Workaround for the WaitHandle.WaitAll 64 handle limit?
Posted
by James
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by James
Published on 2010-04-23T23:31:53Z
Indexed on
2010/04/23
23:33 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 920
My application spawns loads of different small worker threads via ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem
. I have never had any issues before, however, as my application is coming under more load i.e. more threads being created, I am now beginning to get this exception:
WaitHandles must be less than or equal to 64 - missing documentation
What is the best alternative solution to this?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner