Lock free multiple readers single writer
Posted
by dummzeuch
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by dummzeuch
Published on 2009-05-26T07:48:56Z
Indexed on
2010/05/20
2:20 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 294
I have got an in memory data structure that is read by multiple threads and written by only one thread. Currently I am using a critical section to make this access threadsafe. Unfortunately this has the effect of blocking readers even though only another reader is accessing it.
There are two options to remedy this:
- use TMultiReadExclusiveWriteSynchronizer
- do away with any blocking by using a lock free approach
For 2. I have got the following so far (any code that doesn't matter has been left out):
type
TDataManager = class
private
FAccessCount: integer;
FData: TDataClass;
public
procedure Read(out _Some: integer; out _Data: double);
procedure Write(_Some: integer; _Data: double);
end;
procedure TDataManager.Read(out _Some: integer; out _Data: double);
var
Data: TDAtaClass;
begin
InterlockedIncrement(FAccessCount);
try
// make sure we get both values from the same TDataClass instance
Data := FData;
// read the actual data
_Some := Data.Some;
_Data := Data.Data;
finally
InterlockedDecrement(FAccessCount);
end;
end;
procedure TDataManager.Write(_Some: integer; _Data: double);
var
NewData: TDataClass;
OldData: TDataClass;
ReaderCount: integer;
begin
NewData := TDataClass.Create(_Some, _Data);
InterlockedIncrement(FAccessCount);
OldData := TDataClass(InterlockedExchange(integer(FData), integer(NewData));
// now FData points to the new instance but there might still be
// readers that got the old one before we exchanged it.
ReaderCount := InterlockedDecrement(FAccessCount);
if ReaderCount = 0 then
// no active readers, so we can safely free the old instance
FreeAndNil(OldData)
else begin
/// here is the problem
end;
end;
Unfortunately there is the small problem of getting rid of the OldData instance after it has been replaced. If no other thread is currently within the Read method (ReaderCount=0), it can safely be disposed and that's it. But what can I do if that's not the case? I could just store it until the next call and dispose it there, but Windows scheduling could in theory let a reader thread sleep while it is within the Read method and still has got a reference to OldData.
If you see any other problem with the above code, please tell me about it. This is to be run on computers with multiple cores and the above methods are to be called very frequently.
In case this matters: I am using Delphi 2007 with the builtin memory manager. I am aware that the memory manager probably enforces some lock anyway when creating a new class but I want to ignore that for the moment.
Edit: It may not have been clear from the above: For the full lifetime of the TDataManager object there is only one thread that writes to the data, not several that might compete for write access. So this is a special case of MREW.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner