Using automated bdd-gui-tests to keep user-documentation-screenshots up do date?
Posted
by
k3b
on Programmers
See other posts from Programmers
or by k3b
Published on 2011-06-29T09:37:37Z
Indexed on
2011/06/29
16:30 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 328
Are there developpers out there, who (ab)use the CaptureScreenshot()
function
of their automated gui-tests to also create uptodate-screenshots for the userdocumentation?
Background: Whithin the lifetime of an application, its gui-elements are constantly changing.
It makes a lot of work to keep the userdocumentation uptodate, especially if the example data in the pictures should match the textual description.
If you already have automated bdd-gui-tests why not let them take screenshots at certain points?
I am currently playing with webapps in dotnet+specflow+selenium, but this topic also applies to other bdd-engines (JRuby-Cucumber, mspec, rspec, ...) and gui-test-Frameworks (WaitN, WaitR, MsWhite, ....)
Any experience, thoughts or url-links to this topic would be helpfull. How is the cost/benefit relation? Is it worth the efford? What are the Drawbacks?
See also:
© Programmers or respective owner