What are the real life implications for an Apache 2 license?

Posted by Duopixel on Programmers See other posts from Programmers or by Duopixel
Published on 2011-03-11T05:45:30Z Indexed on 2011/03/11 8:17 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 318

Filed under:

license

|

apache-license

I want to use SVG Edit for project. This software is distributed under the Apache 2 license.

I've seen that:

all copies, modified or unmodified, are accompanied by a copy of the licence
all modifications are clearly marked as being the work of the modifier
all notices of copyright, trademark and patent rights are reproduced accurately in distributed copies
the licensee does not use any trademarks that belong to the licensor

Do these pertain to the code or should I display the license somewhere in the GUI? The orignal software displays a "powered by SVG Edit", is it ok if I remove this? And most importantly: what is the correct etiquette for doing this? I don't want to be an asshole, but at the same time I want to simplify the UI as much as possible and removing the link will be part of it if it's not considered rude.

© Programmers or respective owner

Related posts about license

The Apache License, v2.0: Copyright License vs Patent License

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
The Apache License, v2.0 [..] 2. Grant of Copyright License Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative… >>> More
Cryptographic Validation Explained

as seen on Geeks with Blogs - Search for 'Geeks with Blogs'
We have been using LogicNP’s CryptoLicensing for some of our software and I was battling to understand how exactly the whole process worked. I was sent the following document which really helped explain it – so if you ever use the same tool it is well worth a read. Licensing Basics LogicNP CryptoLicensing… >>> More
individual license to volume license

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
Hello, my company has about 100 computer each using individual licenses for MS Office and Windows. We are looking to upgrade about 50 computers. We, in the past, have used Dell as our main supplier of PCs and would like to continue with them. What would be the best route for us in upgrading these… >>> More
Is there an alternative to Google Code Search?

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
Per the Official Google Blog: Code Search, which was designed to help people search for open source code all over the web, will be shut down along with the Code Search API on January 15, 2012. Google Code Search is now gone, and since that makes it much harder to understand the features… >>> More
InstallShield 2010 with license - no license for automatic build system (CI) as Windows service

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I really need help here. We are using CI build-process (Hudson) as an automated build system using Msbuild. The CI run in Apache Tomcat 6 that run under the credentials of a domain user (not a local Windows user ). Every time the CI try to build an InstallShield project (using isproj files) we get… >>> More

Related posts about apache-license

The Apache License, v2.0: Copyright License vs Patent License

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
The Apache License, v2.0 [..] 2. Grant of Copyright License Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative… >>> More
Linking to an Apache License 2.0 library and distributing with proprietary application

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hi all, I've read through "Apache License, Version 2.0" but my interpretation was in slightly different to an answer given in a related question so was hoping for some clarification. Supposing I created an application that linked to a library that was licensed under the license in question, my interpretation… >>> More
MPL 1.1 and APL 2.0 License compatibility

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
I am working a project that is licensed under the MPL 1.1 and would like to incorporate some code that is licensed under the APL 2.0. I know in 2010 Mozilla announced they were updating the MPL to make it more "Apache compatible" among other things. I'm no lawyer. Exactly what part(s) of the MPL… >>> More
How to include an apache library with my opensource code?

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
I have this opensource code with MIT license that uses an Apache 2.0 licensed library. I want to include this in my project, so it can be built right away. In the point 4 of that license explains how to redistribute it: excerpt: 4 . Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of… >>> More
Dalvik + Java licensing question

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
This is a licensing question about the Dalvik and J2SE core libraries. In particular the license governing java.util.concurrent.SynchronousQueue. The license header of the class in the JDK source states that it is GPLv2 only (see grepcode). However, the same file in the Dalvik core libraries seems… >>> More