Overhead of Perfmon -> direct to SQL Database
Posted
by
StuartC
on Server Fault
See other posts from Server Fault
or by StuartC
Published on 2011-03-15T00:05:02Z
Indexed on
2011/03/15
0:11 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 542
Windows
|windows-server-2008-r2
|performance-monitoring
|remote-desktop-services
|xenapp
HI All,
First up, I'm a total newb at Performance Monitoring. I'm looking to set up central performance monitoring of some boxes.
- 2K3 TS ( Monitor General OS Perf & Session Specific Counters )
- 2K8 R2 ( XenApp 6 = Monitor General OS Perf & Session Specific Counters )
- File Server ( Standard File I/O )
My ultimate aim is to get as many counters/information, without impacting the clients session experience at all. Including counters specific to their sessions.
I was thinking it logging directly to a SQL on another server, instead of a two part process of blg file then relog to sql.
Would that work ok? Does anyone know the overhead of going straight to SQL from the client?
I've searched around a bit, but havent found so much information it can be overwhelming.
thanks
© Server Fault or respective owner