Emma - Block Coverage vs Line Coverage
Posted
by MasterGaurav
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by MasterGaurav
Published on 2010-05-20T16:07:03Z
Indexed on
2010/05/20
16:10 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 419
I have a strange scenario... while doing a EMMA coverage for UT, I get the total block coverage size more than line coverage size.
For block coverage, the total size is some 50,000 while the line coverage is out of 18,000.
I get (block-coverage-value) / 50,000 and (line-coverage-value) / 18,000 in the report.
Is it possible? How can the number of blocks be more than the number of lines in code?
btw, you can assume that I know what Block Coverage is: http://emma.sourceforge.net/faq.html#q.blockcoverage
© Stack Overflow or respective owner