Why does Python's math.factorial not play nice with threads?
Posted
by
W1N9Zr0
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by W1N9Zr0
Published on 2012-03-21T22:22:22Z
Indexed on
2012/03/21
23:29 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 338
Why does math.factorial act so weird in a thread?
Here is an example, it creates three threads:
- thread that just sleeps for a while
- thread that increments an int for a while
- thread that does math.factorial on a large number.
It calls start
on the threads, then join
with a timeout
The sleep and spin threads work as expected and return from start
right away, and then sit in the join
for the timeout.
The factorial thread on the other hand does not return from start
until it runs to the end!
import sys
from threading import Thread
from time import sleep, time
from math import factorial
# Helper class that stores a start time to compare to
class timed_thread(Thread):
def __init__(self, time_start):
Thread.__init__(self)
self.time_start = time_start
# Thread that just executes sleep()
class sleep_thread(timed_thread):
def run(self):
sleep(15)
print "st DONE:\t%f" % (time() - time_start)
# Thread that increments a number for a while
class spin_thread(timed_thread):
def run(self):
x = 1
while x < 120000000:
x += 1
print "sp DONE:\t%f" % (time() - time_start)
# Thread that calls math.factorial with a large number
class factorial_thread(timed_thread):
def run(self):
factorial(50000)
print "ft DONE:\t%f" % (time() - time_start)
# the tests
print
print "sleep_thread test"
time_start = time()
st = sleep_thread(time_start)
st.start()
print "st.start:\t%f" % (time() - time_start)
st.join(2)
print "st.join:\t%f" % (time() - time_start)
print "sleep alive:\t%r" % st.isAlive()
print
print "spin_thread test"
time_start = time()
sp = spin_thread(time_start)
sp.start()
print "sp.start:\t%f" % (time() - time_start)
sp.join(2)
print "sp.join:\t%f" % (time() - time_start)
print "sp alive:\t%r" % sp.isAlive()
print
print "factorial_thread test"
time_start = time()
ft = factorial_thread(time_start)
ft.start()
print "ft.start:\t%f" % (time() - time_start)
ft.join(2)
print "ft.join:\t%f" % (time() - time_start)
print "ft alive:\t%r" % ft.isAlive()
And here is the output on Python 2.6.5 on CentOS x64:
sleep_thread test
st.start: 0.000675
st.join: 2.006963
sleep alive: True
spin_thread test
sp.start: 0.000595
sp.join: 2.010066
sp alive: True
factorial_thread test
ft DONE: 4.475453
ft.start: 4.475589
ft.join: 4.475615
ft alive: False
st DONE: 10.994519
sp DONE: 12.054668
I've tried this on python 2.6.5 on CentOS x64, 2.7.2 on Windows x86 and the factorial thread does not return from start on either of them until the thread is done executing.
I've also tried this with PyPy 1.8.0 on Windows x86, and there result is slightly different. The start does return immediately, but then the join doesn't time out!
sleep_thread test
st.start: 0.001000
st.join: 2.001000
sleep alive: True
spin_thread test
sp.start: 0.000000
sp DONE: 0.197000
sp.join: 0.236000
sp alive: False
factorial_thread test
ft.start: 0.032000
ft DONE: 9.011000
ft.join: 9.012000
ft alive: False
st DONE: 12.763000
© Stack Overflow or respective owner