Why should I use MVVM when it breaks built in functionality
Posted
by Jakob
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Jakob
Published on 2010-06-09T19:20:03Z
Indexed on
2010/06/09
19:22 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 240
I'm struggling to grasp why MVVM is really a good pattern to implement in riaserivces, To me there's nothing but trouble to it, it just add's another tier that I have to code. I Get that I could change the UI, but really I don't need to. Instead i won't be able to user out of the box functionality with riaservices, datagrid, dataform all controls require some implementation. Why can't it just be simple?
Is there really no way to get MVVM to automatically set "IsBusy" and all the dataform edit functionality. It's like reinventing the wheel to me, and it seems that I'd be able to write code much faster just using riaservices
© Stack Overflow or respective owner