in another env. [ env settings and… >>> More
failing to establish connection between Postgres db and gwt

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hi, I am using Postgres and gwt 2.0 for one of my applications. I am facing problem connecting to the database. When I try to connect it gives "ClassNotFoundException". Here is what I get when I try to connect to database: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.postgresql.Driver at java.net… >>> More
failing to establish connection between postgre db and gwt

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hi, For i am using postgre and gwt 2.0 for one of my applications. I am facing problem connecting to the database. When i try to connect it gives "ClassNotFoundException". Here is what i get when i try to connect to database: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.postgresql.Driver at java.net… >>> More
Migration and deployement problems JBoss 4.2.2.GA to JBoss 6.0.0.M2

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hi, I'm trying to migrate an application running on JBoss 4.2.2.GA to JBoss 6.0.0.M2 I give you some log to explain my problem : boot.log : 2010-03-16 09:59:29,406 ERROR [org.jboss.system.server.profileservice.ProfileServiceBootstrap] (Thread-2) Failed to load profile: Summary of incomplete deployments… >>> More

Related posts about volatile

"A reference to a volatile field will not be treated as volatile" implications

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
The following code using System.Threading; class Test { volatile int counter = 0; public void Increment() { Interlocked.Increment(ref counter); } } Raises the following compiler warning: "A reference to a volatile field will not be treated as volatile" Am I doing something… >>> More
Java: volatile guarantees and out-of-order execution

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Note that this question is solely about the volatile keyword and the volatile guarantees: it is not about the synchronized keyword (so please don't answer "you must use synchronize" for I don't have any issue to solve: I simply want to understand the volatile guarantees (or lack of guarantees) regarding… >>> More
Volatile or synchronized for primitive type?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
In java, assignment is atomic if the size of the variable is less that or equal to 32 bits but is not if more than 32 bits. What(volatile/synchronized) would be more efficient to use in case of double or long assignment. like, volatile double x = y; synchronized is not applicable with primitive… >>> More
Why is 'volatile' parasitic in C++?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Consider the following code: int main() { int i; volatile int* p = &i;… >>> More
May volatile be in user defined types to help writing thread-safe code

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I know, it has been made quite clear in a couple of questions/answers before, that volatile is related to the visible state of the c++ memory model and not to multithreading. On the other hand, this article by Alexandrescu uses the volatile keyword not as a runtime feature but rather as a compile… >>> More