Classes with the same name - is it restricted only within the same translation unit?
Posted
by LeopardSkinPillBoxHat
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by LeopardSkinPillBoxHat
Published on 2010-05-12T05:46:42Z
Indexed on
2010/05/12
5:54 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 252
Let's just I had the following code:
foo.h
class Foo
{
// ...
};
foo.cpp
#include "foo.h"
// Functions for class Foo defined here...
Let's say that Foo
are built into a static library foo.lib
.
Now let's say I have the following:
foo2.h
class Foo
{
// ...
};
foo2.cpp
#include "foo2.h"
// Functions for class Foo defined here...
This is built into a separate static library foo2.lib
.
Now, if I re-link foo.lib
and foo2.lib
into an executable program foo.exe
, should it be complaining that class Foo
has been defined twice?
In my experiences, neither the compiler or the linker are complaining.
I wouldn't be expecting the compiler to complain, because they have been defined in separate translation units.
But why doesn't the linker complain?
How does the linker differentiate between the 2 versions of the Foo
class? Does it work by decorating the symbols?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner