Why target="_blank" is not advisable to use with XHTML?

Posted by metal-gear-solid on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by metal-gear-solid
Published on 2010-02-12T07:13:37Z Indexed on 2010/05/06 16:48 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 366

Filed under:

XHTML

|

web-standards

|

w3c

|

xhtml-1.1

|

accessibility

and It's validated in XHTML 1.1 and WCAG 2.0 Guidelines doesn't have any info about it's use?

I know it's not valid in XHTML 1.0 strict but if many people using other ways like JavaScript, jquery, rel attribute, PHP etc.

Does it make sense? it means people don't want to follow validation rules. they just want to pass the validation.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about XHTML

Can XHTML nest more XHTML?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
It's legal to nest SVG documents inside XHTML documents; but is it legal to nest XHTML documents inside other XHTML documents in the same fashion? <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> … >>> More
Avoid richfaces to send back javascript libraries in the ajax responses

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I'm using JSF 1.2 with Richfaces, and for every ajax request, the server is sending back the response, whichi is good, but it also contains all the links to the javascript files. I want to improve the performance so I just want the <body> to be returned, because all the javascript files are… >>> More
How to validate my Alexa code <noscript> tag in Head section

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
The doctype and HTML tag of my page is below: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML+RDFa 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml-rdfa-2.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" version="XHTML+RDFa 1.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www… >>> More
XHTML: Why You Should Be Using It

as seen on Internet.com - Search for 'Internet.com'
Marc Plotz gives us the skinny on XHTML ... >>> More
XHTML: Why You Should Be Using It

as seen on Internet.com - Search for 'Internet.com'
Marc Plotz gives us the skinny on XHTML ... >>> More

Related posts about web-standards

Web standards or risk avoidance?

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
My company is building an App Engine application. The app encounters a bug (possibly due to an issue with App Engine itself, as per our research) on IE9, but it cannot be reliably reproduced and is experienced by a small percentage of users. The workaround is to force IE9 to use IE8 mode. As a lazy… >>> More
Hidden web standards behind Google "custom searchEngines"?

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
Today while playing with Google Chrome Omnibox, I notice a strange behavior. I guess there's some "hidden" web standard behind it, but can't figure it out. Here's how to reproduce: Go to http://edition.cnn.com/ Use the search function at the higher right corner, Search a random keyword, for example:… >>> More
Web Standards alternatives to Flex/Silverlight (I mean serious alternatives, not just JS framewoks)

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Is there a set of open standards technologies that I can use to achieve the same way of development as in Flex and Sivlerlight? I am talking about componentization, separation of concerns, rich graphics, states and effects . Please point out some tutorials and other resources if possible. P.S. I… >>> More
Tool to check if web server is following HTTP standard?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I'm writing a simple HTTP server which should play nicely with most clients, but is only meant to implement a subset of HTTP 1.1. During development it would be nice to be able to validate that the generated HTTP reponses are HTTP 1.1 compliant. Is there a tool that can do something along those lines… >>> More
Which doctype should I use for GWT 2.0?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I think I should use <!DOCTYPE html> for my new GWT application; I understand that doing so will put my application into standards-compliant mode. Am I correct? Are there any disadvantages to using this doctype? Does GWT work properly in standards-compliant mode? I'm wary because the GWT tutorial… >>> More