Why would I use Assembly.LoadFile in lieu of Assembly.LoadFrom?
Posted
by
Cheeso
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Cheeso
Published on 2010-12-27T13:35:08Z
Indexed on
2010/12/27
14:54 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 287
It's my impression that Assembly.LoadFrom uses the ApplicationBase and PrivateBinPath. It also my impression that Assembly.LoadFile does not.
Why would anyone want to use LoadFile? In other words, if my understanding is correct, why would anyone want to NOT use the ApplicationBase and PrivateBinPath?
I'm working with some existing code, which uses LoadFile, and I don't understand why it would do so. LoadFile apparently does not load dependencies from the same directory. The LoadFrom method does load dependencies (From the doc: The load-from context...allows dependencies on that path to be found and loaded because the path information is maintained by the context.) I'd like to convert it from using LoadFile, to use LoadFrom.
What is likely to break, if anything, if I replace LoadFile with LoadFrom?
Even if it iss benign, it may be that I cannot do the replacement, just based on project schedules. If I cannot replace LoadFile with LoadFrom, is there a way to convince assemblies loaded with LoadFile to load dependencies? Is there a packaging trick I can use (embedded assembly, ILMerge, an AssemblyResolve event, something like that) that can allow an assembly loaded with LoadFile to also load its dependencies?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner