Building 'flat' rather than 'tree' LINQ expressions
Posted
by Ian Gregory
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Ian Gregory
Published on 2010-05-30T19:51:19Z
Indexed on
2010/05/30
20:12 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 288
I'm using some code (available here on MSDN) to dynamically build LINQ expressions containing multiple OR 'clauses'.
The relevant code is
var equals = values.Select(value => (Expression)Expression.Equal(valueSelector.Body, Expression.Constant(value, typeof(TValue))));
var body = equals.Aggregate<Expression>((accumulate, equal) => Expression.Or(accumulate, equal));
This generates a LINQ expression that looks something like this:
(((((ID = 5) OR (ID = 4)) OR (ID = 3)) OR (ID = 2)) OR (ID = 1))
I'm hitting the recursion limit (100) when using this expression, so I'd like to generate an expression that looks like this:
(ID = 5) OR (ID = 4) OR (ID = 3) OR (ID = 2) OR (ID = 1)
How would I modify the expression building code to do this?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner