Search Results

Search found 1178 results on 48 pages for 'w3c'.

Page 1/48 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • W3c Markup Validator on Windows 2003 with Apache

    - by rihatum
    Hi All, OS = Windows 2003 (latest sp / hotfixes etc) Perl = Active Perl 5.8.9 Build 825 Apache 2.2.11 Followed the following How-To: http://validator.w3.org/docs/install_win.html Facing the following errors : (had an html error too, but I used Perl Package manager to upgrade the required package. Now, the Package manager isn't showing any update of the following package and some others too : SGML::Parser::OpenSP version 0.991 required--this is only version 0.99 at C:/www/validator/httpd/cgi-bin/check line 61. Q : How can I download the latest package for OpenSP ? Q : Would It be just a matter of click and install the package? If someone can provide a step by step that would be very helpful, I am not fluent with building perl packages. Thanks and Regards

    Read the article

  • installing w3c validator on Fedora 11

    - by coure06
    On Fedora 11 i have installed w3c validator using yum install w3c-markup-validator is this installation configure each and everything including the complete website? followed this doc http://validator.w3.org/docs/install.html Apache is already installed. Now how can i open validator site locally? i am trying localhost, 127.0.0.1, 127.0.0.2 but validator website is not opening...

    Read the article

  • What is the benefit to add W3C logo in site?

    - by jitendra
    http://www.w3.org/QA/Tools/Icons If my code is valid then Should i add logo to all my personal and client sites.? Should i add logo to client sites and tell to client these are good to have? If code is valid but semantically correct even can we use logo? What is benefit and purpose to add these logos for XHTML, CSS accessibility. And what is the difference between Gold and Blue logo Why W3C provide these logos?

    Read the article

  • installing w3c validator on Fedora 11

    - by coure06
    On Fedora 11 i have installed w3c validator using yum install w3c-markup-validator Apache is already installed. Now how can i open validator site locally? i am trying localhost, 127.0.0.1, 127.0.0.2 but validator website is not opening...

    Read the article

  • configuring local W3C validator on xampp - windows xp sp3

    - by Gabriel
    Hi I have no experience on perl. I am trying to configure the W3C validator on my localhost (win32). I have already followed all the instructions given by W3C @http://validator.w3.org/docs/install_win.html, but I am getting the following error: Can't locate loadable object for module Encode::HanExtra in @INC (@INC contains: C:/xampp/perl/lib C:/xampp/perl/site/lib .) at C:/xampp/validator-0.8.6/httpd/cgi-bin/check line 49 Compilation failed in require at C:/xampp/validator-0.8.6/httpd/cgi-bin/check line 49. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at C:/xampp/validator-0.8.6/httpd/cgi-bin/check line 49. I'm running perl 5.10.1 on xampp and the following HandExtra Module http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/AUDREYT/Encode-HanExtra-0.23/lib/Encode/HanExtra.pm This is C:/xampp/validator-0.8.6/httpd/cgi-bin/check line 49 : use Encode::HanExtra qw(); # for some chinese character encodings if I document that line using # I get a similar message related to other object: Can't locate loadable object for module Sub::Name in @INC (@INC contains: C:/xampp/perl/lib C:/xampp/perl/site/lib .) at C:/xampp/perl/site/lib/Moose.pm line 12 This is Line 12 at Moose.pm : use Sub::Name 'subname'; I don't know how to proceed. I will appreciate any advise. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Opengraph W3C valid ?

    - by mnml
    Hi, I would like to know if the opengraph markup is W3C valid, I'm getting the following error when I try to validate it: Line 14, Column 17: there is no attribute "PROPERTY" <meta property="og:site_name" content="sitename"> In case it's not valid, will it impact my pagerank and other search engines algo? Is it possible to cloak those properties?

    Read the article

  • Joomla complient w3c

    - by neut
    Im trying to make my joomla powered site w3c compliant. I am stuck with ampersand encoding, I want to encode the '&' to '& amp;'(no space) under the menu, as required. However the menu link can not be directly edited (read-only), I was wondering how I can change this to be encoded? Thanks

    Read the article

  • JavaScript tags, performance and W3C

    - by Thomas
    Today I was looking for website optimization content and I found an article talking about move JavaScript scripts to the bottom of the HTML page. Is this valid with W3C's recommendations? I learned that all JavaScript must be inside of head tag... Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Local web apps and W3C standards.

    - by Babiker
    If am writing a local app that will only run using a specific browser, am i setting my self up by slightly ignoring W3C's standards? I ask this question because in this app i am thinking of using custom HTML tags, custom attributes, etc... Thanks in advance guys.

    Read the article

  • embed tag for flash and w3c

    - by drav
    when validating a site using w3c validator it tells me the tag is not valid markup. So i take it out and it works on safari/chrome but not firefox(3.5.x) but validates fine. Is there something in the tag i must add in order for firefox to display flash.

    Read the article

  • Why this code showing error in W3C validator?

    - by metal-gear-solid
    Why this code showing error in W3C validator "character data is not allowed here" <blockquote>all visible objects, man, are but as pasteboard masks. But in each event -- in the living act, the undoubted deed -- there, some unknown but still reasoning thing puts forth the mouldings of its feature from behind the unreasoning mask. If man will strike, strike through the mask. All visible objects, man, are but as pasteboard masks. But in each event -- in the living act, the undoubted deed -- there, some unknown but still reasoning thing puts forth the mouldings of its feature from behind the unreasoning mask. If man will strike, strike through the mask.</blockquote> It does not giving any error in this validator http://www.onlinewebcheck.com/ and not in https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/249/

    Read the article

  • Joomla contact form doesn't pass W3C validation

    - by aramaz
    Hi, I get the following error when I try to validate a contact page on my site: document type does not allow element "script" here The element named above was found in a context where it is not allowed. This could mean that you have incorrectly nested elements -- such as a "style" element in the "body" section instead of inside "head" -- or two elements that overlap (which is not allowed). One common cause for this error is the use of XHTML syntax in HTML documents. Due to HTML's rules of implicitly closed elements, this error can create cascading effects. For instance, using XHTML's "self-closing" tags for "meta" and "link" in the "head" section of a HTML document may cause the parser to infer the end of the "head" section and the beginning of the "body" section (where "link" and "meta" are not allowed; hence the reported error). I am using Joomla 1.5.7, and the doctype is <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> Any idea how to fix this?

    Read the article

  • W3C Markup Validation errors with jQuery

    - by FFish
    Running a validation on my pages where I used jQuery gives me lots of errors.. I escaped the closing tags but keep getting errors. <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function() { $("#main").html('<p>hello world<\/p>'); }); </script>

    Read the article

  • W3C dom api in Java, get child elements by name

    - by Benju
    I just realized that the method Element.getElementsByTagName("someTagName") returns a nodelist of all elements in the document that have a given tagname. What if I just want to get all child elements by tag name? For example... <person> <name>Bob</name> <car> <name>Toyota Corolla</name> </car> </person>

    Read the article

  • w3c validation error with utf-8

    - by ian
    When I try to validate a certain page I get the below error: Sorry, I am unable to validate this document because on line 136 it contained one or more bytes that I cannot interpret as utf-8 (in other words, the bytes found are not valid values in the specified Character Encoding). Please check both the content of the file and the character encoding indication. The error was: utf8 "\xFF" does not map to Unicode What exactly does this mean and how can I find out what character is causing the problem? The page is generated dynamically in PHP and a bit large and I am not sure what to look for.

    Read the article

  • Le W3C publie ses conseils pour la création d'applications Web mobiles et annonce un nouveau standard

    Le W3C publie ses conseils pour la création d'applications Web mobiles et annonce un nouveau standard Le W3C annonce un nouveau standard destiné à faciliter la tâche des développeurs et fournisseurs de contenu qui créent des applications dynamiques via le Web mobile. Les bonnes pratiques pour les applications Web mobiles (MWABP), publiées comme recommandation du W3C, proposent des conseils pratiques d'experts du Web mobile pour faciliter le développement et la mise en oeuvre d'applications Web mobiles sur de nombreuses plates-formes. «Ce document est une mine d'or de conseils : j'ai eu l'occasion de les mettre en application pour m'assurer que l'application mobile «antisèche» du W3...

    Read the article

  • script attributes

    - by Alex Ivasyuv
    Hi, I need to control some script elements, that's why I want to add class attribute to do it. But, w3c says that it's invalid. Some effect, if I add rel or id attribute. Any other ideas how I can access appropriate script tag? Doctype: XHTML 1.0 Strict Thanks,

    Read the article

  • Why do mozilla and webkit prepend -moz- and -webkit- to CSS3 rules?

    - by egarcia
    CSS3 rules bring lots of interesting features. Take border-radius, for example. The standard says that if you write this rule: div.rounded-corners { border-radius: 5px; } I should get a 5px border radius. But neither mozilla nor webkit implement this. However, they implement the same thing, with the same parameters, with a different name (-moz-border-radius and -webkit-border-radius, respectively). In order to satisfy as many browsers as possible, you end up with this: div.rounded-corners { border-radius: 5px; -moz-border-radius: 5px; -webkit-border-radius: 5px; } I can see two obvious disadvantages: Copy-paste code. This has obvious risks that I will not discuss here. The W3C CSS validator will not validate these rules. At the same time, I don't see any obvious advantages. I believe that the people behind mozilla and webkit are more intelligent than myself. There must be some good reasons to have things structured this way. It's just that I can't see them. So, I must ask you people: why is this?

    Read the article

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >