Biztalk Server 2009 - Failover Clustering and Network Load Balancing (NLB)
Posted
by FullOfQuestions
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by FullOfQuestions
Published on 2010-04-24T02:05:28Z
Indexed on
2010/04/24
2:13 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 970
Hi,
We are planning a Biztalk 2009 set up in which we have 2 Biztalk Application Servers and 2 DB Servers (DB servers being in an Active/Passive Cluster). All servers are running Windows Server 2008 R2.
As part of our application, we will have incoming traffic via the MSMQ, FILE and SOAP adapters. We also have a requirement for High-availability and Load-balancing.
Let's say I create two different Biztalk Hosts and assign the FILE receive handler to the first one and the MSMQ receive handler to the second one. I now create two host instances for each of the two hosts (i.e. one for each of my two physical servers).
After reviewing the Biztalk Documentation, this is what I know so far:
For FILE (Receive), high-availablity and load-balancing will be achieved by Biztalk automatically because I set up a host instance on each of the two servers in the group.
MSMQ (Receive) requires Biztalk Host Clustering to ensure high-availability (Host Clustering however requires Windows Failover Clustering to be set up as well). No loading-balancing option is clear here.
SOAP (Receive) requires NLB to achieve Load-balancing and High-availability (if one server goes down, NLB will direct traffic to the other).
This is where I'm completely puzzled and I desperately need your help:
- Is it possible to have a Windows Failover Cluster and NLB set up at the same time on the two application servers?
- If yes, then please tell me how.
- If no, then please explain to me how anyone is acheiving high-availability and load-balancing for MSMQ and SOAP when their underlying prerequisites are mutually exclusive!
Your help is greatly appreciated,
M
© Stack Overflow or respective owner