How did Perl gain a reputation for being a write-only language?
Posted
by Andrew Grimm
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Andrew Grimm
Published on 2010-04-24T00:39:01Z
Indexed on
2010/04/24
0:43 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 306
How did Perl gain a reputation (deserved, undeserved, or used to be deserved, no longer so) of being a "write only language"?
Was it
- The syntax of the language
- Specific features that were available in the language
- Specific features not being available in the language (or at least old versions of it)
- The kind of tasks Perl was being used for
- The kind of people who use Perl (people who aren't full-time programmers)
- Criticism from people committed to another language
- Something else?
Background: I'd like to know if some aspects that gave Perl the reputation of being write-only also apply to other languages (specifically ruby).
Disclaimer: I recognise that Perl doesn't force people to do write-only code (can any language?), and that you can write bad code in any language.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner