Was Visual Studio 2008 or 2010 written to use multi cores?

Posted by Erx_VB.NExT.Coder on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Erx_VB.NExT.Coder
Published on 2009-11-28T22:46:31Z Indexed on 2010/05/09 15:18 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 195

basically i want to know if the visual studio IDE and/or compiler in 2010 was written to make use of a multi core environment (i understand we can target multi core environments in 08 and 10, but that is not my question).

i am trying to decide on if i should get a higher clock dual core or a lower clock quad core, as i want to try and figure out which processor will give me the absolute best possible experience with Visual Studio 2010 (ide and background compiler).

if they are running the most important section (background compiler and other ide tasks) in one core, then the core will get cut off quicker if running a quad core, esp if background compiler is the heaviest task, i would imagine this would b e difficult to seperate in more then one process, so even if it uses multi cores you might still be better off with going for a higher clock cpu if the majority of the processing is still bound to occur in one core (ie the most significant part of the VS environment).

i am a vb programmer, they've made great performance improvements in beta 2, congrats, but i would love to be able to use VS seamlessly... anyone have any ideas?

thanks,

erx

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about visual-studio-2010

Related posts about multicore